SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING LOW COMPLEXITY TAKEOVER REQUEST LOCATIONS
System, methods, and other embodiments described herein relate to implementing low complexity takeover request locations. In one embodiment, a method includes receiving a potential disengagement event; determining a default takeover location based on the potential disengagement event; determining a preferred takeover location prior to the default takeover location; and generating a takeover request at the preferred takeover location.
1 . A system, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory communicably coupled to the processor and storing machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:
receive a potential disengagement event;
determine a default takeover location based on the potential disengagement event;
determine a preferred takeover location prior to the default takeover location; and
generate a takeover request at the preferred takeover location.
2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein machine-readable instruction to determine the preferred takeover location is based on categorization.
3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein machine-readable instruction to determine the preferred takeover location further includes to evaluate a measure of complexity of the preferred takeover location.
4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein machine-readable instruction further includes an instruction that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to generate a second takeover request at the default takeover location with a higher intensity than the takeover request at the preferred takeover location.
5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein machine-readable instruction to determine the preferred takeover location is based on road type or road geometry.
6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein machine-readable instruction to determine the preferred takeover location is based on traffic controls.
7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein machine-readable instruction to determine the preferred takeover location is based on traffic conditions.
8 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to:
receive a potential disengagement event;
determine a default takeover location based on the potential disengagement event;
determine a preferred takeover location prior to the default takeover location; and
generate a takeover request at the preferred takeover location.
9 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the instruction to determine the preferred takeover location further includes to evaluate a measure of complexity of the preferred takeover location.
10 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the instructions further includes an instruction that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to generate a second takeover request at the default takeover location with a higher intensity than the takeover request at the preferred takeover location.
11 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the instruction to determine the preferred takeover location is based on road type or road geometry.
12 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the instruction to determine the preferred takeover location is based on traffic controls.
13 . A method, comprising:
receiving a potential disengagement event;
determining a default takeover location based on the potential disengagement event;
determining a preferred takeover location prior to the default takeover location; and
generating a takeover request at the preferred takeover location.
14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein determining the preferred takeover location is based on categorization.
15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein determining the preferred takeover location further includes evaluating a measure of complexity of the preferred takeover location.
16 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising generating a second takeover request at the default takeover location with a higher intensity than the takeover request at the preferred takeover location.
17 . The method of claim 13 , wherein determining the preferred takeover location is based on road type or road geometry.
18 . The method of claim 13 , wherein determining the preferred takeover location is based on traffic controls.
19 . The method of claim 13 , wherein determining the preferred takeover location is based on traffic conditions.
20 . The method of claim 13 , wherein determining the preferred takeover location is based on weather conditions.