IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,370,381
Granted Patent B2
US 12,370,381 · App. 18/171,396 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Systems and methods for radiotherapy

Inventors: Supratik Bose (Houston, TX); Jonathan Maltz (Houston, TX); Jingjie Zhou (Shanghai, CN)
Assignee: SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE CO., LTD.
A61N5/1039A61N5/1038
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,370,381
App. No.
18/171,396
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method may include obtaining input data relating to a target treatment plan for performing radiotherapy on a lesion using a radiation device. The input data may include a first target image of the lesion. The method may also include obtaining a segment shape estimation model. The method may also include estimating, based on the segment shape estimation model and the input data, a plurality of target location combinations of the target treatment plan and a plurality of target segment shapes of a collimator of the radiation device. One of the plurality of target location combinations may indicate a location of the collimator relative to the lesion. Each of the plurality of target segment shapes may correspond to one of the plurality of target location combinations.

Claims (65)

1. A system, comprising:

at least one storage device including a set of instructions; and

at least one processor configured to communicate with the at least one storage device, wherein when executing the set of instructions, the at least one processor is configured to direct the system to perform operations including:

obtaining input data relating to a target treatment plan for performing radiotherapy on a lesion using a radiation device, the input data including a first target image of the lesion;

obtaining a segment shape estimation model; and

estimating, based on the segment shape estimation model and the input data, a plurality of target location combinations of the target treatment plan and a plurality of target segment shapes of a collimator of the radiation device, one of the plurality of target location combinations indicating a location of the collimator relative to the lesion, each of the plurality of target segment shapes corresponding to one of the plurality of target location combinations.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of target location combinations are within a plurality of discrete candidate location combinations of a location universal set.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the segment shape estimation model is obtained by performing a training process including:

obtaining the location universal set including the plurality of candidate location combinations; and

determining the segment shape estimation model by iteratively training a preliminary model based on the location universal set.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein obtaining the location universal set including the plurality of candidate location combinations includes:

obtaining a plurality of candidate gantry angles, a plurality of candidate collimator angles, or a plurality of candidate couch locations; and

obtaining the location universal set based on the plurality of candidate gantry angles, the plurality of candidate collimator angles, or the plurality of candidate couch locations.

5. The system of claim 3 , wherein the plurality of target segment shapes are within a distance universal set including a plurality of discrete candidate leaf locations.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the training process includes:

obtaining the distance universal set including the plurality of candidate leaf locations; and

determining the segment shape estimation model by iteratively training the preliminary model based on the distance universal set so that the candidate segment shape corresponding to each of the plurality of candidate location combinations output by the segment shape estimation model is within the distance universal set.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the plurality of candidate leaf locations include a plurality of candidate opening locations and a plurality of candidate opening widths.

8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the training process includes:

obtaining training data including a plurality of training sets.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein obtaining the training data includes:

for one of the plurality of training sets, obtaining a historical treatment plan previously generated based on a sample lesion;

obtaining a first sample image of the sample lesion corresponding to the historical treatment plan;

obtaining sample location combinations and corresponding sample segment shapes in the historical treatment plan; and

obtaining the training set based on the first sample image, the sample location combinations, and the sample segment shapes of historical treatment plan.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein obtaining the training set based on the first sample image, the sample location combinations, and the sample segment shapes of the historical treatment plan includes:

obtaining processed sample location combinations that are within the location universal set, the processed sample location combinations being obtained by processing the sample location combinations based on the location universal set;

obtaining processed sample segment shapes that are within the distance universal set, the processed sample segment shapes being obtained by processing the sample segment shapes based on the distance universal set;

obtaining a sample set including the processed sample segment shapes and closed segment shapes, the closed segment shapes corresponding to the candidate location combinations excluding the processed sample location combinations; and

obtaining the training set by including the first sample image, the processed sample location combinations, and the sample set of the historical treatment plan.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the training process includes:

initializing the preliminary model; and

obtaining the segment shape estimation model by updating the initialized preliminary model using an iteration process including a plurality of iterations, at least one of the plurality of iterations of the iteration process including:

obtaining one of the plurality of training sets;

generating estimated segment shapes corresponding to the plurality of candidate location combinations by inputting the first sample image of the training set into an intermediate model, the intermediate model being the initialized preliminary model in a first iteration of the plurality of iterations of the iteration process or a previously updated model generated in a previous iteration in the iteration process;

determining a value of a loss function based on the estimated segment shapes and the sample set in the training set;

determining whether a termination condition is satisfied;

in response to determining that the termination condition is not satisfied,

generating an updated model by updating the intermediate model based on the value of the loss function; and

initiating a next iteration; and

designating the intermediate model in a last iteration of the plurality of iterations of the iteration process as the segment shape estimation model.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the value of the loss function is determined based on sparsity of the sample set, the sparsity of the sample set relating to the closed segment shapes in the sample set.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the training set includes at least one of a second sample image of normal tissue surrounding the sample lesion, a third sample image of the sample lesion, or sample radiation information of the historical treatment plan, the sample radiation information including at least one of a sample output dose, a sample dose output rate, a sample dose per pulse, or a sample dose distribution in the sample lesion.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the sample radiation information is predicted based on the first sample image of the sample lesion, the second sample image of normal tissue surrounding the sample lesion, and the third sample image of the sample lesion.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one of the plurality of iterations of the iteration process includes:

generating the estimated segment shapes by inputting at least one of the second sample image, the third sample image, or the sample radiation information of the training set into the intermediate model.

16. A system, comprising:

at least one storage device including a set of instructions; and

at least one processor configured to communicate with the at least one storage device, wherein when executing the set of instructions, the at least one processor is configured to direct the system to perform operations including:

obtaining a preliminary model;

obtaining a location universal set including a plurality of discrete candidate location combinations; and

obtaining a segment shape estimation model by iteratively training a preliminary model based on the location universal set, the segment shape estimation model being configured to estimate, based on input data, a plurality of target location combinations in a target treatment plan for performing radiotherapy on a lesion using a radiation device and a plurality of target segment shapes of a collimator of the radiation device, the input data including a first target image of the lesion, each of the plurality of target segment shapes corresponding to one of the plurality of target location combinations, one of the plurality of target location combinations indicating a location of the collimator relative to the lesion.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of target location combinations are within the plurality of discrete candidate location combinations of the location universal set.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the training a preliminary model based on the location universal set comprises:

determining training data, the training data including a plurality of training sets determined based on the location universal set;

training the preliminary model based on the training data.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein one of the plurality of training sets is determined by:

obtaining a historical treatment plan previously generated based on a sample lesion;

obtaining a first sample image of the sample lesion corresponding to the historical treatment plan;

obtaining sample location combinations and corresponding sample segment shapes in the historical treatment plan; and

obtaining the training set based on the first sample image, the sample location combinations, the sample segment shapes of historical treatment plan, and the location universal set.

20. A method implemented on a machine including one or more processors and one or more storage devices, comprising:

obtaining input data relating to a target treatment plan for performing radiotherapy on a lesion using a radiation device, the input data including a first target image of the lesion;

obtaining a segment shape estimation model; and

estimating, based on the segment shape estimation model and the input data, a plurality of target location combinations of the target treatment plan and a plurality of target segment shapes of a collimator of the radiation device, one of the plurality of target location combinations indicating a location of the collimator relative to the lesion, each of the plurality of target segment shapes corresponding to one of the plurality of target location combinations.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2023
From: ZHOU, JINGJIE
To: SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 063086/0555 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2023
From: BOSE, SUPRATIK; MALTZ, JONATHAN
To: UIH AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 063086/0560 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2023
From: UIH AMERICA, INC.
To: SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 063164/0603 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTCN2020110251 · Aug 20, 2020
Related Publication 20230191158A1 · Jun 22, 2023
References Cited (38)
US 5818902A · Yu · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 10507337B2 · Willcut et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11682485B2 · Laaksonen · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11896847B2 · Hibbard · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20120014507A1 · Wu et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150367145A1 · Sjolund et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190074079A1 · Zankowski et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190192880A1 · Hibbard · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200188692A1 · Liu · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 104548372A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 107224678A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107731298A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108771795A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Lu, Renzhi et al., Learning the Relationship Between Patient Geometry and Beam Intensity in Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering, 53(5): 908-920, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Huan-Hsin Tseng et al., The Role of Machine Learning in Knowledge-Based Response-Adapted Radiotherapy, Frontiers in Oncology, 2018, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vaitheeswaran Ganganathna et al., Determination of Optimal Number of Beams in Direct Machine Parameter Optimization-based Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cases, Journal of Medical Physics, 41(2): 129-… [cited by applicant]
Guy Amit et al., Automatic Learning-Based Selection of Beam Angles in Radiation Therapy of Lung Cancer, IEEE, 230-233, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Lindsey M. Appenzoller et al., Predicting Dose-volume Histograms for Organs-at-risk in IMRT Planning, Med. Phys., 39(12): 7446-7461, 2012. [cited by applicant]
M. Mardani et al., Deep-Learning Based Prediction of Achievable Dose for Personalizing Inverse Treatment Planning, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 96(25): e419-420, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Chris Mcintosh et al., Voxel-based Dose Prediction with Multi-patient Atlas Selection for Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning, Physics in Medicine & Biology, 62: 415-431, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Rafid Mahmood et al., Automated Treatment Planning in Radiation Therapy using Generative Adversarial Networks, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2018, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vasant Kearney et al., DoseNet: a Volumetric Dose Prediction Algorithm using 3D Fully-convolutional Neural Networks, Phys. Med. Biol., 2018, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen. Xinyuan et al., A Feasibility Study on an Automated Method to Generate Patient-specific Dose Distributions for Radiotherapy using Deep Learning, Med. Phys., 46(1): 56-64, 2019. [cited by applicant]
A. M. Barragan-Montero et al., Three-Dimensional Dose Prediction for Lung IMRT Patients with Deep Neural Networks: Robust Learning from Heterogeneous Beam Configurations, Medical Physics, 2019, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dan Nguyen et al., A Feasibility Study for Predicting Optimal Radiation Therapy Dose Distributions of Prostate Cancer Patients from Patient Anatomy using Deep Learning, Scientific Reports, 2019, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fan, Jiawei et al., Automatic Treatment Planning Based on Three-dimensional Dose Distribution Predicted from Deep Learning Technique, Medical Physics, 2019, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Olaf Ronneberger et al., U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, MICCAI, 234-241, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Fausto Milletari et al., V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation, 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision, 565-571, 2016. [cited by applicant]
He, Kaiming et al., Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, IEEE, 770-778, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Mao, Xiao-Jiao et al., Image Restoration Using Very Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks with Symmetric Skip Connections, NIPS, 2016, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vincent S. Khoo et al., Class Solutions for Conformal External Beam Prostate Radiotherapy, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 55(4): 1109-1120, 2003. [cited by applicant]
K. N. Ramamurthy et al., Beyond L2-Loss Functions for Learning Sparse Models, IEEE ICASSP, 2016, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ma, Yuting et al., Stabilized Sparse Online Learning for Sparse Data, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18: 1-36, 2017. [cited by applicant]
James L. Bedford et al., Constrained Segment Shapes in Direct-aperture Optimization for Step-and-shoot IMRT, Med.Phys., 33(4): 944-958, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Karl Otto, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: IMRT in a Single Gantry Arc, Med.Phys., 35(1): 310-317, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Yu, Cedric X., Intensity-modulated Arc Therapy with Dynamic Multileaf Collimation: an Alternative to Tomotherapy, Phys. Med. Biol., 40: 1435-1449, 1995. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report in PCT/CN2020/110251 mailed on Apr. 27, 2021, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion in PCT/CN2020/110251 mailed on Apr. 27, 2021, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,728,285