IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,441,483
Granted Patent B2
US 12,441,483 · App. 18/171,707 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Systems and methods for controlling an aircraft using dissimilar air data

Inventors: Sherwin Chunshek Li (Edmonds, WA); Ryan L. Pettit (Snohomish, WA); Bryan A. Lopez (Seattle, WA); Robert Erik Freeman (Seattle, WA); Melville D. W. McIntyre (Mercer Island, WA); Leonard J. Inderhees (Bothell, WA); Russell T. Bridgewater (Monroe, WA)
Assignee: The Boeing Company
B64D45/00G01P13/025B64D2045/0085
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,441,483
App. No.
18/171,707
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and a method include air data sensors configured to detect one more characteristics of air surrounding an aircraft. At least three of the air data sensors differ in type. The air data sensors are configured to output air data. A flight control unit is in communication with the air data sensors. The flight control unit is configured to receive the air data from the air data sensors and control at least one aspect of the aircraft based on at least a portion of the air data. In at least one example, the flight control unit is further configured to vote in relation to the air data from the air data sensors.

Claims (46)

1. A system comprising:

air data sensors configured to detect one more characteristics of air surrounding an aircraft, wherein at least three of the air data sensors differ in type, and wherein the air data sensors are configured to output air data, wherein the air data sensors comprise:

one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors;

one or more multi-function probes (MFPs);

one or more pitot probes;

one or more angle of attack (AOA) vanes; and

one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors; and

a flight control unit in communication with the air data sensors, wherein the flight control unit is configured to:

receive the air data from the air data sensors and control at least one aspect of the aircraft based on at least a portion of the air data, and

vote in relation to the air data from the air data sensors, wherein the flight control unit is configured to vote redundant measurements of each type of air data sensor, and provide multiple voted signals of a given parameter to determine if any of the voted signals are corrupted.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight control unit is configured to vote in relation to redundant signals by selecting a mid-value to prevent an errant signal from affecting a voted output.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight control unit is further configured to select the types of air data sensors that respond differently in presence of different threats in response to at least two of the types being corrupted.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight control unit is further configured to determine that a majority of the air data sensors is corrupted when none of the air data matches.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight control unit is configured to vote by voting two types of the air data sensors, and reserving a third type of the air data sensors as a monitoring signal.

6. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a display that shows the air data.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors include a pair of first flush mounted pressure sensors that are about symmetrical with respect to a central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, wherein the one or more MFPs include a pair of MFPs that are about symmetrical with respect to a central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, wherein the one or more pitot probes include a pair of pitot probes that are about symmetrical with respect to a central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, wherein the one or more AOA vanes include a pair of AOA vanes that are about symmetrical with respect to a central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, and wherein the one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors include one or more pairs of second flush mounted pressure sensors that are about symmetrical with respect to a central longitudinal plane of the aircraft.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the air data sensors further comprise one or more total air temperature (TAT) probes.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors, the one or more MFPs, the one or more AOA vanes, and the one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors are not coupled to pneumatic connections.

10. A method comprising:

detecting, by air data sensors, one more characteristics of air surrounding an aircraft, wherein at least three of the air data sensors differ in type, and wherein the air data sensors are configured to output air data, wherein the air data sensors comprise:

one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors;

one or more multi-function probes (MFPs);

one or more pitot probes;

one or more angle of attack (AOA) vanes; and

one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors;

receiving, by a flight control unit in communication with the air data sensors, the air data from the air data sensors;

controlling, by the flight control unit, at least one aspect of the aircraft based on at least a portion of the air data; and

voting, by the flight control unit, in relation to the air data from the air data sensors, wherein said voting comprises voting redundant measurements of each type of air data sensor, and providing multiple voted signals of a given parameter to determine if any of the voted signals are corrupted.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein said voting comprises voting in relation to redundant signals by selecting a mid-value to prevent an errant signal from affecting a voted output.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein said voting comprises selecting the types of air data sensors that respond differently in presence of different threats in response to at least two of the types being corrupted.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein said voting comprises determining that a majority of the air data sensors is corrupted when none of the air data matches.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein said voting comprises voting two types of the air data sensors, and reserving a third type of the air data sensors as a monitoring signal.

15. The method of claim 10 , further comprising showing the air data on a display.

16. The method of claim 10 , wherein the air data sensors further comprise one or more total air temperature (TAT) probes.

17. The method of claim 10 , wherein the one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors, the one or more MFPs, the one or more AOA vanes, and the one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors are not coupled to pneumatic connections.

18. An aircraft comprising:

one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors;

one or more multi-function probes (MFPs);

one or more pitot probes;

one or more angle of attack (AOA) vanes;

one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors,

one or more total air temperature (TAT) probes, wherein the one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors, the one or more MFPs, the one or more pitot probes, the one or more AOA vanes, the one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors, and the one or more TAT probes are configured to detect one more characteristics of air surrounding the aircraft and output air data;

a flight control unit in communication with the one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors, the one or more MFPs, the one or more pitot probes, the one or more AOA vanes, the one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors, and the one or more TAT probes, wherein the flight control unit is configured to receive the air data and control at least one aspect of the aircraft based on at least a portion of the air data, and wherein the flight control unit is further configured to vote in relation to the air data, wherein the flight control unit is configured to vote redundant measurements of each type of air data sensor, and provide multiple voted signals of a given parameter to determine if any of the voted signals are corrupted; and

a display that shows the air data.

19. The aircraft of claim 18 , wherein the one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors include a pair of first flush mounted pressure sensors that are about symmetrical with respect to a central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, wherein the one or more MFPs include a pair of MFPs that are about symmetrical with respect to the central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, wherein the one or more pitot probes include a pair of pitot probes that are about symmetrical with respect to the central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, wherein the one or more AOA vanes include a pair of AOA vanes that are about symmetrical with respect to the central longitudinal plane of the aircraft, and wherein the one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors include one or more pairs of second flush mounted pressure sensors that are about symmetrical with respect to the central longitudinal plane of the aircraft.

20. The aircraft of claim 18 , wherein the one or more first flush mounted pressure sensors, the one or more MFPs, the one or more AOA vanes, the one or more second flush mounted pressure sensors, and the one or more TAT probes are not coupled to pneumatic connections.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 21, 2023
From: LI, SHERWIN CHUNSHEK; PETTIT, RYAN L.; LOPEZ, BRYAN A.; FREEMAN, ROBERT ERIK; MCINTYRE, MELVILLE D.W.; INDERHEES, LEONARD J.; BRIDGEWATER, RUSSELL T.
To: THE BOEING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 062750/0198 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240278927A1 · Aug 22, 2024
References Cited (16)
US 5001638A · Zimmerman · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5222065A · Krogmann · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 10235523B1 · Keller, III · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10850868B1 · Habboub · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11385632B2 · Whitehead · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20030050766A1 · Cronin · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20100100260A1 · McIntyre · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20120123704A1 · Golly · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130253859A1 · Freeman · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20170276790A1 · Lodden · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190346279A1 · Sly · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200201312A1 · Whitehead · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200201359A1 · Burghardt · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230356730A1 · Schmidt · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2024091629A1 · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Extended European Search Report for EP 23214324.8-1001, dated May 28, 2024. [cited by applicant]