IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,656,478
Granted Patent B2
US 12,656,478 · App. 18/189,166 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Radar system with sparse primary array and dense auxiliary array

Inventors: Zhengzheng Li (Agoura Hills, CA); Xin Zhang (Agoura Hills, CA); Yu Zhang (Thousand Oaks, CA)
Assignee: Aptiv Technologies AG
G01S13/872G01S13/878G01S13/931G01S2013/93271
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,656,478
App. No.
18/189,166
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

This document describes techniques and components of a radar system with a sparse primary array and a dense auxiliary array. Even with fewer antenna elements than a traditional radar system, an example radar system has a comparable angular resolution at a lower cost, lower complexity level, and without aliasing. The radar system includes a processor and antenna arrays that can receive electromagnetic energy reflected by one or more objects. The antenna arrays include a primary subarray and an auxiliary subarray. The auxiliary subarray includes multiple antenna elements with a smaller spacing than the antenna elements of the primary subarray. The processor can determine, using the received electromagnetic energy, first and second potential angles associated with the one or more objects. The processor then associates, using the first and second potential angles, respective angles associated with each of the one or more objects.

Claims (50)

1 . A radar system comprising one or more processors configured to:

determine, based on electromagnetic (EM) energy that is received at a first subarray of an antenna array, first potential angles of one or more objects that are reflecting the EM energy to the antenna array, the first subarray comprising multiple first antenna elements;

determine, based on the EM energy that is received at a second subarray of the antenna array, second potential angles of the one or more objects, the second subarray comprising multiple second antenna elements, the second antenna elements having a smaller spacing than the first antenna elements, a ratio of a spacing of adjacent antenna elements of the first antenna elements to a spacing of adjacent antenna elements of the second antenna elements being equal to an integer, the integer being equal to an exponential of two and greater than two; and

determine, based on the first potential angles and the second potential angles, a respective angle associated with each of the one or more objects.

2 . The radar system of claim 1 , wherein the first subarray and the second subarray are uniform linear arrays.

3 . The radar system of claim 1 , wherein the first subarray is positioned in an azimuth direction and the second subarray is positioned in line with the first subarray in the azimuth direction but offset along an elevation direction.

4 . The radar system of claim 1 , wherein the first subarray is positioned in an elevation direction and the second subarray is positioned in line with the first subarray in the elevation direction but offset along an azimuth direction.

5 . The radar system of claim 1 , wherein the first subarray and the second subarray are positioned in an elevation direction, and the second subarray overlaps with at least a portion of the first subarray.

6 . The radar system of claim 1 , wherein:

the first subarray comprises a first two-dimensional (2D) array with the multiple first antenna elements positioned in an azimuth direction and an elevation direction;

the first potential angles comprise first potential azimuth angles and first potential elevation angles;

the second subarray comprises a second 2D array with the multiple second antenna elements positioned in the azimuth direction and the elevation direction;

the second potential angles comprise second potential azimuth angles and second potential elevation angles;

a first ratio of an azimuth spacing of the first antenna elements in the azimuth direction to an azimuth spacing of the second antenna elements in the azimuth direction is equal to a first integer, the first integer is equal to an exponential of two and greater than two;

a second ratio of an elevation spacing of the first antenna elements in the elevation direction to an elevation spacing of the second antenna elements in the elevation direction is equal to a second integer, the second integer is equal to an exponential of two and greater than two; and

the angle comprises an azimuth angle and an elevation angle associated with each of the one or more objects.

7 . The radar system of claim 6 , wherein the first 2D array overlaps the second 2D array.

8 . The radar system of claim 6 , wherein the first 2D array is offset in the azimuth direction or elevation direction from the second 2D array.

9 . The radar system of claim 1 , wherein a field-of-view of the second subarray is based on the spacing of the second antenna elements.

10 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed, cause a processor of a radar system to:

determine, based on electromagnetic (EM) energy that is received at a first subarray of an antenna array, first potential angles of one or more objects that are reflecting the EM energy to the antenna array, the first subarray comprising multiple first antenna elements;

determine, based on the EM energy that is received at a second subarray of the antenna array, second potential angles of the one or more objects, the second subarray comprising multiple second antenna elements, the second antenna elements having a smaller spacing than the first antenna elements, a ratio of a spacing of adjacent antenna elements of the first antenna elements to a spacing of adjacent antenna elements of the second antenna elements being equal to an integer, the integer being equal to an exponential of two and greater than two; and

determine, based on the first potential angles and the second potential angles, a respective angle associated with each of the one or more objects.

11 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the first subarray and the second subarray are uniform linear arrays.

12 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the first subarray is positioned in an azimuth direction and the second subarray is positioned in line with the first subarray in the azimuth direction but offset along an elevation direction.

13 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the first subarray is positioned in an elevation direction and the second subarray is positioned in line with the first subarray in the elevation direction but offset along an azimuth direction.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein the first subarray and the second subarray are positioned in an elevation direction, and the second subarray overlaps with at least a portion of the first subarray.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein:

the first subarray comprises a first two-dimensional (2D) array with the multiple first antenna elements positioned in an azimuth direction and an elevation direction;

the first potential angles comprise first potential azimuth angles and first potential elevation angles;

the second subarray comprises a second 2D array with the multiple second antenna elements positioned in the azimuth direction and the elevation direction;

the second potential angles comprise second potential azimuth angles and second potential elevation angles;

a first ratio of an azimuth spacing of the first antenna elements in the azimuth direction to an azimuth spacing of the second antenna elements in the azimuth direction is equal to a first integer, the first integer is equal to an exponential of two and greater than two;

a second ratio of an elevation spacing of the first antenna elements in the elevation direction to an elevation spacing of the second antenna elements in the elevation direction is equal to a second integer, the second integer is equal to an exponential of two and greater than two; and

the angle comprises an azimuth angle and an elevation angle associated with each of the one or more objects.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the first 2D array overlaps the second 2D array.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the first 2D array is offset in the azimuth direction or elevation direction from the second 2D array.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 10 , wherein a field-of-view of the second subarray is based on the spacing of adjacent antenna elements of the second antenna elements.

19 . A method comprising:

determining, based on electromagnetic (EM) energy that is received at a first subarray of an antenna array, first potential angles of one or more objects that are reflecting the EM energy to the antenna array, the first subarray comprising multiple first antenna elements;

determining, based on the EM energy that is received at a second subarray of the antenna array, second potential angles of the one or more objects, the second subarray comprising multiple second antenna elements, the second antenna elements having a smaller spacing than the first antenna elements, a ratio of a spacing of adjacent antenna elements of the first antenna elements to a spacing of adjacent antenna elements of the second antenna elements being equal to an integer, the integer being equal to an exponential of two and greater than two; and

determining, based on the first potential angles and the second potential angles, a respective angle associated with each of the one or more objects.

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein:

the first subarray comprises a first two-dimensional (2D) array with the multiple first antenna elements positioned in an azimuth direction and an elevation direction;

the first potential angles comprise first potential azimuth angles and first potential elevation angles;

the second subarray comprises a second 2D array with the multiple second antenna elements positioned in the azimuth direction and the elevation direction;

the second potential angles comprise second potential azimuth angles and second potential elevation angles;

a first ratio of an azimuth spacing of the first antenna elements in the azimuth direction to an azimuth spacing of the second antenna elements in the azimuth direction is equal to a first integer, the first integer is equal to an exponential of two and greater than two;

a second ratio of an elevation spacing of the first antenna elements in the elevation direction to an elevation spacing of the second antenna elements in the elevation direction is equal to a second integer, the second integer is equal to an exponential of two and greater than two; and

the angle comprises an azimuth angle and an elevation angle associated with each of the one or more objects.

Assignments (4)
MERGER Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES (2) S.À R.L.
To: APTIV MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT SERVICES S.À R.L.
Reel/Frame 066566/0173 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES (2) S.À R.L.
Reel/Frame 066746/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT SERVICES S.À R.L.
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
Reel/Frame 066551/0219 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2023
From: LI, ZHENGZHENG; ZHANG, XIN; ZHANG, YU
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 063085/0330 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17153788 · Jan 20, 2021
Provisional Application 63091193 · Oct 13, 2020
Related Publication 20230243954A1 · Aug 3, 2023
References Cited (107)
US 5657027A · Guymon · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 7474262B2 · Alland · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7639171B2 · Alland et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8085183B2 · Hildebrandt et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8310402B2 · Yang · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9395727B1 · Smith et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9869762B1 · Alland et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9958527B2 · Tuxen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10042050B2 · Mersseman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10416680B2 · Li et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10446923B2 · Watson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10620305B2 · Cornic et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10809737B2 · Li et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10866304B1 · Hassibi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10996330B2 · Meyer et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11415664B2 · Hammes et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11619705B2 · Zhang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11635506B2 · Iwasa et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20060214832A1 · Lee · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20110163909A1 · Jeong · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110267217A1 · Hildebrandt et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120086604A1 · Yang · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130063306A1 · Yang · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140218259A1 · Lee et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140266868A1 · Schuman · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160033640A1 · Mersseman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170149147A1 · Minami et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170363713A1 · Kim · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170365924A1 · Topak · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180128892A1 · Granato · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180149736A1 · Alland et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190285738A1 · Iwasa et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190324133A1 · Hong et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190386712A1 · Fang · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200004262A1 · Li et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200112086A1 · Kim et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200161775A1 · Zhu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200256947A1 · Motoda · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200309899A1 · Jonas · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210239791A1 · Vollbracht et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210239821A1 · Vollbracht et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210373144A1 · Amani et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220163623A1 · Kishigami et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220236370A1 · Li et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 106772224A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 111239678A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102004046634A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017221049A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017223429A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 2662699A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 3605135A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3757607A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3204788B1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 4036600A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 4043919A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018116000A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 6523350B2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020186972A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014150908A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017148561A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020007573A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021096889A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21196393.9, Feb. 28, 2022, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21196394.7, Mar. 4, 2022, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21215410.8, Jul. 12, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 21216322.4, Jun. 3, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22197753.1, Mar. 7, 2023, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Amin, et al., “Sparse Arrays and Sampling for Interference Mitigation and DOA Estimation in GNSS” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, No. 6, Jun. 2016, pp. 1302-1317. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “A new method for joint DOD and DOA estimation in bistatic MIMO radar”, Feb. 2010, pp. 714-718. [cited by applicant]
Engels, et al., “Automotive MIMO Radar Angle Estimation in the Presence of Multipath”, Oct. 2017, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Feger, et al., “A 77-GHz FMCW MIMO Radar Based on an SiGe Single-Chip Transceiver”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, No. 5, May 2009, pp. 1020-1035. [cited by applicant]
Gu, et al., “Adaptive Beamforming via Sparsity-Based Reconstruction of Covariance Matrix”, Compressed Sensing in Radar Signal Processing, 2019, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gu, et al., “Joint SVD of Two Cross-Correlation Matrices to Achieve Automatic Pairing in 2-D Angle Estimation Problems”, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 6, pp. 553-556, Feb. 2007, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gu, et al., “Robust Adaptive Beamforming Based on Interference Covariance Matrix Reconstruction and Steering Vector Estimation”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 60, No. 7, Jul. 2012, pp. 3881-3885. [cited by applicant]
Gu, et al., “Robust Adaptive Beamforming Based on Interference Covariance Matrix Sparse Reconstruction”, Signal Processing, vol. 96, Mar. 1, 2014, pp. 375-381. [cited by applicant]
Haardt, et al., “Unitary ESPRIT: How to Obtain Increased Estimation Accuracy with a Reduced Computational Burden”, May 1995, 1232-1242. [cited by applicant]
Jiang, et al., “Joint DOD and DOA Estimation for Bistatic MIMO Radar in Unknown Correlated Noise”, Nov. 2015, pp. 5113-5125. [cited by applicant]
Jin, et al. “Joint DOD and DOA estimation for bistatic MIMO radar”, Feb. 2009, pp. 244-251. [cited by applicant]
Kikuchi, et al., “Pair-Matching Method for Estimating 2-D Angle of Arrival With a Cross-Correlation Matrix”, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 5, pp. 35-40, Mar. 2006, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Moffet, “Minimum-Redundancy Linear Arrays”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-16, No. 2., Mar. 1968, pp. 172-175. [cited by applicant]
Pursuant to MPEP § 2001.6(b) the applicant brings the following co-pending application to the Examiner's attention: U.S. Appl. No. 17/075,632. [cited by applicant]
Razavi-Ghods, “Characterisation of MIMO Radio Propagation Channels”, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2526/ (Year: 2007), 349 pages. [cited by applicant]
Roy, et al., “ESPRIT-Estimation of Signal Parameters Via Rotational Invariance Techniques”, Jul. 1989, pp. 984-995. [cited by applicant]
Steinwandt, et al., “Performance Analysis of ESPRIT-Type Algorithms for Co-Array Structures”, Dec. 10, 2017, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sun, et al., “MIMO Radar for Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving: Advantages and challenges”, Jul. 2020, pp. 98-117. [cited by applicant]
Tropp, et al., “Signal Recovery From Random Measurements via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 53, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 4655-4666, Dec. 2007, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vaidyanathan, et al., “Sparse Sensing with Co-Prime Samplers and Arrays”, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 59, No. 2, Feb. 2011, pp. 573-586. [cited by applicant]
Van Trees, “Planar Arrays and Apertures”, Essay in “Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Optimum Array Processing”, pp. 231-274. Wiley-Interscience, May 2002, 44 pages. [cited by applicant]
Visentin, et al., “Analysis of Multipath and DOA Detection Using a Fully Polarimetric Automotive Radar”, Apr. 3, 2018, pp. 570-577. [cited by applicant]
Wang, et al., “Two-Dimensional Beamforming Automotive Radar with Orthogonal Linear Arrays”, 2019 IEEE Radar Conference, Boston, MA, Apr. 22-26, 2019., 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yu, et al., “MIMO Adaptive Beamforming for Nonseparable Multipath Clutter Mitigation”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 50, No. 4, Oct. 2014, pp. 2604-2618. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, et al., “Flexible Array Response Control via Oblique Projection”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 67, No. 12, Jun. 15, 2019, pp. 3126-3139. [cited by applicant]
Zhou, et al., “A Robust and Efficient Algorithm for Coprime Array Adaptive Beamforming”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, No. 2, Feb. 2018, pp. 1099-1112. [cited by applicant]
Zoltowski, et al., “Closed-Form 2-D Angle Estimation with Rectangular Arrays in Element Space or Beamspace via Unitary ESPRIT”, Feb. 1996, pp. 316-328. [cited by applicant]
Zoltowski, et al., “ESPRIT-Based 2-D Direction Finding with a Sparse Uniform Array of Electromagnetic Vector Sensors”, Aug. 1, 2000, pp. 2195-2204. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20155495.3, Aug. 7, 2020, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20155499.5, Aug. 7, 2020, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20155503.4, Jul. 24, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20213050.6, May 25, 2021, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
“FR5CPEC Radar sensor for vehicular use Teardown Internal Photos Robert Bosch GmbH”, Retrieved at: https://fccid.io/NF3FR5CPEC/Internal-Photos/internal-Photos-4041421, Oct. 10, 2018, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Trummer, “A Polarimetric 76-79 GHz Radar-Frontend for Target Classification in Automotive Use”, Oct. 2016, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22200994.6, Aug. 11, 2023, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 23158330.3, Aug. 25, 2023, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 23165460.9, Sep. 15, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wu, et al., “A Low Complexity Adaptive Algorithm for Eigenspace-Based Two-Dimensional Direction of Arrival Tracking”, IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, vol. E92-A, … [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action regading Chinese Patent Application No. 202111153024.7, dated Sep. 20, 2025. Translation provided by SPTL. [cited by applicant]
Decision on Rejection regarding Chinese Patent Application No. 202111153024.7, dated Feb. 26, 2026. Translation provided by SPTL Associates. [cited by applicant]