IP Library Granted Patent US 12,541,985
Granted Patent B2
US 12,541,985 · App. 18/193,736 · Granted Feb 3, 2026

Document image blur assessment

Inventors: Stuart Wells (Saratoga, CA); Attila Balogh (Vienna, AT); Anshuman Vikram Singh (Vienna, AT); Thomas Krump (Buchkirken, AT); Daryl Huff (Saratoga, CA)
Assignee: Jumio Corporation
G06V30/133G06V30/1801G06V30/414
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,541,985
App. No.
18/193,736
Granted
Feb 3, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure includes a system and method for determining a first measure of blur value associated with a first portion of a document under test; determining a second measure of blur value associated with a second portion of the document under test; determining whether an inconsistency in a set measure of blur values associated with the document under test is present, wherein the set of measure of blur values associated with the document under test includes the first measure of blur value and the second measure of blur value; and modifying a likelihood that the document is accepted or rejected based on whether the inconsistency is absent or present, respectively.

Claims (38)

1 . A method comprising:

determining, using one or more processors, a first measure of blur value associated with a first portion of an image of a document under test based on pixel information representing the first portion of the document under test in the image;

determining, using the one or more processors, a second measure of blur value associated with a second portion of the image of the document under test based on pixel information representing the second portion of the document under test in the image;

determining, using the one or more processors, whether an inconsistency in a set of measure of blur values associated with the document under test is present, wherein the set of measure of blur values associated with the document under test includes the first measure of blur value and the second measure of blur value; and

modifying, using the one or more processors, a likelihood that the document is accepted or rejected based on whether the inconsistency is absent or present, respectively.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is associated with a first bounding box generated using optical character recognition, and the second portion of the document under test is associated with a first bounding box generated using optical character recognition.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein an inconsistency exists when a difference between the first measure of blur and the second measure of blur satisfies a threshold.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is a first character in a first text string and the second portion of the document under test is a second character in the first text string.

5 . The method of claim 4 , the method further comprising:

determining a third measure of blur associated with the first text string at a field level;

determining a fourth measure of blur associated with a second text string at the field level;

comparing the third measure of blur and the fourth measure of blur; and

determining based on the comparison whether a difference in blur at the field level exists.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is associated with a first text string and the second portion of the document under test is associated with a second text string.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is associated with a field label and the second portion of the document under test is a text field associated with the field label.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first measure of blur is determined by applying Canny edge detection to the first portion of the document under test and the second measure of blur is determined by applying Canny edge detection to the second portion of the document under test.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first measure of blur is determined by applying Laplacian variance detection to the first portion of the document under test and the second measure of blur is determined by applying Laplacian variance to the second portion of the document under test.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first measure of blur is determined by applying Cepstral techniques to the first portion of the document under test and the second measure of blur is determined by applying Cepstral techniques to the second portion of the document under test.

11 . A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the system to:

determine a first measure of blur value associated with a first portion of an image of a document under test based on pixel information representing the first portion of the document under test in the image;

determine a second measure of blur value associated with a second portion of the image of the document under test based on pixel information representing the second portion of the document under test in the image;

determine whether an inconsistency in a set of measure of blur values associated with the document under test is present, wherein the set of measure of blur values associated with the document under test includes the first measure of blur value and the second measure of blur value; and

modify a likelihood that the document is accepted or rejected based on whether the inconsistency is absent or present, respectively.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is associated with a first bounding box generated using optical character recognition, and the second portion of the document under test is associated with a first bounding box generated using optical character recognition.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein an inconsistency exists when a difference between the first measure of blur and the second measure of blur satisfies a threshold.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is a first character in a first text string and the second portion of the document under test is a second character in the first text string.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the system to:

determine a third measure of blur associated with the first text string at a field level;

determine a fourth measure of blur associated with a second text string at the field level;

compare the third measure of blur and the fourth measure of blur; and

determine based on the comparison whether a difference in blur at the field level exists.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is associated with a first text string and the second portion of the document under test is associated with a second text string.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first portion of the document under test is associated with a field label and the second portion of the document under test is a text field associated with the field label.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first measure of blur is determined by applying Canny edge detection to the first portion of the document under test and the second measure of blur is determined by applying Canny edge detection to the second portion of the document under test.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first measure of blur is determined by applying Laplacian variance detection to the first portion of the document under test and the second measure of blur is determined by applying Laplacian variance to the second portion of the document under test.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the first measure of blur is determined by applying Cepstral techniques to the first portion of the document under test and the second measure of blur is determined by applying Cepstral techniques to the second portion of the document under test.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 6, 2023
From: WELLS, STUART; BALOGH, ATTILA; SINGH, ANSHUMAN VIKRAM; KRUMP, THOMAS; HUFF, DARYL
To: JUMIO CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063245/0738 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 18148544 · Dec 30, 2022
Continuation In Part 18148542 · Dec 30, 2022
Continuation In Part 18148536 · Dec 30, 2022
Related Publication 20240221405A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (146)
US 4897814A · Clark · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5544255A · Smithies et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5668897A · Stolfo · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5748780A · Stolfo · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5838814A · Moore · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6363162B1 · Moed et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7040539B1 · Stover · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7831531B1 · Baluja et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8326761B1 · Hecht et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8352494B1 · Badoiu · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8886648B1 · Procopio et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8910032B2 · Graves et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9135517B1 · Adams · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9836591B2 · John et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10320807B2 · Khan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11144752B1 · Castelblanco et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11416562B1 · Gruhl et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11593439B1 · Avadhani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11625954B2 · Kwak et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11715102B2 · Edwards et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11900755B1 · Bueche, Jr. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020064305A1 · Taylor · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030172066A1 · Cooper et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030229637A1 · Baxter et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040155877A1 · Hong et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060041506A1 · Mason et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060124726A1 · Kotovich et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060164682A1 · Lev · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070078846A1 · Gulli et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070086628A1 · Fuchs et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070116328A1 · Sablak · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080065630A1 · Luo et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080149713A1 · Brundage · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090060396A1 · Blessan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090152357A1 · Lei et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090261158A1 · Lawson · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100027896A1 · Geva et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110057040A1 · Jones · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110128360A1 · Hatzav et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140002872A1 · Cook · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100590A1 · Robinson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150242592A1 · Weiss et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150341370A1 · Khan · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160005050A1 · Teman · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160098399A1 · Casperson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160210450A1 · Su · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170161375A1 · Stoica et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170193285A1 · Negi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170277945A1 · Budihal et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170322932A1 · Deschenes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170337449A1 · Hamada et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180060874A1 · Kelts et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180075090A1 · Knight et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180186164A1 · Wu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180204113A1 · Galron et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293461A1 · Le et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180300296A1 · Ziraknejad et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180373859A1 · Ganong · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190035431A1 · Attorre · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190205686A1 · Mayer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190272549A1 · Mossoba et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190278986A1 · Nepomniachtchi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184201A1 · Kaehler · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200304650A1 · Roach · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200342600A1 · Sjstrand et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200366671A1 · Larson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210124919A1 · Balakrishnan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210248401A1 · Timoshenko et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210259660A1 · Bharat et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210307841A1 · Buch et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210320801A1 · Wyss · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210326629A1 · Slattery · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220028086A1 · Woodard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220058660A1 · Ivanov · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220180113A1 · Patel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220182430A1 · Bennett-James et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220385880A1 · Nims · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230013380A1 · Choi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230017185A1 · Cheong et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230113148A1 · Zlotnick · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230129350A1 · Bryan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230143239A1 · Yusuf et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230196628A1 · Bischoff et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230298031A1 · Drapeau et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230421602A1 · Boyer et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240046686A1 · Ye et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240205239A1 · Bonev et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250225527A1 · Jiang et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
MY 192715A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US24/62269 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Dec. 30, 2024, date of mailing Mar. 7, 2025, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shokat, Sana, et al. “Analysis and Evaluation of Braille to Text Conversion Methods.” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Shokat, Sana, et al. “Characterization of English Braille Patterns Using Automated Tools and RICA Based Feature Extraction Methods.” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 22, No. 5, 2022, p. 1836. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US2024/048525 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Sep. 26, 2024, date of mailing Nov. 27, 2024, 10 pages. 2024. [cited by applicant]
Di Guardo, Fabrizio. “Facemask-a Real-Time Face Morphing Tool.” Medium, Level Up Coding, May 2, 2023, levelup.gitconnected.com/facemask-a-real-time-face-morphing-tool-5b343591a237. May 2, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Face Landmark Detection Guide | Google AI Edge | Google AI for Developers.” Google, ai.google.dev/edge/mediapipe/solutions/vision/face_landmarker. [cited by applicant]
“Image Segmentation Guide | Google Ai Edge | Google AI for Developers.” Google, ai.google.dev/edge/mediapipe/solutions/vision/image_segmenter. [cited by applicant]
Kirillov, Alexander et al. “Segment Anything.” 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Oct. 1, 2023, doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00371. Oct. 1, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Large Language and Vision Assistant.” LLaVA, llava-vl.github.io/. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Haotian, et al. “Visual Instruction Tuning.” 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 11, 2023, arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08485. Dec. 11, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Llava 1.6—a Hugging Face Space by Liuhaotian.” LLaVA 1.6—a Hugging Face Space by Liuhaotian, huggingface.co/spaces/liuhaotian/LLaVA-1.6. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Xin, et al. “Attribute-Aware Implicit Modality Alignment for Text Attribute Person Search.” Arxiv.Org, Jun. 6, 2024. Jun. 6, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Zhe, et al. “Attribute-guided Transformer for Robust Person Re-identification.” IET Computer Vision, vol. 17, No. 8, Jun. 23, 2023, pp. 977-992, doi: 10.1049/cvi2.12215. Jun. 23, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“7 Best Face Morph Apps 2024 (Morph Two Faces Together).” ContentMaverickscom, Content Mavericks, 2024, contentmavericks.com/best-face-morph-app/. 2024 Web. 25 pgs. 2024. [cited by applicant]
“Levenshtein Distance.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, Dec. 23, 2023, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance.Web. 6 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
“New Method Detects Deepfake Videos with up to 99% Accuracy.” News, May 3, 2022, news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/05/03/new-method-detects-deepfake-videos-99-accuracy. Web. 3 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Bassil, Youssef, and Mohammad Alwani. “Context-Sensitive Spelling Correction Using Google Web 1T 5-Gram Information.” Computer and Information Science (Toronto), vol. 5, No. 3, 2012, p. 37. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Bassil, Youssef, and Mohammad Alwani. “OCR Post-Processing Error Correction Algorithm Using Google Online Spelling Suggestion.” ArXiv.org, 2012, pp. arXiv.org, 2012. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Benalcazar, Daniel, et al. “Synthetic ID Card Image Generation for Improving Presentation Attack Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, 2023, pp. 1814-1824. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Casado, Constantino Alvarez, et al. “Real-time Face Alignment: Evaluation Methods, Training Strategies and Implementation Optimization.” Journal of Real-time Image Processing 18.6 (2021): 2239-2267. Web. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Deepswap.Ai, “Deepswap—Best Face and Video Edit Tools Online.” DeepSwap AI, www.deepswap.ai/?utm_source=bing&cp_id=441169896&msclkid=eb76125c4d531cf9797e77325a694067. Accessed Dec. 2023. Web. 11 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
DEVCODEF1 Editors, Using LLMS for OCR text proofreading: A guide for software developers. Dev Code F1. May 26, 2023, <https://devcodef1.com/news/1007434/Ilms-for-ocr-text-proofreading> Web. 3 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Faceshape. “Face Morphing Simulator—Morph Two Faces Together.” Face Morphing Simulator—Morph Two Faces Together, www.faceshape.com/face-morph. (2022) Web. 2 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Fadilpašić, Sead. “Deepfake Fraud Attacks Are Hitting More and More Businesses.” TechRadar, TechRadar Pro, Feb. 24, 2023, www.techradar.com/news/deepfake-fraud-attacks-are-hitting-more-and-more-businesses. Accessed Jan.… [cited by applicant]
Github, Use Llama2 to Improve the Accuracy of Tesseract OCR. GitHub. (n.d.). https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/llama2_aided_tesseract> Web. Last updated Aug. 2, 2023. 3 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Help Net Security. “Detecting Face Morphing: A Simple Guide to Countering Complex Identity Fraud.” Help Net Security, Mar. 16, 2023, www.helpnetsecurity.com/2023/03/20/facial-morphing-technology/. Web. 5 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Hu, Yifei, et al. “Misspelling Correction with Pre-Trained Contextual Language Model.” ArXiv.org, 2021, pp. arXiv.org, 2021. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Kaspersky, Secure Futures Editors. “What Does the Rise of Deepfakes Means for the Future of Cybersecurity?” Daily English USA Usakasperskycomblog, Kaspersky Secure Futures Editors, USA.kaspersky.com/blog/secure-futures-… [cited by applicant]
Kramer, Robin S. S., et al. “Face Morphing Attacks: Investigating Detection with Humans and Computers.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, p. 28. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kumar, Varun. “14 Best Deepfake Apps and Tools in 2024.” RankRed, Jan. 1, 2024, www.rankred.com/best-deepfake-apps-tools/. Web. 22 pgs. 2024. [cited by applicant]
Lee, Jung-Hun, et al. “Deep Learning-Based Context-Sensitive Spelling Typing Error Correction.” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 152565-152578. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Zhaoxiang, et al. “Facial Pose Estimation by Deep Learning from Label Distributions.” (2019). Web. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW), 9 pgs. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lowphansirkul, Lalita, et al. “WangchanBERTa: Pretraining Transformer-Based Thai Language Models.” ArXiv.org, 2021, pp. arXiv.org, 2021. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Luo, Yinhui et al. “A Review of Homography Estimation: Advances and Challenges.” Electronics 2023 pp. 4977-4977. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/24/4977 2023. [cited by applicant]
Lyu, Siwei, “Detecting ‘deepfake’ Videos in the Blink of an Eye.” The Conversation, Sep. 15, 2022, theconversation.com/detecting-deepfake-videos-in-the-blink-of-an-eye-101072. Web. 4 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Mazaheri, Ghazal et al. “2022 Ieee/Cvf Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (Wacv).” Detection and Localization of Facial Expression Manipulations IEEE 2022 pp. 2773-2783 2022. [cited by applicant]
Nightingale, Sophie J., et al. “Perceptual and Computational Detection of Face Morphing.” Journal of Vision (Charlottesville, Va.), vol. 21, No. 3, 2021, p. 4. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Picsi.Ai, “Create Realistic Face Morphs” Picsi.AI, InsightFace, 2023, www.picsi.ai/. Web. 8 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, A. (Nov. 16, 2021). OCR passports with opencv and Tesseract. PylmageSearch. <https://pyimagesearch.com/2021/12/01/ocr-passports-with-opencv-and-tesseract/> Web. 24 pgs. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Sadeghzadeh, Arezoo, et al., “Pose-invariant face recognition based on matching the occlusion free regions aligned by 3D generic model.” IET Computer Vision, Aug. 2020, vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 177-287. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schulz, Daniel, et al., “Identify Documents Image Quality Assessment.” European Association for Signal Processing, Proceedings 2022 pp. 1017-1021. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Seibold, C., et al., “Detection of Face Morphing Attacks by Deep Learning.” Digital Forensics and Watermarking. IWDW (2017). Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol. 10431. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3… [cited by applicant]
Tesseract—OCR, Improving the Quality of the Output Github.com, Tesseract User Manual v. 5.x, 9 pgs, updated Dec. 5, 2023. Web. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Times, Global. “Tencent Launches Large Language Model ‘Hunyuan’ amid Global Generative AI Frenzy.” Global Times, Sep. 7, 2023, www.globaltimes.cn/page/202309/1297761.shtml. 6 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
YouTube, YouTube, “Morphing Identity: A real-time face morphing system to transforming face identity.” May 15, 2021, Cybernetic Humanity Studio. https://youtu.be/ahKxwaJ3k_U?si=kp4G4wFa8IAsGNLY 2021. [cited by applicant]
Zhao, Jian et al. “2018 Ieee/Cvf Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.” Towards Pose Invariant Face Recognition in the Wild IEEE 2018 pp. 2207-2216. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Erhu, et al. “Forgery Detection for Perforated Nnumber in Security Document by Analysing the Perforated Holes.” The Imaging Science Journal 65.1 (2017): 40-48. Web. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/86219 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Dec. 28, 2023, date of mailing May 23, 2024, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aslam, Asra, et al., May 15, 2019, Depth-Map Generation using Pixel Matching in Stereoscopic Pair of Images, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.03471.pdf, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Elsayed, M et al. “A New Method for Full Reference Image Blur Measure.” International Journal of Simulation: Systems Science and Technology V19 N1 (Feb. 1, 2018): 7.1-7.5 2018 https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.19.01.7. [cited by applicant]
Canada Passport Phot Security Features, Canada.ca, Government of Canada (Dec. 20, 2022) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/canadian-passports/photos.html#photo, webpage 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Edge Detection Using OpenCV, LearnOpenCV.com, (2023) https://learnopencv.com/edge-detection-using-opencv/, webpage. 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Passport Phot Specifications., Government of Canada (2015) https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/migration/ircc/english/pdf/pub/pass-photo-spec-eng.pdf, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, Adrian, “OpenCV Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for blur detection in images and video streams.” PylmageSearch.com, Jun. 15, 2020, webpage, 21 pgs. https://pyimagesearch.com/2020/06/15/opencv-fast-fourier-transf… [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, Adrian, Blur Detection with OpenCV PylmageSearch.com, Sep. 7, 2015, https://pyimagesearch.com/2015/09/07/blur-detection-with-opencv/, webpage, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/79511 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Nov. 13, 2023, date of mailing Mar. 4, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/79821 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Nov. 15, 2023, date of mailing Apr. 4, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]