IP Library Granted Patent US 12,385,846
Granted Patent B2
US 12,385,846 · App. 18/200,425 · Granted Aug 12, 2025

Digital image gemstone verification with filters

Inventors: Jongsik Kim (Carlsbad, CA); Sudhin Mandal (Carlsbad, CA)
Assignee: Gemological Institute of America, Inc. (GIA)
G01N21/87G06V10/141G06V10/145G06V20/95G06V30/1434
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,385,846
App. No.
18/200,425
Granted
Aug 12, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods here may be used for capturing images of sample gemstones under structured, filtered illumination for later comparison and image matching for authentication using networked computer systems.

Claims (27)

1. A method comprising:

by a computer with a processor and memory, the computer in communication with a networked comparison server computer, a digital camera and a structured, filtered light source,

causing the light source illuminate gemstone in a holder, wherein the gemstone includes an inscription, and wherein the light source includes a structured filter;

by the computer, receiving a digital image of the gemstone and at least one identifier for the gemstone;

by the computer, retrieving at least one previously stored digital image and its identifier using the received identifier, wherein the previously stored image and its identifiers includes an inscription on a gemstone and its unique features;

by the computer, comparing the received digital image of the gemstone and/or identifiers with the at least one previously stored digital image retrieved using the identifier(s),

wherein the comparing the received digital image of the gemstone and/or identifier(s) with the at least one previously stored digital image retrieved using the identifier(s);

if the comparison matches, indicating to a user interface, a match; and

if the comparison does not match, indicating to the user interface, no match.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the light source filter is a horizontal filter.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the light source filter is a vertical filter.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the light source filter is a grid filter.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the light source filter is a circular filter.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the light source filter is a square filter.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the light source filter is in a particular shape correlated to a geometry of the gemstone.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the structured, filtered light source includes lines with spacing and size and linewidth that is proportional to at least one of, a distance between the structured, filtered light source to the gemstone, a diameter of the gemstone, a spatial distance between facet junctions of the gemstone, and a height of the gemstone.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the structured, filtered light source is an optical display/projector/monitor/LEDs.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the digital camera and the light source are desk top units which are remote from the computer used for comparing with previously stored images.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the digital camera and the structured, filtered light source are in a same mobile unit which are remote from the computer used for comparing with previously stored images.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the digital camera and light source are directed along a same axis to the gemstone by a dichroic beam splitter.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein the digital camera and light source are directed at opposite sides of the gemstone to provide a back light image.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the comparing the received digital image of the gemstone and/or identifier(s) with the at least one previously stored digital image retrieved using the identifier(s), includes comparing gemstone girdle profile in the images.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the comparing the previously stored digital image of the gemstone and/or identifier(s) can be replaced with a newly acquired digital image of the same gemstone and/or identifier(s).

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the matching server generates a digital certificate/record of gemstone after a successful matching and the resulting digital certificate/record can be provided to a user(s).

17. The method of claim 1 wherein a thickness of lines in the structured, filtered light can be vary from 1 nm to 100 mm and a spacing of lines in the structured, filtered light can be vary from 1 nm to 100 mm.

18. The method of claim 1 wherein lines in the structured, filtered light have a sinusoidal gradation.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein lines in the structured, filtered light are binary without gradation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2023
From: KIM, JONGSIK; MANDAL, SUDHIN
To: GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC. (GIA)
Reel/Frame 063914/0871 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63346235 · May 26, 2022
Related Publication 20230408419A1 · Dec 21, 2023
References Cited (34)
US 2157437A · Shipley · 1939 [cited by applicant]
US 4648717A · Ross et al. · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 5124935A · Wallner · 1992 [cited by examiner]
US 5828405A · Vanier · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5932119A · Kaplan · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 5966673A · Shannon, Sr. · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 7239739B2 · Lapa · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7768656B2 · Lapa et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7834987B2 · Reinitz · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8270719B2 · Ellawand · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9678018B2 · Takahashi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10489647B2 · Schaefer · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10552950B2 · Balagurusamy · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10733615B2 · Koh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11232553B2 · Parikh · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11428641B2 · Gajjar · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11796480B2 · Navot · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11867637B2 · Hakim · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11892405B2 · Takahashi · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12072295B1 · Henley · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20100092067A1 · Ellawand · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20140139608A1 · Rosario et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160232432A1 · Regev · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170241913A1 · Gu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190366475A1 · Scarselli et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200340927A1 · Balagurusamy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210201461A1 · Parikh · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230228690A1 · Tsai · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016127064A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023230007A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Bromley, J., et al. (Aug. 1993) Signature verification using a “Siamese” time delay neural network. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 669-688. [cited by applicant]
Fei-Fei, L., et al. (Apr. 2006) “One-Shot learning of object categories”. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 594-611. [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger O., et al. (2015) U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Navab N., Hornegger J., Wells W., Frangi A. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015… [cited by applicant]
Blatt, Todd J., “Analytics: Business Intelligence, Algorithms and Statistical Analysis,” Jul. 31, 2017. [cited by applicant]