IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,256,998
Granted Patent B2
US 12,256,998 · App. 18/200,978 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Algorithm-based optimization for knee arthroplasty procedures

Inventors: Brian W. McKinnon (Arlington, TN); Ruxandra Cristiana Marinescu Tanasoca (Memphis, TN); Randy C. Winebarger (Southaven, MS); William L. Bowers, Jr. (Southaven, MS); James Bennett Wiebe, III (Coldwater, MS); Nathaniel Milton Lenz (Germantown, TN); Zachary Christopher Wilkinson (Germantown, TN); Sean M. Haddock (Germantown, TN); Ryan Lloyd Landon (Olive Branch, MS); Constantinos Nikou (Monroeville, PA); Branislav Jaramaz (Pittsburgh, PA); Paul Alexander Torrie (Marblehead, MA)
Assignees: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.; SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG; SMITH & NEPHEW ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LIMITED
A61B34/10A61B17/1764A61B34/25A61B90/361A61B90/37A61B90/39A61F2/461G02B27/0172G06N3/08G06N5/046G06N20/00G06N20/10G09B5/02G09B19/003G09B19/24G16H10/60G16H20/40G16H30/40G16H40/63G16H50/50G16H50/70A61B2017/00199A61B2017/00526A61B17/15A61B17/17A61B2034/102A61B2034/104A61B2034/105A61B2034/107A61B2034/108A61B34/20A61B2034/2048A61B2034/2057A61B2034/2063A61B2034/2065A61B2034/2068A61B2034/2072A61B2034/2074A61B2034/252A61B2034/254A61B2034/256A61B2034/258A61B34/30A61B2090/363A61B2090/365A61B2090/371A61B2090/376A61B2090/3916A61B2090/502A61B90/96A61F2002/30952A61F2002/4633G02B2027/0138
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,256,998
App. No.
18/200,978
Filed
May 23, 2023
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2667
USPC
703/11
Abstract

A method for optimizing a knee arthroplasty surgical procedure includes receiving pre-operative data comprising (i) anatomical measurements of the patient, (ii) soft tissue measurements of the patient's anatomy, and (iii) implant parameters identifying an implant to be used in the knee arthroplasty surgical procedure. An equation set is selected from a plurality of pre-generated equation sets based on the pre-operative data. During the knee arthroplasty surgical procedure, patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values are generated and displayed using an optimization process. The optimization process includes collecting intraoperative data from one or more surgical tools of a computer-assisted surgical system, and using the intraoperative data and the pre-operative data to solve the equation set, thereby yielding the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values. A visualization is then provided of the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values on the displays.

Claims (42)

1. A method for optimizing a surgical procedure, the method comprising:

receiving pre-operative data comprising: anatomical measurements of a patient and implant parameters identifying an implant to be used in the surgical procedure;

selecting an equation set from a plurality of pre-generated equation sets based on the pre-operative data; and

during the surgical procedure, comparing patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values with a specified goal using an optimization process comprising:

collecting intraoperative data from one or more surgical tools of a computer-assisted surgical system,

using the intraoperative data and the pre-operative data to solve the equation set, thereby yielding the plurality of patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values, and

comparing the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values with the specified goal.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values comprise subsets of kinetic and kinematic response values for a plurality of joint flexion values.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising receiving a user-selection of individual subsets of the kinetic and kinematic response values based on a user-selected joint flexion value.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying an indication of differences between the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response value and a corresponding target value associated with the specified goal.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein each patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response value and corresponding target value is depicted on a slider scale.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the slider scale further includes one or more indicators of a 510 (K) limit associated with the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response value depicted on the slider scale.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein a distinct weight value is applied to each patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response value during the solving of the equation set.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the equation set is solved using a Goal Programming (GP) algorithm.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the distinct weight value applied to the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values are determined though a Group Decision Making (GDM) process.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimization process is executed in response to activation of one or more user interface components on one or more displays.

11. A method for optimizing a surgical procedure, the method comprising:

receiving pre-operative data comprising: anatomical measurements of a patient and implant parameters identifying an implant to be used in the surgical procedure;

selecting a machine learning model from a plurality of trained machine learning models based on the pre-operative data, wherein the machine learning model is trained to transform the pre-operative data to one or more kinetic response values and one or more kinematic response values; and

during the surgical procedure, comparing patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values with a specified goal using an optimization process comprising:

collecting intraoperative data from one or more surgical tools of a computer-assisted surgical system,

applying the machine learning model to the pre-operative data and the intraoperative data, thereby determining a plurality of patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values, and

comparing the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values with the specified goal.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values comprise kinetic and kinematic response values for a plurality of joint flexion values.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising allowing user-selection of individual subsets of the kinetic and kinematic response values based on a user-selected joint flexion value.

14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising displaying an indication of differences between the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response value and a corresponding target value associated with the specified goal.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein each patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response value and corresponding target value is depicted on a slider scale.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the slider scale further includes one or more indicators of a 510 (K) limit associated with the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response value depicted on the slider scale.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning model is a neural network trained using a database of information collected from previous surgical procedures.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning model is a support vector machine trained using a database of information collected from previous surgical procedures.

19. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

detecting an update of one or more of the pre-operative data during the surgical procedure;

applying the machine learning model to the updated pre-operative data, thereby determining a plurality of updated patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values;

providing a visualization of the updated patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values on one or more displays.

20. A computer-assisted surgical system comprising:

one or more surgical tools generating intraoperative data during a surgical procedure;

a database comprising a plurality of pre-generated equation sets;

a processor configured to:

receive pre-operative data comprising: anatomical measurements of a patient and implant parameters identifying an implant to be used in the surgical procedure;

select an equation set from the plurality of pre-generated equation sets based on the pre-operative data,

during the surgical procedure, perform an optimization process solving the equation set using the pre-operative data and the intraoperative data to determine a plurality of patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values; and

a graphical user interface providing an interactive visualization of the patient-specific kinetic and kinematic response values.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2024
From: MCKINNON, BRIAN W.; MARINESCU TANASOCA, RUXANDRA CRISTIANA; WINEBARGER, RANDY C.; BOWERS, WILLIAM L., JR.; LENZ, NATHANIEL MILTON; WILKINSON, ZACHARY CHRISTOPHER; HADDOCK, SEAN M.; LANDON, RYAN LLOYD; NIKOU, CONSTANTINOS; JARAMAZ, BRANISLAV; TORRIE, PAUL ALEXANDER
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Reel/Frame 066462/0182 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2024
From: WIEBE, JAMES BENNETT, III
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Reel/Frame 066462/0567 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2024
From: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.; SMITH & NEPHEW ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LIMITED; SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
Reel/Frame 066462/0744 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 16817101 · Mar 12, 2020
Continuation In Part PCTUS2020016559 · Feb 4, 2020
Provisional Application 62939946 · Nov 25, 2019
Provisional Application 62885673 · Aug 12, 2019
Provisional Application 62864663 · Jun 21, 2019
Provisional Application 62801257 · Feb 5, 2019
Provisional Application 62801245 · Feb 5, 2019
Related Publication 20230285084A1 · Sep 14, 2023
References Cited (5)
US 11596479B2 · McGuan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11684423B2 · McKinnon · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20100076563A1 · Otto · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20150106024A1 · Lightcap · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190167352A1 · Mahfouz · 2019 [cited by examiner]