IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,728,900
Granted Patent B2
US 12,728,900 · App. 18/203,485 · Granted Sep 8, 2026

Handbrake and impact monitoring system

Inventors: Erik L. Gotlund (Green Oaks, IL); David P. Cannon (Chicago, IL); Michael E. Antonakakis (Colorado Springs, CO); Thomas M. Kingsley (Chicago, IL)
Assignee: TTX Company
B61L15/0081B61L15/0027B61L15/0072B61L27/40B61L25/025
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,728,900
App. No.
18/203,485
Granted
Sep 8, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, and non-transitory machine-readable media for remote monitoring and for detecting that a handbrake has been activated and an impact event may have occurred. In one or more example embodiments, a device for detecting a handbrake or impact event includes a controller having one or more processors, a data array, an accelerometer, and memory storing executable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the controller to obtain from an accelerometer acceleration data indicating longitudinal acceleration of a railcar, store the acceleration data in the data array, and provide an indication that a handbrake or impact event has occurred.

Claims (51)

1 . A system comprising:

a magnetic monitoring device associated with a handbrake, wherein the magnetic monitoring device is fixably attached to a bellcrank of a rail car using a multi-piece bracket;

the multi-piece bracket, wherein the multi-piece bracket is slotted and configured to allow adjustment of a location of a magnet associated with the magnetic monitoring device; and

a computing device associated with the rail car, the computing device comprising:

a processor; and

a memory storing instructions that, when read by the processor, cause the computing device to:

receive, from the magnetic monitoring device, an indication of an application of the handbrake;

determine, based on applying a debouncing algorithm to the indication, that the application occurred; and

determine, based on a distance measurement associated with the application, a magnitude of a braking event.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the magnetic monitoring device comprises a reed switch.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the reed switch is placed in a fixed position associated with at least one of:

a handbrake lever,

a handbrake sheave wheel,

a handbrake brake rod, or

a chain that moves when the handbrake is applied.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when read by the processor, cause the computing device to generate the indication based on feedback from a magnet of the magnetic monitoring device indicating movement of the handbrake.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the magnetic monitoring device comprises: a magnet mounting bracket, and a handbrake remote monitoring device.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when read by the processor, cause the computing device to associate the application with a location determined by a global positioning system device.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when read by the processor, cause the computing device to determine, based on the debounce algorithm, that the indication was not caused by an impact event.

8 . The computing device of claim 1 , wherein the multi-piece bracket is adjustable after installation.

9 . A computer-implemented method for detecting a rail car event, comprising:

adjusting a location of a magnet associated with a magnetic monitoring device using a slotted, multi-piece bracket;

determining, using the magnetic monitoring device, an indication of an application of a handbrake, wherein the magnetic monitoring device is fixably attached to a bellcrank using the slotted, multi-piece bracket;

receiving the indication of the application of the handbrake;

determining, based on applying a debouncing algorithm to the indication, that the indication was not consistent with the application;

determining, based on an acceleration measurement exceeding a threshold, that an impact event occurred; and

recording a location associated with the impact event.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising generating the indication based on feedback from a reed switch.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the reed switch is placed in a fixed position associated with at least one of:

a handbrake lever,

a handbrake sheave wheel,

a handbrake brake rod, or

a chain that moves when the handbrake is applied.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising generating the indication based on feedback from a magnetic monitoring device, wherein the magnetic monitoring device comprises: a magnet mounting bracket, and a handbrake remote monitoring device.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising determining, based on comparing the acceleration measurement with a historical acceleration measurement, a damping deficiency.

14 . The computing device of claim 9 , further comprising adjusting, after installation, the location of the magnet by adjusting a fastener associated with the slotted, multi-piece bracket.

15 . A non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform steps comprising:

determining, using a magnetic monitoring device, an indication of an application of a handbrake, wherein the magnetic monitoring device is fixably attached to a handbrake mechanism of a rail car using a slotted, multi-piece bracket configured to allow adjustment of a location of a magnet associated with the magnetic monitoring device;

determining, by a longitudinal accelerometer and based on an acceleration measurement exceeding a threshold, that an impact event occurred; and

recording a location associated with the impact event.

16 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to further perform steps comprising:

receiving the indication of the application of the handbrake; and

determining, based on applying a debouncing algorithm to the indication, that the indication was not consistent with the application.

17 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to further perform steps comprising: generating the indication based on feedback from a reed switch, and wherein the reed switch is placed in a fixed position associated with at least one of:

a handbrake lever,

a handbrake sheave wheel,

a handbrake brake rod, or

a chain that moves when the handbrake is applied.

18 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to further perform steps comprising: generating the indication based on feedback from a magnetic monitoring device, wherein the magnetic monitoring device comprises: a magnet mounting bracket, and a handbrake remote monitoring device.

19 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to further perform steps comprising: determining, based on feedback from a global positioning system device, the location.

20 . The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the longitudinal accelerometer is mounted to an end sill of a rail car.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2026
From: GOTLUND, ERIK L.; CANNON, DAVID P.; ANTONAKAKIS, MICHAEL E.; KINGSLEY, THOMAS M.
To: TTX COMPANY
Reel/Frame 074784/0689 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17566280 · Dec 30, 2021
Continuation In Part 17154793 · Jan 21, 2021
Provisional Application 63133010 · Dec 31, 2020
Provisional Application 62964726 · Jan 23, 2020
Related Publication 20230415799A1 · Dec 28, 2023
References Cited (81)
US 6311109B1 · Hawthorne et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6487488B1 · Peterson, Jr. et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6490523B2 · Doner · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6622067B1 · Lovelace, II et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6668216B2 · Mays · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6691064B2 · Vroman · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6837550B2 · Dougherty et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7685884B2 · Degutis et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7688218B2 · LeFebvre et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7698962B2 · LeFebvre et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7769509B2 · Gaughan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8045962B2 · Schullian et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8234917B2 · Burkhart et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8781671B2 · Beck et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8812175B2 · Baker · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8874304B2 · Friesen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8924117B2 · Kull · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9020667B2 · Haas et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9026281B2 · Murphy et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9365223B2 · Martin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9403517B2 · Kernwein · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9469198B2 · Cooper et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9845099B2 · Kurz · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9981673B2 · Martin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10081377B2 · Shubs, Jr. et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10137915B2 · LeFebvre et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20030060938A1 · Duvall · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060047419A1 · Diendorf et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299550A1 · Baker · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120046811A1 · Murphy · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120204655A1 · Gregar · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130245880A1 · Mcquade · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130342362A1 · Martin · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140060979A1 · Martin · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140263895A1 · Dickenson · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150099461A1 · Holden et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150183445A1 · Gotlund et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150219487A1 · Maraini · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150232079A1 · Martin · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160082988A1 · Kurz · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160272228A1 · LeFebvre et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160325767A1 · LeFebvre · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170084094A1 · Worden et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170210401A1 · Mian · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170297595A1 · Ryan · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170343377A1 · Holden et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180050707A1 · Culbertson · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180222504A1 · Birch et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103269A1 · Bell · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210291883A1 · Gotlund et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220119021A1 · Gotlund et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230171525A1 · Ramasundaram et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 106600951A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107615312A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 110264580A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 1535418B1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2990294A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 4093648A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 4271602A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
KR 20160000031A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021150908A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022147337A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Aug. 8, 2023—(EP) Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC Communication—App 21841161.9. [cited by applicant]
Sep. 27, 2023—(CA) 1st Office Action—App 3,165,833. [cited by applicant]
Jul. 6, 2023—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 17/154,793. [cited by applicant]
Apr. 4, 2022—(WO) International Search Report & Written Opinion—PCT/US21/065801. [cited by applicant]
Sawley K et al: “The effect of hollow-worn wheels on vehicle stability in straight track,” Wear, Elsevier Sequoia, Luasanne, CH, vol. 258, No. 7-8, Mar. 1, 2005 (Mar. 1, 2005), pp. 1100-1108, XP004731843, ISSN: 0043-164… [cited by applicant]
Nov. 23, 2022—(IN) Examination Report—App. No. 202247047658. [cited by applicant]
Mar. 17, 2023—(AU) Examination Report—App. No. 2021209920. [cited by applicant]
Apr. 15, 2024—(CN) Notice of Grant and Registration—App 202180023332.X. [cited by applicant]
Dec. 18, 2023—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 18/203,447. [cited by applicant]
Dec. 18, 2023—(CN) 1st Office Action—App 202180023332.X. [cited by applicant]
Jan. 4, 2024—(US) Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 17/154,793. [cited by applicant]
Jul. 26, 2024—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 18/203,447. [cited by applicant]
May 7, 2024—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 17/154,793. [cited by applicant]
Oct. 25, 2024—(CA) 1st Office Action—App 3,203,906. [cited by applicant]
Nov. 26, 2024—(WO) Int. Search Report & Written Opinion—App. No. PCT/US24/42797. [cited by applicant]
Sep. 4, 2025—(EP) Exam Report—App. No. 21707057.2. [cited by applicant]
Jul. 8, 2025—(CA) Notice of Allowance—App. No. 3,165,833. [cited by applicant]
Sep. 16, 2025—(CA) Office Action—App 3,203,906. [cited by applicant]
Aug. 11, 2025—Preliminary Office Action—App BR112022014566-7. [cited by applicant]