IP Library Granted Patent US 12,578,227
Granted Patent B2
US 12,578,227 · App. 18/214,376 · Granted Mar 17, 2026

Dual comb spectroscopy under no-walking condition

Inventors: Gregory B. Rieker (Boulder, CO); Caroline B. Alden (Boulder, CO); Robert J. Wright (Boulder, CO); Sean C. Coburn (Longmont, CO)
Assignee: The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate
G01J3/4531G01N21/274G01J2003/2866G01J2003/4538
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,578,227
App. No.
18/214,376
Granted
Mar 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for adaptive dual frequency-comb spectroscopy includes repeatedly (i) recording a single interferogram with a dual frequency-comb spectrometer, (ii) averaging the single interferogram into an averaged interferogram, and (iii) determining a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the averaged interferogram, until the SNR of the averaged interferogram exceeds a SNR threshold. In certain embodiments, determining the SNR includes determining a signal amplitude of a center burst of the averaged interferogram and determining a noise level of the averaged interferogram from data points of the averaged interferogram located away from the center burst. In certain embodiments, determining the SNR includes Fourier transforming the averaged interferogram into a frequency spectrum and numerically integrating the frequency spectrum.

Claims (38)

1 . A method for adaptive dual frequency-comb spectroscopy, comprising:

while operating a dual frequency-comb spectrometer under a no-walking condition, repeatedly:

recording a single interferogram with the dual frequency-comb spectrometer,

updating, with the single interferogram, a cumulatively averaged interferogram of a sequence of previously recorded interferograms, and

determining a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the cumulatively averaged interferogram,

until the SNR of the cumulatively averaged interferogram exceeds a SNR threshold.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining the SNR of the cumulatively averaged interferogram includes:

determining a signal amplitude of a center burst of the cumulatively averaged interferogram; and

determining a noise level of the cumulatively averaged interferogram from data points of the cumulatively averaged interferogram located away from the center burst.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining the SNR of the cumulatively averaged interferogram includes:

Fourier transforming the cumulatively averaged interferogram into a frequency spectrum; and

numerically integrating the frequency spectrum.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising discarding the single interferogram after said updating.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling a gimbal mount to steer a double pulse train of the dual frequency-comb spectrometer to a retroreflector.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein said controlling occurs prior to said repeatedly recording, updating, and determining.

7 . The method of claim 6 , further comprising resetting the cumulatively averaged interferogram prior to said repeatedly recording, updating, and determining.

8 . A system for adaptive dual frequency-comb spectroscopy, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory in communication with the processor, the memory storing a cumulatively averaged interferogram of a sequence of previously recorded interferograms;

the memory further storing machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to,

control a dual frequency-comb spectrometer to operate under a no-walking condition; and repeatedly:

(i) control the dual frequency-comb spectrometer to record a single interferogram,

(ii) receive the single interferogram from the dual frequency-comb spectrometer,

(iii) update the cumulatively averaged interferogram with the single interferogram, and

(iv) determine a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the cumulatively averaged interferogram,

until the SNR of the cumulatively averaged interferogram exceeds a SNR threshold.

9 . The system of claim 8 , further comprising the dual frequency-comb spectrometer.

10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to determine the SNR of the cumulatively averaged interferogram comprise machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to:

determine a signal amplitude of a center burst of the cumulatively averaged interferogram, and

determine a noise level of the cumulatively averaged interferogram from data points of the cumulatively averaged interferogram located away from the center burst.

11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to determine the SNR of the cumulatively averaged interferogram comprise machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to:

Fourier transform the cumulatively averaged interferogram into a frequency spectrum, and

numerically integrate the frequency spectrum.

12 . The system of claim 8 , the memory storing additional machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to discard the single interferogram after the cumulatively averaged interferogram is updated.

13 . The system of claim 8 , the memory storing additional machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to adjust a gimbal mount such that the gimbal mount steers a double pulse train of the dual frequency-comb spectrometer to a retroreflector.

14 . The system of claim 13 , further comprising the gimbal mount.

15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to adjust the gimbal mount are executed prior to the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to repeatedly record, update, and determine.

16 . The system of claim 15 , the memory storing additional machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control to system to reset the cumulatively averaged interferogram prior to the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to repeatedly record, update, and determine.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Aug 29, 2024
From: UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
To: US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 068804/0280 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2023
From: RIEKER, GREGORY B.; ALDEN, CAROLINE B.; WRIGHT, ROBERT J.; COBURN, SEAN C.
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, A BODY CORPORATE
Reel/Frame 064063/0371 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17023080 · Sep 16, 2020
Provisional Application 62900829 · Sep 16, 2019
Related Publication 20230349764A1 · Nov 2, 2023
References Cited (11)
US 8502152B1 · Hashmonay · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20110069309A1 · Newbury et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20170201328A1 · Hugi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180045596A1 · Prasad · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180216996A1 · Kieu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
Bernhardt et al., “Cavity-enhanced dual-comb spectroscopy”, Nature Photonics vol. 4, Nov. 29, 2009, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Coburn et al., “Regional trace-gas source attribution using a field-deployed dual frequency comb spectrometer”, Optica vol. 5 No. 4, Apr. 2018, pp. 320-327. [cited by applicant]
Coddington et al., “Coherent dual-comb spectroscopy at high signal-to-noise ratio”, Physical Review A 82, 2010, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Coddington et al., “Coherent linear optical sampling at 15 bits of resolution”, Optics Letters vol. 34 No. 14, Jul. 15, 2009, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Giorgetta et al., “Fast high-resolution spectroscopy of dynamic continuous-wave laser sources”, Nature Photonics vol. 4, Oct. 24, 2010, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Newbury et al., “Sensitivity of coherent dual-comb spectroscopy”, Optics Express vol. 18 No. 8, Apr. 12, 2010, pp. 7929-7945. [cited by applicant]