IP Library Granted Patent US 12,288,220
Granted Patent B2
US 12,288,220 · App. 18/215,511 · Granted Apr 29, 2025

Machine-learned attendance prediction for ticket distribution

Inventor: Marc Eric Lore (New York, NY)
Assignee: Jump Platforms, Inc.
G06Q30/0206G06N20/00G06Q10/02G06Q30/0201G06Q30/0205
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,288,220
App. No.
18/215,511
Granted
Apr 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A ticket exchange server is configured to determine a number of tickets to distribute for an event. The ticket exchange server accesses, for a stadium, training data describing attendance at historical events, historical opponents of a sports team, and a historical win/loss record of the sports team. The ticket exchange server trains a machine-learned model configured to predict an attendance for a future event at the stadium based on an opponent of the sports team at the future event and a current or predicted win/loss record of the sports team. The ticket exchange server selects an event for the sports team against an opponent and determines a predicted attendance using the machine-learned model. The ticket exchange server identifies a number of tickets greater than a capacity of the stadium to make available based on the predicted attendance and distributes the number of tickets to prospective attendees.

Claims (40)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

applying a machine-learned model to event information for a future event of an event type associated with a historical attendance, the machine-learned model configured to generate a predicted attendance for the future event;

identifying a number of tickets greater than a capacity of a venue of the future event based on the predicted attendance;

distributing, via a ticket exchange server, up to the identified number of tickets to prospective attendees of the future event, the distributed tickets identifying a section of the venue but not identifying a specific seat within the venue; and

in response to receiving a location of a mobile device including a distributed ticket captured by a GPS receiver of the mobile device indicating that the mobile device is located at the section identified by the distributed ticket within the venue, assigning, via the ticket exchange server, a seat within the section to the distributed ticket, and detecting a near-field signal transmitted by the mobile device identifying the distributed ticket to the seat within the section to physically unlock the seat.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the event information further comprises calendar data including one or more of a day of the week of the future event, a time of the future event, and a schedule of events related to the future event.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the machine-learned model predicts an attendance for each section of the venue, the method further comprising:

identifying, for each section of the venue, a number of tickets greater than a capacity of the section to make available based on the predicted attendance for the section.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

in response to more attendees arriving than available seats at the future event, sending, to one or more client devices associated with attendees, incentives to release tickets for the future event.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein each ticket specifies a section of the venue, the method further comprising:

in response to detecting, via a client device of an attendee with a ticket, a presence of the attendee at the venue, sending, to the client device, a seat assignment in the section associated the ticket.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the venue comprises one or more of: a theater, a concert hall, a court, a field, and a stadium.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the event type comprises one or more of: a sporting event, a visual show, an auditory show, a conference, a concert, a meeting, a movie, a musical, a play, a talk, and a talk show.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the identified number of tickets is greater for a first predicted attendance than for a second predicted attendance greater than the first predicted attendance.

9. A system comprising:

a hardware processor; and

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by the hardware processor, cause the hardware processor to perform steps comprising:

applying a machine-learned model to event information for a future event of an event type associated with a historical attendance, the machine-learned model configured to generate a predicted attendance for the future event;

identifying a number of tickets greater than a capacity of a venue of the future event based on the predicted attendance;

distributing, via a ticket exchange server, up to the identified number of tickets to prospective attendees of the future event, the distributed tickets identifying a section of the venue but not identifying a specific seat within the venue; and

in response to receiving a location of a mobile device including a distributed ticket captured by a GPS receiver of the mobile device indicating that the mobile device is located at the section identified by the distributed ticket within the venue, assigning, via the ticket exchange server, a seat within the section to the distributed ticket, and detecting a near-field signal transmitted by the mobile device identifying the distributed ticket to the seat within the section to physically unlock the seat.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the event information further comprises calendar data including one or more of a day of the week of the future event, a time of the future event, and a schedule of events related to the future event.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the machine-learned model predicts an attendance for each section of the venue, and wherein the instructions cause the hardware processor to perform further steps comprising:

identifying, for each section of the venue, a number of tickets greater than a capacity of the section to make available based on the predicted attendance for the section.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the instructions cause the hardware processor to perform further steps comprising:

in response to more attendees arriving than available seats at the future event, sending, to one or more client devices associated with attendees, incentives to release tickets for the future event.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein each ticket specifies a section of the venue, and wherein the instructions cause the hardware processor to perform further steps comprising:

in response to detecting, via a client device of an attendee with a ticket, a presence of the attendee at the venue, sending, to the client device, a seat assignment in the section associated the ticket.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the venue comprises one or more of: a theater, a concert hall, a court, a field, and a stadium.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the event type comprises one or more of: a sporting event, a visual show, an auditory show, a conference, a concert, a meeting, a movie, a musical, a play, a talk, and a talk show.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the identified number of tickets is greater for a first predicted attendance than for a second predicted attendance greater than the first predicted attendance.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing executable instructions that, when executed by a hardware processor, cause the hardware processor to perform steps comprising:

applying a machine-learned model to event information for a future event of an event type associated with a historical attendance, the machine-learned model configured to generate a predicted attendance for the future event;

identifying a number of tickets greater than a capacity of a venue of the future event based on the predicted attendance;

distributing, via a ticket exchange server, up to the identified number of tickets to prospective attendees of the future event, the distributed tickets identifying a section of the venue but not identifying a specific seat within the venue; and

in response to receiving a location of a mobile device including a distributed ticket captured by a GPS receiver of the mobile device indicating that the mobile device is located at the section identified by the distributed ticket within the venue, assigning, via the ticket exchange server, a seat within the section to the distributed ticket, and detecting a near-field signal transmitted by the mobile device identifying the distributed ticket to the seat within the section to physically unlock the seat.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the event information further comprises calendar data including one or more of a day of the week of the future event, a time of the future event, and a schedule of events related to the future event.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the venue comprises one or more of: a theater, a concert hall, a court, a field, and a stadium.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the event type comprises one or more of: a sporting event, a visual show, an auditory show, a conference, a concert, a meeting, a movie, a musical, a play, a talk, and a talk show.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2026
From: JUMP PLATFORMS, INC.
To: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC
Reel/Frame 075510/0131 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2023
From: LORE, MARC ERIC
To: UPTIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 064101/0339 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2023
From: UPTIX, INC.
To: JUMP PLATFORMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 064206/0225 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17892133 · Aug 22, 2022
Continuation 17109098 · Dec 1, 2020
Related Publication 20230342800A1 · Oct 26, 2023
References Cited (37)
US 7386517B1 · Donner · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 10366373B1 · Denker et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10650331B1 · Mossoba et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20070055554A1 · Sussman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070124259A1 · Sussman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070162301A1 · Sussman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20110208674A1 · Mills et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130185103A1 · Sunshine et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140089015A1 · Stefik et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140129266A1 · Perl et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244320A1 · Matsui et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140344294A1 · Skeen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150012306A1 · Butterfield · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150154571A1 · Zamer · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150227969A1 · Hanly · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160029165A1 · Block · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160042364A1 · Zamer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170109662A1 · Sunshine · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170372551A1 · Bruce et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180025373A1 · Perriman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180322551A1 · Siegel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190012862A1 · Bruce · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200272952A1 · Shealy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200273055A1 · Smith · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200380572A1 · Smith · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2019221737A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2021/060936, Feb. 18, 2022, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mukhopadhaya, S. et al., “An efficient auction based TATKAL scheme for Indian Railway,” 2010 International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communication and 2010 Asia-Pacific Conference on Information Technology … [cited by applicant]
Sinnott, R.O., et al., “Estimating crowd sizes through social media,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2016, pp. 1-6, doi:… [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/109,089, filed Jan. 13, 2023, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/109,098, filed Apr. 18, 2022, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/109,098, filed Oct. 5, 2021, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/109,102, filed Jun. 3, 2022, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/109,102, filed Mar. 2, 2022, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/109,089, filed Jul. 24, 2023, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/109,102, filed Sep. 12, 2022, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report and Opinion, EP Patent Application No. 21901277.0, Oct. 18, 2024, nine pages. [cited by applicant]