IP Library Granted Patent US 12,589,769
Granted Patent B2
US 12,589,769 · App. 18/219,916 · Granted Mar 31, 2026

Motion sickness mitigation

Inventors: John D. Harkleroad (Ypsilanti, MI); Vasudeva S. Murthy (Ann Arbor, MI)
Assignees: Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
B60W60/0013A61B5/05A61B5/1114A61B5/6893B60H1/00742B60N2/0278B60J3/04B60W2420/408B60W2540/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,589,769
App. No.
18/219,916
Granted
Mar 31, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, and other embodiments described herein relate to detecting whether a user in a vehicle is experiencing motion sickness. In one embodiment, a method includes determining whether a user in a vehicle is experiencing motion sickness based on a first movement measurement of the vehicle and a second movement measurement of a head of the user using a radar sensor and in response to determining whether the user is experiencing motion sickness, activating mitigation control.

Claims (68)

1 . A method comprising:

determining whether a user in a vehicle is experiencing motion sickness based on at least a phasal difference between a first movement measurement of the vehicle and a second movement measurement of a head of the user using a radar sensor;

in response to determining whether the user is experiencing motion sickness, activating mitigation control;

determining whether a second user in the vehicle is experiencing motion sickness based on the first movement measurement and a third movement measurement of a head of the second user using a second radar;

determining which of the user or the second user is experiencing more severe motion sickness; and

generating a drop off schedule based on which of the user or the second user is experiencing more severe motion sickness.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first movement measurement and the second movement measurement are based on one or more of:

a movement measurement;

a velocity measurement; or

an acceleration measurement.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first movement measurement and the second movement measurement are triaxial.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the radar sensor is multiple input, multiple output millimeter wave radar.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a motion sickness sensitivity score from the user; and

wherein determining whether the user is experiencing motion sickness is further based on the motion sickness sensitivity score.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the mitigation control includes at least one of:

adjusting a vehicle cabin temperature;

adjusting a vehicle seat recline angle;

opening a vehicle window;

adjusting a window tint;

activating a seat ventilation system; or

adjusting vehicle driving style.

7 . A system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory storing machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

determine whether a user in a vehicle is experiencing motion sickness based on at least a phasal difference between a first movement measurement of the vehicle and a second movement measurement of a head of the user using a radar sensor;

in response to determining whether the user is experiencing motion sickness, activate mitigation control;

determine whether a second user in the vehicle is experiencing motion sickness based on the first movement measurement and a third movement measurement of a head of the second user using a second radar;

determine which of the user or the second user is experiencing more severe motion sickness; and

generate a drop off schedule based on which of the user or the second user is experiencing more severe motion sickness.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the first movement measurement and the second movement measurement are based on one or more of:

a movement measurement;

a velocity measurement; or

an acceleration measurement.

9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the first movement measurement and the second movement measurement are triaxial.

10 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the radar sensor is multiple input, multiple output millimeter wave radar.

11 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the machine-readable instructions further include instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to:

receive a motion sickness sensitivity score from the user; and

determine whether the user is experiencing motion sickness further based on the motion sickness sensitivity score.

12 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the mitigation control includes at least one of:

adjusting a vehicle cabin temperature;

adjusting a vehicle seat recline angle;

opening a vehicle window;

adjusting a window tint;

activating a seat ventilation system; or

adjusting vehicle driving style.

13 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium including instructions that when executed by a processor cause the processor to:

determine whether a user in a vehicle is experiencing motion sickness based on at least a phasal difference between a first movement measurement of the vehicle and a second movement measurement of a head of the user using a radar sensor;

in response to determining whether the user is experiencing motion sickness, activate mitigation control;

determine whether a second user in the vehicle is experiencing motion sickness based on the first movement measurement and a third movement measurement of a head of the second user using a second radar;

determine which of the user or the second user is experiencing more severe motion sickness; and

generate a drop off schedule based on which of the user or the second user is experiencing more severe motion sickness.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the first movement measurement and the second movement measurement are based on one or more of:

a movement measurement;

a velocity measurement; or

an acceleration measurement.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the first movement measurement and the second movement measurement are triaxial.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the radar sensor is multiple input, multiple output millimeter wave radar.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the instructions further include instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to:

receive a motion sickness sensitivity score from the user; and

determine whether the user is experiencing motion sickness further based on the motion sickness sensitivity score.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the mitigation control includes at least one of:

adjusting a vehicle cabin temperature;

adjusting a vehicle seat recline angle;

opening a vehicle window;

adjusting a window tint;

activating a seat ventilation system; or

adjusting vehicle driving style.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2026
From: TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
To: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 074740/0573 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2023
From: HARKLEROAD, JOHN D.; MURTHY, VASUDEVA S.
To: TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 064297/0825 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250018979A1 · Jan 16, 2025
References Cited (23)
US 9868332B2 · Anderson · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10107635B2 · Larner · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10942037B1 · Larner · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11529090B2 · Bulut et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11541797B2 · Dhaens · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11585670B2 · Larner · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20170136842A1 · Anderson · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180052000A1 · Larner · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190022347A1 · Wan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190204909A1 · Xiao · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200114929A1 · Wan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200337623A1 · Bulut · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200383580A1 · Shouldice · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200385025A1 · Nishimura · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220001893A1 · Tartz · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220001894A1 · Yeom · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220135054A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220297577A1 · Amereller et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230305578A1 · Melin · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230339378A1 · Takamatsu · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240253414A1 · Giovanardi · 2024 [cited by examiner]
D. Bresnahan and Y. Li, “Driver Head Motion Monitoring Using a mm-Wave FMCW Radar,” 2021 IEEE Texas Symposium on Wireless and Microwave Circuits and Systems (WMCS), Waco, TX, USA, 2021, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/WMCS52222.2… [cited by examiner]
M. Nosrati, S. Shahsavari, S. Lee, H. Wang and N. Tavassolian, “A Concurrent Dual-Beam Phased-Array Doppler Radar Using MIMO Beamforming Techniques for Short-Range Vital-Signs Monitoring,” in IEEE Transactions on Antenn… [cited by examiner]