IP Library Granted Patent US 12,243,083
Granted Patent B2
US 12,243,083 · App. 18/238,963 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Supply chain finance system

Inventor: David W. Quillian (Atlanta, GA)
Assignee: PrimeRevenue, Inc.
G06Q30/06G06Q40/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,243,083
App. No.
18/238,963
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In an electronic supply chain finance system, a method of enabling a supplier to obtain funds includes receiving information from a buyer defining a payment obligation, receiving an offer to sell the payment obligation, and creating an electronic negotiable instrument on behalf of the buyer as obligor, to the supplier as payee, having a payable date based on a maturity date of the payment obligation and a payment value based on a payment amount of the payment obligation.

Claims (66)

1. A method of operating an electronic supply chain finance system, where the system has a non-transitory computer-readable medium containing program instructions and a processor in operative communication with the non-transitory computer-readable medium to execute the program instructions to implement the method, utilized by a buyer, a supplier that provides at least one of goods and services to the buyer and a financial institution, each of which accesses the system through a computer network interface, comprising multiple performances of the steps of:

receiving information from the buyer via an encrypted transmission defining a payment obligation from the buyer to the supplier;

presenting the payment obligation to the supplier;

receiving from the supplier an offer to sell the payment obligation;

presenting the offer to a first financial institution;

receiving an acceptance of the offer from the first financial institution;

creating a first electronic record that stores

a payment value based on a payment amount of the payment obligation and

an identifier;

storing the first electronic record in a memory device,

wherein each said performance, being for a respective said payment obligation, respective said supplier, respective said buyer, and respective said first financial institution, comprises a respective set of steps of receiving information, presenting the payment obligation, receiving an offer to sell, presenting the offer, receiving an acceptance, creating a respective said first electronic record, and storing the first electronic record, and

wherein each said identifier is unique among said identifiers stored in a plurality of said first electronic records created by the multiple performances of the creating step;

applying a verification mechanism to the first electronic record to verify stored data in the first electronic record is unaltered since creating the first electronic record; and

controlling access by the parties to the plurality of first electronic records so that said access is to the plurality of first electronic records and so that, upon said access, each of the first electronic records of the plurality of first electronic records is verified as unaltered since its creation at the creating step with the verification mechanism.

2. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the first electronic record created at the creating step includes a payable date that is a maturity date of the payment obligation.

3. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, upon receipt of the information from the buyer defining the payment obligation, the payment obligation is irrevocable by the buyer.

4. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the offer to sell has a discounted value and a payment date earlier than a maturity date of the payment obligation.

5. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the negotiable instrument is a time draft, on behalf of the buyer as drawer, to the supplier as payee, and drawn on an account owned or controlled by the buyer.

6. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the method comprises the step of, after creation of the negotiable instrument and receipt of the acceptance, transferring to the supplier an amount of funds determined by terms of the offer.

7. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, applying the verification mechanism comprises associating the negotiable instrument with an encrypted unique identifier.

8. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation defined by the information received at the first receiving step corresponds to a transaction in which the supplier provides the at least one of goods and services to the buyer, and

the negotiable instrument substitutes for and extinguishes all other obligations of the buyer to pay the supplier for the at least one of goods and services from the transaction.

9. The method as in claim 8 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the method comprises, upon receipt of the acceptance and receipt of indorsement of the negotiable instrument, effecting transfer to the supplier from the first financial institution of an amount of funds determined by terms of the offer.

10. The method as in claim 8 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the payment obligation comprises an account payable from the buyer to the supplier.

11. The method as in claim 8 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation arises upon receipt of the information from the buyer, and

pursuant to agreement by the buyer the payment obligation is irrevocable by the buyer.

12. The method as in claim 1 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation defined by the information received at the first receiving step corresponds to a transaction in which the supplier provides the at least one of goods and services to the buyer, and

the method further comprises, upon indorsement of the negotiable instrument, effecting transfer to the supplier from the first financial institution of an amount of funds determined by terms of the offer.

13. The method as in claim 12 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation arises upon receipt of the information from the buyer, and

pursuant to agreement by the buyer the payment obligation is irrevocable by the buyer.

14. A method of operating an electronic supply chain finance system, where the system has a non-transitory computer-readable medium containing program instructions and a processor in operative communication with the non-transitory computer-readable medium to execute the program instructions to implement the method, utilized by a buyer, a supplier that provides at least one of goods and services to the buyer and a financial institution, each of which accesses the system through a computer network interface, comprising multiple performances of the steps of:

receiving information from the buyer via an encrypted transmission defining a payment obligation from the buyer to the supplier;

presenting the payment obligation to the supplier;

receiving from the supplier an offer to sell the payment obligation;

presenting the offer to a first financial institution;

receiving an acceptance of the offer from the first financial institution;

creating a first electronic record that stores

a payment value based on a payment amount of the payment obligation and

an identifier;

applying a function to data of the first electronic record that produces output data that varies with variations in the first electronic record data to verify stored data in the first electronic record is unaltered since creating the first electronic record, and storing the output data separately from the first electronic record in memory,

wherein each said performance, being for a respective said payment obligation, respective said supplier, respective said buyer, and respective said first financial institution, comprises a respective set of steps of receiving information, presenting the payment obligation, receiving an offer to sell, presenting the offer, receiving an acceptance, creating a respective said first electronic record, and storing the output data separately, and

wherein each said identifier is unique among said identifiers stored in a plurality of said first electronic records created by the multiple performances of the creating step; and

controlling access by the parties to the plurality of first electronic records so that said access is to the plurality of first electronic records and so that, upon said access, each of the first electronic records of the plurality of first electronic records is verified as unaltered since its creation at the creating step with the applied function to data of the first electronic record.

15. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the first electronic record created at the creating step includes a payable date that is a maturity date of the payment obligation.

16. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, upon receipt of the information from the buyer defining the payment obligation, the payment obligation is irrevocable by the buyer.

17. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the offer to sell has a discounted value and a payment date earlier than a maturity date of the payment obligation.

18. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the negotiable instrument is a time draft, on behalf of the buyer as drawer, to the supplier as payee, and drawn on an account owned or controlled by the buyer.

19. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the method comprises the step of, after creation of the negotiable instrument and receipt of the acceptance, transferring to the supplier an amount of funds determined by terms of the offer.

20. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the negotiable instrument creating step comprises associating the negotiable instrument with an encrypted unique identifier.

21. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation defined by the information received at the first receiving step corresponds to a transaction in which the supplier provides the at least one of goods and services to the buyer, and

the negotiable instrument substitutes for and extinguishes all other obligations of the buyer to pay the supplier for the at least one of goods and services from the transaction.

22. The method as in claim 21 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the method comprises, upon receipt of the acceptance and receipt of indorsement of the negotiable instrument, effecting transfer to the supplier from the first financial institution of an amount of funds determined by terms of the offer.

23. The method as in claim 21 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances, the payment obligation comprises an account payable from the buyer to the supplier.

24. The method as in claim 21 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation arises upon receipt of the information from the buyer, and

pursuant to agreement by the buyer the payment obligation is irrevocable by the buyer.

25. The method as in claim 14 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation defined by the information received at the first receiving step corresponds to a transaction in which the supplier provides the at least one of goods and services to the buyer, and

the method further comprises, upon indorsement of the negotiable instrument, effecting transfer to the supplier from the first financial institution of an amount of funds determined by terms of the offer.

26. The method as in claim 25 , wherein for each performance of the multiple performances,

the payment obligation arises upon receipt of the information from the buyer, and pursuant to agreement by the buyer the payment obligation is irrevocable by the buyer.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2026
From: PRIMEREVENUE, INC.
To: FIFTH THIRD BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 075008/0938 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2024
From: QUILLIAN, DAVID W.
To: PRIMEREVENUE, INC.
Reel/Frame 066170/0265 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17967494 · Oct 17, 2022
Continuation 16820485 · Mar 16, 2020
Continuation 13283401 · Oct 27, 2011
Continuation 13112955 · May 20, 2011
Provisional Application 61347066 · May 21, 2010
Related Publication 20230410165A1 · Dec 21, 2023
References Cited (190)
US 4713761A · Sharpe et al. · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4799156A · Shavit et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5025372A · Burton et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5433483A · Yu · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5465206A · Hilt et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5550734A · Tarter et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5677955A · Doggett et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5694552A · Aharoni · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 5717989A · Tozzoli et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5757917A · Rose et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5794207A · Walker et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5802497A · Manasse · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5818343A · Sobel et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5825881A · Colvin, Sr. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5890137A · Koreeda · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5910896A · Hahn-Carlson · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5933817A · Hucal · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5950174A · Brendzel · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5970475A · Barnes et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5978780A · Watson · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6029150A · Kravitz · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6052674A · Zervides et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6081790A · Rosen · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6167378A · Webber, Jr. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6167385A · Hartley-Urquhart · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6212504B1 · Hayosh · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6772342B1 · Hawthorne · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6934692B1 · Duncan · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7047219B1 · Martin et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7069234B1 · Cornelius et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7082412B1 · Treider et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7149720B2 · Shepherd · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7155409B1 · Stroh · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7165174B1 · Ginter et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7266525B1 · Duncan · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7340433B1 · Kay et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7363270B2 · Iversen · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7430537B2 · Templeton et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7505945B2 · Landrock · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7716130B2 · Duncan · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7720755B1 · Coyle · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7725372B2 · Hahn-Carlson · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7765161B2 · McKenney et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7996314B1 · Smith et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8296204B2 · Templeton et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8370259B2 · Templeton et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8396790B2 · Zafrir · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8417637B2 · Templeton et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9224143B2 · Potts et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10592943B2 · Quillian · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11475492B2 · Quillian · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11741513B2 · Quillian · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20010016838A1 · Landrock · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20010029482A1 · Tealdi et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20010051919A1 · Mason · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020004772A1 · Templeton et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020062258A1 · Bailey et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020116332A1 · Sanchez · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020169708A1 · Chittenden · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030014318A1 · De La Motte et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030018563A1 · Kilgour et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030046229A1 · Cresswell · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030061082A1 · Stoutenburg et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030183685A1 · Steele Moore et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030220863A1 · Holm et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030225694A1 · Algiene · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030225708A1 · Park · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040044620A1 · Iversen · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040049445A1 · Kishore · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040083181A1 · Briley et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040093493A1 · Bisbee et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040111619A1 · Laurie et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050131780A1 · Princen · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050131785A1 · Yap · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050187835A1 · Stoutenburg et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050283437A1 · McRae et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060080111A1 · Homeier-Beals · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060089890A1 · Campbell · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060095358A1 · Viarengo et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060095367A1 · Iverson · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060095374A1 · Lo et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060122933A1 · Browning et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060149668A1 · Zafrir · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070061260A1 · deGroeve et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070100711A1 · Stroh · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070130063A1 · Jindia et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070143230A1 · Narainsamy et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070156584A1 · Barnes · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070174191A1 · Keaton et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070271182A1 · Prakash et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070282744A1 · Barnes et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080133940A1 · Laurie et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080162304A1 · Ourega · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080172314A1 · Hahn-Carlson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080219543A1 · Csulits et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080247629A1 · Gilder et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080249931A1 · Gilder et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080262953A1 · Anderson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080262954A1 · Nally · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080312998A1 · Templeton et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090010427A1 · Meadow et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090132404A1 · King et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100004953A1 · Pelenur et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100049650A1 · Keaton et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070324A1 · Bock et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100161466A1 · Gilder · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100260408A1 · Prakash et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110066529A1 · Larsen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110066564A1 · Larsen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120011071A1 · Pennock et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120054103A1 · Templeton et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120054104A1 · Templeton et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120109823A1 · Templeton et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120116972A1 · Walker · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120185375A1 · Tealdi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130246261A1 · Purves et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130311399A1 · Tilton · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140074701A1 · Kingston et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140289113A1 · Decristoforo · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150019944A1 · Kalgi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150154588A1 · Purves et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150178693A1 · Solis · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150220914A1 · Purves et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170011464A1 · Puma · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200279242A1 · Dahn et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 1184546A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
EP 0858057A2 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
EP 0910028A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
GB 1199308A · 1970 [cited by applicant]
JP H11149503A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 9011572A1 · 1990 [cited by applicant]
WO 9109370A1 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
WO 9716798A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 9814921A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 9828699A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 9903243A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 9910850A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 9915999A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 9966460A2 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 0022561A3 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 0067167A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
Jane Kaufman Winn, What is a Transferable Record and Who Cares?, 7 B. U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 203 (2001). (Year: 2001). [cited by examiner]
Bregman, Robert L., “A Note on Optimal Order Quantities for Credit Purchases,” International Journal of Production Economics, 28, May 8, 1992, pp. 203-210. [cited by applicant]
Emmanuel T. Laryea, Payment for Paperless Trade: Are There Viable Alternatives to the Documentary Credit, 33 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 3 (2001). (Year: 2001). [cited by applicant]
FactorWorks 2.0 Checkpoint Document, FactorWorks Inc., pp. 1-64. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action dated May 26, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Jul. 14, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Mar. 15, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Jun. 24, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Mar. 7, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Haight, Timothy, “The Enemy Is Us,” Network Computing, May 1, 1993, Issue: 405. [cited by applicant]
Herzberg, Amir and Yochai, Hilik, “MiniPay: Charging Per Click on the Web,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 29, 1997, pp. 939-951. [cited by applicant]
Hill, Ned C. and Michael J. Swenson, “The Impact of EDI on Credit and Sales,” Business Credit, Jan. 1, 1995, vol. 97, No. 1. [cited by applicant]
Information Disclosure Statement for U.S. Appl. No. 09/947,062 dated Jun. 4, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Information Disclosure Statement for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Nov. 15, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Information Disclosure Statement for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Aug. 18, 2010. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US13/20480, dated Mar. 18, 2013. [cited by applicant]
J Christopher Westland; Theordore H. Clark, “Electronic Financial Markets,” in Global Electronic Commerce: Theory and Case Studies , MIT Press, 1999, pp. 385-444 (E Market) (1999). [cited by applicant]
J. H. Chen and W. H. Chen, “Factoring Account Receivables Towards Mitigating Cash Flow Fluctuation for Construction Projects,” 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Beijing, China, 2008, pp. 5538-5542 (2… [cited by applicant]
Kosiur, David R. “Chapter 3 Handling Money on the Net.” Understanding Electronic Commerce. Redmond, WA: Microsoft, 1997. 35-63. [cited by applicant]
M. Sirbu, “Credits and debits on the Internet,” in IEEE Spectrum, vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 23-29 (Feb. 1997). [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Apr. 3, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Oct. 29, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Jul. 23, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Oct. 9, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/036,877. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/134,071. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Petersen, Mitchell A. and Rajan Raghuram G. , “Trade Credit: Theories and Evidence,” The Review of Financial Studies, Fall 1997, pp. 661-691, vol. 10, No. 3. [cited by applicant]
Response to Final Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Response to Final Office Action dated May 26, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Mar. 15, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Response to Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Mar. 7, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/036,877. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2021, for U.S. Appl. No. 17/134,071. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/734,856. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Apr. 3, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/561,837 dated Oct. 29, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Jul. 23, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/756,484 dated Oct. 9, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Sirbu, M., NetBill: An Internet Commerce System Optimized for Network-Delivered Services, IEEE Personal Communications, Aug. 1995, pp. 34-39. [cited by applicant]
The Inside Story—In-House Banking, Mar. 11, 1994 Banking Technology BNKTC, 2010 Factivia Inc., pp. 5-7. [cited by applicant]
Time draft; Internet Archive(https://web.archive.org/web/20080216022843/http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/time-draft.html) Feb. 16, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Uniform Commercial Code, Article 3—Negotiable Instruments (2002), Part 1. General Provisions and Definitions, http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104 , Nov. 17, 2016, pp. 1-3. [cited by applicant]
Zaretsky, B., Contract Liability of Parties to Negotiable Instruments, Alabama Law Review, pp. 626-677. [cited by applicant]