IP Library Granted Patent US 12,239,847
Granted Patent B2
US 12,239,847 · App. 18/243,703 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Hybrid trajectory and beam angle optimization for external beam radiation therapy

Inventor: Santtu Ollila (Helsinki, FI)
Assignee: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
A61N5/1031A61N5/103A61N5/1037A61N5/1039A61N5/1045A61N5/1081G06T7/0012A61N2005/1034G06T2207/20072G06T2207/30004G06T2207/30241
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,239,847
App. No.
18/243,703
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of determining treatment geometries for a radiotherapy treatment includes providing a patient model having one or more regions of interest (ROIs); defining a delivery coordinate space (DCS); for each beam's eye view (BEV) plane of each vertex in the DCS, and for each ROI, evaluating a dose of the ROI using transport solutions; evaluating a BEV scores of each pixel of the BEV plane using the doses of the one or more ROIs; determining one or more BEV regions in the BEV plane based on the BEV scores; determining a BEV region connectivity manifold based on the BEV regions; determining a set of treatment trajectories based on the BEV region connectivity manifold; and determining one or more IMRT fields. Each treatment trajectory defines a path through a set of vertices in the DCS. Each IMRT field defines a direction of incidence corresponding to a vertex in the DCS.

Claims (47)

1. A method of determining treatment geometries for a radiotherapy treatment, the method comprising:

providing a patient model including one or more regions of interest (ROIs) for the radiotherapy treatment;

defining a delivery coordinate space (DCS) having a set of candidate vertices, each respective candidate vertex defining a respective beam's eye view (BEV) plane;

identifying a first energy mode and a second energy mode for the radiotherapy treatment;

for the first energy mode:

determining a first BEV region connectivity manifold by evaluating doses of the one or more ROIs for each respective BEV plane corresponding to each respective candidate vertex of the DCS using transport solutions for the first energy mode;

for the second energy mode:

determining a second BEV region connectivity manifold by evaluating doses of the one or more ROIs for each respective BEV plane corresponding to each respective candidate vertex of the DCS using transport solutions for the second energy mode;

determining a set of optimal treatment trajectories based on the first BEV region connectivity manifold and the second BEV region connectivity manifold; and

determining a set of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields, each respective IMRT field of the set of IMRT fields corresponding to a respective vertex in the delivery coordinate space.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective vertex of each respective IMRT field is on one of the set of optimal treatment trajectories.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the set of optimal treatment trajectories includes at least a first optimal treatment trajectory that corresponds to the first energy mode, and at least a second optimal treatment trajectory that corresponds to the second energy mode.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein each respective IMRT field of the set of IMRT fields corresponds to the first energy mode if the respective vertex of the respective IMRT field is on the first optimal treatment trajectory, or the second energy mode if the respective vertex is on the second optimal treatment trajectory.

5. A system for determining treatment geometries for a radiotherapy treatment, the system comprising a processor configured to:

receive or generate a patient model including one or more regions of interest (ROIs) for the radiotherapy treatment;

define a delivery coordinate space (DCS) having a set of candidate vertices, each respective candidate vertex defining a respective beam's eye view (BEV) plane;

identify a first energy mode and a second energy mode for the radiotherapy treatment;

determine a first BEV region connectivity manifold for the first energy mode;

determine a second BEV region connectivity manifold for the second energy mode;

determine a set of optimal treatment trajectories based on the first BEV region connectivity manifold and the second BEV region connectivity manifold; and

determine a set of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields, each respective IMRT field of the set of IMRT fields corresponding to a respective vertex in a delivery coordinate space.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

evaluate doses of the one or more ROIs for each respective BEV plane corresponding to each respective candidate vertex of the DCS using transport solutions for the first energy mode; and

determine the first BEV region connectivity manifold based on the evaluation.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

evaluate doses of the one or more ROIs for each respective BEV plane corresponding to each respective candidate vertex of the DCS using transport solutions for the second energy mode; and

determine the second BEV region connectivity manifold based on the evaluation.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the respective vertex of each respective IMRT field is on one of the set of optimal treatment trajectories.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the set of optimal treatment trajectories includes at least a first optimal treatment trajectory that corresponds to the first energy mode, and at least a second optimal treatment trajectory that corresponds to the second energy mode.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein each respective IMRT field of the set of IMRT fields corresponds to the first energy mode if the respective vertex of the respective IMRT field is on the first optimal treatment trajectory, or the second energy mode if the respective vertex is on the second optimal treatment trajectory.

11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium upon which is embodied a sequence of programmed instructions which when executed by a computer processing system causes the computer processing system to determine treatment geometries for a radiotherapy treatment by:

receiving or generating a patient model including one or more regions of interest (ROIs) for the radiotherapy treatment;

defining a delivery coordinate space (DCS) having a set of candidate vertices, each respective candidate vertex defining a respective beam's eye view (BEV) plane;

identifying a first energy mode and a second energy mode for the radiotherapy treatment;

determining a first BEV region connectivity manifold for the first energy mode;

determining a second BEV region connectivity manifold for the second energy mode;

determining a set of optimal treatment trajectories based on the first BEV region connectivity manifold and the second BEV region connectivity manifold; and

determining a set of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields, each respective IMRT field of the set of IMRT fields corresponding to a respective vertex in a delivery coordinate space.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , further causing the computer processing system to:

evaluate doses of the one or more ROIs for each respective BEV plane corresponding to each respective candidate vertex of the DCS using transport solutions for the first energy mode; and

determine the first BEV region connectivity manifold based on the evaluation.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 12 , further causing the computer processing system to:

evaluate doses of the one or more ROIs for each respective BEV plane corresponding to each respective candidate vertex of the DCS using transport solutions for the second energy mode; and

determine the second BEV region connectivity manifold based on the evaluation.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein the respective vertex of each respective IMRT field is on one of the set of optimal treatment trajectories.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the set of optimal treatment trajectories includes at least a first optimal treatment trajectory that corresponds to the first energy mode, and at least a second optimal treatment trajectory that corresponds to the second energy mode.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein each respective IMRT field of the set of IMRT fields corresponds to the first energy mode if the respective vertex of the respective IMRT field is on the first optimal treatment trajectory, or the second energy mode if the respective vertex is on the second optimal treatment trajectory.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 27, 2023
From: OLLILA, SANTTU
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 065370/0241 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 27, 2023
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 065382/0543 →
Continuity (4)
Division 17870286 · Jul 21, 2022
Division 16586666 · Sep 27, 2019
Provisional Application 62738741 · Sep 28, 2018
Related Publication 20240001146A1 · Jan 4, 2024
References Cited (32)
US 20020051513A1 · Pugachev et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20080004845A1 · Failla et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20170189717A1 · MacDonald et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170354832A1 · Bush et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180078785A1 · Ollila et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180078789A1 · Ollila et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180099151A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190015060A1 · Weiss · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200101320A1 · Locke et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200101322A1 · Ollila et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200101323A1 · Ollila · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200101325A1 · Ollila et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 107206253A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107666940A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011053802A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011153639A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016116868A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016188754A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017152286A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018083072A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018137772A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Hilbig et al., “Design of an inverse planning system for radiotherapy using linear optimization”, Med. Phys. vol. 12, No. 2, 2002. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2019/053623, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, mailed Apr. 9, 2020, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US2019/053623, “Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee”, mailed Jan. 22, 2020, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-final Office Action issued Nov. 18, 2022, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,661. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action issued Jun. 13, 2022, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,661. [cited by applicant]
Non-final Office Action issued Jan. 28, 2022, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,661. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued Sep. 15, 2022, in Chinese Patent Application No. 201980063700.6. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued May 27, 2024, in European Patent Application No. 19790941.9. [cited by applicant]
Locke et al., “Trajectory Optimization in Radiotherapy Using Sectioning (TORUS)”, Dept. of Rad. Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, doi:10.1002/mp.12270, Stanford, CA, Apr. 4, 2017. [cited by applicant]
McGhee et al., “AcurosXB Technical Manual”, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, Apr. 23, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Locke et al., “Beam angle optimization for breast radiotherapy using TORUS”, Sep. 4, 2018. [cited by applicant]