IP Library Granted Patent US 12,546,590
Granted Patent B2
US 12,546,590 · App. 18/248,804 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Systems and methods for determining a length and/or a diameter of a conduit

Inventors: Graeme Alexander Lyon (Dublin, IE); Roxana Tiron (Dublin, IE); Niall Andrew Fox (Dublin, IE); Redmond Shouldice (Dublin, IE); Stephen McMahon (Dublin, IE)
Assignee: ResMed Sensor Technologies Limited
G01B17/00A61M16/0003A61M16/024A61M16/0622A61M16/08A61B5/6803A61M16/0605A61M2205/3327A61M2205/3331A61M2205/3375A61M2205/6018
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,546,590
App. No.
18/248,804
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes generating acoustic data representative of at least one or more reflections of an acoustic signal. The one or more reflections are indicative of a length and/or a diameter of a conduit coupled to a respiratory therapy device. The method further includes analyzing the acoustic data to determine the length and/or diameter of the conduit. In some cases, analyzing the acoustic data includes determining a resonant frequency of the conduit, and determining the length of the conduit based at least in part on the resonant frequency. In some cases, analyzing the acoustic data includes comparing the acoustic data to predetermined sets of acoustic data that each correspond to a known length and/or diameter of the conduit, and selecting one of the predetermined sets of acoustic data that best matches the generated acoustic data. The selected set of acoustic data corresponds to the length and/or diameter of the conduit.

Claims (59)

1 . A method comprising:

generating acoustic data representative of at least one or more reflections of an acoustic signal in a conduit coupled to a respiratory therapy device, the one or more reflections being indicative of a length of the conduit, a diameter of the conduit, or both the length and the diameter of the conduit; and

analyzing the acoustic data to determine the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit, the analyzing including:

producing a frequency intensity signal from the acoustic data, the frequency intensity signal representing an intensity of the one or more reflections of the acoustic signal across a frequency band;

selecting a portion of the frequency intensity signal expected to include the resonant frequency of the conduit;

calculating a transform of the selected portion of the frequency intensity signal to generate a wave period intensity signal;

extracting a resonant frequency of the conduit from the wave period intensity signal; and

determining the length of the conduit based at least in part on the resonant frequency of the conduit.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the acoustic data to determine the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit includes:

comparing at least a portion of the acoustic data to one or more predetermined sets of acoustic data, each of the one or more predetermined sets of acoustic data corresponding to (i) a conduit having a known length, (ii) a conduit having a known diameter, or (iii) both (i) and (ii); and

selecting one of the one or more predetermined sets of acoustic data that matches the portion of the acoustic data, the selected predetermined set of acoustic data corresponding to the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the acoustic data to determine the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit includes:

comparing the frequency-domain intensity signal to one or more predetermined frequency intensity signals, each of the one or more predetermined frequency intensity signals corresponding to (i) a conduit having a known length, (ii) a conduit having a known diameter, or (iii) both (i) and (ii); and

selecting one of the one or more predetermined frequency signals that matches the frequency intensity signal, the selected predetermined frequency intensity signal corresponding to the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the acoustic data to determine the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit includes:

generating a cepstrum from the acoustic data;

comparing the generated cepstrum to one or more predetermined cepstrums, each of the one or more predetermined cepstrums corresponding to (i) a conduit having a known length, (ii) a conduit having a known diameter, or (iii) both (i) and (ii); and

selecting one of the one or more predetermined cepstrums that matches the generated cepstrum, the selected predetermined cepstrum corresponding to the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the acoustic data further includes:

calculating a log of the frequency intensity signal prior to the selecting the portion of the frequency intensity signal that is expected to include the resonant frequency of the conduit;

performing pre-processing on the acoustic data prior to determining the resonant frequency, the pre-processing including (i) de-trending, (ii) spectral windowing, or (iii) both (i) and (ii).

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the portion of the frequency intensity signal expected to include the resonant frequency of the conduit is based at least in part on a speed of sound, a sampling rate of the acoustic data, predetermined conduit length ranges, predetermined conduit diameter ranges, or any combination thereof.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the length of the conduit is proportional to the resonant frequency of the conduit.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating an initial characterization of a user interface coupled to the conduit, an initial categorization of the user interface, or both, based at least in part on the acoustic data; and

generating an updated characterization of the user interface, an updated categorization of the user interface, or both, based at least in part on (i) the initial characterization of the user interface, the initial categorization of the user interface, or both, and (ii) the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein generating the initial characterization of the user interface, the initial categorization of the user interface, or both, includes calculating a cepstrum of the generated acoustic data.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein generating the updated characterization of the user interface, the updated categorization of the user interface, or both, includes adjusting the cepstrum based at least in part on the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the initial characterization of the user interface, the initial categorization of the user interface, or both, is based at least in part on an assumed length of the conduit, and wherein adjusting the cepstrum includes multiplying the cepstrum by a ratio of (i) the determined length of the conduit to (ii) the assumed length of the conduit.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the initial characterization of the user interface, the initial categorization of the user interface, or both, is based at least in part on an assumed diameter of the conduit, and wherein adjusting the cepstrum includes multiplying the cepstrum by a ratio of (i) the determined diameter of the conduit to (ii) the assumed diameter of the conduit.

13 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the initial characterization of the user interface includes a determination of a type of the user interface, a determination of a manufacturer of the user interface, a determination of a model of the user interface, a determination of a form factor of the user interface, a determination of a size of one or more elements of the user interface, or any combination thereof.

14 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the initial categorization of the user interface includes a determination of whether the user interface belongs to a first user interface category or a second user interface category,

wherein (i) the first user interface category is associated with a direct connection between the conduit and a cushion of the user interface, between the conduit and a frame of the user interface, or between the conduit and both the cushion and the frame, and

wherein the second user interface category is associated with an indirect connection between the conduit and a cushion of the user interface, between the conduit and a frame of the user interface, or between the conduit and both the cushion and the frame.

15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

supplying pressurized air to an airway of a user via the conduit and a user interface coupled to the conduit;

comparing (i) the length of the conduit to an expected length of the conduit, (ii) the diameter of the conduit to an expected diameter of the conduit, or (iii) both (i) and (ii); and

in response to (i) the length of the conduit being different than the expected length of the conduit, (ii) the diameter of the conduit being different than the determined length of the conduit, or (iii) both (i) and (ii), increasing or decreasing a pressure of the pressurized air supplied to the airway of the user.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein in response to the length of the conduit being greater than the expected length of the conduit or the diameter of the conduit being greater than the expected diameter of the conduit, the action includes increasing the pressure of the pressurized air, and wherein in response to the length of the conduit being less than the expected length of the conduit or the diameter of the conduit being less than the expected diameter of the conduit, the action includes decreasing the pressure of the pressurized air.

17 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

supplying pressurized air to an airway of a user via the conduit and a user interface coupled to the conduit;

determining (i) the length of the conduit at a first time prior to the supplying of the pressurized air to the airway of the user, (ii) the diameter of the conduit at the first time, or (iii) both (i) and (ii);

determining the length of the conduit at a second time during the supplying of the pressurized air to the airway of the user, (ii) the diameter of the conduit at the second time, or (iii) both (i) and (ii); and

in response to (i) the length of the conduit at the second time being different than the length of the conduit at the first time by at least a threshold amount, (ii) the diameter of the conduit at the second time being different than the diameter of the conduit at the first time by at least a threshold amount, or (iii) both (i) and (ii), increasing or decreasing a pressure of the pressurized air supplied to the airway of the user.

18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the transform includes a Fourier Transform, an inverse Fourier Transform, a cross-correlation analysis, or any combination thereof.

19 . A system comprising:

a respiratory therapy system including:

a respiratory therapy device configured to supply pressurized air; and

a user interface coupled to the respiratory therapy device via a conduit, the user interface being configured to engage the user and aid in directing the supplied pressurized air to an airway of the user;

a memory device storing machine-readable instructions; and

a control system coupled to the memory device, the control system including one or more processors configured to execute the machine-readable instructions to:

generate acoustic data representative of at least one or more reflections of an acoustic signal in the conduit, the one or more reflections being indicative of a length of the conduit, a diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit; and

analyze the acoustic data to determine the length of the conduit, the diameter of the conduit, or both the length of the conduit and the diameter of the conduit, wherein to analyze the acoustic data, the one or more processors of the control system are configured to execute the machine-readable instructions to:

produce a frequency intensity signal from the acoustic data, the frequency intensity signal representing an intensity of the one or more reflections of the acoustic signal across a frequency band;

select a portion of the frequency intensity signal expected to include the resonant frequency of the conduit;

calculate a transform of the selected portion of the frequency intensity signal to generate a wave period intensity signal;

extract a resonant frequency of the conduit from the wave period intensity signal; and

determine the length of the conduit based at least in part on the resonant frequency of the conduit.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the transform includes a Fourier Transform, an inverse Fourier Transform, a cross-correlation analysis, or any combination thereof.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2023
From: LYON, GRAEME ALEXANDER; TIRON, ROXANA; FOX, NIALL ANDREW; SHOULDICE, REDMOND; MCMAHON, STEPHEN
To: RESMED SENSOR TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 063331/0146 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63107763 · Oct 30, 2020
Related Publication 20230417544A1 · Dec 28, 2023
References Cited (33)
US 5245995A · Sullivan et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 6502572B1 · Berthon-Jones et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 9358353B2 · Armitstead et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10376224B2 · Aarts et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10492720B2 · Phillips et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10660563B2 · McDarby et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20110313689A1 · Holley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20170311879A1 · Armitstead et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200337634A1 · McDarby et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200383580A1 · Shouldice et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210150873A1 · Shouldice et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220168526A1 · Holley · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220339383A1 · Holley · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230191063A1 · Fox · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230377114A1 · Shouldice · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240024597A1 · Dos Santos · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240131287A1 · Peake · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 0092899A2 · 1983 [cited by examiner]
EP 2830497B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3476678A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2008138040A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014047310A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016061629A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017132726A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018050913A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019122413A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019122414A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020104465A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021250553A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP-0092899-A2, English Translation (Year: 1983). [cited by examiner]
EP-3476678-A1, English Translation (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2021/060053 mailed Jan. 21, 2022 (4 pp.). [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2021/060053 mailed Jan. 21, 2022 (4 pp.). [cited by applicant]