IP Library Granted Patent US 12,253,063
Granted Patent B2
US 12,253,063 · App. 18/263,433 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Controlling wind turbine based on wind veer

Inventors: Jiarong Hong (New Brighton, MN); Linyue Gao (Minneapolis, MN)
Assignee: Regents of the University of Minnesota
F03D7/0204F03D7/028F05B2270/1033F05B2270/32F05B2270/321
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,253,063
App. No.
18/263,433
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes determining, by a control system, from among a plurality of categories, a current category of an incoming wind approaching a wind turbine, and setting, by the control system, a yaw bias of the wind turbine based on the current category. In some examples, the plurality of categories includes two or more wind conditions, such as a first wind condition in which wind contacting an upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and wind contacting a lower rotor of the wind turbine is veering, a second wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is backing, and so on.

Claims (50)

1. A method comprising:

determining, by a control system, from among a plurality of categories, a current category of an incoming wind approaching a wind turbine, the plurality of categories including three or more of:

a first wind condition in which wind contacting an upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and wind contacting a lower rotor of the wind turbine is veering,

a second wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is backing,

a third wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is backing and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is veering, or

a fourth wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is backing and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is backing; and

setting, by the control system, a yaw bias of the wind turbine according to a yaw bias value determined based on the current category.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine comprises, setting, by the control system, the yaw bias of the wind turbine based on the current category and one or more of an incoming wind speed at a hub height of the wind turbine, a change in a wind direction along the lower rotor of the wind turbine, or a change in a wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine is in response to the change in the wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising setting the yaw bias value of the wind turbine by referencing one or more sets of tables stored in the control system, wherein the one or more sets of tables comprise the yaw bias value.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the one or more sets of tables comprises a first set of tables and a second set of tables, and wherein the setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine comprises:

setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to a first yaw bias value from the first set of tables in response to a change in a wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0 and a change in a wind direction along the lower rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0; and

setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to a second yaw bias value from the second set of tables in response to the change in the wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0 and the change in the wind direction along the lower rotor of the wind turbine being less than 0.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

evaluating, by the control system, a change in power generation by the wind turbine after setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine based on the current category; and

updating, by the control system, the yaw bias value corresponding to the current category based on the change in power generation of the wind turbine.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the current category of the incoming wind approaching the wind turbine comprises periodically determining an updated current category of the incoming wind approaching the wind turbine, and wherein the setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine comprises periodically setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine based on the updated current category.

8. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the method further comprises obtaining, by the control system, measurements from one or more sensors, wherein each of the one or more sensors is configured to measure a wind direction and a wind magnitude, and

wherein the determining the current category of the incoming wind approaching the wind turbine comprises determining the current category of the incoming wind approaching the wind turbine based on the measurements from the one or more sensors.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the one or more sensors are configured to determine a respective wind direction and a respective wind magnitude for each elevation of a plurality of elevations.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the one or more sensors comprise at least one of a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor or anemometer.

11. A control system comprising processing circuitry configured to perform operations comprising:

determining, from among a plurality of categories, a current category of an incoming wind approaching a wind turbine, the plurality of categories including three or more of:

a first wind condition in which wind contacting an upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and wind contacting a lower rotor of the wind turbine is veering,

a second wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is backing,

a third wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is backing and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is veering, or

a fourth wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is backing and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is backing; and

setting a yaw bias of the wind turbine according to a yaw bias value determined based on the current category.

12. The control system of claim 11 , wherein the setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine comprises setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to the yaw bias value based on the current category and one or more of an incoming wind speed at a hub height of the wind turbine, a change in a wind direction along the lower rotor of the wind turbine, or a change in a wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine.

13. The control system of claim 12 , wherein the setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine comprises setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to the yaw bias value in response to the change in the wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0.

14. The control system of claim 11 , wherein the setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine comprises setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to the yaw bias value by referencing one or more sets of tables stored in the control system, wherein the one or more sets of tables comprise the yaw bias value.

15. The control system of claim 14 , wherein the one or more sets of tables comprises a first set of tables and a second set of tables, and setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to the yaw bias value from the one or more sets of tables comprises:

setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to a yaw bias value from the first set of tables in response to a change in a wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0 and a change in a wind direction along the lower rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0; and

setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to a yaw bias value from the second set of tables in response to the change in the wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine being greater than 0 and the change in the wind direction along the lower rotor of the wind turbine being less than 0.

16. The control system of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise:

evaluating whether setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to the yaw bias value based on the current category increased power generation by the wind turbine; and

responsive to determining that setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine to the yaw bias value based on the current category failed to increase power generation by the wind turbine, resetting the yaw bias of the wind turbine.

17. The control system of claim 11 , wherein:

determining the current category of the incoming wind approaching the wind turbine comprises periodically determining an updated current category of the incoming wind approaching the wind turbine, and

the operations comprise setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine based on the current category by periodically setting the yaw bias of the wind turbine based on the updated current category.

18. The control system of claim 11 , wherein the control system further comprises one or more of a memory circuitry or a communication interface.

19. A wind turbine comprising:

a plurality of rotors comprising at least an upper rotor and a lower rotor;

a nacelle, connected to each rotor of the plurality of rotors, configured to rotate so that a yaw bias of the nacelle attains a yaw bias value, wherein a control system determines the yaw bias value based on a current category of an incoming wind approaching the wind turbine, wherein the control system determines the current category from among a plurality of categories comprising three or more of:

a first wind condition in which wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is veering,

a second wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is veering and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is backing,

a third wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is backing and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is veering, or

a fourth wind condition in which the wind contacting the upper rotor of the wind turbine is backing and the wind contacting the lower rotor of the wind turbine is backing.

20. The wind turbine of claim 19 , wherein the control system determines the setting based on the current category and further based on one or more of an incoming wind speed at a hub height of the wind turbine, a change in a wind direction along the lower rotor of the wind turbine, or a change in a wind direction along the upper rotor of the wind turbine.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jun 9, 2025
From: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 071499/0069 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2023
From: HONG, JIARONG; GAO, LINYUE
To: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Reel/Frame 065485/0699 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63199871 · Jan 29, 2021
Related Publication 20240309841A1 · Sep 19, 2024
References Cited (38)
US 8987929B2 · Jayant · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 11674498B1 · Evans · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20150086357A1 · Gregg · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150276786A1 · Zuo et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180119678A1 · Lebosq · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20240309841A1 · Hong · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 2927484A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012044161A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
Abkar et al., “Wake flow in a wind farm during a diurnal cycle”, Journal of Turbulence, vol. 17, No. 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 420-441. [cited by applicant]
Allaerts et al., “Large eddy simulation of a large wind-turbine array in a conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer”, Physics of Fluids, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 2015, 22 pp. [cited by applicant]
Bardal et al., “Performance test of a 3MW wind turbine-effects of shear and turbulence”, Energy Procedia, Jan. 2015, pp. 83-91. [cited by applicant]
Bastankhah et al., “Wind tunnel study of the wind turbine interaction with a boundary-layer flow: Upwind region, turbine performance, and wake region”, Physics of Fluids, vol. 29, No. 6, Jun. 2017, 18 pp. [cited by applicant]
Bodini et al., “Spatial and temporal variability of turbulence dissipation rate in complex terrain”, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 19, No. 7, Apr. 4, 2019, pp. 4367-4382. [cited by applicant]
Bodini et al., “U.S. East Coast Lidar Measurements Show Offshore Wind Turbines Will Encounter Very Low Atmospheric Turbulence”, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 46, No. 10, May 1, 2019, pp. 5582-5591. [cited by applicant]
Chamorro et al., “On the scale-to-scale coupling between a full-scale wind turbine and turbulence”, J. Turbul, vol. 16, No. 7, 2015, pp. 617-632, (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year o… [cited by applicant]
Chamorro et al., “Turbulence effects on a full-scale 2.5 MW horizontal-axis wind turbine under neutrally stratified conditions”, Wind Energy, vol. 18, No. 2, Feb. 2015, pp. 339-349. [cited by applicant]
Dasari et al., “Near-wake behaviour of a utility-scale wind turbine”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Jan. 2019, pp. 204-246. [cited by applicant]
Emeis et al., “Wind Regimes”, Wind Energy Meteorology, Chapter 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 11-30. [cited by applicant]
Englberger et al., “Does the rotational direction of a wind turbine impact the wake in a stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer?”, Wind Energy Science Discussions, Aug. 7, 2019, 24 pp. [cited by applicant]
Gadde et al., “Effect of Coriolis force on a wind farm wake”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1256, No. 1, Jul. 2019, 11 pp. [cited by applicant]
Gao et al., “Effect of wind veer on wind turbine power generation”, Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, No. 1, Jan. 4, 2021, 11 pp. [cited by applicant]
Gao et al., “Effects of inflow turbulence on structural response of wind turbine blades”, Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, Apr. 2020, 19 pp. [cited by applicant]
Gomez et al., “The effect of wind direction shear on turbine performance in a wind farm in central Iowa”, Wind Energy Sci, Jan. 2020, pp. 125-139. [cited by applicant]
Holton et al., “Chapter 8—The planetary boundary layer”, Introduction to Dynamic Meteorolgy, 2013, pp. 255-277, (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2013, is sufficient… [cited by applicant]
Howland et al., “Influence of atmosphereic conditions on the power production of utility-scale wind turbines in yaw misalignment”, Aug. 4, 2020, 37 pp. [cited by applicant]
Howland et al., “Influence of the horizontal component of Earth's rotation on wind turbine wakes”, J Phys. Conf., vol. 1037, No. 7, Jun. 2018, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from International Application No. PCT/US2022/070356 dated Aug. 10, 2023, 7 pp. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2022/070356, dated May 9, 2022, 14 pp. [cited by applicant]
Lu et al., “Large-eddy simulation of a very large wind farm in a stable atmospheric boundary layer”, Physics of Fluids, vol. 23, No. 6, Jun. 2011, 32 pp. [cited by applicant]
Shu et al., “Investigation of Marine Wind Veer Characteristics Using Wind Lidar Measurements”, Atmosphere, vol. 11, Oct. 31, 2020, 14 pp. [cited by applicant]
Tian et al., “Effects of incoming surface wind conditions on the wake characteristics and dynamic wind loads acting on a wind turbine model”, Physics of Fluids, vol. 26, No. 12, Dec. 2014, 20 pp. [cited by applicant]
Tian et al., “Numerical investigations into the idealized diurnal cycle of atmospheric boundary layer and its impact on wind turbine's power performance”, Renewable Energy, vol. 145, Jan. 2020, pp. 419-427. [cited by applicant]
Toloui et al., “Measurement of atmospheric boundary layer based on super-large-scale particle image velocimetry using natural snowfall”, Experiments in fluids, vol. 55, No. 1737, May 10, 2014, 14 pp. [cited by applicant]
Van Der Laan et al., “Why the Coriolis force turns a wind farm wake clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere”, Wind Energy Science, vol. 2, No. 1, May 29, 2017, pp. 285-294. [cited by applicant]
Verhulst et al., “Large eddy simulation study of the kinetic energy entrainment by energetic turbulent flow structures in large wind farms”, Physics of Fluids, vol. 26, No. 2, Feb. 2014, 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
Wagner et al., “Simulation of shear and turbulence impact on wind turbine performance”, National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Jan. 2010, 55 pp. [cited by applicant]
Walter et al., “Speed and direction shear in the stable nocturnal boundary layer”, J. Sol. Energy Eng., vol. 131, No. 1, Feb. 2009, 7 pp. [cited by applicant]
Yoshiaki et al., “Effects of turbulence, wind shear, wind veer, and atmospheric stability on power performance: a case study in Brazil”, EWEA Annual Event, 2015, 6 pp., (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609… [cited by applicant]