IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,208,026
Granted Patent B2
US 12,208,026 · App. 18/285,146 · Granted Jan 28, 2025

Prosthesis with powered ankle and toe joints

Inventors: Tommaso Lenzi (Salt Lake City, UT); Lukas R. Gabert (Salt Lake City, UT); Minh Tran (Salt Lake City, UT)
Assignee: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION
A61F2/6607A61F2002/5043A61F2002/5072A61F2002/6621A61F2002/6836A61F2002/701A61F2002/7635
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,208,026
App. No.
18/285,146
Granted
Jan 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein is a robotic ankle foot prosthesis that replicates the key biomechanical functions of the biological ankle and toe joints while matching the weight, size, and battery life of passive microprocessor-controlled prostheses. A single actuator powers the ankle and toe joints. The mechanism maximizes the mechanical energy regeneration during walking while imitating the physiological features of energy injection by way of the ankle joint and energy dissipation by way of the toe joint.

Claims (70)

1. A powered assistive ankle and foot device, comprising:

a shank assembly comprising an ankle joint and a shank pivot shaft offset from the ankle joint and mechanically connected to the ankle joint;

a tarsal assembly comprising a proximal section and a distal section, the proximal section being mechanically connected to the shank pivot shaft of the shank assembly;

a toe assembly mechanically connected to the distal section of the tarsal assembly, the toe assembly comprising a toe joint and a toe pivot shaft offset from the toe joint and mechanically connected to the toe joint, the toe pivot shaft being mechanically connected to the distal section of the tarsal assembly; and

a linear actuator included in or associated with the tarsal assembly, wherein the linear actuator powers movement of both the ankle joint and the toe joint,

when a distance between the shank pivot shaft and the toe pivot shaft is lessened, the ankle joint moves in plantarflexion and the toe joint moves in toe flexion; and

when a distance between the shank pivot shaft and the toe pivot shaft is increased, the ankle joint moves in dorsiflexion and the toe joint moves in toe extension.

2. The device of claim 1 , wherein the linear actuator is configured to adjust the distance between the shank pivot shaft and the toe pivot shaft to thereby provide simultaneous torque to both the ankle joint and the toe joint.

3. The device of claim 1 , wherein an offset distance between the ankle joint and the shank pivot shaft is greater than an offset distance between the toe joint and the toe pivot shaft.

4. The device of claim 1 , wherein the linear actuator comprises a screw assembly including a screw and a nut.

5. The device of claim 4 , wherein the linear actuator comprises a ball screw assembly.

6. The device of claim 4 , wherein the linear actuator further comprises a compliant element configured to move the toe joint toward a neutral position when no force is applied via the linear actuator.

7. The device of claim 6 , wherein the compliant element is a spring.

8. The device of claim 6 , wherein the compliant element is mechanically connected to the nut of the screw assembly and functions to move the nut toward a neutral position along the screw when the screw is not rotated.

9. The device of claim 6 , wherein the compliant element is attached to and spans between a proximal anchor and a distal anchor, wherein the proximal anchor is connected to the nut of the screw assembly and the distal anchor is connected to the toe pivot shaft.

10. The device of claim 9 , wherein the proximal and distal anchors include bores sized to receive the screw.

11. The device of claim 1 , further comprising a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator.

12. The device of claim 11 , wherein the motor is attached to or housed within the shank assembly.

13. The device of claim 12 , wherein the motor does not rotate relative to a shank frame during ankle joint movement of the device.

14. The device of claim 13 , wherein the motor is in direct contact with the shank frame.

15. The device of claim 11 , wherein the motor is mechanically connected to the linear actuator via a power transmission assembly, wherein the power transmission assembly comprises multiple bevel gears.

16. The device of claim 15 , wherein the power transmission assembly comprises three bevel gears.

17. The device of claim 16 , wherein a first bevel gear is coaxial to an output gear, a second bevel gear is coaxial with the shank pivot shaft, and a third bevel gear is coaxial to an axis of rotation of screw of the ball screw assembly and functions to transfer power to the screw.

18. The device of claim 1 , wherein the shank assembly comprises a pyramid adaptor, the pyramid adaptor comprising an integrated ground force sensor.

19. The device of claim 1 , wherein the device is a prosthesis.

20. A powered assistive ankle and foot device, comprising:

a shank assembly comprising an ankle joint and a shank pivot shaft offset from and mechanically connected to the ankle joint;

a tarsal assembly comprising a proximal section and a distal section, the proximal section being mechanically connected to the shank pivot shaft;

a toe assembly comprising a toe joint and a toe pivot shaft offset from and mechanically connected to the toe joint, the toe pivot shaft being mechanically connected to the distal section of the tarsal assembly; and

a linear actuator associated with the tarsal assembly, the linear actuator being configured as linear series elastic actuator comprising a screw assembly and a spring,

wherein an offset distance between the ankle joint and the shank pivot shaft is greater than an offset distance between the toe joint and the toe pivot shaft, and

wherein the linear actuator is configured to adjust the distance between the shank pivot shaft and the toe pivot shaft to thereby provide simultaneous torque to both the ankle joint and the toe joint.

21. The device of claim 20 , wherein the spring is mechanically connected to a nut of the screw assembly and functions to move the nut toward a neutral position along a screw of the screw assembly when the screw is not rotated.

22. The device of claim 21 , wherein the spring is attached to and spans between a proximal anchor and a distal anchor, wherein the proximal anchor is connected to the nut of the screw assembly and the distal anchor is connected to the toe pivot shaft, and wherein proximal and distal anchors include bores sized to receive the screw.

23. The device of claim 21 , further comprising a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator, wherein the motor is attached to or housed within the shank assembly, and wherein the motor does not rotate relative to a shank frame during ankle joint movement of the device.

24. The device of claim 21 , wherein the device is a prosthesis.

25. A powered assistive ankle and foot device, comprising:

a shank assembly comprising an ankle joint;

a tarsal assembly comprising a proximal section and a distal section, the proximal section being mechanically connected to the shank assembly;

a toe assembly mechanically connected to the distal section of the tarsal assembly, the toe assembly comprising a toe joint; and

a linear actuator included in or associated with the tarsal assembly, wherein the linear actuator powers movement of both the ankle joint and the toe joint, wherein the linear actuator comprises a screw assembly including a screw and a nut, and comprises a compliant element configured to move the toe joint toward a neutral position when no force is applied via the linear actuator

wherein the compliant element is mechanically connected to the nut of the screw assembly and functions to move the nut toward a neutral position along the screw when the screw is not rotated.

26. The device of claim 25 , further comprising a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator, wherein the motor is attached to or housed within the shank assembly, and wherein the motor does not rotate relative to a shank frame during ankle joint movement of the device.

27. The device of claim 25 , further comprising a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator, wherein the motor is mechanically connected to the linear actuator via a power transmission assembly, wherein the power transmission assembly comprises multiple bevel gears.

28. A powered assistive ankle and foot device, comprising:

a shank assembly comprising an ankle joint;

a tarsal assembly comprising a proximal section and a distal section, the proximal section being mechanically connected to the shank assembly;

a toe assembly mechanically connected to the distal section of the tarsal assembly, the toe assembly comprising a toe joint; and

a linear actuator included in or associated with the tarsal assembly, wherein the linear actuator powers movement of both the ankle joint and the toe joint, wherein the linear actuator comprises a screw assembly including a screw and a nut, and comprises a compliant element configured to move the toe joint toward a neutral position when no force is applied via the linear actuator,

wherein the compliant element is attached to and spans between a proximal anchor and a distal anchor, wherein the proximal anchor is connected to the nut of the screw assembly and the distal anchor is connected to the toe pivot shaft.

29. The device of claim 28 , wherein the proximal and distal anchors include bores sized to receive the screw.

30. The device of claim 28 , further comprising a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator, wherein the motor is attached to or housed within the shank assembly, and wherein the motor does not rotate relative to a shank frame during ankle joint movement of the device.

31. The device of claim 28 , further comprising a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator, wherein the motor is mechanically connected to the linear actuator via a power transmission assembly, wherein the power transmission assembly comprises multiple bevel gears.

32. A powered assistive ankle and foot device, comprising:

a shank assembly comprising an ankle joint;

a tarsal assembly comprising a proximal section and a distal section, the proximal section being mechanically connected to the shank assembly;

a toe assembly mechanically connected to the distal section of the tarsal assembly, the toe assembly comprising a toe joint;

a linear actuator included in or associated with the tarsal assembly, wherein the linear actuator powers movement of both the ankle joint and the toe joint; and

a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator,

wherein the motor is attached to or housed within the shank assembly and wherein the motor does not rotate relative to a shank frame during ankle joint movement of the device.

33. The device of claim 32 , wherein the motor is in direct contact with the shank frame.

34. A powered assistive ankle and foot device, comprising:

a shank assembly comprising an ankle joint;

a tarsal assembly comprising a proximal section and a distal section, the proximal section being mechanically connected to the shank assembly;

a toe assembly mechanically connected to the distal section of the tarsal assembly, the toe assembly comprising a toe joint;

a linear actuator included in or associated with the tarsal assembly, wherein the linear actuator powers movement of both the ankle joint and the toe joint; and

a motor mechanically connected to the linear actuator to power the linear actuator,

wherein the motor is mechanically connected to the linear actuator via a power transmission assembly, wherein the power transmission assembly comprises multiple bevel gears.

35. The device of claim 34 , wherein the power transmission assembly comprises three bevel gears.

36. The device of claim 35 , wherein a first bevel gear is coaxial to an output gear, a second bevel gear is coaxial with the shank pivot shaft, and a third bevel gear is coaxial to an axis of rotation of screw of the ball screw assembly and functions to transfer power to the screw.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Mar 11, 2025
From: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
To: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 070480/0451 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2024
From: LENZI, TOMMASO; GABERT, LUKAS R.; TRAN, MINH
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
Reel/Frame 066656/0878 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2024
From: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 066656/0968 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63168128 · Mar 30, 2021
Related Publication 20240180723A1 · Jun 6, 2024
References Cited (40)
US 9579221B2 · Mosler · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20050216097A1 · Rifkin · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20110208322A1 · Rifkin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20150230943A1 · Marlin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150328020A1 · Clausen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20230218410A1 · Petrone · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020041491A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN102885660 (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
“Proprio Foot,” Ossur, Retrieved at Https://www.ossur.com/prosthetic-solutions/products/dynamic-solutions/proprio-foot., Retrieved on Apr. 2022, pp. 14. [cited by applicant]
Adams P. F. et al., “Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1996,” Natl. Heal. Surv. Vital Heal. Stat, 1999, pp. 1-203. [cited by applicant]
Au et al., “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag, vol. 15, 2008, pp. 52-59. [cited by applicant]
Au, S. K. et al., “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis improves walking metabolic economy,” IEEE Trans. Robot, vol. 25, 2009, pp. 51-66. [cited by applicant]
Baimyshev, A. et al., “Design and Preliminary Assessment of Lightweight Swing-Assist Knee Prosthesis,” in 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2018, p… [cited by applicant]
Bellman, R. D. et al., “SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics,” 2nd IEEE RAS EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Robot. Biomechatronics, 2008, pp. 51… [cited by applicant]
Bruening, D. A. et al., “Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model part II: Kinetics and clinical implications,” Gait Posture, vol. 35, 2012, pp. 535-540. [cited by applicant]
Bruening, D. A. et al., “Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model. Part I: Model repeatability and kinematic validity,” Gait Posture, vol. 35, 2012, pp. 529-534. [cited by applicant]
Collins, S. H. et al., “Recycling energy to restore impaired ankle function during human walking,” PLoS One, vol. 5, Issue 5, 2011, e9307. [cited by applicant]
Convens, B. et al. “Modeling, Design and Test-Bench Validation of a Semi-Active Propulsive Ankle Prosthesis with a Clutched Series Elastic Actuator,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett, vol. 4, 2019, pp. 1823-1830. [cited by applicant]
Goldfarb, M. et al., “Realizing the promise of robotic leg prostheses,” Sci. Transl. Med, vol. 5, 2013, p. 210ps15. [cited by applicant]
Hahn, A. et al., “First results concerning the safety, walking, and satisfaction with an innovative, microprocessor-controlled four-axes prosthetic foot,” Prosthet. Orthot Int, vol. 42, Issue 3, 2018, pp. 350-356. [cited by applicant]
Honert, E. C. et al., “Effect of toe joint stiffness and toe shape on walking biomechanics,” Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, vol. 13, Issue 6, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Lawson, B. E. et al., “A Robotic Leg Prosthesis: Design, Control, and Implementation,” Robot. Autom. Mag, vol. 21, 2014, pp. 70-81. [cited by applicant]
Lenzi, T. et al., “A lightweight robotic ankle prosthesis with non-backdrivable cam-based transmission,” in 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2017, pp. 1142-1147. [cited by applicant]
Lenzi, T. et al., “Design and preliminary testing of the RIC hybrid knee prosthesis,” in 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2015, pp. 1683-1686. [cited by applicant]
Lenzi, T. et al., “Design, development, and testing of a lightweight hybrid robotic knee prosthesis,” Int. J. Rob. Res, vol. 37, 2018, pp. 953-976. [cited by applicant]
Lenzi, T. et al., “Design, Development, and Validation of a Lightweight Non-backdrivable Robotic Ankle Prosthesis,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 2019, pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Narang, Y. et al., “The Effects of Prosthesis Inertial Properties on Prosthetic Knee Moment and Hip Energetics Required to Achieve Able-bodied Kinematics,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng, vol. 24, Issue 7, 2016, … [cited by applicant]
Nester, C. J. et al., “Movement of the human foot in 100 pain free individuals aged 18-45: Implications for understanding normal foot function,” J. Foot Ankle Res, vol. 7, 2014, pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Nickel, E. et al., “Passive prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism for automatic adaptation to sloped surfaces,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev, vol. 51, 2014, pp. 803-814. [cited by applicant]
Schmalz, T. et al., “Energy expenditure and biomechanical characteristics of lower limb amputee gait: The influence of prosthetic alignment and different prosthetic components,” Gait Posture, vol. 16, 2002, pp. 255-263. [cited by applicant]
Shepherd, M. K. et al., “The VSPA Foot: A Quasi-Passive Ankle-Foot Prosthesis with Continuously Variable Stiffness,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 25, Issue 12, 2017, pp. 2375-… [cited by applicant]
Sinitski E. H. et al., “Biomechanics of the ankle-foot system during stair ambulation: Implications for design of advanced ankle-foot prostheses,” J. Biomech, vol. 45, 2012, pp. 588-594. [cited by applicant]
Smith, J. D. et al., “Effects of prosthetic mass distribution on metabolic costs and walking symmetry,” J. Appl. Biomech, vol. 29, 2013, pp. 317-328. [cited by applicant]
Smith, J. D. et al., “Short and Longer Term Changes in Amputee Walking Patterns Due to Increased Prosthesis Inertia,” JPO J. Prosthetics Orthot, vol. 23, 2011, pp. 114-123. [cited by applicant]
Takahashi, K. Z. et al., “Energy neutral: The human foot and ankle subsections combine to produce near zero net mechanical work during walking,” Sci. Rep, vol. 7, 2017, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Versluys, R. et al., “Prosthetic feet: state-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics,” Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol, vol. 4, 2009, pp. 65-75. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Q. et al., “Walk the walk: A lightweight active transtibial prosthesis,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag, 2015, pp. 80-89. [cited by applicant]
Zhu, J. et al., “PANTOE 1: Biomechanical design of powered ankle-foot prosthesis with compliant joints and segmented foot,” in IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM, 2010, pp. 31-3… [cited by applicant]
Zhu, J. et al., “Pantoe II: Improved version of a powered transtibial prosthesis with ankle and toe joints,” in Frontiers in Biomedical Devices, BIOMED—2018 Design of Medical Devices Conference, DMD 2018 (2018). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2022/022374, mailed on Jun. 22, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]