IP Library Granted Patent US 12,250,140
Granted Patent B2
US 12,250,140 · App. 18/288,744 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Method of optimizing a usage distribution in a communications network

Inventors: Fritz Schinkel (Munich, DE); Christian Münch (Munich, DE); Sebastian Engel (Munich, DE); Marc Geitz (Hagen, DE); Oliver Holschke (Berlin, DE); Timmy Schüller (Münster, DE)
Assignees: Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH; Deutsche Telekom AG
H04L45/125H04L47/125
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,250,140
App. No.
18/288,744
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method of optimizing a usage distribution in a communications network uses a quantum concept processor. A set of traffic demands for a transfer of determined data volumes between origin nodes and destination nodes among the plurality of communication nodes is captured. The traffic demands are split into sub-demands. A set of optional communication paths for an individual routing of each sub-demand is specified. The edges within the set of optional communication paths are assigned a respective usage capacity limit. Fractional capacity usages of the edges are calculated based on the respective usage capacity limit. The calculated fractional capacity usages are formulated as terms of a quadratic stress function. An optimized routing is determined by using a quantum concept processor, thereby selecting for each sub-demand one communication path from the set of optional communication paths such that the quadratic stress function is minimized.

Claims (29)

1. A computer-implemented method of optimizing a usage distribution in a communications network in which data traffic is routed, wherein the communications network has a plurality of communication nodes connectable over edges of communication paths for a routing of the data traffic, the method comprising:

capturing a set of traffic demands, each traffic demand specifying a transfer of a determined data volume from an origin node to a destination node among the plurality of communication nodes,

splitting the traffic demands into sub-demands, wherein the sub-demands are traffic demands split into fragments and one sub-demand represents a fragment of a traffic demand by splitting the data volume of the traffic demand into a determined data volume packet,

specifying a set of optional communication paths for an individual routing of each sub-demand, wherein edges within the set of optional communication paths are assigned a respective usage capacity limit,

calculating, for each sub-demand, fractional capacity usages of the edges within the set of optional communication paths, the fractional capacity usages calculated based on the respective usage capacity limit,

formulating the calculated fractional capacity usages as terms of a quadratic stress function, and

determining, by using a quantum concept processor, an optimized routing by selecting for each sub-demand one communication path from the set of optional communication paths such that the quadratic stress function is minimized.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

specifying a set of path variables, wherein each path variable is associated with one of the sub-demands and one communication path from the set of optional communication paths,

formulating, in the quadratic stress function, path terms that connect the calculated fractional capacity usages of the edges of a respective communication path from the set of optional communication paths with the path variable associated with the respective communication path from the set of optional communication paths, and

calculating the path terms, by using the quantum concept processor, to choose for each sub-demand one communication path from the set of optional communication paths such that the quadratic stress function is minimized.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the path terms are calculated under consideration of a path condition that each sub-demand is routed along exactly one communication path from the set of optional communication paths.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the traffic demands are split into sub-demands with determined discrete data volumes.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the quadratic stress function is formulated under consideration of one or both of constraints for the set of traffic demands or the respective sub-demands:

organization of the communications network in different network domains, or

latency of the communications network.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the set of optional communication paths for an individual routing of each sub-demand is specified under consideration of one or more of:

one or more redundant optional communication paths associated with a sub-network of the communications network,

organization of the communications network in different network domains, and

latency of the communications network.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the set of optional communication paths for an individual routing of each sub-demand is specified such that for topologically near origin and destination nodes a smaller number of optional communications paths is selected than for topologically distant origin and destination nodes.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the quadratic stress function is formulated as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization function.

9. A quantum concept processor, configured to perform one or more steps of the method according to claim 1 .

10. A computer program comprising instructions that, when the program is executed by one or more processors, that causes each of the one or more processors to perform one or more steps of the method according to claim 1 .

11. A computer-readable storage medium on which the computer program of claim 10 is stored.

12. A workplace for a network planner, configured to verify an optimized routing determined by the method according to claim 1 .

13. An interface arrangement comprising one or more interfaces to a plurality of communication nodes of a communications network in which data traffic is routed, wherein the interface arrangement is configured to automatically deploy an optimized routing determined by the method according to claim 1 to the communication nodes of the communications network.

14. The quantum concept processor according to claim 9 , wherein the quantum concept processor is a digital annealing processing unit.

15. The quantum concept processor according to claim 9 , wherein the quantum concept processor is a quantum annealing processing unit.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2026
From: FSAS TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
To: FUJITSU GERMANY GMBH
Reel/Frame 073418/0171 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 9, 2026
From: FUJITSU TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GMBH
To: FSAS TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
Reel/Frame 074293/0428 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE STREET ADDRESS OF THE FIRST NAMED RECEIVING PARTY TO MIES-VAN-DER-ROHE-STRASSE 8 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 67110 FRAME 165. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 25, 2024
From: SCHINKEL, FRITZ; MÜNCH, CHRISTIAN; ENGEL, SEBASTIAN; GEITZ, MARC; HOLSCHKE, OLIVER; SCHÜLLER, TIMMY
To: FUJITSU TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GMBH; DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Reel/Frame 067218/0415 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 22, 2024
From: SCHINKEL, FRITZ; MÜNCH, CHRISTIAN; ENGEL, SEBASTIAN; GEITZ, MARC; HOLSCHKE, OLIVER; SCHÜLLER, TIMMY
To: FUJITSU TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GMBH; DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Reel/Frame 067110/0165 →
Priority Claims (2)
DE 102021004716.8 · Sep 20, 2021 · national
EP 21205005 · Oct 27, 2021 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240223494A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (14)
US 20160164781A1 · Imai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170286852A1 · Rezaie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200204477A1 · Rahman · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200396154A1 · Fiaschi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210211364A1 · Feldmann · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210232364A1 · Swenson · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230049956A1 · Miyahara et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016111599A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021157008A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Juexiao Su et al., “Fast Embedding of Constrained SatisfactionProblem to Quantum Annealer with Minimizing Chain Length,” Jun. 18, 2017, pp. 1-6, XP058367890, DOI: 10.1145/3061639.3062246. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2022 in counterpart European Application No. 21205005.8. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2022 in counterpart International Application No. PCT/EP2022/075647. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion dated Dec. 13, 2022 in counterpart International Application No. PCT/EP2022/075647. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Reason(s) for Rejection dated Nov. 26, 2024, of counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2023-570454. [cited by applicant]