IP Library Granted Patent US 12,705,524
Granted Patent B2
US 12,705,524 · App. 18/293,559 · Granted Aug 11, 2026

Systems and devices for quantum processor topology

Inventor: Kelly T.R. Boothby (Vancouver, CA)
Assignee: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.
G06N10/40H10N60/12H10N69/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,705,524
App. No.
18/293,559
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Granted
Aug 11, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2812
USPC
257/31
Abstract

Topologies for analog processors may include cells comprising at least portions of qubits and couplers. Qubits and couplers may be shared among or extend across multiple cells. A cell may include four sets of partial qubits, and partial qubits may form whole qubits with partial qubits in adjacent cells. First and second sets of partial qubits may include partial qubits that extend substantially parallel to one another and along a first direction. Third and fourth sets may include partial qubits that extend substantially parallel to one another and along a second direction. Each partial qubit in the first and second sets may cross, and be substantially orthogonal to, at least one partial qubit from each of the third and fourth sets. A cell may include first and second sets of intra-cell couplers, and partial couplers that form inter-cell couplers with partial couplers in adjacent cells.

Claims (47)

1 . A quantum processor comprising:

a plurality of cells tiled over an area such that each cell of the plurality of cells is positioned proximately adjacent at least one other cell of the plurality of cells, each cell comprising:

a plurality of partial qubits, wherein each partial qubit in the plurality of partial qubits comprises at least a portion of a length of a whole qubit, the plurality of partial qubits comprising:

a first set of partial qubits, each partial qubit in the first set of partial qubits extending substantially along a first direction,

a second set of partial qubits, each partial qubit in the second set of partial qubits extending substantially along the first direction, wherein each partial qubit in the second set of partial qubits is substantially parallel with each partial qubit in the first set of partial qubits,

a third set of partial qubits, each partial qubit in the third set of partial qubits extending substantially along a second direction, wherein each partial qubit in the third set of partial qubits crosses at least one partial qubit in the first set of partial qubits and at least one partial qubit in the second set of partial qubits, and

a fourth set of partial qubits, each partial qubit in the fourth set of partial qubits extending substantially along the second direction, wherein each partial qubit in the fourth set of partial qubits is substantially parallel with each partial qubit in the third set of partial qubits, and wherein each partial qubit in the fourth set of partial qubits crosses at least one partial qubit in the first set of partial qubits and at least one partial qubit in the second set of partial qubits;

a first set of couplers, wherein each coupler in the first set of couplers communicatively couples a partial qubit of the plurality of partial qubits extending substantially along the first direction and a partial qubit of the plurality of partial qubits extending substantially along the second direction; and

a second set of couplers, wherein each coupler in the second set of couplers communicatively couples a partial qubit in the first set of partial qubits to a partial qubit in the second set of partial qubits, or a partial qubit in the third set of partial qubits to a partial qubit in the fourth set of partial qubits; and

a set of inter-cell couplers, each inter-cell coupler of the set of inter-cell couplers communicatively couplingcouples two partial qubits in adjacent cells of the plurality of cells wherein the two partial qubits belong to a same one of a respective first, second, third, or fourth set of partial qubits of each one of the adjacent cells.

2 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein partial qubits of the plurality of partial qubits extending substantially along the first direction are substantially orthogonal to partial qubits of the plurality of partial qubits extending substantially along the second direction.

3 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein each partial qubit in at least one of the first set of partial qubits, the second set of partial qubits, the third set of partial qubits, and the fourth set of partial qubits comprises half of the length of a whole qubit.

4 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein at least one set of partial qubits in each cell of the plurality of cells forms a set of whole qubits with a set of partial qubits in an adjacent cell of the plurality of cells.

5 . The quantum processor of claim 3 , wherein each whole qubit in a set of whole qubits spans a majority of a length of two cells of the plurality of cells.

6 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein:

the partial qubits of the first set of partial qubits extend substantially parallel to a first major axis, the first major axis extending substantially along the first direction;

the partial qubits of the second set of partial qubits extend substantially parallel to a second major axis along a second major axis, the second major axis extending substantially along the first direction;

the partial qubits of the third set of partial qubits extend substantially parallel to a third major axis, the third major axis extending substantially along the second direction; and

the partial qubits of the fourth set of partial qubits extend substantially parallel to a fourth major axis, the fourth major axis extending substantially along the second direction,

wherein both of the first major axis and the second major axis cross both of the third major axis and the fourth major axis.

7 . The quantum processor of claim 6 , wherein pairs of crossing major axes are substantially orthogonal to one another.

8 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein:

each partial qubit of the first set of partial qubits extends substantially parallel to a respective first major axis, each respective first major axis extending substantially along the first direction, wherein each respective first major axis is parallel to all other first major axes of other partial qubits in the first set of partial qubits;

each partial qubit of the second set of partial qubits extends substantially parallel to a respective second major axis, each respective second major axis extending substantially along the first direction, wherein each respective second major axis is parallel to all other second major axes of other partial qubits in the second set of partial qubits and the first major axis of the partial qubits in the first set of partial qubits;

each partial qubit of the third set of partial qubits extends substantially parallel to a respective third major axis, each respective third major axis extending substantially along the second direction, wherein each respective third major axis is parallel to all other third major axes of other partial qubits in the third set of partial qubits; and

each partial qubit of the fourth set of partial qubits extends substantially parallel to a respective fourth major axis, each respective fourth major axis extending substantially along the second direction, wherein each respective fourth major axis is substantially parallel to all other fourth major axes of other partial qubits in the fourth set of partial qubits and the third major axis of the partial qubits in the third set of partial qubits.

9 . The quantum processor of claim 8 , wherein:

each respective first major axis of each partial qubit in the first set of partial qubits crosses: at least one third major axis and at least one fourth major axis;

each respective second major axis of each partial qubit in the second set of partial qubits crosses: at least one third major axis and at least one fourth major axis;

each respective third major axis of each partial qubit in the third set of partial qubits crosses: at least one first major axis and at least one second major axis; and

each respective fourth major axis of each partial qubit in the fourth set of partial qubits crosses: at least one first major axis and at least one second major axis.

10 . The quantum processor of claim 9 , wherein each pair of crossing major axes are substantially orthogonal to one another.

11 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein each coupler in the first set of couplers is positioned at a region proximate to a location at which the partial qubit extending substantially along the first direction meets the partial qubit extending substantially along the second direction.

12 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein;

each coupler in the second set of couplers communicatively couples each partial qubit in the first set of partial qubits to a nearest-neighboring partial qubit in the second set of partial qubits, or

each coupler in the second set of couplers communicatively couples each partial qubit in the third set of partial qubits to a nearest-neighboring partial qubit in the fourth set of partial qubits.

13 . The quantum processor of claim 1 , wherein each whole qubit is a superconducting flux qubit.

14 . The quantum processor of claim 13 , wherein each whole qubit comprises:

a Josephson junction;

a first qubit loop formed by a first superconducting current path; and

a second qubit loop formed by a second superconducting current path,

wherein the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop are electrically coupled in parallel across the Josephson junction, and

wherein the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop each comprise a material that exhibits superconducting behavior at and below a critical temperature.

15 . The quantum processor of claim 14 , wherein the Josephson junction is selected from a group consisting of: a compound Josephson junction and a compound-compound Josephson junction.

16 . The quantum processor of claim 14 , wherein the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop are substantially symmetric about an axis of the Josephson junction, the axis of the Josephson junction intersecting:

a first connection between the first qubit loop, the second qubit loop, and the Josephson junction, and

a second connection between the first qubit loop, the second qubit loop, and the Josephson junction.

Assignments (1)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2025
From: PSPIB UNITAS INVESTMENTS II INC.
To: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.; 1372934 B.C. LTD.
Reel/Frame 070470/0098 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63227395 · Jul 30, 2021
Related Publication 20240338584A1 · Oct 10, 2024
References Cited (163)
US 6437413B1 · Yamaguchi et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6627915B1 · Ustinov et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6627916B2 · Amin et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6670630B2 · Blais et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6784451B2 · Amin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6822255B2 · Tzalenchuk et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6838694B2 · Esteve et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6885325B2 · Omelyanchouk et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6900454B2 · Blais et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6979836B2 · Zagoskin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6984846B2 · Newns et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7005941B2 · Bremond et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7018852B2 · Wu et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7133888B2 · Kohn et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7268576B2 · Amin · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7335909B2 · Amin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7453162B2 · Freedman et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7533068B2 · Maassen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7566896B2 · Freedman et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7605600B2 · Harris · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7619437B2 · Thom et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7624088B2 · Johnson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7639035B2 · Berkley · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7687938B2 · Bunyk et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7756485B2 · Paas et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7778951B2 · Gilbert et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7800395B2 · Johnson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7843209B2 · Berkley · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7876248B2 · Berkley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7880529B2 · Amin · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7898282B2 · Harris et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7930152B2 · Coffey et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7932515B2 · Bunyk · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7984012B2 · Coury et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8063657B2 · Rose · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8098179B2 · Bunyk et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8102185B2 · Johansson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8111083B1 · Pesetski et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8159313B2 · Uchaykin · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8169231B2 · Berkley · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8174305B2 · Harris · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8190548B2 · Choi · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8195596B2 · Rose et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8421053B2 · Bunyk et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8441329B2 · Thom et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8536566B2 · Johansson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8738105B2 · Berkley et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8854074B2 · Berkley · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8951808B2 · Ladizinsky et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9015215B2 · Berkley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9111230B2 · Gambetta et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9129224B2 · Lanting et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9178154B2 · Bunyk · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9183508B2 · King · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9361169B2 · Berkley · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9524470B1 · Chow et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9633314B2 · Kwon · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9710758B2 · Bunyk et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9727823B2 · Amin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10013657B2 · Bourassa et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10262276B2 · Puri et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10268622B2 · Hilton et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10572814B2 · Friesen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10832155B2 · Lechner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11494681B1 · Peterson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11507871B2 · Boothby et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11615336B2 · Oliver et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20050250621A1 · Corbalis et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20120319684A1 · Gambetta et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140229722A1 · Harris · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150076681A1 · Satomi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180032893A1 · Epstein · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180309452A1 · Kerman · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190019099A1 · Hoskinson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190266508A1 · Bunyk · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210384404A1 · Finck · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230027682A1 · Molavi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CA 2386426A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 0227653A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005093649A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007085074A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015178990A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023009609A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023219656A2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Amin et al., “Decoherence in adiabatic quantum computation”, arXiv:0708.0384v1, Aug. 2, 2007. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0384. [cited by applicant]
Amin et al., “Role of Single Qubit Decoherence Time in Adiabatic Quantum Computation”, arXiv:0803.1196 [cond-mat.mes-hall], Sep. 17, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Amin et al., “Thermally assisted adiabatic quantum computation,” arXiv:cond-mat/0609332v2, pp. 1-5, (Mar. 2, 2007) Feb. 1, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Ardavan et al., “Nanoscale solid-state quantum computing”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Jun. 11, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Averin et al., “Variable Electrostatic Transformer: Controllable Coupling of Two Charge Qubits,” Physical Review Letters 91(5): 057003-1-057003-4, Aug. 1, 2003. arXiv:cond-mat/0304166v1, Apr. 7, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Barends R. et al., “Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits,” arXiv:1304.2322v1 [quant-ph], Apr. 8, 2013, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bell, et al, “Quantum Superinductor With Tunable Non-Linearity”, arxiV:1206.0307v2, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Berggren, “Quantum Computing With Superconductors”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92(10), Oct. 1, 2004. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2986358_Quantum_Computing_with_Superconductors. [cited by applicant]
Blatter et al., “Design aspects of superconducting-phase quantum bits,” Physical Review B 63: 174511-1-174511-9, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Boothy et al, “Fast Clique Minor Generation in Chimera Qubit Connectivity Graphs”, arXiv:1507.04774v2, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Boyer et al., “On the Cutting Edge: Simplified O(n) Planarity by Edge Addition”, Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, Jan. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Brennen et al., “Why should anyone care about computing with anyons?,” arXiv:0704.2241v1 [quant-ph], pp. 1-12, Apr. 18, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Bunyk et al., “Architectural Considerations in the Design of a Superconducting Quantum Annealing Processor,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 24, arXiv:1401.5504v1 [quant-ph] Jan. 21, 2014, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Butcher, J.R., “Advances in Persistent-Current Qubit Research: Inductively Coupled Qubits and Novel Biasing Methods,” Final Report, Delft University of Technology, Jan. 10, 2002, 52 pages. [cited by applicant]
Carelli et al., “SQUID Systems for Macroscopic Quantum Coherence and Quantum Computing”, IEEE trans. Apple. Supercond., Mar. 1, 2001. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/919321. [cited by applicant]
Chancellor et al., “Circuit design for multi-body interactions in superconducting quantum annealing systems with applications to a scalable architecture”, Nature Magazine, Aug. 1, 2017, 2016. https://www.nature.com/arti… [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Qubit architecture with high coherences and fast tunable coupling”, Physical Review Letters, Feb. 28, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.7367. [cited by applicant]
Childs et al., “Robustness of adiabatic quantum computation”, Physical Review A, vol. 65, Oct. 14, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., “Quiet Readout of Superconducting Flux States,” Physica Scripta. T102: 173-177, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., “Superconducting quantum bits,” Nature 453:1031-1042, Jun. 19, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Cosmelli, C., “Controllable Flux Coupling for the Integration of Flux Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0403690v1 [cond-mat.supr-con]. Mar. 29, 2004, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Coury, “Embedding Graphs into Extended Grid”, arXiv:cs/0703001 [cs.DM] Feb. 28, 2007. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0703001. [cited by applicant]
Deng et al, “Solving Graph Problems Using Gaussian Boson Sampling”, Physical Review Letters 130, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Devoret et al., “Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook,” Science 339:1169-1174, Mar. 8, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Devoret et al., “Superconducting Qubits: A Short Review,” arXiv:cond-mat/0411174v1, Nov. 7, 2004, 41 pages. [cited by applicant]
DiVincenzo, “The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation,” arXiv:quanti-ph/0002077v3, Apr. 13, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Farhi et al., “Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithms versus Simulated Annealing,” MIT-CTP #3228, arXiv:quant-ph/0201031 v1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 8, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Filippov et al., “Tunable Transformer for Qubits Based on Flux States,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 13(2): Jun. 1-4, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Friedman et al., “Detection of a Schrodinger's Cat State in an rf-SQUID,” arXiv:cond-mat/0004293v2 2:1-7, Apr. 19, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Friedman et al., “Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states,” Nature 406:43-46, Jul. 6, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Ghiu et al., “Asymmetric two-output quantum processor in any dimension,” arXiv:quant-ph/0610138v1, pp. 1-8, Oct. 17, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Grajcar et al., “Four-Qubit Device with Mixed Couplings”, Physical Review Letters, Feb. 3, 2006. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.047006. [cited by applicant]
Gutwenger et al., “Graph Drawing Algorithm Engineering with AGD”, Software Visualization, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Han et al., “Time-Resolved Measurement of Dissipation-Induced Decoherence in a Josephson Junction,” Science 293:1457-1459, Aug. 24, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al., “Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit,” arXiv:0909.4321v1, Sep. 24, 2009, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al., “Experimental Investigation of an Eight-Qubit Unit Cell in a Superconducting Optimization Processor,” arXiv:1004.1628v2, Jun. 28, 2010, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Harris, Sign and Magnitude Tunable Coupler for Superconducting Flux Qubits, arXiv:cond-mat/0608253v1, Aug. 11, 2006 2006. [cited by applicant]
Hillery et al., “Approximate programmable quantum processors,” arXiv:quant-ph/0510161v1, pp. 1-7, Oct. 20, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Ilichev, et al., “Continuous Monitoring of Rabi Oscillations in a Josephson Flux Qubit”, Physical Review Letters 91(9):097906-1-097906-4, week ending Aug. 19, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Istrail, “Statistical Mechanics, Three-Dimensionality and NP-completeness—I. Universality of Intractability for the Partition Function of the Ising Model Across Non-Planar Lattices”, Brown University. 2000. [cited by applicant]
Kaminsky et al., “Scalable Architecture for Adiabatic Quantum Computing of NP—Hard Problems”, arXiv:quant-ph/0211152, Nov. 23, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Katzgraber et al., “Glassy Chimeras Could be Blind to Quantum Speedup: Designing Better Benchmarks for Quantum Annealing Machines,” Physical Review X(4):021008, 2014. (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Knysh et al., “Adiabatic Quantum Computing in systems with constant inter-qubit couplings”, arXiv:quant-ph/0511131, Nov. 15, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Koch et al., “Model for I/f Flux Noise in SQUIDs and Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0702025v2, pp. 1-14, May 5, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Krenner et al., “Recent advances in exciton-based quantum information processing in quantum dot nanostructures”, New Journal of Physics, Aug. 26, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Lang, “Analog was not a Computer Trademark!,” Sound & Vibration: Aug. 16-24, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Lechner et al., “A quantum annealing architecture with all-to-all connectivity from local interactions”, Science Advances., vol. 1, No. 19, Oct. 23, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Levinson, “Principles of Lithography”, The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, 2001. (book details provided). [cited by applicant]
Levitov, et al., “Quantum Spin Chains and Majorana States in Arrays of Coupled Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0108266v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. Aug. 19, 2001, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lidar, “On the quantum computational complexity of the Ising spin glass partition function and of knot invariants,” New Journal of Physics 6(167): 1-15, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication: The Science of Miniaturization, CRC Press, 2002, pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Makhlin et al., “Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices”, arXIv:cond-mat/0011269v1, Nov. 15, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Martinis et al., “Rabi Oscillations in a Large Josephson-Junction Qubit,” Physical Review Letters 89(11):117901-1-117901-4, Sep. 9, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Martinis, “Superconducting phase qubits,” Quantum Inf Process 8:81-103, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Mc Hugh et al., “A quantum computer using a trapped-ion spin molecule and microwave radiation,” arXiv:quant-ph/0310015v2, pp. 1-9, Apr. 13, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Mizel et al., “Energy barrier to decoherence”, Physical Review A, vol. 63, Mar. 19, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Mutzel, “Optimization in graph drawing”, Technische Universitat Wien, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Nielsen et al., “7.8 Other implementation schemes,” in Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 343-345. [cited by applicant]
Nielsen, “Cluster-State Quantum Computation,” arXiv:quant-ph/0504097v2, pp. 1-15, Jul. 1, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Niskanen et al., “Quantum Coherent Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits,” Science 316:723-726, May 4, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Plourde et al., “Entangling Flux Qubits with a Bipolar Dynamic Inductance,” Physical Review B 70, arXiv:quant-ph/0406049v1, Jun. 8, 2004, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ramos et al., “Design for Effective Thermalization of Junctions for Quantum Coherence,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 11(1):998-1001, Mar. 2001. [cited by applicant]
Rocchetto et al., “Stabilizers as a design tool for new forms of the Lechner-Hauke-Zoller annealer”, Science Advances, Oct. 21, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Ryan et al., “Characterization of complex quantum dynamics with a scalable NMR information processor,” arXiv:quant-ph/0506085v1, pp. 1-4, Feb. 13, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Shields et al., “Area efficient layouts of binary trees in grids”, ACM Digital Library, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Shin et al., “How “Quantum” is the D-Wave Machine?”, arXiv:1401.7087v2, May 2, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Shor, “Introduction to Quantum Algorithms,” AT&T Labs—Research, arXiv:quant-ph/0005003 v2, pp. 1-17, Jul. 6, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Steffen et al., “Quantum computing: An IBM perspective”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 55, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 2011. [cited by applicant]
T. P. Spiller, I. D'Amico & B. W. Lovett, “Entanglement distribution for a practical quantum-dot-based quantum processor architecture”, New Journal of Physics 9(2007) 20, Jan. 29, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Thaker et al., “Quantum Memory Hierarchies: Efficient Designs to Match Available Parallelism in Quantum Computing,” arXiv:quant-ph/0604070v1, 12 pages, Apr. 10, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Tokuda, “Analog Computation Using Single-Electron Circuits”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Oct. 1, 2000. http://lalsie.ist.hokudai.ac.jp/publication/dlcenter.php?fn=paper/aicsp_2000_tokuda.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Van Dam, “Quantum Computing: In the ‘Death Zone’?,” Nature Physics 3:220-221, Apr. 2007. [cited by applicant]
VanDenBrink Mediated Tunable Coupling of Flux Qubits, New Journal of Physics 7 (2005) 230, Nov. 7, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Vlasov, “Von Neumann Quantum Processors,” arXiv:quant-ph/0311196v1, pp. 1-8, Nov. 27, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Wendin et al., “Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Qubits and Computing,” arXiv:cond-mat/0508729v1 [cond-mat.supr-con], Aug. 30, 2005, 60 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wilhelm, “A Shift In Spectroscopy”, Nature vol. 455/4, Sep. 4, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Wocjan et al., “Treating the Independent Set Problem by 2D Ising Interactions with Adiabatic Quantum Computing,” arXiv:quant-ph/0302027v1, pp. 1-13, Feb. 4, 2003. [cited by applicant]
You, et al., “Fast Two-Bit Operations in Inductively Coupled Flux Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0309491v1, pp. 1-5, Sep. 22, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Zagoskin et al., “Superconducting Qubits”, arXiv:0805.0164 [cond-mat.supr-con], 2008. [0805.0164] Superconducting qubits (arxiv.org). [cited by applicant]