IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,632,760
Granted Patent B2
US 12,632,760 · App. 17/786,192 · Granted May 19, 2026

Systems and methods for tuning capacitance of qubits

Inventors: Reza Molavi (North Vancouver, CA); Mark H. Volkmann (Burnaby, CA); Emile M. Hoskinson (Vancouver, CA); Richard G. Harris (North Vancouver, CA); Trevor M. Lanting (Vancouver, CA); Paul I. Bunyk (Pt. Roberts, WA); Andrew J. Berkley (Vancouver, CA)
Assignee: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.
G06N10/40H10N60/12G06F30/347G06F30/392G06F30/394
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,632,760
App. No.
17/786,192
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A qubit within an analog computing system with two or more body loops is discussed, along with inductors disposed along at least one of the body loops to provide tunable inductance and increase or decrease the qubit capacitance. Near and far inductors can be tuned to homogenize the inductance and capacitance of the qubit across a range of programmable states based on predicted and target inductance and capacitance for the qubit.

Claims (35)

1 . An analog computing system comprising a qubit, the qubit comprising:

a Josephson junction;

a first qubit loop formed by a first superconducting current path; and

a second qubit loop formed by a second superconducting current path;

wherein the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop are electrically connected in parallel across the Josephson junction, and a position of the Josephson junction along the first qubit loop defines a critical distance dividing the first qubit loop into a near inductor regime and a far inductor regime where adding a lumped inductance in the near inductor regime decreases a qubit capacitance at the Josephson junction and where adding the lumped inductance in the far inductor regime increases the qubit capacitance at the Josephson junction, the analog computing system further comprising:

a plurality of inductors disposed along the first qubit loop, each of the plurality of inductors tunable to provide a tunable inductance, the plurality of inductors comprising:

one or more near inductors, each near inductor disposed in the near inductor regime; and

one or more far inductors, each far inductor disposed in the far inductor regime.

2 . The analog computing system according to claim 1 further comprising one or more couplers tunably coupleable to the first qubit loop, each of the one or more couplers tunable to provide a respective coupling strength with the qubit.

3 . The analog computing system according to claim 2 wherein the tunable inductance for each of the plurality of inductors is tunable within a corresponding inductance range and each of the one or more couplers has a corresponding coupler-induced inductance range, each coupler-induced inductance range comprising a difference in a qubit inductance at the Josephson junction between states of the corresponding one of the one or more couplers, and a sum of the tunable inductance ranges of the plurality of inductors is greater than each of the corresponding coupler-induced inductance ranges.

4 . The analog computing system according to claim 3 wherein the sum of the tunable inductance ranges of the plurality of inductors is greater than a total coupler-induced inductance range, the total coupler-induced inductance range comprising a difference between a first coupler-induced inductance and a second coupler-induced inductance, the first coupler-induced inductance comprising the qubit inductance in a first state where each of the one or more couplers is ferromagnetically coupled to the qubit and the second coupler-induced inductance comprising the qubit inductance in a second state where each of the one or more couplers is anti-ferromagnetically coupled to the qubit.

5 . The analog computing system according to claim 4 wherein:

the one or more near inductors collectively are tunable to reduce the qubit capacitance from a first coupler-induced capacitance to within a first threshold of a target capacitance;

the one or more far inductors collectively are tunable to increase the qubit capacitance from a second coupler-induced capacitance to within a second threshold of the target capacitance;

the first coupler-induced capacitance comprises the qubit capacitance in a third state where each of the one or more couplers that is in the near inductor regime is anti-ferromagnetically coupled to the first qubit loop and each of the one or more couplers that is in the far inductor regime is ferromagnetically coupled to the first qubit loop; and

the second coupler-induced capacitance comprises the qubit capacitance in a fourth state where each of the one or more couplers that is in the near inductor regime is ferromagnetically coupled to the first qubit loop and each of the one or more couplers that is in the far inductor regime is anti-ferromagnetically coupled to the first qubit loop.

6 . The analog computing system according to claim 5 wherein, for a predetermined target qubit inductance and a predetermined set of coupling strengths for the one or more couplers, the plurality of inductors are tunable to provide a total tunable inductance for each of the first, second, third, and fourth states which increases the qubit inductance to within a third threshold of the predetermined target qubit inductance and at least one of: increases and reduces the qubit capacitance to within a fourth threshold of the target capacitance.

7 . The analog computing system according to claim 2 wherein one inductor of the plurality of inductors comprises one or more inductor Josephson junctions interrupting the first qubit loop and tunable to provide a respective tunable inductance range of the one inductor of the plurality of inductors.

8 . The analog computing system according to claim 7 wherein the one of the plurality of inductors comprises one or more DC-SQUIDs, the one or more DC-SQUIDs comprising the one or more inductor Josephson junctions.

9 . The analog computing system according to claim 8 wherein the one of the plurality of inductors comprises a plurality of DC-SQUIDs connected in series along the first qubit loop.

10 . The analog computing system according to claim 1 wherein the qubit comprises at least one secondary inductor disposed along the second qubit loop.

11 . The analog computing system according to claim 10 wherein the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop partially overlap along a shared portion and a shared inductor of the plurality of inductors is disposed along the shared portion.

12 . The analog computing system according to claim 11 wherein the shared inductor comprises one of the one or more near inductors.

13 . The analog computing system according to claim 10 wherein the at least one secondary inductor comprises:

one or more secondary near inductors, each secondary near inductor disposed along the second qubit loop less than a second critical distance from the Josephson junction; and

one or more secondary far inductors, each secondary far inductor disposed along the second qubit loop more than the second critical distance from the Josephson junction.

14 . The analog computing system according to claim 13 wherein the plurality of inductors and the at least one secondary inductor collectively provide a collective tunable inductance range of at least twice a total coupler-induced inductance range.

15 . The analog computing system of claim 1 , further comprising a first flux bias line in communication with the first qubit loop and a second flux bias line in communication with the second qubit loop, the first flux bias line receiving signals independently from the second flux bias line.

16 . The analog computing system of claim 1 , wherein the second qubit loop comprises a first portion in communication with the Josephson junction and a second portion spaced from the Josephson junction, the first portion and the second portion being separated by a crossing, wherein a current in the second qubit loop travels in a first rotational direction in the first portion and a second rotational direction that is opposite to the first rotational direction in the second portion.

17 . The analog computing system of claim 1 , wherein the Josephson junction comprises one of a compound Josephson junction or a compound-compound Josephson junction.

18 . The analog computing system of claim 1 , wherein the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop partially overlap along a shared portion.

19 . The analog computing system of claim 1 , further comprising a coupler tunably coupled to one of the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop.

20 . The analog computing system of claim 19 , further comprising a second qubit coupled to the coupler.

21 . The analog computing system of claim 1 , wherein the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop are symmetric about an axis of the Josephson junction, the axis of the Josephson junction intersecting a first connection between the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop and the Josephson junction and a second connection between the first qubit loop and the second qubit loop and the Josephson junction.

22 . The analog computing system of claim 1 , further comprising one or more additional qubit loops electrically connected in parallel across the Josephson junction.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2026
From: MOLAVI, REZA; VOLKMANN, MARK H.; HOSKINSON, EMILE M.; BERKLEY, ANDREW J.; HARRIS, RICHARD G.; LANTING, TREVOR M.; BUNYK, PAUL I.
To: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 074377/0514 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 15, 2026
From: DWSI HOLDINGS INC.
To: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 074378/0009 →
CONTINUATION Recorded Apr 15, 2026
From: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.
To: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 075417/0601 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 15, 2026
From: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.; DWSI HOLDINGS INC.
To: DWSI HOLDING INC.
Reel/Frame 075420/0565 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2025
From: PSPIB UNITAS INVESTMENTS II INC.
To: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.; 1372934 B.C. LTD.
Reel/Frame 070470/0098 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 14, 2023
From: D-WAVE SYSTEMS INC.; 1372934 B.C. LTD.
To: PSPIB UNITAS INVESTMENTS II INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063340/0888 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62951738 · Dec 20, 2019
Related Publication 20230027682A1 · Jan 26, 2023
References Cited (400)
US 3573759A · Zimmerman et al. · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 4028714A · Henkels · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4504926A · Toyoda · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4769753A · Knudson et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4956642A · Harada · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5162731A · Fujimaki · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5323344A · Katayama et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5326986A · Miller et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5329165A · Kao et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5768297A · Shor · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5787307A · Imoto · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5869846A · Higashino et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5917322A · Gershenfeld et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6128764A · Gottesman · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6157044A · Nakanishi et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6169981B1 · Werbos · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6317766B1 · Grover · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6360112B1 · Mizuno et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6459097B1 · Zagoskin · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6495854B1 · Newns et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6504172B2 · Zagoskin et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6563310B2 · Zagoskin · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6563311B2 · Zagoskin · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6605822B1 · Blais et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6614047B2 · Tzalenchuk et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6627915B1 · Ustinov et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6627916B2 · Amin et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6633053B1 · Jaeger · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6649929B2 · Newns et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6670630B2 · Blais et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6728131B2 · Ustinov · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6753546B2 · Tzalenchuk et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6803599B2 · Amin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6838694B2 · Esteve et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6885325B2 · Omelyanchouk et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6897468B2 · Blais et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6900454B2 · Blais et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6900456B2 · Blais et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6911664B2 · Il et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6919579B2 · Amin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6930320B2 · Blais et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6936841B2 · Amin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6943368B2 · Amin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6960780B2 · Blais et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6978070B1 · Mccarthy et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6979836B2 · Zagoskin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6984846B2 · Newns et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7002174B2 · Il et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7015499B1 · Zagoskin · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7133888B2 · Kohn et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7135701B2 · Amin et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7230266B2 · Hilton et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7253654B2 · Amin · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7307275B2 · Lidar et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7335909B2 · Amin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7418283B2 · Amin · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7533068B2 · Maassen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7605600B2 · Harris · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7613764B1 · Hilton et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7624088B2 · Johnson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7639035B2 · Berkley · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7843209B2 · Berkley · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7876248B2 · Berkley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7880529B2 · Amin · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7898282B2 · Harris et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8008942B2 · Van et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8018244B2 · Berkley · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8035540B2 · Berkley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8098179B2 · Bunyk et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8102185B2 · Johansson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8169231B2 · Berkley · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8190548B2 · Choi · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8195596B2 · Rose et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8421053B2 · Bunyk et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8536566B2 · Johansson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8611974B2 · Maibaum et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8644898B1 · De Andrade et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8854074B2 · Berkley · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8951808B2 · Ladizinsky et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9015215B2 · Berkley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9152923B2 · Harris et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9495644B2 · Chudak et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9727823B2 · Amin · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9870277B2 · Berkley · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10037493B2 · Harris et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10068180B2 · Amin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10312141B2 · Kirby et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10528886B2 · Boothby · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10552755B2 · Lanting et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10938346B2 · Berkley et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11127893B2 · Johnson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11182230B2 · Berkley et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11424521B2 · Whittaker et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11494683B2 · Amin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20010020701A1 · Zagoskin · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20010023943A1 · Zagoskin · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020060635A1 · Gupta · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020117656A1 · Amin et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020179937A1 · Ivanov et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020180006A1 · Franz et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020188578A1 · Amin et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030016069A1 · Furuta et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030071258A1 · Zagoskin et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030111661A1 · Tzalenchuk et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030193097A1 · Il et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030207766A1 · Esteve et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030224944A1 · Il et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040000666A1 · Lidar et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040012407A1 · Amin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040016918A1 · Amin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040071019A1 · Magnus et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050047245A1 · Furuta et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050224784A1 · Amin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060147154A1 · Thom et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080116448A1 · Kitaev · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080215850A1 · Berkley et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080258753A1 · Harris · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090078931A1 · Berkley · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090322374A1 · Przybysz et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110057169A1 · Harris · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110060780A1 · Berkley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120094838A1 · Bunyk et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120124432A1 · Pesetski et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140229722A1 · Harris · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150032991A1 · Lanting et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150111754A1 · Harris · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150219730A1 · Tsukamoto et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150263736A1 · Herr et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160132785A1 · Amin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160335558A1 · Bunyk · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170256698A1 · Nayfeh et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180054201A1 · Reagor et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180247217A1 · Heeres et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180314970A1 · Harris et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180341874A1 · Puri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190013065A1 · Przybysz · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190019098A1 · Przybysz · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190164959A1 · Thomas et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190237648A1 · Przybysz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392878A1 · Murduck et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200036332A1 · Abdo · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200090738A1 · Naaman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200320426A1 · Amin · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200401649A1 · Lanting · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210013391A1 · Johnson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210073667A1 · Harris · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210190885A1 · Swenson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210248506A1 · Hoskinson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220020913A1 · Harris et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220123048A1 · Swenson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220374755A1 · Didier · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230010205A1 · Sank · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230027682A1 · Molavi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230106489A1 · Harris · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230370069A1 · Amin et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CA 3029949C · 2020 [cited by examiner]
DE 19511172A1 · 1996 [cited by applicant]
EP 0251568A1 · 1988 [cited by applicant]
EP 0916961A2 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
EP 1085422A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
KR 20190015330A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 9612305A1 · 1996 [cited by applicant]
WO 03090161A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 03090161A3 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2005093649A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010028183A2 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2012064974A2 · 2012 [cited by examiner]
WO 2015013532A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017192733A2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019126396 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021126875A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022155140A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023004040A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023114811A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023219656A2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024050333A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024102504A2 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024172854A2 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Barends et al., “Logic gates at the surface code threhold: Superconducting qubitsd poised for fault-tolerant quantum computing”, Uiniversity of California, https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4848, 2014, 15 pages. (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Ghiu et al., “Asymmetric two-output quantum processor in any dimension”, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2199659_Asymmetric_two-output_quantum_processor_in_any_dimension, Oct. 2, 2018, 8 pages. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Martinis et al., “Superconducting Qubits and the Physics of Josephson Junctions”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0402415, Feb. 16, 2004, 26 pages. (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
Wang et al., “Measurement of the Decay of Fock States in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit”, Physical Review Letters, No. 101, Dec. 12, 2008, 4 pages. (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Harris, Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit, arXiv:0909.4321v1 [cond-mat.supr-con], Sep. 24, 2009, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aassime et al., “Radio-frequency Single-electron Transistor as Readout Device for Qubits: charge sensitivity and backaction”, Phys Rev Lett 86, pp. 3376-3379, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Benatti et al., “Testing Macroscopic Quantum Coherence”, II Nuovo Cimento B 110, No. 5-6, pp. 593-610, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Briegel et al., “Quantum repreaters for Communication”, arXiv.org:quant-ph/9803056, pp. 1-8 (1998), 1998. [cited by applicant]
Castellano et al., “A Squid Switch for a Macroscopic Quantum Coherence Experiment”, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 167, pp. 593-596 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Costabile et al., “rf-Induced steps in intermediate length Josephson-tunnel junctions”, J Appl Phys 63, pp. 5406-5410 (1988), 1988. [cited by applicant]
De Bruyn Ouboter et al., “Multi-terminal SQUID controlled by the transport current”, Physica B 205, pp. 153-162 (1995), 1995. [cited by applicant]
Feldman et al., “Josephson Junctions Digital Circuits”, FED Report, Feb. 1998, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gotz et al., “Harmonic current-phase relation in Nb—A1-based superconductor/ normal conductor/ superconductor-type Josephson junctions betWeen 4.2 K and the critical temperature”, ApplPhys. Lett. 77, pp. 1354-1356 (2000… [cited by applicant]
Greenberg et al., “Low-frequency characterization of quantum tunneling in flux qubits”, ArXiv.org preprint server: cond-mat/0208076, last accessed on Aug. 20, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Grover, “A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search”, Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pp. 212-219 (1996). [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev et al., “Characterization of superconducting structures designed for qubit realizations”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, pp. 4184-4186, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev et al., “Degenerate Ground State in a Mesoscopic YBa2Cu3O7-x Grain Boundary Josephson Junction”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, pp. 5369-5372, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev et al., “Radio-frequency based monitoring of small supercurrents”, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, pp. 1882-1887, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev et al., “Radio-frequency method for characterization of superconducting weak links,” Physica C 350, pp. 244-248, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev et al., “Temperature dependence of the current-phase relation for YBa2Cu3O7-x step-edge Josephson junctions”, App. Phys. Lett. 72, pp. 731-733, 1998. [cited by applicant]
Ioffe et al., “Environmentally decoupled sds—Wave Josephson junctions for quantum computing”, Nature 398, pp. 679-681 (1999). [cited by applicant]
Jones et al., “Implementation of a quantum search algorithm on a quantum computer”, Nature 393, pp. 344-346 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Jonker et al., “On quantum and classical computing with arrays of superconducting persistent current qubits”, Proceedings fifth IEEE International workshop on computer architectures for machine perception, Padova, italy… [cited by applicant]
Ketchen, “Integrated Thin Film do-SQUID sensors”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 23, pp. 1650-1657, 1987. [cited by applicant]
Kitaev et al., “Quantum measurements and the Abellan StabiliZer Problem”, arXiv:quant-ph/9511026, pp. 1-22 (1995). [cited by applicant]
Knill et al., “Resilient Quantum Computation”, Science 279, pp. 342-345 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Korotkov et al., “Charge Sensitivity of Radio-Frequency Single Electron Transistor”, Appl. Phys Lett. 74, pp. 4052-4054 (1999). [cited by applicant]
Krech, “Linear Microwave Response of a Charge-Type Qubit”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, pp. 1022-1025, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Makhlin et al., “Nano-electronic circuits as quantum bits”, ISACS 2000 Geneva. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Emerging Technologies of the 21st century Geneva, Switzerland, Mar. 28-32, 2000, pp. 2… [cited by applicant]
Rey-de-Castro et al., “Design of an RSFQ Control Circuit to Observe MQC on an rf-Squid”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 11, pp. 1014-1017 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Rifkin et al., “rf SQUID's in the nonhysteretic mode: Detailed comparison of theory and experiment,” J. App. Phys 47, pp. 2645-2650, 1976. [cited by applicant]
Schmidt et al., “Experimental investigations of the stationary behaviour of thin film double SQUIDS”, Physica B&C Netherlands vol. 125B+C No. 2, Aug. 1984, pp. 185-198, Aug. 1, 1984. [cited by applicant]
Schoelkopf et al., “The Radio-Frequency Single-Electron Transistor (RF-Set): A Fast and Ultrasensitive Electrometer”, Science 280, pp. 1238-1242 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Shor, “Polynominal—Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer”, SIAM Journal on Computing 26, pp. 1484-1509 (1997). [cited by applicant]
Silver et al., “Quantum States and Transitions in Weakly Connected Superconducting Rings”, Phys. Rev 157, pp. 317-341, 1967. [cited by applicant]
Stolz et al., “LTS SQUID sensor with a new configuration,” Supercon. Sci. Tech. 12, pp. 806-808, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Van der Wal et al., “Quantum Superposition of Macroscopic Persistent current states”, Science 290, pp. 773-777, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Vandersypen et al., “Experimental realiZation of order-finding With a quantum computer”, ArXiv.org:quant-ph/0007017, pp. 1-4 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Walraff et al., “Annular Long Josephson Junctions in a Magnetic Field: Engineering and Probing the Fluxon Interaction Potential”, J. Low Temp. Phys. 118, pp. 543-553 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Xi et al., “Effects of Fields induced hole density modulation on normal state and superconducting transport in YBa2Cu307-x”, Physical Review Letters, 68, pp. 1240-1243, 1992. [cited by applicant]
Zagoskin, “A scalable, tunable qubit, based on a clean DND or grain boundary D_D junction”, Los Alamos National Laboratory preprint cond-mat/9903170, pp. 1-8, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Zahn, “Experimental Apparatus for the measurement if the quantum interferences of the critical current of DC-tunnel SQUIDs”, Experimentelle technik der physik East Germany vol. 28, No. 2, 1980, pp. 163-168, 1980. [cited by applicant]
Zahn, “The critical current of the low damped DC-Squid”, Experimentelle technik der physik East Germany vol. 31, No. 4, 1983, pp. 311-318, 1983. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Non-constant bias current for do SQUID operation”, Physica C 368, pp. 181-184, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Operation of high-temperature rf SQUID magnetometers using dielectric SrTIO3 resonators”, App. Phys. Lett. 67, pp. 3183-3185, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Watanabe, M. et al., “Resonance-Free Low-Pass Filters for the AC Josephson Voltage Standard,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 16(1), Mar. 2006, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Allman, et al., “RFSQUID-Mediated Coherent Tunable Coupling Between a Superconducting Phase Qubit and a Lumped Element Resonator”, arXiv:1001.0816v1 [cond-mat.supr-con], Jan. 6, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Amin et al., “Thermally assisted adiabatic quantum computation,” arXiv:cond-mat/0609332v2, pp. 1-5, (Mar. 2, 2007) Feb. 1, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Amin, “Effect of Local Minima on Adiabatic Quantum Optimization,” arXiv:0709.0528v2, Apr. 4, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Anton, et al., “Magnetic Flux Noise in dc SQUIDs: Temperature and Geometry Dependence”, Physical Review Letters, PRL 110, 147002, Apr. 5, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Auger James M. Fault-tolerance thresholds for the surface code with fabrication errors, arXiv: 1706.04912v1, Jun. 15, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Barends, et al., Logic Gates at the Surface Code Threshold: Superconducting Qubits Poised for Fault-tolerant Quantum Computing, 2014, arXiv:1402.4848. [cited by applicant]
Blais, et al., “Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits” an architecture for quantum computation, arXiv:cond-mat/0402216v1, Feb. 7, 2004, pp. 1-14 (Year: 2004). [cited by applicant]
Brennen et al., “Why should anyone care about computing with anyons?,” arXiv:0704.2241v1 [quant-ph], pp. 1-12, Apr. 18, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Chancellor, et al., “Scalable Universal Holonomic Quantum Computation Realized with an Adiabatic Quantum Data Bus and Potential Implementation Using Superconducting Flux Qubits”, arXiv: 1301.7100v3 [quant-ph], Mar. 21, … [cited by applicant]
Chow, et al., “Complete Universal Quantum Gate Set Approaching Fault-tolerant Thresholds with Superconducting Qubits”, arXiv: 1202.5344v1 [quant-ph], Feb. 23, 2012, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., “Quiet Readout of Superconducting Flux States,” Physica Scripta. T102: 173-177, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Cosmelli, C., “Controllable Flux Coupling for the Integration of Flux Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0403690v1 [cond-mat. supr-con]. Mar. 29, 2004, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Devitt, Quantum Error Correction for Beginners, arXiv: 0905.2794v4 [quant-ph], Jun. 21, 2013, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Economist, Quantum Dreams, Economist,pp. 1-3 (Mar. 8, 2001), Science & Technology. [cited by applicant]
Farhi et al., “Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithms versus Simulated Annealing,” MIT-CTP #3228, arXiv:quant-ph/0201031 v1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 8, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Filippov et al., “Tunable Transformer for Qubits Based on Flux States,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 13(2): 1-4, Jun. 2003. [cited by applicant]
Geerlings, et al., “Improving the Quality Factor of Microwave Compact Resonators by Optimizing Their Geometrical Parameters”, arXiv: 1204.0742v3 [cond-mat.supr-con], Jun. 5, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Ghiu et al., “Asymmetric two-output quantum processor in any dimension,” arXiv:quant-ph/0610138v1, pp. 1-8, Oct. 17, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al., “A Compound Josephson Junction Coupler for Flux Qubits With Minimal Crosstalk,” arXiv:0904.3784v3 [cond-mat.supr-con], Jul. 16, 2009, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al., “Experimental Investigation of an Eight-Qubit Unit Cell in a Superconducting Optimization Processor,” arXiv: 1004.1628v2, Jun. 28, 2010, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Harris,“Sign and Magnitude Tunable Coupler for Superconducting Flux Qubits”, arXiv:cond-mat/0608253v1, Aug. 11, 2006, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Hofheinz, et al., “Generation of Fock States in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit”, Nature 454, pp. 310-314, Jul. 1, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Hofheinz, et al., “Synthesizing Arbitrary Quantum Staes in a Superconducting Resonator, Nature”, vol. 459, pp. 546-549, May 28, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Ilichev, et al., “Continuous Monitoring of Rabi Oscillations in a Josephson Flux Qubit”, Physical Review Letters 91(9): 097906-1-097906-4, week ending Aug. 19, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Inokuchi et al., “Analog computation using quantum-flux parametron devices,” Physica C 357-360 :1618-1621, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Johnson, et al; “A scalable control system for a superconducting adiabatic quantum optimization processor”; Superconductor Science and Technology; IOP Publishing; Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23 (2010); vol. 23, No. 6, Jun.… [cited by applicant]
Jordan, et al., “Perturbative Gadgets at Arbitrary Orders”, arXiv:0802.1874v4 [quant-ph], Jan. 31, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Knill, Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division, National Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, Oct. 22, 2018, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
LaForestFlux-vector Model of Spin Noise in Superconducting Circuits: Electron Versus Nuclear Spins and Role of Phase Transition, arXiv: 1501.03776v3 [cond-mat.supr-con], Jul. 21, 2015, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Lanting, Evidence for Temperature Dependent Spin-diffusion as a Mechanism of Intrinsic Flux Noise in SQUIDs, arXiv: 1306.1512v3 [cond-mat.supr-con], Dec. 23, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Levitov, et al., “Quantum Spin Chains and Majorana States in Arrays of Coupled Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0108266v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. Aug. 19, 2001, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lidar , Towards Fault Tolerant Adiabatic Quantum Computation, arXiv: 0707.0021v3 [quant-ph], May 2, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Manucharyan et al., “Fluxonium: single Cooper pair circuit free of charge offsets”, arXiv:0906.0831v2, [cond-mat.mes-hall] Oct. 20, 2009, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mc Hugh et al., “A quantum computer using a trapped-ion spin molecule and microwave radiation,” arXiv:quant-ph/0310015v2, pp. 1-9, Apr. 13, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Paik, et al., “Observation of High Coherence in Josephson Junction Qubits Measured in a Three-dimensional Circuit QED Architecture”, arXiv: 1105.4652v4 [quant-ph], Nov. 2, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Pop, et al., “Experimental Demonstration of Aharonov-Casher Interference in a Josephson Junction Circuit”, arXiv:1104.3999v1 [cond-mat.mess-hall], Apr. 20, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Sendelbach, et al., “Complex Inductance, Excess Noise, and Surface Magnetism in dc SQUIDs”, Physical Review Letters 103, 117001, Sep. 11, 2009. [cited by applicant]
VanDenBrink Mediated Tunable Coupling of Flux Qubits, New Journal of Physics 7 (2005) 230, Nov. 7, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Venturelli et al., “Quantum Optimization of Fully-Connected Spin Glasses”, arXiv, Jun. 29, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Wang, et al., “Measurement of the Decay of Fock States in a Superconducting Quantum Circuit”, arXiv:0808.3279v1 [cond-mat.mess-hall], Aug. 24, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Wenner, et al., “Catching Time-Reversed Microwave Photons with 99.4% Absorption Efficiency”, arXiv: 1311.1180v2 [quant-ph], Nov. 16, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Yin, et al., “Controlled Catch and Release of Microwave Photon States”, arXiv: 1208.2950v1 [cond-mat.supr-con], Aug. 14, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Zagoskin-Superconducting Qubits, La Physique au Canada 63(4):215-227, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Semenov , et al., Semenov, et al., “Classical and Quantum Operation Modes of the Reversible Logic Circuits,” Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, Presentation, Dec. 2006, 2… [cited by applicant]
Wang, Z. L, et al., “Quantum state characterization of a fast tunable superconducting resonator,”Letters 102, 163503 (2013), 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kerman, et al., “IARPA Quantum ENhances Optimiztion”(QEO) Study, Office of the Director of Natioanal Intelligence, Oct. 16, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Oliver, Quantum Enhanced Optimization: Experimental Study Overview, IARPA, Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Oct. 26, 2025. [cited by applicant]
Van den Brink, “Galvanic coupling of FLux Qubits: Simple Theory and Tunability”, arXiv:cond-mat/0605398v1 [cond-mat.supr-con], May 16, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Van der Wal, Quantum Superpositions of Persistent Josephson Currents, DUP Science, Sep. 24, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Baust,, Characterization of Flux-driven Josephson Parametric Amplifiers, Diploma Thesis, Technische Universitat Munchen, Aug. 2010, 119 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bell et al., “Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifier based on a chain of Coupled Asymmetric SQUIDs”, arXiv:1509.04573 [cond-mat.supr-con], Sep. 15, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Bell, et al, “SQUID Based Superconducting Traveling-Wave Parametric Amplifier”, IEEE/CSC & ESAS Superconductivity News Forum (global edition), Oct. 2014, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chamon, et al., “A superconducting circuit realization of combinatorial gauge symmetry”, arXiv:2006.10060v1 [quant-ph] Jun. 17, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chancellor et al., “Circuit design for multi-body interactions in superconducting quantum annealing systems with applications to a scalable architecture”, arXiv:1603.09521v5, Oct. 13, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Christopher Eichler et al., ‘Controlling the dynamic range of a Josephson parametric amplifier’, EPJ Quantum Technology, vol. 1, No. 2, Jan. 29, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Bergeal et al., “Josephson-based Parametric Amplifiers for Quantum Measurements”, Quantum-Mechanical Electronics Lab, Applied Physics and Physics, Yale University, Nov. 9, 92 pages. [cited by applicant]
Devoret, et al., “Introduction to Quantum-limited parametric Amplification of Quantum Signals with Josephson Circuits”, arXiv:1605.00539v2, May 25, 2016, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Eddins, et al, “Josephson Parametric Amplifiers: Theory and Application”, Quantum Nanoelectronics Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of CA, Berkley, Workshop on Microwave Cavity Design for Axion Detection Liv… [cited by applicant]
Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons”, arXiv:quant-ph/9707021v1 Jul. 9, 1997, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lechner et al., “A quantum annealing architecture with all-to-all connectivity from local interactions”, Science Advances. Oct. 23, 2015. https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/9/e1500838. [cited by applicant]
Macklin, et al., “A near-quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier”, Science Sciencemag. org,, Oct. 16, 2015, vol. 350, Issue 6258, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Puri, et al., “Quantum Annealing with All-to-all Connected Nonlinear Oscillators”, Nature Communications, vol. 8, Article No. 15785, Jun. 8, 2017, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sete, et al., “Purcell Effect with Microwave Drive: Suppression of Qubit Relaxation Rate”, arXiv: 1401.5545v2, Mar. 21, 2014, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Simbierowicz, et al., “Flux-driven Josephson Parametric Amplifier for Sub-GHz Frequencies Fabricated with Side-wall Passivated Spacer Junction Technology”, arXiv:1805.07307v1, May 18, 2018, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
White et al., “Traveling wave parametric amplifier with Josephson junctions using minimal resonator phase matching”, Applied Physics Letters 106, Jun. 15, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Zhao, et al. “Two-photon Driven Kerr Resonator for Quantum Annealing with Three-dimensional Circuit QED”, arXiv:1712.03613v2, Dec. 12, 2017, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., “Experimental Realization of Spin Liquids in a Programmable Quantum Device”, arXiv:2009.07853v2, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Al-Saidi et al., “Eigenstates of a small Josephson junction coupled to a resonant cavity”, Physical Review B, 65, pp. 014512-1 to 014512-7, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Armour et al., “Entangle ment and Decoherence of a Micromechanical Resonator via Coupling to a Cooper-Pair Box”, Physical RevieW Letters, 88, pp. 148304-1 to 148301-4, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Averin et al., “Quantum Computing and Quantum Measurements With Mesoscopic Josephson Junctions”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 1055-1074, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Barone et al., “Quantum Computation With Aharonov-Bohm Qubits”, WWW.arXiv.org preprint: cond-mat/0203038 v1 (Mar. 2, 2002). [cited by applicant]
Blais et al., “Quantum netWork optimization”, Physical RevieW A, 64, pp. 022312-1 to 022312-5 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Buisson et al., “Entangled states in a Josephson charge qubit coupled to a superconducting resonator”, arXiv.org: cond/mat/0008275 (2000). [cited by applicant]
Burkard et al., “Spintronics and Quantum Dots for Quantum Computing and Quantum Communication,” Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 965-986, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Cory et al., “NMR Based Quantum Information Processing: Achievements and Prospects”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 875-907, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Cottet et al., “Implementation of a combined charge-phase quantum bit in a superconducting circuit”, Physica C 367, pp. 197-203, 2002. [cited by applicant]
DiVincenzo et al., “Experimental Proposals for Quantum Computaton”, H-K Lo and S.L. Braunstein (eds.), chapter 1, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Berlin (2001), also published WWW. ArXiv.org preprint: quant-ph/0002077 (Apr. 13, … [cited by applicant]
Dykman, “Quantum Computing Using Electrons Floating on Liquid Helium”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 1095-1108, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Ettinger et al., “An Integrated 20 GHZ SiGe Bipolar Differential Oscillator With High Tuning Range”. [cited by applicant]
Grangier et al., “Implementations of Quantum Computing Using Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 859-874, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Hekking et al., “Cooper Pair BOX Coupled to a Current-Biased Josephson Junction”, arXiv.org:cond-mat/0201284 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Hu et al., “Decoherence and dephasing in spin-based solid state quantum computers”, arXiv.org:cond--mat/0108339 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Joyez et al., “Observation of Parity-Induced Suppression of Josephson Tunneling in the Superconducting Single Electron Transistor”, hysical Review Letters, 72(15)12458 2461, (1994). [cited by applicant]
Kane et al., “Silicon-based Quantum Computation”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 1023-1041, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Kulik et al., “Quantum Computational Gates With Radiation Free Couplings”, WWW.arXiv.org preprint1 cond-mat/0203313 v1 (Mar. 14, 2002). [cited by applicant]
Leggett et al., “Dynamics of the dissipative tWo-state system”, RevieWs of Modern Physics, 59, pp. 1-85, 1987. [cited by applicant]
Lidar et al., “Quantum Codes for Simplifying Design and Suppressing Decoherence in Superconducting Phase-Qubits”, Quant. Inf. Proc. 1, pp. 155-182, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Lidar et al., “Reducing Constraints on Quantum Computer Design by Encoded Selective Recoupling”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017905, pp. 1-4, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Majer et al., “Simple phase bias for superconducting circuits”, Applied Physics Letters 80 pp. 3638-3640, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Makhlin et al., “Josephson-Junction Qubits”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 1043-1054, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Marquardt et al., “Superposition of tWo mesoscopically distinct quantum states: Coupling a Cooper-pair boX to a large superconducting island”, Physical RevieW B, 63, pp. 054514-054520 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Mooij et al., “Quantum superposition of macroscopic persistent—current states”, Science, 290, pp. 773-777, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Olariu et al., “The quantum effects of electromagnetic fluxes,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, pp. 339-436 and 13 pages of figures, 1987. [cited by applicant]
Orlando et al., “Engineering the Quantum Measurement Process for the Persistent Current Qubit”, Physica C 3681294-299 (Mar. 2002). [cited by applicant]
Plastina et al. “Communicating Josephson qubits”, arXiv.org:cond-mat/0206586 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Poyatos et al., “Schemes of Quantum Computations With Trapped Ions”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 785-799, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Rifkin et al., “Current-Phase relation and phase-dependent conductance of superconducting point contacts from rf impedance measurements”, Phys. Rev. B ]313894-3901 (1976). [cited by applicant]
Schmidt, “The Physics of Superconductors”, P. Muller and AV. Ustinov (Eds.), Springer, 1997, chapter 4. [cited by applicant]
Shnirman et al., “Quantum measurements performed With a single-electron transistor”, Phys. Rev. B 57(24) 115400-15407 (1998). [cited by applicant]
Spiller et al., “Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Computing,” Fortschritte der Physik 48, pp. 1075-1094, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Tanaka et al., “DC SQUID Readout Readout For Qubit,” Physica C, 3681300 304 (Mar. 2002). [cited by applicant]
Vion et al., “Manipulating the quantum state of an electrical circuit”, Science, 296, pp. 886-889 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., “Coherent temporal oscillations of macroscopic quantum states in a Josephson junction”, Science, 296, pp. 889-892, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Substrate resonator for HTS rf SQUID operation”, Physica C 372-3761282-286 (2002). [cited by applicant]
Zorin, “Quantum-Limited Electrometer Based on Single Cooper Pair Tunneling”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, pp. 4408-4411, 1996. [cited by applicant]
Zorin, “Radio-Frequency Bloch-Transistor Electrometer”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, pp. 3388-3391, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Zurek, “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”, Physics Today, 44, 10, pp. 36-44, 1991. [cited by applicant]
Boothby et al., “Architectural considerations in the design of a third-generation superconducting quantum annealing processor”, arXiv:2108.02322v1, Aug. 2021, pp. 3-4; and figure 4. [cited by applicant]
Bunyk et al., “Architectural Considerations in the Design of a Superconducting Quantum Annealing Processor,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 24, arXiv:1401.5504v1 [quant-ph] Jan. 21, 2014, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/081515 dated Jan. 18, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2023/073045 dated Jan. 9, 2024 in 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ko, et al., “A Novel Method for Correcting Device Parameter Mismatches in Josephsen Junction Circuits”, IEEE Transitions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 3, No. 1. Mar. 1993, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Amin et al., “Current Biased Josephson Junction System,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/557,747, filed Mar. 29, 2004, 49 pages. [cited by applicant]
Amin et al., “Degenerate Level Qubit Operations”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/429,170, filed Nov. 25, 2002, 41 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ataides, et al., “the XZZX surface code”, Nature Communications, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22274-1,. 2021, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Augar et al., “Fault-tolerance thresholds for the surface code with fabrication errors”, Phys. Rev. A 96 042316—Published Oct. 12, 2017, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Averin et al., “Variable Electrostatic Transformer: Controllable Coupling of Two Charge Qubits,” Physical Review Letters 91(5): 057003-1-057003-4, Aug. 1, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Averin, D.V., “Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Cooper Pairs,” arXiv:quant-ph/9706026v1, Jun. 13, 1997, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Barrett, et al., “Fault Tolerant Quantum Computation with Very High Threshold for Loss Errors”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, Feb. 2005—Published Nov. 9, 2010, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Blais et al., “Tunable Coupling of Superconducting Qubits,” arXiv:cond-mat/0207112v3 [cond-mat.mes-hall], Mar. 18, 2003, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Blatter et al., “Design aspects of superconducting-phase quantum bits,” Physical Review B 63: 174511-1-174511-9, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Bocko et al., “Prospects for Quantum Coherent Computation Using Superconducting Electronics,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 7(2):3638-3641, Jun. 1997. [cited by applicant]
Brown, et al., “A fault-tolerant non-Clifford gate for the surface code in two dimensions”, Science Advances, May 22, 2020, vol. 6, Issue 21, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Calderbank, et al., “Good quantum error-correcting codes exist”, Phys. Rev. A54, 1098—Published Aug. 1, 2996, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., “Superconducting quantum bits,” Nature 453:1031-1042, Jun. 19, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Devoret et al., “Superconducting Circuits for Quantum Information: An Outlook,” Science 339:1169-1174, Mar. 8, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Devoret et al., “Superconducting Qubits: A Short Review,” arXiv:cond-mat/0411174v1, Nov. 7, 2004, 41 pages. [cited by applicant]
Feynman, “Simulating Physics with Computers,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21(6/7): 467-488, 1982. [cited by applicant]
Fowler, et al., “Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation”, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324—Published Sep. 18, 2012, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Friedman et al., “Aharonov-Casher-Effect Suppression of Macroscopic Tunneling of Magnetic Flux,” arXiv:cond-mat/0109544v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall], Sep. 28, 2001, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Friedman et al., “Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states,” Nature 406:43-46, Jul. 6, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Grajcar et al. “Parametric Amplification for Quantum State Readout,” U.S. Appl. No. 60/557,750, filed Mar. 29, 2004, 51 pages. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al., “Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit,” arXiv:0909.4321v1, Sep. 24, 2009, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hilton et al., “Bus Architecture for Quantum Processing”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/556,778, filled Mar. 26, 2004, 40 pages. [cited by applicant]
Horsman, et al., “Surface code quantum computing by lattice surgery”, 2012 Journal of Physics, 14 123011, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev et al., “Characterization and Measurement of Superconducting Structures”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/341,974, filed Dec. 18, 2001, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev et al., “Extra-Substrate Control System”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/372,958, filed Apr. 15, 2002, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Johnson et al., “Scalable Control System for a Superconducting Adiabatic Quantum Optimization Processor,” Superconductor Science & Technology (2010). [cited by applicant]
Knill, Fault-Tolerant Postselected Quantum Computation: Schemes, arXiv:quant-ph/0402171v1, Feb. 23, 2004, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Makhlin et al., “Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices,” Reviews of Modern Physics 73 (2):357-400, Apr. 2001. [cited by applicant]
Martinis, “Superconducting phase qubits,” Quantum Inf Process 8:81-103, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Mooij et al., “Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit,” Science 285:1036-1039, Aug. 13, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Naaman et al., “On-Chip Josephson Junction Microwave Switch,” Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., Baltimore, Maryland, USA, Dec. 7, 2015, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nagayama, et al., “Sureface code error correction on a defective lattice”, IOP Publishing, New J. Phys. 19 (2017) 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/996,355, mailed Oct. 17, 2022, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Orlando et al., “Superconducting persistent-current qubit,” Physical Review B 60(22):15398-15413, Dec. 1, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Tang, et al., “Robust surface code topology against sparse fabrication defects in a superconducting-qubit array”, Phys Rev. A 93. 032322—Published Mar. 15, 2018, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Venegas-Andraca, et al., “A cross-disciplinary introduction to quantum annealing-base algorithms”, Contemporary Physics, Quantum Annealing ArXiv:1803.03372v1 [puant-ph] Mar. 9, 2018, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wendin et al., “Superconducting Quantum Circuits, Qubits and Computing,” arXiv:cond-mat/0508729v1 [cond-mat. supr-con], Aug. 30, 2005, 60 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zagoskin et al., “Two-Junction Phase Qubit”, U.S. Appl. No. 60/349,663, filed Jan. 15, 2002, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zagoskin et al., “Superconducting Qubits,” La Physique au Canada 63(4):215-227, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Born , et al., “Fabrication of Ultrasmall Tunnel Junctions by Electron Beam Direct-Writing”, IEEE, 2001, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Il'ichev, et al., “Nonsinusoidal Current-Phase Relationship of Grain Boundary Josephson junctions in High-Tc Superconductors”, Physical Review Letters 81, 1998, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Benjamin, “Schemes for Parallel Quantum Computation Without Local Control of Qubits”, arXiv:quant-ph/99099007v2, Sep. 18, 1999, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Benjamin, Quantum Computing Without Local Control of Qubit-Qubit Interactions, 2001, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bravyi, et al., “Hight-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory”, arXiv:2308.07915v1 [quant-ph] Aug. 15, 2023, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bravyi, et al., “Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas”, arXiv:quant-ph/0403025v2 Dec. 16, 2004, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Carelli et al., “SQUID Systems for Macroscopic Quantum Coherence and Quantum Computing”, IEEE trans. Apple. Supercond., Mar. 1, 2001. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/919321. [cited by applicant]
Chamberland et al., “Building A Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer Using Concatenated Cat Codes”, arXiv:2012.04108v2 [quant-ph] Jan. 27, 2022,117 page. [cited by applicant]
Cosmelli et al., “An Integrated System of SQUIDs for the Study of Macroscopic Quantum Coherence”, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Gottesman, et al., “Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction”, arXiv:quant-ph/9705052v1, May 28, 1997, 122 pages. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al., ‘A Compound Josephson Junction Coupler for Flux Qubits With Minimal Crosstalk’, arXiv:0904.3784v3, Jul. 2009. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/012000 mailed Apr. 21, 2022, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Litinski, et al., “A Game of Surface Codes: Large-Scale Quantum Computing with Lattice Surgery”, arXuv:1808.0289.02892v3 [quant=ph] Feb. 3, 2019, 37 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mizuta, et al., “Quantum and Tunnelling Capacitance in Charge and Spin Qubits”, arXiv:1604.02884v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] Aug. 16, 2016, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Neill, “A path towards quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits”, PHD Thesis—University of California, Dec. 1, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Neven, “Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit”, arXiv:2207.06431v1 [quant-ph] Jul. 13, 2022, 44 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen et al., “Scalable High-Performance Fluxonium Quantum Processor”, arXiv:2201.09374v2 [quant-ph] Feb. 5, 2022, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Orlando et al, “Flux-based Superconducting Qubits for Quantum Computation” Physica C 372-376, 194-200, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Ortlepp et al., “Access Time and Power Dissipation of a Model 256-Bit Single Flux Quantum RAM”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 24, No. 4, Aug. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Ortlepp et al., “Design Guidelines for Suzuki Stacks as Reliable High-speed Josephson Voltage Drivers”, Superconductor Science Technology, 26 (2013) 035007 (12pp). [cited by applicant]
Raussendorf, et al., “Fault-Tolerant quantum computation with high threshold in two dimensions”, arXiv:quant-ph/0610082v2, May 14, 2007, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tokunaga et al., “SiO2 passivation film effects on YBCO junctions”, Science Direct, Sep. 10, 1998. [cited by applicant]
Yamamoto, “Flux Driven Josephson Parametric Amplifier”, arXiv:0808.1386v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 2008. [cited by applicant]
Yan et al., “A tunable coupling scheme for implementing high-fidelity two-qubit gates”, Arxiv: 1803.09813v1, Mar. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Abrams et al., “A quantum algorithm providing exponential speed increase for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors,” arXiv:quant-ph/9807070v1, Jul. 24, 1998, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]