IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,558,727
Granted Patent B2
US 12,558,727 · App. 18/304,154 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Method and apparatus for additive manufacture of a workpiece

Inventors: Michael Totzeck (Schwaebisch Gmuend, DE); Frank Widulle (Neu-Ulm, DE); Christian Platt (Ulm, DE); Beat Marco Mout (Aalen, DE); Diana Spengler (Aalen, DE)
Assignee: Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH
B22F10/38B22F10/85B22F12/90B33Y30/00B33Y50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,558,727
App. No.
18/304,154
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for additive manufacturing includes obtaining a dataset that defines the workpiece in multiple workpiece layers arranged one on top of the other. A layer stack of multiple workpiece layers is produced based on the dataset. The layer stack has a respective topmost workpiece layer at a defined instant of time. The layer stack is thermally excited at the defined instant of time and a sequence of images of the respective topmost workpiece layer is recorded. The layer stack is inspected using the sequence of images. The inspection involves evaluation of an individual temporal deformation profile of the respective topmost workpiece layer in response to the thermal excitation. The individual temporal deformation profile has multiple characteristic features including an individual deformation increase, an individual deformation maximum, and an individual deformation decrease. The inspection result is determined by evaluating at least one of the characteristic features.

Claims (52)

1 . A method for additively manufacturing a workpiece, comprising:

obtaining a dataset that defines the workpiece in a plurality of workpiece layers arranged one on top of the other;

producing the plurality of workpiece layers arranged one on top of the other using a layer forming tool which is controlled in dependence on the dataset, wherein the plurality of workpiece layers form a layer stack which, at a defined instant of time, has a respective topmost workpiece layer and a number of respective workpiece layers underneath;

thermally exciting the layer stack at the defined instant of time;

recording a sequence of images of the respective topmost workpiece layer; and

inspecting the layer stack using the sequence of images in order to obtain an inspection result that is representative of the workpiece,

wherein an individual temporal deformation profile of the respective topmost workpiece layer is determined in response to the thermal excitation using the sequence of images,

wherein the individual temporal deformation profile has a plurality of characteristic features including an individual deformation increase, an individual deformation maximum, and an individual deformation decrease, and

wherein the inspection result is determined by evaluating at least one of the characteristic features from the plurality of characteristic features.

2 . The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection result is determined by evaluating at least two of the characteristic features from the plurality of characteristic features.

3 . The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one of the characteristic features includes the individual deformation maximum.

4 . The method of claim 1 wherein determining the inspection result comprises determining at least one of a slope of the individual temporal deformation profile or an instant of time when the individual deformation maximum occurs.

5 . The method of claim 1 wherein determining the inspection result comprises determining a turning point in the individual temporal deformation profile.

6 . The method of claim 1 wherein:

each image from the sequence of images has a plurality of image segments,

a respective individual temporal deformation profile is determined for each image segment from the plurality of image segments in response to the thermal excitation, and

the inspection result is determined based on the respective individual temporal deformation profiles.

7 . The method of claim 1 wherein:

the thermal excitation of the layer stack includes a thermal excitation of the topmost workpiece layer in a first layer region which is locally delimited,

the sequence of images show the first layer region and a further layer region of the topmost workpiece layer, and

the first layer region and the further layer region are disjoint.

8 . The method of claim 1 wherein:

the sequence of images include at least one first image of the topmost workpiece layer which was recorded before the thermal excitation, and

the inspection result is determined using the at least one first image and further images recorded after the thermal excitation.

9 . The method of claim 1 wherein the sequence of images are normalized using at least one reference image before the individual temporal deformation profile is determined.

10 . The method of claim 1 wherein the sequence of images are recorded with a frame rate of ≥1 kHz.

11 . The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection result is determined based on the sequence of images using a principal component analysis.

12 . The method of claim 1 wherein:

the layer stack is repeatedly thermally excited,

at least one excitation parameter is varied between repeated excitations, and

the inspection result is determined based on the repeated excitations.

13 . The method of claim 12 wherein the at least one excitation parameter is an excitation intensity or an excitation duration.

14 . The method of claim 1 wherein:

the thermally exciting, recording a sequence of images, and inspecting the layer stack using the sequence of images are repeated for a plurality of respective topmost workpiece layers, and

the method further comprises determining a plurality of inspection results based on the plurality of respective topmost workpiece layers.

15 . The method of claim 14 wherein a weighted average is formed from the plurality of inspection results in order to detect an undesired anomaly in the layer stack.

16 . The method of claim 1 wherein the individual temporal deformation profile is determined using a measurement method including at least one of: speckle interferometry, digital holography, shearography, laser Doppler vibrometry, Fabry-Perot interferometry, Sagnac interferometry, or interferometry with nonlinear optics.

17 . The method of claim 1 wherein the inspection result is additionally determined using at least one of a thermal transient profile, ultrasonic excitation, a simulated deformation profile, a melt pool characterization, or angle-selective illumination of the topmost workpiece layer.

18 . An apparatus for additively manufacturing a workpiece, the apparatus comprising:

a memory configured to store a dataset that defines the workpiece in a plurality of workpiece layers arranged one on top of the other;

a manufacturing platform;

a layer forming tool;

a heating tool;

a camera directed at the manufacturing platform; and

an evaluation and control unit configured to:

produce a plurality of workpiece layers arranged one on top of the other on the manufacturing platform using the layer forming tool and the dataset, the plurality of workpiece layers forming a layer stack which, at a defined instant of time, has a topmost workpiece layer and a number of workpiece layers underneath,

thermally excite the layer stack at the defined instant of time using the heating tool,

record a sequence of images of the topmost workpiece layer using the camera,

determine an individual temporal deformation profile of the topmost workpiece layer in response to the thermal excitation using the sequence of images, and

inspect the layer stack using the individual temporal deformation profile,

wherein the individual temporal deformation profile has a plurality of characteristic features including an individual deformation increase, an individual deformation maximum, and an individual deformation decrease, and

wherein the evaluation and control unit determines an inspection result using at least one of the characteristic features from the plurality of characteristic features.

Assignments (4)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY NAME FROM CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIK GMBH TO CARL ZEISS AG PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 065853 FRAME: 0813. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 14, 2023
From: PLATT, CHRISTIAN; WIDULLE, FRANK; TOTZECK, MICHAEL; MOUT, BEAT MARCO
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 066014/0805 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2023
From: PLATT, CHRISTIAN; WIDULLE, FRANK; TOTZECK, MICHAEL; MOUT, BEAT MARCO
To: CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 065853/0813 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2023
From: SPENGLER, DIANA
To: CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 065853/0944 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2023
From: CARL ZEISS AG
To: CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 065854/0081 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 102020127581.1 · Oct 20, 2020 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTEP2021079021 · Oct 20, 2021
Related Publication 20230256513A1 · Aug 17, 2023
References Cited (20)
US 7278315B1 · Klein · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8449176B2 · Shepard · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20080291465A1 · Lorraine · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20150061170A1 · Engel · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150219444A1 · Bamberg · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170266727A1 · Nishino · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200158499A1 · Stoppe · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 105571505A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 110475635A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102007031206B3 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
DE 102014212246B3 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016115241A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016201289A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016110266A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017108874A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017124100A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3444100A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020229391A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Everton, Sarah K. et al.: Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing; Materials & Design, vol. 95, 2016, p. 431-445—ISSN 0261-3069 (P). [cited by applicant]
German Search Report for German App. No. DE 102020127581.1; dated Sep. 28, 2021; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]