IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,582,840
Granted Patent B2
US 12,582,840 · App. 18/315,961 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

System and method for radiation treatment planning

Inventors: Peter Voet (Atlanta, GA); Chunhua Men (Atlanta, GA); Spencer Marshall (Brandon, FL)
Assignee: Elekta, Inc.
A61N5/1031A61N5/1045A61N2005/1034
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,582,840
App. No.
18/315,961
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for radiation treatment planning for delivering radiation therapy by a radiotherapy system, the method comprising: receiving a reference objective, the reference objective representing a goal to be achieved by the radiotherapy system; performing an optimisation procedure, according to the received reference objective, to determine a set of parameters, the set of parameters relating to characteristics of radiation to be delivered by the radiotherapy system, wherein the optimisation procedure comprises: optimising the set of parameters to obtain an achieved value, and responsive to the achieved value not meeting the reference objective, obtaining a relaxed objective using the achieved value and a relaxation value, and determining a configuration of the radiotherapy system using the optimised set of parameters and the relaxed objective.

Claims (43)

1 . A method for radiation treatment planning for delivering radiation therapy by a radiotherapy system, the method comprising:

receiving a reference objective, the reference objective representing a goal to be achieved by the radiotherapy system;

performing an optimization procedure, according to the received reference objective, to determine a set of parameters, the set of parameters relating to characteristics of radiation to be delivered by the radiotherapy system, wherein the optimization procedure comprises:

optimizing the set of parameters to obtain an achieved value;

responsive to the achieved value not meeting the reference objective, obtaining a relaxed objective using the achieved value and a relaxation value, and setting the relaxed objective as a constraint; and

determining a configuration of the radiotherapy system using the optimized set of parameters and the relaxed objective as a constraint.

2 . The method of claim 1 further comprising:

responsive to the achieved value meeting the reference objective, determining a configuration of the radiotherapy system using the optimized set of parameters and the reference objective.

3 . The method of claim 1 wherein performing the optimization procedure comprises:

performing a first pass optimization, the first pass optimization comprising:

optimizing the set of parameters to obtain a first pass achieved value;

responsive to the first pass achieved value not meeting the reference objective, obtaining a first pass relaxed objective using the first pass achieved value and a first pass relaxation value; and

determining a configuration of the radiotherapy system using the optimized set of parameters and the first pass relaxed objective.

4 . The method of claim 3 wherein performing the optimization procedure further comprises:

performing a second pass optimization, the second pass optimization comprising:

responsive to the first pass achieved value meeting the reference objective, further optimizing the set of parameters, according to the received reference objective, to obtain a second pass achieved value;

obtaining a second pass relaxed treatment-planning objective using the second pass achieved value and a second pass relaxation value; and

determining a configuration of the radiotherapy system using the further optimized set of parameters and the second pass relaxed treatment-planning objective.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein determining a configuration of the radiotherapy system using the further optimized set of parameters and the second pass relaxed treatment-planning objective comprises:

performing a further optimization procedure using the second pass relaxed treatment-planning objective as an objective or a constraint.

6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the second pass relaxation value is smaller than the first pass relaxation value.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of parameters is related to a fluence pattern of the radiation to be delivered.

8 . The method of claim 7 wherein the set of parameters comprises a weight of beamlets.

9 . The method of claim 1 wherein determining a configuration of the radiotherapy system comprises determining an arrangement of a beam shaping apparatus.

10 . The method of claim 9 wherein the beam shaping apparatus is a multileaf collimator (MLC).

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the relaxation value is automatically set according to a cost function.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the reference objective comprises any of a cost function, a reference dose, and/or a reference volume.

13 . The method of claim 12 wherein, when the reference objective comprises a reference dose, the cost function comprises any of: a maximum dose cost function, a mean dose cost function, a serial cost function, and/or an equivalent uniform dose (EUD) cost function.

14 . The method of claim 12 wherein, when the reference objective comprises a reference volume, the cost function comprises any of: a Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) based cost function, a Target Penalty cost function or a Parallel cost function.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the reference objective relates to any one or more of: a region of interest, a shell, a planned target volume (PTV), a critical structure, and an organ at risk.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the relaxation value is determined relative to the achieved value and further bounded by a lower value and an upper value.

17 . A treatment planning system for delivering radiation therapy by a radiotherapy apparatus, the treatment planning system comprising a processor configured to:

receive a reference objective, the reference objective representing a goal to be achieved by the radiotherapy apparatus;

perform optimization, according to the received reference objective, to determine a set of parameters, the set of parameters relating to characteristics of radiation to be delivered by the radiotherapy apparatus, wherein performing optimization comprises:

optimizing the set of parameters to obtain an achieved value;

responsive to the achieved value not meeting the reference objective, obtaining a relaxed objective using the achieved value and a relaxation value, and setting the relaxed objective as a constraint; and

determine a configuration of the radiotherapy apparatus using the optimized set of parameters and the relaxed objective as a constraint.

18 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions configured to cause a processor to:

receive a reference objective, the reference objective representing a goal to be achieved by a radiotherapy system; and

perform an optimization, according to the received reference objective, to determine a set of parameters, the set of parameters relating to characteristics of radiation to be delivered by the radiotherapy system, wherein performing the optimization comprises:

optimizing the set of parameters to obtain an achieved value;

responsive to the achieved value not meeting the reference objective, obtaining a relaxed objective using the achieved value and a relaxation value, and setting the relaxed objective as a constraint; and

determine a configuration of the radiotherapy system using the optimized set of parameters and the relaxed objective as a constraint.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 14, 2024
From: VOET, PETER; MEN, CHUNHUA
To: ELEKTA, INC.
Reel/Frame 068883/0923 →
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT Recorded May 9, 2024
From: MARSHALL, SPENCER
To: ELEKTA, INC.
Reel/Frame 067374/0253 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240374925A1 · Nov 14, 2024
References Cited (18)
US 6064203A · Bottomley · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6963771B2 · Scarantino et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7317192B2 · Ma · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8492735B2 · Brand · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9884206B2 · Schulte et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10737114B2 · Gattiker et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10835760B2 · Kuusela et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20100104068A1 · Kilby et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130072742A1 · Nord et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150202464A1 · Brand et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180304099A1 · Li et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190247676A1 · Peltola et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210138267A1 · Nord et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210316157A1 · Lynch et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3681600 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Elekta AB,, Monaco Training Guide, Document ID: LTGMON0530, (2017), 1313 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application No. 24175404.3, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 6, 2024”, (Dec. 6, 2024), 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Naccarato, Stefania, “Automated Planning for Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on the 1.5 T MR Linac”, Advances in Radiation Oncology vol. 7 Issue 3, Oct. 19, 2021, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]