IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,548,314
Granted Patent B2
US 12,548,314 · App. 18/330,857 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Method and device for training a neural network

Inventors: Thomas Branz (Esslingen, DE); Markus Hanselmann (Stuttgart, DE); Andreas Genssle (Musberg, DE)
Assignee: Robert Bosch GmbH
G06V10/82G06N3/045
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,548,314
App. No.
18/330,857
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for training a first neural network is disclosed. The neural network is configured to ascertain, based on sensor signals of a technical system, an output signal characterizing a classification and/or a regression result regarding the sensor signal. The method includes (i) during operation of the technical system, receiving a sensor signal of the technical system, (ii) ascertaining a first output signal by way of the first neural network and based on the sensor signal, (iii) ascertaining a second output signal by way of a second neural network and based on the sensor signal, wherein the second neural network has a different architecture than the first neural network, and (iv) training the first neural network by adjusting parameters of the first neural network, wherein the first neural network is trained as a function of the second output signal.

Claims (16)

1 . A method for training a first neural network to ascertain output signals characterizing classification and/or regression results based on sensor signals of a technical system, the method comprising:

(a) during operation of the technical system, receiving a first sensor signal of the technical system;

(b) ascertaining a first output signal by providing the first sensor signal as an input to the first neural network and determining the first output signal based on the first sensor signal using the first neural network;

(c) ascertaining a second output signal by providing the first sensor signal as an input to the second neural network and determining the second output signal based on the first sensor signal using the second neural network, the second neural network having been previously trained to ascertain output signals characterizing classification and/or regression results based on sensor signals of the technical system, the second neural network having a different architecture than the first neural network; and

(d) training the first neural network by adjusting parameters of the first neural network based on a comparison between the first output signal and the second output signal, such that the first neural network is trained to mimic behavior of the second neural network.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the adjustment is ascertained based on a difference between the first output signal and the second output signal.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein a difference in the architecture of the first neural network and the second neural network is such that the first neural network requires less computing capacity and/or less memory to ascertain the first output signal.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one layer of the first neural network corresponds in its parameterization to a layer of the second neural network and parameters of the layer of the first neural network are not adjusted during training.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein step (b) and step (c) are carried out by an embedded computing unit of the technical system.

6 . The method according to claim 5 , wherein step (d) is carried out by a computer outside of the technical system.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein control signals of the technical system are ascertained based on the second output signal.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first sensor signal is provided by a camera sensor and characterizes an image.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the technical system is an at least partially automated vehicle or a robot.

10 . A training device which is configured to carry out the method according to claim 1 .

11 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein a processor executes a computer program to carry out the method.

12 . A machine-readable storage medium on which the computer program according to claim 11 is stored.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2023
From: BRANZ, THOMAS; HANSELMANN, MARKUS; GENSSLE, ANDREAS
To: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
Reel/Frame 064841/0142 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2022 205 824.0 · Jun 8, 2022 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230401836A1 · Dec 14, 2023
References Cited (28)
US 11699075B2 · Willers · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20100049339A1 · Schafer · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20180077538A1 · Matus · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180173572A1 · Bequet · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180285727A1 · Baum · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180300556A1 · Varerkar · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190286153A1 · Rankawat · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200082174A1 · Charette · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200174132A1 · Nezhadarya · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200280680A1 · Nichols · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200293899A1 · Fernando · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210042503A1 · Karras · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210142160A1 · Mohseni · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220051017A1 · Choi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220180173A1 · Jonnalagadda · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220188646A1 · Ramesh · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220222929A1 · Gauerhof · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220230021A1 · Muehlenstaedt · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230074706A1 · Xiao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240020968A1 · Haskin · 2024 [cited by examiner]
David Griffiths et al.,“A Review on Deep Learning Techniques for 3D Sensed Data Classification,” Jun. 25, 2019, Remote sensing, vol. 11, 1499, 2019, pp. 1-20. [cited by examiner]
Evangelos Maltezos et al., “Building Extraction From LiDAR Data Applying Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” Dec. 26, 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 16, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 155-159. [cited by examiner]
Jianping Gou et al., “Knowledge Distillation: A Survey,” Mar. 22, 2021, International Journal of Computer Vision, pp. 1-6. [cited by examiner]
Agnieszka Kuras et al.,“ Hyperspectral and Lidar Data Applied to the Urban Land Cover Machine Learning and Neural-Network-Based Classification: A Review,” Aug. 26, 2021, Remote Sensing, 13, 3393, 2021, pp. 1-21. [cited by examiner]
Maxime Oquab et al., “Learning and Transferring Mid-Level Image Representations using Convolutional Neural Networks,” Jun. 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014… [cited by examiner]
Gou et al., “Knowledge Distillation: A Survey”, International Journal of Computer Vision 129, May 20, 2021, arXiv:2006.05525; (36 pages). [cited by applicant]
Oquab et al., “Learning and Transferring Mid-Level Image Representations using Convolutional Neural Networks”, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; pp. 1717-1724. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Learning Student Networks in the Wild”, 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); pp. 6424-6433. [cited by applicant]