IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,700,063
Granted Patent B2
US 12,700,063 · App. 18/345,103 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

Methods, apparatuses, systems and computer-readable mediums for correcting echo planar imaging artifacts

Inventors: Catalina Raymond (Los Angeles, CA); Benjamin Ellingson (Redondo Beach, CA); Jingwen Yao (Los Angeles, CA); Thorsten Feiweier (Poxdorf, DE); Bryan Clifford (Malden, MA); Xiaodong Zhong (Oak Park, CA)
Assignees: Siemens Healthineers AG; The Regents of the University of California
G06T5/50G06T2207/10081G06T2207/10088G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084G06T2207/20212G06T2207/30008G06T2207/30016
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,700,063
App. No.
18/345,103
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for correcting echo planar imaging artifacts includes correcting at least one echo planar imaging artifact in an image to obtain a correct image. A trained neural network is used to correct the at least one echo planar imaging artifact. The image is obtained through echo planar imaging.

Claims (21)

1 . A method of correcting echo planar imaging artifacts, the method comprising:

correcting, using a trained neural network, at least one echo planar imaging artifact in an image to obtain a corrected image, wherein

the trained neural network is trained using a dataset of artifacted echo planar images,

the dataset of artifacted echo planar images includes high-resolution images that have been generated by an imaging process other than echo planar imaging and modified to include at least one first simulated echo planar imaging artifact, and

the at least one first simulated echo planar imaging artifact is at least one of a simulated B0 susceptibility artifact, a simulated chemical shift artifact, a simulated Rician noise artifact, a simulated Nyquist artifact, or a simulated Gibbs ringing artifact.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the image is obtained through echo planar imaging.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the dataset of artifacted echo planar images further includes at least one artifacted image with at least one second simulated echo planar imaging artifact.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the dataset of artifacted echo planar images further includes at least one artifacted image with at least one deliberately induced echo planar imaging artifact generated by altering imaging equipment.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one echo planar imaging artifact includes at least one of a B0 susceptibility artifact, a chemical shift artifact, a Rician noise artifact, a Nyquist artifact, or a Gibbs ringing artifact.

6 . A method of training a neural network to correct single-shot echo planar imaging artifacts, the method comprising:

inputting a dataset of artifacted single-shot echo planar images into a neural network, each artifacted echo planar image including at least one synthetic echo planar imaging artifact;

modifying, via the neural network, each image of the dataset of artifacted single-shot echo planar images to remove the at least one synthetic echo planar imaging artifact; and

updating one or more parameters of the neural network based on the modified images of the dataset of artifacted single-shot echo planar images,

wherein the dataset of artifacted single-shot echo planar images includes high-resolution images that have been generated by an imaging process other than echo planar imaging and modified to include the at least one synthetic echo planar imaging artifact and the at least one synthetic echo planar imaging artifact is at least one of a simulated B0 susceptibility artifact, a simulated chemical shift artifact, a simulated Rician noise artifact, a simulated Nyquist artifact, or a simulated Gibbs ringing artifact.

7 . The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

validating the neural network with a validation dataset of artifacted single-shot echo planar images, each artifacted single-shot echo planar image, in the validation dataset of artifacted single-shot echo planar images, including at least one synthetic echo planar imaging artifact.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the at least one synthetic echo planar imaging artifact includes at least one of a B0 susceptibility artifact, a chemical shift artifact, a Rician noise artifact, a Nyquist artifact, or a Gibbs ringing artifact.

9 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the neural network is trained using a combination of supervised and unsupervised learning.

10 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the neural network employs at least one of a generative adversarial network (GAN) multiscale generator model architecture, a GAN multiscale generator with attention architecture, a GAN multiscale generator model with attention architecture, or a GAN generator model with attention and with recurrent convolutional layers architecture.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the neural network is trained to minimize at least one of a discriminative loss, a Wasserstein loss, or a loss computed using a pretrained model.

12 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the neural network is trained with an iterative fine-tuning approach.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066267/0346 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2023
From: RAYMOND, CATALINA; ELLINGSON, BENJAMIN; YAO, JINGWEN; ZHONG, XIAODONG
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Reel/Frame 065523/0911 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 10, 2023
From: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 064549/0458 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2023
From: FEIWEIER, THORSTEN
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 064490/0897 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2023
From: CLIFFORD, BRYAN
To: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 064335/0449 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250005715A1 · Jan 2, 2025
References Cited (34)
US 10712416B1 · Sandino · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11714152B2 · Akcakaya · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12174281B2 · Solomon · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20190377047A1 · Chen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200300954A1 · Sharma · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210165061A1 · Koerzdoerfer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210272335A1 · Huang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220026516A1 · Guidon · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230136320A1 · Solomon · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230186532A1 · Schuelke · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230236271A1 · Fessler · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20250251478A1 · Gessert · 2025 [cited by examiner]
Yang, Qinqin, et al. “Model-based synthetic data-driven learning (MOST-DL): Application in single-shot T 2 mapping with severe head motion using overlapping-echo acquisition.” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 41.11 … [cited by examiner]
Lee, J., Han, Y., Ryu, J., Park, J., & Ye, J. C. (2019). k-Space deep learning for reference-free EPI ghost correction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. [cited by applicant]
Chen, N., & Wyrwicz, A. M. (2004). Removal of EPI Nyquist Ghost Artifacts with Two-Dimensional Phase Correction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. [cited by applicant]
Fischer, H., & Ladebeck, R. (1998). Echo-Planar Imaging Image Artifacts. [cited by applicant]
Rong, W., Li, Z., Zhang, W., & Sun, L. (2014). An improved Canny Edge Detection Algorithm. [cited by applicant]
Ozan Oktay, Jo Schlemper, Loic Le Folgoc, Matthew Lee, Mattias Heinrich, Kazunari Misawa, Kensaku Mori, Steven McDonagh, Nils Y Hammerla, Bernhard Kainz, Ben Glocker, and Daniel Rueckert, (2018) Attention U-Net: Learnin… [cited by applicant]
Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., & Bottou, L. (2017). Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning. [cited by applicant]
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszar, F., Caballero, J. a. R., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., & Shi, W. (2017). Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversari… [cited by applicant]
Zijlstra, F., Bouwman, J. G., Braskute, I., Viergever, M. A., & Seevinck, P. R. (2017). Fast Fourier-Based Simulation of Off-Resonance Artifacts in Steady-State Gradient Echo MRI Applied to Metal Object Localization. Ma… [cited by applicant]
Kawamura, M., Tamada, D., Funayama, S., Kromrey, M., Ichikawa, S., Onishi, H., & Motosugi, U. (2021). Accelerated Acquisition of High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Brain with a Multi-shot Echo-planar Sequ… [cited by applicant]
Bouwman, J. G., & Bakker, C. J. (2012). Alias Subtraction More Efficient Than Conventional Zero-Padding in the Fourier-Based Calculation of the Susceptibility Induced Perturbation of the Magnetic Field in MR. Magnetic R… [cited by applicant]
Poser, B. A., Barth, M., Goa, P. E., Deng, W., & Stenger, V. A. (2013). Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging with Nyquist Ghost Compensation: Interleaved Dual Echo With Acceleration (IDEA) Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI). Magnetic… [cited by applicant]
Ellingson et al. A. E. (2015). Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. Neuro-Oncology. [cited by applicant]
Johnson, J. C., Alahi, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016). Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution. Department of Computer Science, Stanford University. [cited by applicant]
Alom, Z., Yakopcic, C., Taha, T. M., & Asari, V. K. (2018). Recurrent Residual Convolutional Neural Networks based on U-Net (R2U-Net) for Medical Image Segmentation. [cited by applicant]
Wang, J., Sun, K., Cheng, T., Jiang, B., Deng, C., Zhao, Y., Liu, D., Mu, Y., Tan, M., Wang, X., Liu, W., & Xiao, B. (2021). Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Patt… [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. [cited by applicant]
Isola, P., Zhu, J., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017). Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks. [cited by applicant]
Bruder, H., Fischer, H., Reinfelder, H., & Schmitt, F. (1992). Image Reconstruction for Echo Planar Imaging with Nonequidistant k-Space Sampling. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. [cited by applicant]
Truong, T., Clymer, B. D., Chakeres, D. W., & Schmalbrock, P. (2002). Three-dimensional numerical simulations of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities in the human head. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. [cited by applicant]
Bilgic, B., Chatnuntawech, I., Manhard, M. K., Tian, Q., Liao, C., Iyer, S., Cauley, S. F., Huang, S. Y., Polimeni, J. R., Wald, L. L., & Setsompop, K. (2019). Highly accelerated multishot echo planar imaging through sy… [cited by applicant]
Buonocore, M. H., & Gao, L. (1997). Ghost Artifact Reduction for Echo Planar Imaging Using Image Phase Correction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. [cited by applicant]