IP Library Granted Patent US 12,214,250
Granted Patent B2
US 12,214,250 · App. 18/350,977 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Devices for exercise apparatuses

Inventors: Paul Edward Jaquish (Nevada City, CA); John Paul Jaquish (Nevada City, CA); Henry David Alkire (Nevada City, CA)
Assignee: Jaquish Biomedical Corporation
A63B23/03525A63B21/00069A63B21/00072A63B21/0058A63B21/0087A63B21/4034A63B21/4047A63B23/0216A63B23/0405A63B23/0429A63B24/0062G16H20/30G16H40/63G16H50/30A63B5/22A63B21/00A63B21/00181A63B21/0628A63B21/078A63B21/151A63B21/159A63B21/4011A63B21/4035A63B2023/003A63B23/0211A63B23/03508A63B23/1209A63B23/1263A63B23/1281A63B24/0003A63B24/0087A63B2024/0093A63B71/0622A63B2071/0658A63B2208/0204A63B2208/0214A63B2208/0228A63B2220/51A63B2220/833A63B2225/09A63B2225/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,214,250
App. No.
18/350,977
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computing system for determining osteogenic loading from an exercise apparatus for performing an exercise is provided. The exercise apparatus includes a loading interface, a frame, a linear adjustment system interposing between and fixedly coupled to the loading interface and the frame, and a sensor coupled to the linear adjustment system. A position of the loading interface of the exercise apparatus is adjusted through a movement of the linear adjustment system at one or more intermediate positions of a plurality of functional positions of the loading interface. A force exerted by a subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions is received. A measurement of the force exerted by the subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions from the sensor is obtained. A corresponding osteogenic loading for the force exerted by the subject is determined.

Claims (39)

1. A computer system for determining an osteogenic loading from an exercise apparatus for performing an exercise, the exercise apparatus comprising a loading interface, a frame, a linear adjustment system interposing between and fixedly coupled to the loading interface and the frame, and a sensor coupled to the linear adjustment system, the computer system comprising one or more processors and memory storing one or more programs for execution by the one or more processors, the one or more programs singularly or collectively executing a method comprising:

(A) adjusting, through a movement of the linear adjustment system in a first longitudinal direction, a position of the loading interface of the exercise apparatus at one or more intermediate positions of a plurality of functional positions in a functional range of the loading interface, wherein the functional range comprises a first terminal functional position, the one or more intermediate positions, and a second terminal functional position, thereby permitting movement of the loading interface to the position in the one or more intermediate positions

(B) receiving, in response to the adjusting (A), a force exerted by a subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions;

(C) obtaining, in response to the receiving (B), a measurement of the force exerted by the subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions from the sensor; and

(D) determining, based on the measurement of the force, a corresponding osteogenic loading for the force exerted by the subject.

2. The exercise apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the exercise apparatus is a leg press apparatus, an adjustable cable apparatus, a chest press apparatus, bench press apparatus, a vertical lift apparatus, a core apparatus, or a combination thereof.

3. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises (E) providing, through a user interface on a display of the computer system, the corresponding osteogenic loading.

4. The computer system of claim 3 , wherein the user interface provides the corresponding osteogenic loading as a numerical value, a graphical, or both.

5. The computer system of claim 3 , wherein the providing (E) further comprises providing, through the user interface, the position in the one or more intermediate positions of the loading interface.

6. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting (A) fixes the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions.

7. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein

the exercise apparatus further comprises a correlation mechanism, and

the determining (D) further comprises determining the corresponding osteogenic loading based on the second measurement of the force exerted by the subject on the linear adjustment system.

8. The computer system of claim 7 , wherein the correlation mechanism obtains the second measurement based on the measurement of the force exerted on the loading inference by the subject and the position of the loading interface.

9. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the linear adjustment system comprises a mechanism that facilitates the adjusting (A), and wherein the mechanism comprises an electronic mechanism, a pneumatic mechanism, a hydraulic mechanism, a mechanical mechanism, or a combination thereof.

10. The computer system of claim 9 , wherein the mechanical mechanism comprises a dial, a handle, a knob, a grip and a button, or a combination thereof.

11. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein, prior to the adjusting (A), the method comprises providing an affordance on a display that allows the subject to select a functional position in the plurality of functional positions for the loading interface prior to the adjusting (A).

12. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein a respective distance between each position in the one or more intermediate positions is uniform.

13. The computer system of claim 12 , wherein the respective uniform distance is in a range of from 0.7 centimeters (cm) to 12.7 cm.

14. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting (A) and/or the determining (D) comprises using a predetermined master table for the exercise apparatus, and wherein, for each functional position in the plurality of functional positions and for each weight in a plurality of weights, the predetermined master table comprises a set of forces measured by the sensor and corresponding forces exerted on the loading interface.

15. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting (A) is configured to extend, retract, or pivot between each functional position in the plurality of functional positions.

16. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting (A) further comprises displaying a current functional position in the plurality of functional positions of the loading interface.

17. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises

(E) outputting, to a display, the corresponding osteogenic loading or the measurement of the force.

18. The computer system of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises

(F) further determining, based on the corresponding osteogenic loading, a numerical or graphical comparison of a current force output in a current session by the subject with the exercise apparatus that is fixed by the linear adjustment system to any one of:

(i) a magnitude of a force generated by the subject in a session with the exercise apparatus immediately prior to the current session with the exercise apparatus by the subject,

(ii) in a prior session with the exercise apparatus for which a highest force was achieved by the subject, and

(iii) a first ever session the subject had with the exercise apparatus.

19. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium for determining an osteogenic loading from an exercise apparatus for performing an exercise, the exercise apparatus comprising a loading interface, a frame, a linear adjustment system interposing between and fixedly coupled to the loading interface and the frame, and a sensor coupled to the linear adjustment system, which when executed by a computer system, cause the computer system to execute a method comprising:

(A) adjusting, through a movement of the linear adjustment system in a first longitudinal direction, a position of the loading interface of the exercise apparatus to one or more intermediate positions of a plurality of functional positions in a functional range of the loading interface, wherein the functional range comprises a first terminal functional position, the one or more intermediate positions, and a second terminal functional position, thereby permitting movement of the loading interface to the position in the one or more intermediate positions;

(B) receiving, in response to the adjusting (A), a force exerted by a subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions;

(C) obtaining, in response to the receiving (B), a measurement of the force exerted by the subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions from the sensor; and

(D) determining, based on the measurement of the force, a corresponding osteogenic loading for the force exerted by the subject.

20. A method for determining an osteogenic loading from an exercise apparatus for performing an exercise, the exercise apparatus comprising a loading interface, a frame, a linear adjustment system interposing between and fixedly coupled to the loading interface and the frame, and a sensor coupled to the linear adjustment system, which when executed by a computer system, cause the computer system to execute a procedure comprising:

(A) adjusting, through a movement of the linear adjustment system in a first longitudinal direction, a position of the loading interface of the exercise apparatus to one or more intermediate positions of a plurality of functional positions in a functional range of the loading interface, wherein the functional range comprises a first terminal functional position, the one or more intermediate positions, and a second terminal functional position, thereby permitting movement of the loading interface to the position in the one or more intermediate positions;

(B) receiving, in response to the adjusting (A), a force exerted by a subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions;

(C) obtaining, in response to the receiving (B), a measurement of the force exerted by the subject on the loading interface at the position in the one or more intermediate positions from the sensor; and

(D) determining, based on the measurement of the force, a corresponding osteogenic loading for the force exerted by the subject.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2023
From: JAQUISH, PAUL EDWARD; JAQUISH, JOHN PAUL; ALKIRE, HENRY D.
To: JAQUISH BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064227/0808 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 12, 2023
From: JAQUISH INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; JAQUISH BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION
To: JAQUISH BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064228/0129 →
Continuity (5)
Division 16862822 · Apr 30, 2020
Continuation 15758291
Continuation 14859085 · Sep 18, 2015
Provisional Application 62329999 · Apr 29, 2016
Related Publication 20230347206A1 · Nov 2, 2023
References Cited (79)
US 4466610A · Israel · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4556214A · Petrofsky et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4571682A · Silverman et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4930770A · Baker · 1990 [cited by examiner]
US 5004230A · Jones · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5011142A · Eckler · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5103404A · McIntosh · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5260870A · Tsuchiya · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5569120A · Anjanappa et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US RE35598E · Sadoff · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5722921A · Simonson · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5830116A · Gautier · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6159131A · Pfeffer · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6296595B1 · Stark et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6375598B1 · Frame · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6436058B1 · Krahner et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6515593B1 · Stark et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6561951B2 · Cannon · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6582342B2 · Kaufman · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6595901B2 · Reinbold et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6643385B1 · Bravomalo · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6746370B1 · Fleming · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6872187B1 · Stark · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7063644B2 · Albert et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7070539B2 · Brown et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7090623B2 · Stewart · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7101327B1 · Baumler · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7182719B2 · Tuller · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7371216B2 · Weyand et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7618347B2 · Yeo et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7666118B1 · Anthony · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7938760B1 · Webber · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8187153B2 · Douglas et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8388499B1 · Rindfleisch · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8475338B2 · Greenhill et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8591386B2 · Meyer et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8870720B1 · Webber et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8900097B1 · Griggs et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9028433B2 · Stephen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9050496B2 · Towley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10675497B2 · Jaquish · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20020072655A1 · Pfeffer · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020091039A1 · Reinhold et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020128119A1 · Arai · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030013071A1 · Todd · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030032524A1 · Lamar · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030199370A1 · Bucay-Bissu · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040077462A1 · Brown · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040110602A1 · Feldman · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040117214A1 · Shea · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040127336A1 · Lapcevic · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040198555A1 · Anderson et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050020415A1 · Reno · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050107726A1 · Oyen · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070027006A1 · Suiter · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080119763A1 · Wiener · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080248926A1 · Cole et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100216600A1 · Noffsinger et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100234196A1 · Shinomiya · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120040799A1 · Jaquish · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140094721A1 · Diallo · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140213414A1 · Balandis · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140228174A1 · Olsen · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140274566A1 · Draper · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140342878A1 · Hashish · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150141200A1 · Murray · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150238801A1 · Meredith · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160144239A1 · Sclafani · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160199245A1 · Mikulski · 2016 [cited by examiner]
EP 1166826 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009225845A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012143434A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010059061A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
Jaquish J., “Multiple-of-bodyweight axial bone loading using novel exercise intervention with and without bisphosphonate use for osteogenic adaptation”, Osteoporosis International, vol. 198, Supplement 24, Dec. 4, 2013,… [cited by applicant]
Mookerjee, S. et al., “Comparison of Strength Differences and Joint Action Durations Between Full and Partial Range-of-Motion Bench Press Exercise”, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 13(1), 1999, pp. 76-81. [cited by applicant]
The International Bureau of WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 23, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/041190. [cited by applicant]
ISA/US, International Written Opinion dated Aug. 16, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/041190. [cited by applicant]
Supplementary Search Report for EP Application No. 06826421.7 dated Aug. 3, 2012. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/34552 dated Jan. 25, 2013. [cited by applicant]