IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,486,760
Granted Patent B2
US 12,486,760 · App. 18/356,784 · Granted Dec 2, 2025

Method and apparatus for evaluating the expansion of shape memory polymer in well completions

Inventors: David Chace (Spring, TX); Feyzi Inanc (Spring, TX); Ian Oliver McGlynn (Houston, TX); Emmannuel David Soans (Tomball, TX)
Assignee: BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
E21B47/111E21B33/128E21B47/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,486,760
App. No.
18/356,784
Granted
Dec 2, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A downhole system for evaluating an expansion of a shape memory material (SMM) in a borehole. The SMM expands into an annulus between a work string and an annulus. A pulsed neutron gamma ray tool irradiates the borehole and formation with neutrons and detects gamma rays generated from the borehole in response to the irradiation. A processor receives inelastic gamma ray measurements and capture gamma ray measurements based on irradiating the borehole at a first location within the borehole after the SMM has been expanded into the annulus at the first location, estimates a ratio of a first quantity including at least the inelastic gamma ray measurements to a second quantity including the capture gamma ray measurements, at the location, and evaluates a degree to which the SMM has filled the borehole at the location based on a relation between the ratio measurement and a selected range.

Claims (27)

1 . A method of evaluating an expansion of a shape memory material (SMM) in a borehole, comprising:

expanding the SMM into the borehole at a first location;

obtaining inelastic gamma ray measurements and capture gamma ray measurements from the borehole at the first location using a pulsed neutron gamma ray tool;

estimating a ratio of a first quantity including at least the inelastic gamma ray measurements to a second quantity including the capture gamma ray measurements, at the first location; and

evaluating a degree to which the SMM has filled the borehole at the first location based on a relation between the ratio and a selected range determined using a Monte Carlo model.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising running the pulsed neutron gamma ray tool through the borehole after the SMM has been expanded at the first location.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining a first set of inelastic gamma ray measurements and capture gamma ray measurements at the first location that includes the SMM in an expanded state and a second set of inelastic gamma ray measurements and capture gamma ray measurements at a second location that is without the SMM or in which the SMM is present in an unexpanded state, estimating a first ratio including at least the first inelastic gamma ray measurements and the first capture gamma ray measurements for the first location and a second ratio including at least the second inelastic gamma ray measurements and the second capture gamma ray measurements for the second location, and evaluating the expansion of the SMM at the first location based on a difference between the first ratio and the second ratio.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating the expansion further comprises evaluating the expansion of the SMM into an annulus of the borehole.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of: (i) comparing the ratio with a select range of a modeled ratio response to quantitatively estimate the degree to which the SMM has filled the borehole; and (ii) comparing the ratio to a threshold to estimate the degree to which the SMM has filled the borehole.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of: (i) recommending a production operation when an amount of an annulus filled by the SMM meets a criterion; (ii) recommending an injection operation when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM meets the criterion; (iii) recommending a storage operation when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM meets the criterion; (iv) recommending a completion operation when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM meets the criterion; and (v) recommending a remedial action when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM does not meet the criterion.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the ratio is at least one of: (i) a ratio of the inelastic gamma ray measurements to the capture gamma ray measurements (RICS); and (ii) a ratio of total gamma ray measurements to capture gamma ray measurements.

8 . A downhole system, comprising:

a work string forming an annulus with a borehole;

a shape memory material (SMM) configured to expand into the annulus;

a pulsed neutron gamma ray tool configured to irradiate the borehole and formation with neutrons and detect gamma rays generated from the borehole in response to the irradiation; and

a processor configured to:

receive inelastic gamma ray measurements and capture gamma ray measurements based on irradiating the borehole at a first location within the borehole after the SMM has been expanded into the annulus at the first location;

estimates a ratio of a first quantity including at least the inelastic gamma ray measurements to a second quantity including the capture gamma ray measurements, at the first location; and

evaluates a degree to which the SMM has filled the borehole at the first location based on a relation between the ratio and a selected range determined using a Monte Carlo model.

9 . The downhole system of claim 8 , wherein the pulsed neutron gamma ray tool is configured to be run through the work string after the SMM has been expanded into the annulus.

10 . The downhole system of claim 8 , wherein the pulsed neutron gamma ray tool is configured to be run between a first location including the SMM in an expanded state and a second location without SMM or in which SMM is present in an unexpanded state, and the processor is further configured to:

obtain a first set of inelastic gamma ray measurements and capture gamma ray measurements at the first location and a second set of inelastic gamma ray measurements and capture gamma ray measurements at the second location;

estimate a first ratio including at least the first inelastic gamma ray measurements and the first capture gamma ray measurements for the first location and a second ratio including at least the second inelastic gamma ray measurements and the second capture gamma ray measurements for the second location; and

evaluate the expansion of the SMM at the first location based on a difference between the first ratio and the second ratio.

11 . The downhole system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to evaluate the expansion of the SMM into the annulus.

12 . The downhole system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform at least one of: (i) comparing the ratio with a selected range of the modeled ratio response to quantitatively estimate the degree to which the SMM has filled the borehole; and (ii) comparing the ratio to a threshold to estimate the degree to which the SMM has filled the borehole.

13 . The downhole system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to recommend at least one of: (i) a production operation when an amount of the annulus filled by the SMM meets a criterion; (ii) an injection operation when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM meets the criterion; (iii) a storage operation when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM meets the criterion; (iv) a completion operation when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM meets the criterion; and (v) a remedial action when the amount of the annulus filled by the SMM does not meet the criterion.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 1, 2023
From: CHACE, DAVID; INANC, FEYZI; MCGLYNN, IAN OLIVER; SOANS, EMMANNUEL DAVID
To: BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 064449/0561 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250027405A1 · Jan 23, 2025
References Cited (18)
US 9163474B2 · Ramon · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 10570330B2 · Shojaei · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20070125532A1 · Murray · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070240877A1 · O'Malley · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20100212891A1 · Stewart et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110168386A1 · Green et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20170138187A1 · Moronkeji et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180136361A1 · Jacobson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190178076A1 · Hinkie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009045656A1 · 2009 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2011133369A1 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2016089526A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022198176A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2025014848A1 · 2025 [cited by examiner]
Fai Auto, “Viscous Vibration Dampers”, https://www.faiauto.com/viscous-vibration-dampers/, retrieved Nov. 5, 2024, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Flores, et al., “Acoustic and Nuclear Wireline Logging Validation of Shape Memory PolymerScreen Expansion”; SPE Paper No. 196047-MS; Sep. 30, 2019; 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
G. Bourgois, “Dual Mass Flywheel for Torsional Vibrations Damping: Parametric study for applicaiton in heavy vehicle”, Chalmers University of Technology Department of Applied Mechanics, 2016, 104 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report & Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US24/38715, mailed Oct. 24, 2024; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]