IP Library Granted Patent US 12,430,764
Granted Patent B2
US 12,430,764 · App. 18/365,389 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

CT reconstruction quality control

Inventors: Fedor Chelnokov (Khimki, RU); Grant Karapetyan (Moscow, RU)
Assignee: James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics, Inc.
G06T7/0012G06T2207/10081G06T2207/20021G06T2207/30036G06T2207/30168
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,430,764
App. No.
18/365,389
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method, system, and instructions can include receiving a reconstructed volume of an object; determining an air density and a material density from the reconstructed volume of the object; subdividing the reconstructed volume into one or more blocks, each block comprising one or more voxels; determining one or more contrast blocks within the reconstructed volume; and determining a reconstruction quality based on the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume.

Claims (34)

1. A computer-implemented method of reconstruction quality control, comprising:

receiving a reconstructed volume of an object;

determining the number of contrast blocks within the reconstructed volume;

upon determining the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is not greater than a reconstruction pass value, raising an alert; and

upon determining the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is greater than a reconstruction pass value, allowing further processing.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reconstructed volume is a computed tomography (CT) reconstructed volume.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the object is a dental impression.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an air voxel count and a material voxel count in one or more blocks in the reconstructed volume.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the air voxel count comprises the number of voxels having a density below or equal to an air density.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the material voxel count comprises the number of voxels having a density above or equal to a material density.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein a contrast block comprises a block where both a fraction of air voxels and a fraction of material voxels is greater than a contrast block threshold value of all voxels within the block.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reconstruction quality is good where the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is greater than a reconstruction pass value.

9. A system of reconstruction quality control, comprising:

a processor;

a computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions executable by the processor to perform steps comprising:

receiving a reconstructed volume of an object;

determining the number of contrast blocks within the reconstructed volume;

upon determining the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is not greater than a reconstruction pass value, raising an alert; and

upon determining the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is greater than a reconstruction pass value, allowing further processing.

10. The system of claim 9 , further comprising determining an air voxel count and a material voxel count in one or more blocks in the reconstructed volume.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the air voxel count comprises the number of voxels having a density below or equal to the air density.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the material voxel count comprises the number of voxels having a density above or equal to the material density.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein a contrast block comprises a block where both a fraction of air voxels and a fraction of material voxels is greater than a contrast block threshold value of all voxels within the block.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the reconstruction quality is good where the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is greater than a reconstruction pass value.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing executable computer program instructions for reconstruction quality control, the computer program instructions comprising instructions for:

receiving a reconstructed volume of an object;

determining the number of contrast blocks within the reconstructed volume; upon determining the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is

not greater than a reconstruction pass value, raising an alert; and

upon determining the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is greater than a reconstruction pass value, allowing further processing.

16. The medium of claim 15 , further comprising determining an air voxel count and a material voxel count in one or more blocks in the reconstructed volume.

17. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the air voxel count comprises the number of voxels having a density below or equal to the air density.

18. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the material voxel count comprises the number of voxels having a density above or equal to the material density.

19. The medium of claim 16 , wherein a contrast block comprises a block where both a fraction of air voxels and a fraction of material voxels is greater than a contrast block threshold value of all voxels within the block.

20. The medium of claim 15 , wherein the reconstruction quality is good where the number of contrast blocks in the reconstructed volume is greater than a reconstruction pass value.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 25, 2023
From: CHELNOKOV, FEDOR; KARAPETYAN, GRANT
To: JAMES R. GLIDEWELL DENTAL CERAMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 064707/0384 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17219243 · Mar 31, 2021
Related Publication 20230394659A1 · Dec 7, 2023
References Cited (48)
US 5224037A · Jones et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 6343108B1 · Heuscher · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7251307B2 · Chen · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7277595B1 · Reid · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7330528B2 · Jefferson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7940884B2 · Bruder et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8723866B2 · Buyanovskiy · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8724880B2 · Shiki et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8842904B2 · Chen · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9155514B2 · Panin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9235889B1 · Frenkel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9498177B2 · Bruder et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10229517B2 · Raupach et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11544846B2 · Nikolskiy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040170248A1 · Cahill · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040183812A1 · Rasker et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070217567A1 · Noshi et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090169081A1 · Garms · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100246918A1 · Kappler et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110002395A1 · Nishihara · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110142316A1 · Wang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110164031A1 · Shi · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120170822A1 · Litvin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140093030A1 · Mukumoto et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160095668A1 · Kuo et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160163073A1 · Grass et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170278281A1 · Schmitt · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180028064A1 · Elbaz · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180132982A1 · Nikolskiy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180276854A1 · Suzuki et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190197674A1 · Bai et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200178910A1 · Susuki et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200205943A1 · Elbaz et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200380669A1 · Wu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200405455A1 · Nikolskiy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210077045A1 · Wen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210372950A1 · Nikolskiy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220172411A1 · Chelnokov · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220245867A1 · Chelnokov · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 0825457A3 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005312970A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015014867A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017191162A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019183584A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
A.C. Kak, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging, IEEE Press, 1988. (Textbook). [cited by applicant]
Lucia Franco et al., Integrating quality control tests in a computed tomography system, 11th European Conference on Non-Destructive testing (ECNDT 2014), Oct. 6-10, 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, in 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US22/22590, International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Jul. 7, 2022, in 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/US22/22590, Preliminary Report, mailed Oct. 12, 2023, in 8 pages. [cited by applicant]