IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,680,435
Granted Patent B2
US 12,680,435 · App. 18/366,354 · Granted Jul 14, 2026

Formation breakdown pressure near wellbores

Inventors: Tameem Almani (Dammam, SA); Khaqan Khan (Dhahran, SA); Mohammad H. Altwaijri (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
E21B43/26E21B47/022E21B49/006
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,680,435
App. No.
18/366,354
Filed
Aug 7, 2023
Granted
Jul 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2857
USPC
702/11
Abstract

Among other things, methods and systems are described for calculating formation breakdown pressures. A method involves determining, during hydraulic fracturing operations, a pore pressure for a wellbore; determining a poroelastic stress for the wellbore using a poroelastic stress equation and based on the pore pressure; determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a breakdown pressure upper bound for the wellbore; applying, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a stress correction on the breakdown pressure upper bound based on whether the wellbore is an open hole wellbore or a cemented liner wellbore; and determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a breakdown pressure for the wellbore based on the stress-corrected upper bound breakdown pressure for the wellbore.

Claims (51)

1 . A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving input parameters for computing a breakdown pressure for a wellbore in a formation, the input parameters comprising an inclination angle of the wellbore from a vertical axis, and an azimuth angle of the wellbore relative to a maximum horizontal stress direction, at a particular depth;

determining, during hydraulic fracturing operations, a pore pressure for the wellbore based on a time duration, an injection fluid compressibility, and a poroelastic parameter;

determining a poroelastic stress for the wellbore using a poroelastic stress equation and based on the pore pressure determined for the wellbore, an empirical parameter, a pore pressure, the poroelastic parameter, a tensile strength of rock, and a Poisson ratio;

determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a breakdown pressure upper bound for the wellbore based on a minimum horizontal stress and a maximum horizontal stress for the wellbore, an overburden vertical stress for the wellbore, the inclination angle of the wellbore, the azimuth angle of the wellbore, and a wellbore circumferential angle;

applying, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a stress correction on the breakdown pressure upper bound for the wellbore based on whether the wellbore is an open hole wellbore or a cemented liner wellbore, to generate a stress-corrected upper bound breakdown pressure for the wellbore;

determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, the breakdown pressure for the wellbore based on the stress-corrected upper bound breakdown pressure for the wellbore, the poroelastic stress for the wellbore, and the pore pressure for the wellbore;

determining, based at least on the breakdown pressure, a horsepower level for creating a fracture geometry used in the hydraulic fracturing operations;

determining a successful placement of stimulation materials for the hydraulic fracturing operations;

determining, based at least on the breakdown pressure, a pressure rating of tubulars required for fracturing treatment; and

completing the hydraulic fracturing operations using the horsepower level, the successful placement of the stimulation materials, and one or more tubulars having the pressure rating of the tubulars required for the fracturing treatment.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the pore pressure for the wellbore comprises:

determining the pore pressure for the wellbore using a Stehfest method equation that is a function of the time duration, a distance from the wellbore in a radial direction, the injection fluid compressibility, and the poroelastic parameter.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the Stehfest method equation further comprises a modified Bessel function of a second kind of order 0.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the poroelastic stress is further based on a Composite Simpson's Rule for numerical integration.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the input parameters further comprise an initial wellbore pressure, a rock permeability, a rock porosity, the injection fluid compressibility, an injection fluid viscosity, the Poisson ratio, a wellbore radius, and a distance from the wellbore in a radial direction, at the particular depth.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein an initial value for the distance from the wellbore in the radial direction is two and a half the wellbore radius.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the wellbore is one of: (i) a deviated wellbore, or (ii) a vertical wellbore.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein an initial value for the time duration is a time at which the formation is expected to break after a slurry injection.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein an initial value for the time duration is 1000 seconds.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the wellbore is either open hole or cement lined.

11 . A system comprising:

one or more processors configured to perform operations comprising:

receiving input parameters for computing a breakdown pressure for a wellbore in a formation, the input parameters comprising an inclination angle of the wellbore from a vertical axis, and an azimuth angle of the wellbore relative to a maximum horizontal stress direction, at a particular depth;

determining, during hydraulic fracturing operations, a pore pressure for the wellbore based on a time duration, an injection fluid compressibility, and a poroelastic parameter;

determining a poroelastic stress for the wellbore using a poroelastic stress equation and based on the pore pressure determined for the wellbore, an empirical parameter, a pore pressure, the poroelastic parameter, a tensile strength of rock, and a Poisson ratio;

determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a breakdown pressure upper bound for the wellbore based on a minimum horizontal stress and a maximum horizontal stress for the wellbore, an overburden vertical stress for the wellbore, the inclination angle of the wellbore, the azimuth angle of the wellbore, and a wellbore circumferential angle;

applying, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a stress correction on the breakdown pressure upper bound for the wellbore based on whether the wellbore is an open hole wellbore or a cemented liner wellbore, to generate a stress-corrected upper bound breakdown pressure for the wellbore;

determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, the breakdown pressure for the wellbore based on the stress-corrected upper bound breakdown pressure for the wellbore, the poroelastic stress for the wellbore, and the pore pressure for the wellbore;

determining, based at least on the breakdown pressure, a horsepower level for creating a fracture geometry used in the hydraulic fracturing operations;

determining a successful placement of stimulation materials for the hydraulic fracturing operations;

determining, based at least on the breakdown pressure, a pressure rating of tubulars required for fracturing treatment; and

completing the hydraulic fracturing operations using the horsepower level, the successful placement of the stimulation materials, and one or more tubulars having the pressure rating of the tubulars required for the fracturing treatment.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein determining the pore pressure for the wellbore comprises:

determining the pore pressure for the wellbore using a Stehfest method equation that is a function of the time duration, a distance from the wellbore in a radial direction, the injection fluid compressibility, and the poroelastic parameter.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the Stehfest method equation further comprises a modified Bessel function of a second kind of order 0.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein determining the poroelastic stress is further based on a Composite Simpson's Rule for numerical integration.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the input parameters further comprise an initial wellbore pressure, a rock permeability, a rock porosity, the injection fluid compressibility, an injection fluid viscosity, the Poisson ratio, a wellbore radius, and a distance from the wellbore in a radial direction, at the particular depth.

16 . A non-transitory computer storage medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

receiving input parameters for computing a breakdown pressure for a wellbore in a formation, the input parameters comprising an inclination angle of the wellbore from a vertical axis, and an azimuth angle of the wellbore relative to a maximum horizontal stress direction, at a particular depth;

determining, during hydraulic fracturing operations, a pore pressure for the wellbore based on a time duration, an injection fluid compressibility, and a poroelastic parameter;

determining a poroelastic stress for the wellbore using a poroelastic stress equation and based on the pore pressure determined for the wellbore, an empirical parameter, a pore pressure, the poroelastic parameter, a tensile strength of rock, and a Poisson ratio;

determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a breakdown pressure upper bound for the wellbore based on a minimum horizontal stress and a maximum horizontal stress for the wellbore, an overburden vertical stress for the wellbore, the inclination angle of the wellbore, the azimuth angle of the wellbore, and a wellbore circumferential angle;

applying, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, a stress correction on the breakdown pressure upper bound for the wellbore based on whether the wellbore is an open hole wellbore or a cemented liner wellbore, to generate a stress-corrected upper bound breakdown pressure for the wellbore;

determining, during the hydraulic fracturing operations, the breakdown pressure for the wellbore based on the stress-corrected upper bound breakdown pressure for the wellbore, the poroelastic stress for the wellbore, and the pore pressure for the wellbore;

determining, based at least on the breakdown pressure, a horsepower level for creating a fracture geometry used in the hydraulic fracturing operations;

determining a successful placement of stimulation materials for the hydraulic fracturing operations;

determining, based at least on the breakdown pressure, a pressure rating of tubulars required for fracturing treatment; and

completing the hydraulic fracturing operations using the horsepower level, the successful placement of the stimulation materials, and one or more tubulars having the pressure rating of the tubulars required for the fracturing treatment.

17 . The non-transitory computer storage medium of claim 16 , wherein determining the pore pressure for the wellbore comprises:

determining the pore pressure for the wellbore using a Stehfest method equation that is a function of the time duration, a distance from the wellbore in a radial direction, the injection fluid compressibility, and the poroelastic parameter.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2023
From: ALMANI, TAMEEM; KHAN, KHAQAN; ALTWAIJRI, MOHAMMAD H.
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 064680/0074 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250052141A1 · Feb 13, 2025
References Cited (27)
US 10221649B2 · Shahri et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10597982B2 · Shahri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10982536B2 · Kirane et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11255184B1 · Xia et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11675106B2 · Almani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20160291181A1 · Sinha · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20220259960A1 · Xia · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220381946A1 · Almani et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 107939380A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
Zhu et al., “A prediction of breakdown pressure from damaged deviated well” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 675 (2021) 012174 (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Greenberg, Prentice-Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1998, 1348 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ding et al., “The Research on Influence of Unloading on Borehole Stability in Clay-Rich Shale Formation,” The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal, Aug. 2017, 10: 204-219, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fatahi, “Simulation of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation Interacted with Natural Fractures,” PhD Dissertation, Curtin University, Nov. 2016, 188 pages. [cited by applicant]
Foundations of Applied Mathematics, Greenberg, Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1978, p. 423-434, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Greenberg “Foundations of Applied Mathematics” discloses on p. 430 Bessel function of first and second kind and order v are given by (22.93) and (22.94); (1978). [cited by applicant]
Haimson et al., “In Situ Stress Determination at Great Depth by Means of Hydraulic Fracturing,” 11th Symposium on Rock Mechanics. W. Somerton, Society of Mining Engineers of AIME, 1970, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ito et al., “Physical Background to the Breakdown Pressure in Hydraulic Fracturing Tectonic Stress Measurements,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 1991, 28(4):285-293, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ito, “Effect of pore pressure gradient on fracture initiation in fluid saturated porous media: Rock,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75:1753-1762, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Khorram et al., “Modeling and Simulation of Oil Well Stimulation by High Power Ultrasonic Irradiation”, Acta Acustica United With Acustica, Jun. 2017, 103(3):411-420, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Medlin et al., “Laboratory Investigation of Fracture Initiation Pressure and Orientation,” presented at the SPE-AIME 51st Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Oct. 3-6, 1976, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Numerical Analysis, Burden and Faires, Brooks/Cole, Ninth ed., Boston, MA, 2011, 895 pages. [cited by applicant]
Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics, 2nd ed., 2008, Elsevier, 515 pages. [cited by applicant]
Poroelasticity, vol. 27, Hassanizadeh (ed)., 2016, 893 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rice et al., “Some Basic Stress Diffusion Solutions for Fluid-Saturated Elastic Porous Media with Compressible Constituents,” Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, May 1976, 14(2):227-241, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schmitt et al., “Poroelastic effects in the determination of the maximum horizontal principal stress in hydraulic fracturing tests—A proposed breakdown equation employing a modified effective stress relation for tensile… [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “On Approximating the Modified Bessel Function of the Second Kind,” Journal of Inequalities and Applications, Article ID 41, Feb. 2017, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang, “Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology,” Princeton Series in Geophysics, Dec. 3, 2000, pp. 201, 202, 259, and 260, 4 pages total. [cited by applicant]