IP Library Patent Application 18375699
Patent Application
App. No. 18/375,699

CORRECTIVE COLLAR UTILIZING GEOLOCATION TECHNOLOGY

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
18/375,699
Abstract

The disclosed technology includes a pet collar that can be configured to determine its geolocational position and evaluate that position with respect to the geo-fence of a predetermined, geo-fenced “safe” zone. If the collar determines that its position is inside a safe zone but is near the geo-fence, the collar can be configured to provide a warning correction. If the collar determines that it is outside a predetermined safe zone, the collar can also be configured to provide a stronger correction to discourage the pet from continuing away from the safe zone. The collar can also be configured to guide the pet back to the safe zone such as by varying the strength and/or type of correction provided based at least in part on the distance of the collar from the geo-fence.

Claims (58)

1 . A collar comprising:

a strap configured to be worn by an animal;

a communication interface configured to transmit and receive data;

one or more processors; and

a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the collar to:

receive instructions from a user device to activate a keep-away mode;

receive distance threshold data indicative of a predetermined distance metric to be maintained between the collar and an animal-adverse device;

determine whether the collar is within the predetermined distance metric from the animal-adverse device; and

output a keep-away corrective action responsive to determining that the collar is within the predetermined distance metric from the animal-adverse device.

2 . The collar of claim 1 , wherein the animal-adverse device is the user device.

3 . The collar of claim 1 , wherein predetermined distance metric is based at least in part on a strength of a signal from the animal-adverse device.

4 . The collar of claim 1 , wherein:

the animal-adverse device is one of a plurality of devices associated with respective animal-adverse parties, and

the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, is further configured to cause the collar to output a keep-away corrective action responsive to determining that the collar is within the predetermined distance metric from any of the plurality of devices associated with the respective animal-adverse parties.

5 . The collar of claim 1 , the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the collar to:

receive a signal from the animal-adverse device, the signal comprising a unique identifier associated with the animal-adverse device; and

determine whether the signal is associated with the animal-adverse device based on a unique identifier; and

output the keep-away corrective action responsive to (1) determining that the collar is within the predetermined distance metric from the animal-adverse device, and (2) determining that the signal is associated with the animal-adverse device.

6 . The collar of claim 5 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to pair with the animal-adverse device and receive the unique identifier from the animal-adverse device.

7 . The collar of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to output the keep-away corrective action further responsive to:

receiving an authorization code associated with the animal-adverse device; and

confirming that the authorization code is valid.

8 . The collar of claim 7 , wherein confirming the authorization code is valid comprises determining whether the authorization code has expired.

9 . The collar of claim 8 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors are further configured to cause the collar to, in response to determining that the authorization code has expired, disable the keep-away mode.

10 . The collar of claim 1 , wherein the keep-away corrective action is at least one of an emission of light, a vibration, output of an audible warning via a speaker of the collar, output of a pre-recorded voice command via the speaker, outputting an electrical shock, and spraying a liquid.

11 . The collar of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to receive at least one of (i) first geo-fence data indicative of a first predetermined geographical area in which it is permissible for the collar to be located and (ii) second geo-fence data indicative of a second predetermined geographical area in which it is impermissible for the collar to be located.

12 . The collar of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to output a first corrective action responsive to determining that:

the collar is located (i) inside the first predetermined geographical area and (ii) within a predetermined distance from a boundary of the first predetermined geographical area, and

the animal wearing the collar is moving toward the boundary of the first predetermined geographical area.

13 . The collar of claim 12 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to output a second corrective action responsive to determining that the collar is located outside the first predetermined geographical area or the collar is located inside the second predetermined geographical area.

14 . A collar comprising:

a strap configured to be worn by an animal;

a geolocation sensor;

a communication interface configured to transmit and receive data;

one or more processors; and

a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the collar to:

receive geo-fence data indicative of a geographical area in which it is permissible for the collar to be located; and

operate in a lost mode responsive to determining that the collar is outside of the geographical area, the lost mode comprising:

determining a selected return path to the geographical area, the selected return path being based on a path previously traveled by a wearer of the collar and selected from among a plurality of return paths, the selected return path being a path traveled most frequently by the wearer of the collar compared to any other path of the plurality of return paths; and

instructing, via one or more corrective actions, the wearer of the collar to orient itself in a direction to follow the selected return path.

15 . The collar of claim 14 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to operate in the lost mode responsive to determining that wearer of the collar is outside the geographical area for at least a predetermined duration.

16 . The collar of claim 14 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to:

determine that the wearer of the collar is approaching a road; and

prevent the wearer of the collar from entering the road.

17 . The collar of claim 14 further comprising a magnetometer configured to determine a direction in which the wearer of the collar is facing, the lost mode further comprising:

determining a current location and a current orientation of the collar, the current orientation corresponding to a direction in which the wearer of the collar is facing and based at least in part on data received from the magnetometer; and

instructing, via one or more corrective actions, the animal wearing the collar to orient itself in a direction to follow the selected return path.

18 . The collar of claim 17 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to:

responsive to determining that the current location of collar has deviated from the selected return path, instruct, via one or more corrective actions, the wearer of the collar to orient itself in a direction to follow the selected return path and to move in a direction to follow the selected return path.

19 . A collar comprising:

a strap configured to be worn by an animal;

an accelerometer configured to detect motion of the collar;

one or more processors; and

a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the collar to:

receive motion data from the accelerometer;

in response to determining that the motion data indicates a motion of the collar is below a threshold level of motion, transition the collar to a resting mode; and

decrease a frequency of receiving or transmitting data.

20 . The collar of claim 19 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, are further configured to cause the collar to prevent output of a corrective action.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 4, 2026
From: PROTECT ANIMALS WITH SATELLITES LLC
To: CHICAGO ATLANTIC ADMIN, LLC AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 075021/0693 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 2, 2023
From: EHRMAN, KENNETH SCOTT; EHRMAN, MICHAEL
To: PROTECT ANIMALS WITH SATELLITES, LLC
Reel/Frame 065434/0027 →