IP Library Granted Patent US 12,048,564
Granted Patent B2
US 12,048,564 · App. 18/393,080 · Granted Jul 30, 2024

Method and device for detecting a neural response in a neural measurement

Inventors: Peter Scott Vallack Single (Artarmon, AU); Dean Michael Karantonis (Artarmon, AU)
Assignee: Saluda Medical Pty Ltd
A61B5/7246A61B5/24A61B5/4848A61B5/6846A61B5/6877A61B5/7203A61B5/7257A61N1/36071A61N1/36139A61B5/7282A61B2562/046G06F2218/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,048,564
App. No.
18/393,080
Granted
Jul 30, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for processing a neural measurement obtained in the presence of artifact, in order to detect whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement. A neural measurement is obtained from one or more sense electrodes. The neural measurement is correlated against a filter template, the filter template comprising at least three half cycles of an alternating waveform, amplitude modulated by a window. From an output of the correlating, it is determined whether a neural response is present in the neural measurement.

Claims (37)

1. A method for processing a neural measurement in order to determine a magnitude of a neural response in the neural measurement, the method comprising:

applying a first electrical stimulus to neural tissue of a patient, the first electrical stimulus defined by at least one stimulus parameter;

obtaining the neural measurement from one or more sense electrodes subsequent to the first electrical stimulus;

determining, based on the neural measurement, a time delay of a window to be applied to a subsequent neural measurement;

applying the window at the time delay to the subsequent neural measurement to produce a windowed neural measurement; and

determining from the windowed neural measurement the magnitude of the neural response evoked by an electrical stimulus in the subsequent neural measurement.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the magnitude of the neural response comprises correlating the windowed neural measurement against a filter template.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the filter template comprises at least three half cycles of an alternating waveform, amplitude modulated by a template window.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the template window comprises a triangular window.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the triangular window is a standard triangular window of length L comprising coefficients w(n) as follows:

For L odd:

w ( n )=2 n /( L+ 1) for 1≤ n ≤( L+ 1)/2=2−2 n /( L+ 1) for ( L+ 1)/2+1≤ n≤L

For L even:

w ( n )=(2 n− 1)/ L for 1≤ n≤L/ 2=2−(2 n− 1)/ L for L/ 2+1≤ n≤L.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the triangular window is a Bartlett window of length L in which samples 1 and L are zero.

7. The method of claim 3 wherein the template window comprises one of a Hanning window, a rectangular window, and a Kaiser-Bessel window.

8. The method of claim 3 wherein the window comprises one or more basis functions derived from a sinusoidal binomial transform.

9. The method of claim 3 wherein the filter template comprises four half-cycles of an alternating waveform.

10. The method of claim 3 wherein the filter template comprises half cycles of a sine wave, amplitude modulated by the template window.

11. The method of claim 3 wherein the filter template comprises half cycles of a cosine wave, amplitude modulated by the template window.

12. The method of claim 2 wherein determining the magnitude comprises calculating only a single point of correlation.

13. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the time delay comprises:

applying the window at an approximate time delay to the neural measurement;

computing real and imaginary parts of the fundamental frequency of the discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) of the windowed neural measurement;

calculating a phase defined by the real and imaginary parts;

calculating, based on a fundamental frequency of the filter template, the time adjustment needed to change the calculated phase to π/2; and

determining the time delay as the sum of the approximate time delay and the time adjustment.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the time delay is re-determined prior to every processing of the neural measurement.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the time delay is re-determined in response to a detected change in a posture of the patient.

16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using the magnitude of the neural response in a closed loop feedback circuit to determine the at least one stimulus parameter for a subsequent electrical stimulus.

17. An implantable device for processing a neural measurement in order to determine a magnitude of a neural response in the neural measurement, the device comprising:

an electrical stimulus source configured to generate a first electrical stimulus to be applied to neural tissue, the first electrical stimulus defined by at least one stimulus parameter;

measurement circuitry for obtaining the neural measurement from one or more sense electrodes subsequent to the first electrical stimulus; and

a processor configured to:

determine, based on the neural measurement, a time delay of a window to be applied to a subsequent neural measurement;

apply the window at the time delay to the subsequent neural measurement to produce a windowed neural measurement; and

determine from the windowed neural measurement the magnitude of the neural response evoked by the an electrical stimulus in the subsequent neural measurement.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2025
From: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP
Reel/Frame 070518/0710 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 18, 2024
From: SINGLE, PETER SCOTT VALLACK; KARANTONIS, DEAN MICHAEL
To: SALUDA MEDICAL PTY LTD
Reel/Frame 066161/0387 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2013904519 · Nov 22, 2013 · national
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17716545 · Apr 8, 2022
Continuation 16537468 · Aug 9, 2019
Continuation 15037038
Related Publication 20240180496A1 · Jun 6, 2024