IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,513,099
Granted Patent B2
US 12,513,099 · App. 18/400,529 · Granted Dec 30, 2025

Capturing output of language operator-based communication analysis

Inventors: Yongjie Chen (London, GB); Qi Feng (London, GB)
Assignee: Twilio Inc.
H04L51/21G06F40/40H04L67/306
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,513,099
App. No.
18/400,529
Granted
Dec 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for automatically analyzing and/or summarizing communications using language operators, the method receiving a definition of a language operator, the definition comprising one or more phrases indicative of a match to a concept associated with a communication; surfacing, in a UI, one or more results of applying the language operator to the communication, the surfacing of each result of the one or more results using an interactive UI element linked to one or more communication phrases, the interactive UI element highlighting a match between the concept and the one or more communication phrases; and training a machine learned (ML) model to improve an accuracy of the result based on one or more inputs received via the UI.

Claims (37)

1 . A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving a definition of a language operator, the definition comprising one or more phrases indicative of a match to a concept associated with a communication;

surfacing, in a UI, one or more results of applying the language operator to the communication, the surfacing of each result of the one or more results using an interactive UI element linked to one or more communication phrases, the interactive UI element highlighting a match between the concept and the one or more communication phrases, the surfacing of the one or more results further comprising:

surfacing an identifier associated with the language operator, and

surfacing an indicator corresponding to a count of the one or more results of applying the language operator to the communication; and

training a machine learned (ML) model to improve an accuracy of the one or more results based on one or more inputs received via the UI, an input of the one of more inputs corresponding to a user indicating a confirmation or a rejection of a result of the one or more results, a quality of the input being assessed based on one or more user characteristics, the one or more user characteristics comprising at least one of a plurality of expertise levels associated with language operators.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein training the ML model to improve the accuracy of the one or more results comprises:

augmenting a training set for the ML model with a training example derived based on the input received via the UI, the ML model being enabled to implement the language operator, the training example including a context comprising the one or more communication phrases and a label being one of a positive label or a negative label, wherein:

the label is the positive label if the input corresponds to the user indicating the confirmation of the result of applying the language operator to the communication; and

the label is the negative label if the input corresponds to the user indicating the rejection of the result of applying the language operator to the communication; and

training the ML model using the augmented training set.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising surfacing, in the UI, a plurality of language operators, wherein each language operator of the plurality of language operators is associated with an identifier, a set of results of applying the language operator to the communication, and an indicator associated with the set of results.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the plurality of language operators comprise at least one of an extract operator, or a classify operator.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the indicator associated with each language operator of the plurality of language operators is a number of elements in the set of results of applying the language operator to the communication.

6 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising surfacing a ranking of the plurality of language operators wherein a ranking position of each language operator of the plurality of language operators is determined based on the indicator associated with the language operator.

7 . A system comprising:

at least one processor; and

a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, configure the system to:

receive a definition of a language operator, the definition comprising one or more phrases indicative of a match to a concept associated with a communication;

surface, in a UI, one or more results of applying the language operator to the communication, the surfacing of each result of the one or more results using an interactive UI element linked to one or more communication phrases, the interactive UI element highlighting a match between the concept and the one or more communication phrases, the surfacing of the one or more results further comprising:

surfacing an identifier associated with the language operator, and

surfacing an indicator corresponding to a count of the one or more results of applying the language operator to the communication; and

train a ML model to improve an accuracy of the one or more results based on one or more inputs received via the UI, an input of the one of more inputs corresponding to a user indicating a confirmation or a rejection of a result of the one or more results, a quality of the input being assessed based on one or more user characteristics, the one or more user characteristics comprising at least one of a plurality of expertise levels associated with language operators.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein training the ML model to improve the accuracy of the result comprises:

augmenting a training set for the ML model with a training example derived based on the input received via the UI, the ML model being enabled to implement the language operator, the training example comprising a context comprising the one or more communication phrases and a label being one of a positive label or a negative label, wherein:

the label is the positive label if the input corresponds to the user indicating the confirmation of the result of applying the language operator to the communication; and

the label is the negative label if the input corresponds to the user indicating the rejection of the result of applying the language operator to the communication; and

training the ML model using the augmented training set.

9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the instructions further configure the system to surface, in the UI, a plurality of language operators, wherein each language operator of the plurality of language operators is associated with an identifier, a set of results of applying the language operator to the communication, and an indicator associated with the set of results.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the indicator associated with each language operator of the plurality of language operators is a number of elements in the set of results of applying the language operator to the communication.

11 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of language operators comprises at least one of an extract operator or a classify operator.

12 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, the computer-readable storage medium including instructions that when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:

receive a definition of a language operator, the definition comprising one or more phrases indicative of a match to a concept associated with a communication;

surface, in a UI, one or more results of applying the language operator to the communication, the surfacing of each result of the one or more results using an interactive UI element linked to one or more communication phrases, the interactive UI element highlighting a match between the concept and the one or more communication phrases, the surfacing of the one or more results further comprising:

surfacing an identifier associated with the language operator, and

surfacing an indicator corresponding to a count of the one or more results of applying the language operator to the communication; and

train a ML model to improve an accuracy of the one or more results based on one or more inputs received via the UI, an input of the one of more inputs corresponding to a user indicating a confirmation or a rejection of a result of the one or more results, a quality of the input being assessed based on one or more user characteristics, the one or more user characteristics comprising at least one of a plurality of expertise levels associated with language operators.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2024
From: CHEN,, YONGJIE; FENG, QI
To: TWILIO INC.
Reel/Frame 067772/0047 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63534034 · Aug 22, 2023
Related Publication 20250071077A1 · Feb 27, 2025
References Cited (155)
US 3568155A · Abraham et al. · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 5384703A · Withgott et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5945933A · Kalkstein · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6138139A · Beck et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6567805B1 · Johnson et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7702508B2 · Bennett · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7725321B2 · Bennett · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7801910B2 · Houh et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8428227B2 · Angel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8494133B2 · Jeffs et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8775165B1 · Oikawa · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8798242B1 · Sankaranarayanan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8942359B2 · Seetharaman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8983975B2 · Kenton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9880807B1 · Haggerty et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9910909B2 · Hegde et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9965726B1 · Tablan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10089639B2 · Kannan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10453455B2 · Manuvinakurike et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10467339B1 · Shen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10839335B2 · Weisman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10978056B1 · Challa · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11165900B2 · Sachdev · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11170175B1 · Kohli et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11475210B2 · De Oliveira et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11568231B2 · Meteer et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11765267B2 · Cole et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11809804B2 · Láinez Rodrigo et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11848025B2 · Proenca et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11941348B2 · De Oliveira et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11947872B1 · Mahler-Haug et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12079573B2 · Láinez rodrigo et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12158902B2 · De Oliveira et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12166919B2 · Cole et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020046018A1 · Marcu et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040093200A1 · Scott · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20070133437A1 · Wengrovitz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090030894A1 · Mamou et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100104086A1 · Park · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100332477A1 · Jeffs et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130007037A1 · Azzam et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140108369A1 · Nijjer · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140169547A1 · Murgai · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150032448A1 · Wasserblat et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150046783A1 · O'donoghue et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150106091A1 · Wetjen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150181020A1 · Fitzsimmons et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150256677A1 · Konig et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160092792A1 · Chandrasekaran et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180113854A1 · Vig et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180332165A1 · Cunningham et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190121852A1 · Applegate et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392837A1 · Jung et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200279017A1 · Norton et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210056170A1 · Bohannon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210158805A1 · Sivasubramanian et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210264097A1 · Herzig et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210294829A1 · Bender et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210335367A1 · Graff et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210365485A1 · Kohita et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220067269A1 · De Oliveira et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220067284A1 · He et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220121884A1 · Zadeh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220156296A1 · De Oliveira et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220156460A1 · Láinez Rodrigo et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220210268A1 · Cole et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220382959A1 · Láinez Rodrigo et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220414319A1 · De Oliveira et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230134796A1 · Bhatnagar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230388413A1 · Cole et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240037418A1 · Durairaj et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240152689A1 · De Oliveira et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240378384A1 · Rodrigo et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250030797A1 · Cole et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021234610 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022086939A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, filed Jul. 19, 2021, Transition-Driven Transcript Search (as amended). [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/447,039 U.S. Pat. No. 11,765,267, filed Sep. 7, 2021, Tool for Annotating and Reviewing Audio Conversations. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/448,675, filed Aug. 11, 2023, Tool for Annotating and Reviewing Audio Conversations. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/304,081 U.S. Pat. No. 11,475,210, filed Jun. 14, 2021, Language Model for Abstractive Summarization. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,176 U.S. Pat. No. 11,941,348, filed Sep. 7, 2022, Language Model for Abstractive Summarization. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/410,621, filed Jan. 11, 2024, Language Model for Abstractive Summarization. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/449,405, filed Sep. 29, 2021, Tool for Categorizing and Extracting Data From Audio Conversations. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/303,279, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 24, 2023”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/304,081, Notice of Allowability mailed Jul. 20, 2022”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/304,081, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 9, 2022”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Dec. 12, 2023”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2024”, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2024”, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2023”, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Response filed Mar. 6, 2024 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2024”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Response filed Dec. 14, 2023 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2023”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/447,039, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Nov. 7, 2022”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/447,039, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 21, 2023”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/447,039, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 16, 2022”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/447,039, Notice of Allowance mailed May 12, 2023”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/447,039, Response filed Apr. 21, 2023 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 21, 2023”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/447,039, Response filed Nov. 16, 2022 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 16, 2022”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/449,405, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Jan. 24, 2024”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/449,405, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2023”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/449,405, Response filed Feb. 27, 2024 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2023”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Application Serial No. 17/939,176, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 15, 2023”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,176, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 8, 2023”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,176, Response filed Sep. 14, 2023 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 15, 2023”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/939,176, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Feb. 21, 2024”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/448,675, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2024”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Ba, Jimmy Lei, et al., “Layer Normalization”, (Jul. 21, 2016), 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Celikyilmaz, Asli, et al., “Deep Communicating Agents for Abstractive Summarization”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1803.10357v3 [cs.CL], (Aug. 15, 2018), 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Chopra, Sumit, et al., “Abstractive Sentence Summarization with Attentive Recurrent Neural Networks”, Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT16, (2016), 93-98. [cited by applicant]
Dai, et al., “Semi-supervised Sequence Learning”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1511.01432 [cs.LG], (Nov. 4, 2015), 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Devlin, Jacob, et al., “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding”, (2018), 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Efstathiou, et al., “Semantic Source Code Models Using Identifier Embeddings”, IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), (2019), 29-33. [cited by applicant]
Gehrmann, Sebastian, et al., “Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarization”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1808.10792v2 [cs.CL], (Oct. 9, 2018), 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Gu, Jiatao, et al., “Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learning”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1603.06393v3, (Jun. 8, 2016), 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Holtzman, Ari, et al., “The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration”, 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), (Apr. 2020), 16 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Howard, Jeremy, et al., “Universal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1801.06146v5 [cs.CL], (May 23, 2018), 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kingma, Diederik P, et al., “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization”, (Jan. 30, 2017), 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kudo, Taku, et al., “SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processing”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1808.06226v1 [cs.CL], (Aug. 19, 2018), 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Li, Piji, et al., “Actor-Critic based Training Framework for Abstractive Summarization”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1803.11070v2 [cs.CL], (Aug. 15, 2018), 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Lin, Chin-Yew, “Rouge: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries”, Text Summarization Branches Out: Proceedings of the ACL-04 Workshop, Barcelona, Spain., [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.a… [cited by applicant]
Liu, Peter J, et al., “Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequences”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1801.10198v1 [cs.CL], (Jan. 30, 2018), 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Lloret, Elena, et al., “The Challenging Task of Summary Evaluation: An Overview”, Author preprint, Language Resources and Evaluation, 52:1, 101-148, (2017), 54 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nallapati, Ramesh, et al., “Abstractive text summarization using sequence-to-sequence RNNs and beyond”, arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1602.06023v5 [cs.CL], [Online] Retrieved from the internet: <https://www.aclweb.org/antholog… [cited by applicant]
Narayan, Shashi, et al., “Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary.”, arxiv prepint, arixiv 1808.08745v1 cs.cl, (Aug. 27, 2018), 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Paulus, Romain, et al., “A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarization”, arXiv:1705.04304v3 [cs.CL], (Nov. 13, 2017), 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Peters, Matthew, et al., “Deep contextualized word representations”, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1… [cited by applicant]
Radford, Alec, et al., “Improving Language Understanding Generative Pre-Training”, author preprint, (2018), 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Radford, Alec, et al., “Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners”, author preprint, (2018), 24 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rush, Alexander M, et al., “A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1509.00685v2 [cs.CL], (Sep. 3, 2015), 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Schluter, Natalie, “The limits of automatic summarisation according to ROUGE”, Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: vol. 2, Short Papers, (Apr. 3-7… [cited by applicant]
See, Abigail, et al., “Get to the Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1704.04368v2 [cs.CL], (Apr. 25, 2017), 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Sennrich, Rico, et al., “Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units”, In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL Berlin, Germany, vol. 1: Long Papers… [cited by applicant]
Sutskever, Ilya, et al., “Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks”, Part of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (NIPS 2014), (2014), 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Tu, Zhaopeng, et al., “Modeling Coverage for Neural Machine Translation”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1601.04811v6 [cs.CL], (Aug. 6, 2016), 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vaswani, Ashish, et al., “Attention is All You Need”, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), arXiv:1706.03762v5 [cs.CL], (Dec. 6, 2017), 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vinyals, Oriol, et al., “Pointer Networks”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1506.03134v2 [stat.ML], (Jan. 2, 2017), 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wu, Yonghui, et al., “Googles Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1609.08144v2 cs.CL, (Oct. 8, 2016), 23 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Zeng, Wenyuan, et al., “Efficient Summarization with Read-Again and Copy Mechanism”, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1611.03382v1 [cs.CL], (Nov. 10, 2016), 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/449,405, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 29, 2024”, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/448,675, Response filed Jun. 12, 2024 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2024”, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Response filed Jun. 25, 2024 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2024”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/448,675, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 5, 2024”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S Appl. No. 17/305,976, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 22, 2024”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/448,675, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Jul. 30, 2024”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/449,405, Corrected Notice of Allowability mailed Aug. 7, 2024”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Aug. 9, 2024”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, 312 Amendment filed Sep. 13, 2024”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/305,976, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication mailed Sep. 20, 2024”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/448,675, 312 Amendment filed Oct. 3, 2024”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/448,675, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Oct. 22, 2024”, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/977,366, filed Dec. 11, 2024, Transition-Driven Transcription Search. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/984,491, filed Dec. 17, 2024, Language Model for Abstractive Summarization. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/410,621, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2025”, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/410,621, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Jun. 11, 2025”, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 18/410,621, Response filed Jun. 24, 2025 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2025”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]