IP Library Granted Patent US 12,268,534
Granted Patent B2
US 12,268,534 · App. 18/402,915 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

Compression arm devices and methods

Inventors: Kenneth Defreitas (Patterson, NY); Alan Rego (Woodbury, CT)
Assignee: Hologic, Inc.
A61B6/0414A61B6/502A61B6/0435
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,268,534
App. No.
18/402,915
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A compression arm device for compressing a breast in an imaging system with a compression paddle. The compression arm device includes a drive for moving the compression paddle towards the breast such that the drive provides a variable resistance during a contact of the compression paddle with the breast.

Claims (35)

1. An imaging system comprising:

a rotatable x-ray tube assembly; and

a rotatable arm assembly comprising:

an immobilization device and a receptor housing, the immobilization device and the receptor housing configured to immobilize a patient's breast therebetween; and

a drive assembly comprising:

a slide rail stage supporting the immobilization device and configured to move at least partially along the rotatable arm assembly;

a motor configured to drive movement of the slide rail stage via a driving torque so as to position the immobilization device relative to the receptor housing;

at least one knob having at least one encoder coupled in communication with the motor, wherein based on rotation of the at least one knob, the position of the immobilization device via the motor is controlled; and

a clutch coupled to the at least one knob, wherein the clutch is configured to provide variable torque resistance on the at least one knob that is different than the driving torque of the immobilization device during movement.

2. The imaging system of claim 1 , wherein the drive assembly further includes at least one sensor configured to measure an immobilization force exerted on the patient's breast via the immobilization device, and wherein the variable torque resistance is in proportion to the measured immobilization force.

3. The imaging system of claim 2 , wherein the variable torque resistance is configured to increase as the measured immobilization force increases.

4. The imaging system of claim 2 , wherein the variable torque resistance is configured to decrease as the measured immobilization force decreases.

5. The imaging system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one knob is configured to rotate in a first direction to move the immobilization device towards the receptor housing for breast immobilization and rotate in an opposite second direction to move the immobilization device away from the receptor housing for breast release.

6. The imaging system of claim 5 , wherein the clutch is configured to provide the variable torque resistance during breast immobilization of the immobilization device.

7. The imaging system of claim 5 , wherein the clutch provides the variable torque resistance during breast immobilization or release of the immobilization device.

8. The imaging system of claim 5 , wherein the at least one encoder is configured to detect rotational direction of the at least one knob.

9. The imaging system of claim 1 , wherein the drive assembly further comprises a leadscrew supporting the immobilization device and operably coupled to the motor.

10. The imaging system of claim 1 , wherein the clutch is a magnetic particle clutch.

11. A method of immobilizing a breast for an imaging procedure on an imaging system having a rotatable x-ray tube assembly and a rotatable arm assembly, the method comprising:

positioning the breast on a receptor housing of the rotatable arm assembly;

driving movement of an immobilization device disposed on the rotatable arm assembly relative to the receptor housing, wherein the movement of the immobilization device is driven via at least one knob having at least one encoder coupled in communication with a motor providing a driving torque; and

providing variable torque resistance on the at least one knob via a clutch that is different than the driving torque of the immobilization device during movement.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

measuring an immobilizing force exerted on the breast by the immobilization device; and

based on the measured immobilizing force, providing proportional variable torque resistance.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the variable torque resistance increases as the measured immobilizing force increases.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the variable torque resistance decreases as the measured immobilizing force decreases.

15. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

rotating the at least one knob in a first direction to move the immobilization device towards the receptor housing for breast immobilization; and

rotating the at least one knob in an opposite second direction to move the immobilization device away from the receptor housing for breast release.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the clutch provides the variable torque resistance during breast immobilization of the immobilization device.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the clutch provides the variable torque resistance during breast immobilization or release of the immobilization device.

18. The method of claim 15 , further comprising detecting rotational direction of the at least one knob via the at least one encoder.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein driving movement of the immobilization device includes rotating, via the motor, a leadscrew supporting the immobilization device.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein providing variable torque resistance includes actuating a magnetic particle clutch coupled to the at least one knob.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 069172/0436 Recorded Apr 28, 2026
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: HOLOGIC, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED; FAXITRON BIOPTICS, LLC
Reel/Frame 075503/0086 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2026
From: BIOTHERANOSTICS, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED; GEN-PROBE PRODESSE, INC.; CYTYC CORPORATION; SUROS SURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; GYNESONICS, INC.; BOLDER SURGICAL, LLC; FAXITRON BIOPTICS, LLC; HEALTH BEACONS, INC.; HOLOGIC, INC.
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 075462/0440 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 14, 2024
From: HOLOGIC, INC.; GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED; FAXITRON BIOPTICS, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 069172/0436 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 3, 2024
From: DEFREITAS, KENNETH; REGO, ALAN
To: HOLOGIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 066003/0863 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17732834 · Apr 29, 2022
Continuation 16981350
Provisional Application 62676522 · May 25, 2018
Related Publication 20240197269A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (53)
US 4250894A · Frei et al. · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4658409A · Summ · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 5713356A · Kruger · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6049583A · Galkin · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6091981A · Cundari et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6620115B2 · Sarvazyan et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7656993B2 · Hoernig · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8217357B2 · Stein et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8594275B2 · Matsuura · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8753278B2 · Stoll · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8903039B2 · Masumoto et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9050009B2 · Den Heeten et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11350891B2 · Defreitas · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11890120B2 · Defreitas · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20130016807A1 · Kallert et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140121520A1 · Wang et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140321607A1 · Smith et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140328458A1 · Erhard et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140348291A1 · Lee et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160135772A1 · Nam · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160166217A1 · Davis et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160183889A1 · Matsuura · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160206229A1 · Arai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160228008A1 · Lee · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160235379A1 · Homann · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170086765A1 · Smith et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20210038173A1 · DeFreitas · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 202665563 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 105491953A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 105726049 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 107427273A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 10334421 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP S60114238A · 1985 [cited by applicant]
JP H04064346A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006508761A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 4874777 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012050517A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 5174081 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 5424956 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014526363A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 5634938 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 5634939 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016135319A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016076528 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Branderhorst, W. et al., “Mammographic compression—A need for mechanical standardization”, Feb. 2015, European Journal of Radiology 14(2); 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Kornguth et al., “Impact of Patient-Controlled Compression on the Mammography Experience”, Jan. 1993, Radiology 186;99-102. [cited by applicant]
Mercer et al., “Practitioner compression force varability in mammography: a preliminary study”, The British Institute of Radiology, 2013, 1-9. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application PCT/US2019/033559 mailed Dec. 10, 2020, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/033559 mailed Jul. 25, 2019, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Poulos, Ann et al., “Breast Compression in Mammography: How Much is Enough?”, Australian Radiology (2003) 47, 121-126. [cited by applicant]
Sullivan, Daniel et al., “Measurement of Force Applied during Mammography”, Nov. 1991, Radiology 181; 355-357. [cited by applicant]
Tanner, “Mammographic Unit Compression Force: Acceptance Test and Quality Control Protocols”, Jul. 1992, Radiology 184; 45-48. [cited by applicant]
Yaffe et al., “Quality Control for Digital Mammography: Part II Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST Trial”, 2006 Medical Physics 33(3); 737-752. [cited by applicant]