IP Library Granted Patent US 12,514,489
Granted Patent B2
US 12,514,489 · App. 18/421,401 · Granted Jan 6, 2026

Systems and methods for seizure detection based on changes in electroencephalogram (EEG) non-linearities

Inventor: Kurt E. Hecox (New Berlin, WI)
Assignee: Advanced Global Clinical Solutions Inc.
A61B5/4094A61B5/0006A61B5/002A61B5/0022A61B5/30A61B5/316A61B5/369A61B5/372A61B5/7203A61B5/742A61B5/746G16H50/20A61B2503/045
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,514,489
App. No.
18/421,401
Granted
Jan 6, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system of seizure detection including one or more processing circuits configured to receive an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal generated based on electrical brain activity of a patient and determine a plurality of metrics based on the EEG signal, the plurality of metrics indicating non-linear features of the EEG signal. The one or more processing circuit are configured to perform a preliminary analysis with one of the plurality of metrics, wherein the preliminary analysis indicates that the EEG signal indicates a candidate seizure or that the EEG signal is insignificant, perform a secondary analysis with one or more metrics of the plurality of metrics to determine whether the EEG signal indicates the candidate seizure or that the EEG signal is insignificant, and generate a seizure alert indicating that the EEG signal indicates the candidate seizure.

Claims (69)

1 . A method of seizure detection, comprising:

receiving, by one or more processing circuits, a signal that indicates electrical brain activity of a patient;

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, an occurrence of a trajectory pattern of a non-linear metric by determining a plurality of values of the non-linear metric over time using the signal;

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, that a probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than a probability level indicating that the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is statistically significant;

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, that the signal indicates a candidate seizure based at least in part on a determination that the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than the probability level; and

updating, by the one or more processing circuits, a user interface to provide a notification of the candidate seizure.

2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, that the signal indicates the candidate seizure based on at least one of a default parameter value or user input.

3 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, a dimensionality of the signal by performing a phase space analysis by increasing a value of the dimensionality until a number of false neighbors reaches zero, wherein a starting value of the dimensionality is based on an age of the patient.

4 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, a plurality of metrics indicating a plurality of non-linear features of the signal; and

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, that the signal indicates the candidate seizure based on the determination that the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than the probability value and further based on the plurality of metrics;

wherein the plurality of metrics comprise at least one of dimensionality, synchrony, Lyapunov exponents, entropy, global non-linearity, distance differences between recurrence trajectories, or self-similarity.

5 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

determining, by the one or more processing circuits, the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern based on a number of the plurality of values decreasing with respect to a previous value of the plurality of values.

6 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

receiving, by the one or more processing circuits, user input via the user interface; and

setting, by the one or more processing circuits, the probability level to a value selected by a user via the user input.

7 . The method of claim 1 , comprising:

retrieving, by the one or more processing circuits, a default value from a memory device; and

setting, by the one or more processing circuits, the probability level to the default value retrieved from the memory device.

8 . A system, comprising:

one or more computer systems comprising one or more processors configured to:

receive a signal that indicates electrical brain activity of a patient;

determine an occurrence of a trajectory pattern of a non-linear metric by determining a plurality of values of the non-linear metric over time using the signal;

determine that a probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than a probability level indicating that the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is statistically significant;

determine that the signal indicates a candidate seizure based at least in part on a determination that the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than the probability level; and

update a user interface to provide a notification of the candidate seizure.

9 . The system of claim 8 , comprising:

the one or more computer systems comprising the one or more processors is configured to:

determine that the signal indicates the candidate seizure based on at least one of a default parameter value or user input.

10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the one or more computer systems comprising the one or more processors is configured to:

determine a dimensionality of the signal by performing a phase space analysis by increasing a value of the dimensionality until a number of false neighbors reaches zero, wherein a starting value of the dimensionality is based on an age of the patient.

11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the one or more computer systems comprising the one or more processors is configured to:

determine a plurality of metrics indicating a plurality of non-linear features of the signal; and

determine that the signal indicates the candidate seizure based on the determination that the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than the probability level and further based on the plurality of metrics;

wherein the plurality of metrics comprise at least one of dimensionality, synchrony, Lyapunov exponents, entropy, global non-linearity, distance differences between recurrence trajectories, or self-similarity.

12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the one or more computer systems comprising the one or more processors is configured to:

determine the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern based on a number of the plurality of values decreasing with respect to a previous value of the plurality of values.

13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the one or more computer systems comprising the one or more processors is configured to:

receive user input via the user interface; and

set the probability level to a value selected by a user via the user input.

14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the one or more computer systems comprising the one or more processors is configured to:

retrieve a default value from a memory device; and

set the probability level to the default value retrieved from the memory device.

15 . One or more non-transitory storage media storing instructions thereon, that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations, comprising:

receiving a signal that indicates electrical brain activity of a patient;

determining an occurrence of a trajectory pattern of a non-linear metric by determining a plurality of values of the non-linear metric over time using the signal;

determining that a probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than a probability level indicating that the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is statistically significant;

determining that the signal indicates a candidate seizure in response to a determination that the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern is less than the probability level; and

updating a user interface to provide a notification of the candidate seizure.

16 . The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

determining the probability value of the occurrence of the trajectory pattern based on a number of the plurality of values decreasing with respect to a previous value of the plurality of values.

17 . The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

receiving user input via the user interface; and

setting the probability level to a value selected by a user via the user input.

18 . The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

retrieving a default value from a memory device; and

setting the probability level to the default value retrieved from the memory device.

19 . The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

determining that the signal indicates the candidate seizure based on at least one of a default parameter value or user input.

20 . The one or more non-transitory storage media of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

determining a dimensionality of the signal by performing a phase space analysis by increasing a value of the dimensionality until a number of false neighbors reaches zero, wherein a starting value of the dimensionality is based on an age of the patient.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2024
From: HECOX, KURT E.
To: ADVANCED GLOBAL CLINICAL SOLUTIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 066233/0825 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 17379597 · Jul 19, 2021
Continuation 17366854 · Jul 2, 2021
Continuation 16938501 · Jul 24, 2020
Continuation 16938541 · Jul 24, 2020
Continuation PCTUS2020025136 · Mar 27, 2020
Continuation PCTUS2020025136 · Mar 27, 2020
Provisional Application 62890497 · Aug 22, 2019
Related Publication 20240156392A1 · May 16, 2024
References Cited (72)
US 3863625A · Viglione et al. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 4566464A · Piccone et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 5743860A · Hively et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5815413A · Hively et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5857978A · Hively et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6011990A · Schultz et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6304775B1 · Iasemidis et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6658287B1 · Litt et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 10743809B1 · Kamousi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20020035338A1 · Dear et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020095099A1 · Quyen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20060200038A1 · Savit et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090124923A1 · Sackellares et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110218406A1 · Hussain · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120197092A1 · Luo et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130096840A1 · Osorio et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140194769A1 · Nierenberg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150126892A1 · Kim et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150148617A1 · Friedman · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150282755A1 · Deriche et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160000382A1 · Jain et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170035316A1 · Kuzniecky et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170231519A1 · Westover et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170245804A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170258410A1 · Gras · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170311870A1 · Bardakjian et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190209072A1 · Shafique et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005533313A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017121072 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2023099043A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
KR 100425532B1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016013596 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017145226 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019078328A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Baier et al., Characterizing correlation changes of complex pattern transitions: The case of epileptic activity, Physics Letters A, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, NL, vol. 363, No. 4, Feb. 14, 2007, pp. 290-29… [cited by applicant]
Abasolo, D. et al., “Non-Linear Analysis of Intracranial Electroencephalogram Recordings with Approximate Entropy and Lempel-Ziv Complexity for Epileptic Seizure Detection,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual International … [cited by applicant]
Akbarian, B. et al., “Automatic Seizure Detetion Based on Nonlinear Dynamical Analysis of EEG Signals and Mutual Information,” Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Jul., Aug. 2018, vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 227-240. [cited by applicant]
Anticipation of epileptic seizures from standard EEG recordings, The Lancet, vol. 361, Mar. 15, 2003, www.thelancet.com, p. 970. [cited by applicant]
Bedeeuzzaman, M. et al., “Automatic Seizure Detection Using Inter Quartile Range,” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975-8887), vol. 44, No. 11, Apr. 2012, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Bergey, G.K., et al., “Epileptic Seizures are Characterized by Changing Signal Complexity,” Clin Neurophysiol, Feb. 2001;112(2):241-9, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Burns, Samuel P. et al., “A Network Analysis of the Dynamics of Seizure,” 34th Annual International Conference of the IEE EMBS, San Diego, California USA, Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2012, pp. 4684-4697. [cited by applicant]
Celka, P, et al., Time-varying statistical complexity measures with application to EEG analysis and segmentation, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medici… [cited by applicant]
Chillemi et al. Early Trends in Seizure Onset: A Nonlinear Approach. In: D'Attellis CE, Kluev VV, Mastrorakis NE, editors. Mathematics and computers in science and engineering. Word Scientific and Engineering Society Pr… [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report regarding European Application No. 20854632.5, dated Nov. 8, 2022, 10 pps. [cited by applicant]
Ghosh, A. et al., “Pre-ictal Epileptic Seizure Prediction Based on ECG Signal Analysis,” 2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Techology (I2CT), pp. 920-925. [cited by applicant]
Hills, “Seizure detection using FFT, temporal and spectral correlation coefficients, eigenvalues and Random Forest,” retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/blobs/download/forum-message-attachment-files/4803/seizure-detec… [cited by applicant]
Lehnertz et al. Can Epileptic Seizures be Predicted? Evidence from Nonlinear Time Series Analysis of Brain Electrical Activity. Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, No. 22, Jun. 1, 1998. (Year: 1998). [cited by applicant]
Lehnertz et al. Seizure prediction by nonlinear EEG analysis. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Jan. 2003. (Year: 2003). [cited by applicant]
Lehnertz, K., “Non-Linear Time Series Analysis of Intracranial EEG Recordings in Patients With Epilepsy—an Overview,” International Journal of Psychophysiology 34 (1999) pp. 45-52. [cited by applicant]
Lehnertz, Klaus et al., “Nonlinear EEG Analysis in Epilepsy: Its Possible Use for Interictal Focus Localization, Seizure Anticipation, and Prevention,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 18(3):209-222, 2001 American C… [cited by applicant]
Lehnertz. Epilepsy and Nonlinear Dynamics. J Biol Phys (2008) 34:253-266. (Year: 2008). [cited by applicant]
Liang, Z. et al., “EEG Entropy Measures in Anesthesia,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, vol. 9, Article 16, 17 pages, published Feb. 18, 2015, doi:10.3389/fncom.2015.00016. [cited by applicant]
Martinerie et al. Epileptic seizures can be anticipated by non-linear analysis. Natural Medicine, vol. 4, No. 10, Oct. 1998 (Year: 1998). [cited by applicant]
Natus NeuroWorks EEG Solutions, PN 024991, Rev 01, 4 pps., located at website: https://partners.natus.com/asset/resource/file/neuro/asset/2018-07/024991_01%20NeuroWorks%20EEG%20Solutions%20Brochure%20fnl.pdf (2008). [cited by applicant]
Persyst, “Persyst 13 Overview,” located at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVmHQIZ3x-Y, Nov. 30, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Persyst, “Seizure Detection,” retrieved from https://www.persyst.com/technology/seizure-detection/ in Jul. 2020 (undated). [cited by applicant]
Schelter et al. Testing statistical significance of multivariate time series analysis techniques for epileptic seizure prediction. Chaos 16, 013108 (2006). (Year: 2006). [cited by applicant]
Schindler, et al., “Assessing seizure dynamics by analysing the correlation structure of multichannel intracranial EEG,” Brain 130(1), pp. 64-77 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Schindler, et al., “Increasing synchronization may promote seizure termination: Evidence from status epilepticus,” Clinical Neurophysiology 118(9), pp. 1955-1968 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Senger & Tetzlaff, “Eigenvalue based EEG signal analysis for seizure prediction,” Sixth International Workshop on Seizure Prediction, retrieved from https://www.iwsp4.org/IWSP6_Program_Booklet.pdf, p. 35 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Senger & Tetzlaff, “New Signal Processing Methods for the Development of Seizure Warning Devices in Epilepsy,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 63(5), pp. 609-616 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Song, Yuedong, “A review of developments of EEG-based automatic medical support systems for epilepsy diagnosis and seizure detection,” J. Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2011, 4, pp. 788-796. doi:10.4236/jbise.2011.… [cited by applicant]
Van Der Heyden, M.J., et al., “Non-Linear Analysis of Intracranial Human EEG in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 110, Issue 10, 2 pages (1999). [cited by applicant]
Van Drongelen, W., “Seizure Anticipation in Pediatric Epilepsy: Use of Kolmogorov Entropy,” Pediatr Neurol. Sep. 2003, 29(3): pp. 207-213. [cited by applicant]
Wang, et al., “Feature extraction and recognition of epileptiform activity in EEG by combining PCA with ApEn,” Cognitive Neurodynamics 4, pp. 233-240 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Williamson, James R. et al., “Epileptic Seizure Prediction Using the Spatiotemporal Correlation structure of Intracranial EEG,” ICASSP 2011, 978-1-4577-0539-7/11, pp. 665-668. [cited by applicant]
Winterhalder et al. The seizure prediction characteristic: a general framework to assess and compare seizure prediction methods. Epilepsy & Behavior 4 (2003) 318-325. (Year: 2003). [cited by applicant]
Yadollahpour, A. et al., “Seizure Prediction Methods: A Review of the Current Predicting Techniques,” Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal, vol. 7, No. 1, 2014, pp. 153-162. [cited by applicant]
Yakovlevea, et al., “EEG Analysis in Structural Focal Epilepsy Using the Methods of Nonlinear Dynamics (Lyapunov Exponents, Lempel-Ziv Complexity, and Multiscale Entropy),” Thee Scientific World Journal 2020, 8407872, 1… [cited by applicant]
Yuan Ye et al: “A Comparison Analysis of Embedding Dimensions between Normal and Epileptic EEG Time Series”, Journal of Physiological Sciences, vol. 58, No. 4, Jan. 1, 2008 (Jan. 1, 2008), pp. 239-247, XP055976529 JP. [cited by applicant]
Yuan, Y. et al., Automated Detection of Epileptic Seizure Using Artificial Neural Network, 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2008, pp. 1959-1962. [cited by applicant]
Farahmand et al, “Noise-Assisted Multivariate EMD-Based Mean-Phase Coherence Analysis to Evaluate Phase-Synchrony Dynamics in Epilepsy Patients”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. … [cited by applicant]