IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,633,222
Granted Patent B2
US 12,633,222 · App. 18/421,758 · Granted May 19, 2026

Systems and methods for drone monitoring, data analytics, and mitigation cloud services using edge computing

Inventors: Brandon Fang-Hsuan Lo (San Diego, CA); Scott Torborg (San Diego, CA); Mike Spindel (San Diego, CA); Paul Wicks (San Diego, CA); Stephen Larew (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: SkySafe, Inc.
G08G5/20G08G5/55G08G5/57
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,633,222
App. No.
18/421,758
Filed
Jan 24, 2024
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2688
USPC
340/3.1
Abstract

Systems and methods for providing drone activity cloud services to cloud consumers using cloud and edge computing are provided. The drone monitoring service is rendered by drone sensors detecting and identifying drones, cloud and edge servers aggregating drone activity data from sensors and UAS traffic management systems, and cloud consumers monitoring drone activities using cloud and edge devices to access the cloud. The drone data analytics service reports drone activity statistics, predicted drone activities, and abnormal behaviors to cloud consumers based on the statistics and behavior models obtained by machine learning and federated learning techniques. The drone mitigation service, when initiated by cloud consumers, determines how to optimally configure sensors and collaboratively send signals to deactivate unauthorized drones. Moreover, data processing, artificial intelligence, mobility support, and traffic management functional units empower cloud and edge servers to support these cloud services.

Claims (59)

1 . A system for providing drone activity cloud services to cloud consumer devices, the system comprising:

a drone sensor configured to detect and identify a drone in a geographic area;

a cloud server configured to be located at a data center outside of the geographic area;

an edge server configured to be located within the geographic area,

wherein the cloud server and the edge server are configured to aggregate drone activity data from the drone sensor and an uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) traffic management system; and

a cloud consumer device configured to monitor drone activities using the cloud server, wherein the cloud consumer device is further configured to access the aggregated drone activity data,

wherein the cloud server and the edge server are further configured to implement a drone data analytics service, and wherein the cloud server reports one or more of drone activity statistics, predicted drone activities, and abnormal behaviors to the cloud consumer device based on statistics and behavior models obtained by machine learning and federated learning techniques, wherein at least a portion of the statistics and behavior models are stored at the edge server,

wherein a drone mitigation service, when initiated by the cloud consumer device, is configured to determine how to configure the drone sensor and collaboratively send signals to deactivate an unauthorized drone, wherein at least a portion of the drone mitigation service is performed at the edge server without communication to the cloud server to reduce a delay associated with deactivating the unauthorized drone.

2 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a cloud network comprising the cloud server and the cloud consumer device; and

an edge network comprising the edge server.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the cloud consumer device comprises one or more of the following: a smartphone, a tablet, a virtual reality device, an augmented reality device, a mixed reality device, a laptop, a desktop computer, a sensor node, and/or a drone.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the cloud server and the edge server each comprise:

a data processing unit configured to filter, fuse, and/or aggregate the drone activity data for a drone monitoring service; and

an artificial intelligence unit configured to implement the machine learning and/or the federated learning techniques for the drone data analytics service.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the cloud server and the edge server each comprises:

a sensor control unit configured to determine parameters for smart sensor configurations and/or intelligent jamming;

a mobility support unit configured to handle a drone activity handoff at a boundary of a cloud or edge network when the drone moves from one network to another; and

a traffic management unit configured to handle cooperative interactions with the UAS traffic management system.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the drone data analytics service is further configured to generate an activity notification and a trajectory for the identified drone.

7 . The system of claim 6 , wherein the trajectory and the activity data are overlaid on a map with real-time updates.

8 . A method for providing drone activity cloud services to a cloud consumer device, the method comprising:

detecting and identifying one or more drones located in a geographic area using a drone sensor;

aggregating, at a cloud server and an edge server, drone activity data from the drone sensor and an uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) traffic management system, the cloud server configured to be located at a data center outside of the geographic area and the edge server configured to be located within the geographic area;

monitoring, at the cloud consumer device, drone activities using the cloud consumer device to access the aggregated drone activity data;

implementing, at the cloud server and the edge server, a drone data analytics service, and wherein the cloud server that reports one or more of drone activity statistics, predicted drone activities, and abnormal behaviors to the cloud consumer device based on statistics and behavior models obtained by machine learning and federated learning techniques, wherein at least a portion of the statistics and behavior models are stored at the edge server; and

determining how to configure the drone sensor and collaboratively send signals to deactivate an unauthorized drone in response to initiating a drone mitigation service by the cloud consumer device, wherein at least a portion of the drone mitigation service is performed at the edge server without communication to the cloud server to reduce a delay associated with deactivating the unauthorized drone.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the cloud server and the cloud consumer device are arranged to form a cloud network; and

the edge server is arranged to form an edge network.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the cloud consumer device comprises one or more of the following: a smartphone, a tablet, a virtual reality device, an augmented reality device, a mixed reality device, a laptop, a desktop computer, a sensor node, and/or a drone.

11 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the cloud server and the edge server each comprise:

a data processing unit configured to filter, fuse, and/or aggregate the drone activity data for a drone monitoring service; and

an artificial intelligence unit configured to implement the machine learning and/or the federated learning techniques for the drone data analytics service, abnormal behavior detection, and/or collaborative learning.

12 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the cloud server and the edge server each comprise:

a sensor control unit configured to determine parameters for smart sensor configurations and/or intelligent jamming;

a mobility support unit configured to handle a drone activity handoff at a boundary of a cloud network or edge network when the drone moves from one network to another; and

a traffic management unit configured to handle cooperative interactions with the UAS traffic management system.

13 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

generating, using the drone data analytics service, an activity notification and a trajectory for one of the identified drones.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the trajectory and the activity data are overlaid on a map with real-time updates.

15 . A hybrid network for providing drone activity services, the hybrid network comprising:

a cloud network comprising: a plurality of cloud servers and a plurality of cloud devices; and

an edge network comprising: a plurality of edge servers,

wherein the edge network comprises at least one drone sensor configured to detect and identify a drone in a geographic area, the cloud servers configured to be located at one or more data centers outside of the geographic area and each of the edge servers configured to be located within the corresponding geographic area,

wherein the plurality of cloud servers and the plurality of edge servers are configured to aggregate drone activity data from the drone sensors and an uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) traffic management system,

wherein the plurality of cloud devices and the plurality of edge devices are further configured to monitor drone activities and to access the aggregated drone activity data, and

wherein a drone mitigation service, when initiated by a first one of the plurality of cloud devices, is configured to determine how to configure the drone sensors and collaboratively send signals to deactivate an unauthorized drone, wherein at least a portion of the drone mitigation service is performed at the edge server in the geographic area associated with the unauthorized drone without communication to the cloud server to reduce a delay associated with deactivating the unauthorized drone.

16 . The hybrid network of claim 15 , wherein:

the plurality of cloud servers and the plurality of edge servers are further configured to implement a drone data analytics service, and wherein the plurality of cloud servers are configured to report one or more of drone activity statistics, predicted drone activities, and abnormal behaviors to the plurality of cloud devices based on statistics and behavior models obtained by machine learning and federated learning techniques, wherein at least a portion of the statistics and behavior models are stored at the plurality of edge servers.

17 . The hybrid network of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of cloud devices comprises one or more of the following: a smartphone, a tablet, a virtual reality device, an augmented reality device, a mixed reality device, a laptop, a desktop computer, a sensor node, and/or a drone.

18 . The hybrid network of claim 15 , wherein each of the plurality of cloud servers and of the plurality of edge servers comprises:

a data processing unit configured to filter, fuse, and/or aggregate the drone activity data for a drone monitoring service; and

an artificial intelligence unit configured to implement the machine learning and/or the federated learning techniques for the drone data analytics service, abnormal behavior detection, and/or collaborative learning.

19 . The hybrid network of claim 15 , wherein each of the plurality of cloud servers and of the plurality of edge servers comprises:

a sensor control unit configured to determine parameters for smart sensor configurations and/or intelligent jamming;

a mobility support unit configured to handle a drone activity handoff at a boundary of the cloud network or of the edge network when a drone moves from one network to another; and

a traffic management unit configured to handle cooperative interactions with the UAS traffic management system.

20 . The hybrid network of claim 15 , wherein the drone data analytics service is further configured to generate an activity notification and a trajectory for one of the identified drones.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 25, 2026
From: SKYSAFE, INC.
To: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC
Reel/Frame 073889/0860 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2024
From: LO, BRANDON FANG-HSUAN; TORBORG, SCOTT; SPINDEL, MIKE; WICKS, PAUL; LAREW, STEPHEN
To: SKYSAFE, INC.
Reel/Frame 067082/0449 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63481693 · Jan 26, 2023
Related Publication 20240257648A1 · Aug 1, 2024
References Cited (70)
US 5345539A · Webb · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 8837337B2 · Blanz et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9275645B2 · Hearing et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9529360B1 · Melamed et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9763177B1 · Baskaran et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9996079B2 · Magy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10051475B2 · Shattil et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10139838B2 · Lection et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10237743B2 · Shattil et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10317506B2 · Seeber et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10467885B2 · Trundle et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20060071671A1 · Tola · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20140349666A1 · Sun · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170092138A1 · Trundle · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170148332A1 · Ziemba et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170295551A1 · Sadiq · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180017665A1 · Wittenberg · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180081355A1 · Magy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180262900A1 · Moon · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190103030A1 · Banga et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200382156A1 · Lo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210008833A1 · Tsuchibuchi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210088337A1 · Koubaa · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210099870A1 · Moon · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210116912A1 · Pikus et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210117578A1 · Cheruvu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210407305A1 · Jordan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230008429A1 · Natiuk · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 107272743A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 109067478A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102009055263A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 3422038A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 2546438A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004527166A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
KR 20180054007A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018125686A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018170736A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019032162A2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021230948A2 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2024/012800, mailed on May 28, 2024, in 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2024/012800, mailed on Mar. 20, 2025, in 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Drone Market Is Estimated to Expand at a Healthy CAGR in the Upcoming Forecast 2025,” [Online] Sep. 13, 2019 https://www.americanewshour.com/?s=Drone+Market+Is+Estimated+To+Expand+At+a+Healthy+CAGR+in+the+Upcoming+Fore… [cited by applicant]
“Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Channels and Modulation,” 3GPP TS 36.211 (2018) vol. 15.0. [cited by applicant]
“FCC Part 15.247 Test Report for GL300A (FCC ID:SS3-GL3001501),” Tech. Rep., Apr. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://fccid.io/SS3-GL3001501/Test-Report/Test-Report-Rev-2599009. [cited by applicant]
“FCC Part 15.247 Test Report for GL300C (FCC ID: SS3-GL3001510),” Tech. Rep., Oct. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://fccid.io/SS3-GL3001510/RF-Exposure-Info/SAR-Test-Report-2805129. [cited by applicant]
“FCC Part 15.247 Test Report for GL300F (FCC ID:SS3-GL300F1609),” Tech. Rep., Sep. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://fccid.io/SS3-GL300F1609/Test-Report/Test-Report-3155813. [cited by applicant]
Beyme et al. “Efficient Computation of DFT of Zadoff-Chu sequences,” Elec. Letters (2009) vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 461-463. [cited by applicant]
D. Angelosante, G. B. Giannakis, and N. D. Sidiropoulos, “Estimating multiple frequency-hopping signal parameters via sparse linear regression,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, No. 10, pp. 5044-5056, Oc… [cited by applicant]
Federal Aviation Administration, “FAA aerospace forecasts fiscal years 2019-2039,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.faa.gov/data research/aviation/aerospace forecasts/. [cited by applicant]
Gul et al. “Timing and Frequency Synchronization for OFDM Downlink Transmissions Using Zadoff-Chu Sequences,” IEEE Trans. On Wireless Comm. (2015) vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 1716-1729. [cited by applicant]
Haiquan et al., “Proactive eavesdropping in UAV-aided mobile relay systems”, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Springer International Publishing, Cham, vol. 2020, No. 1, Feb. 24, 2020 (Feb. 24, … [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in application No. PCT/US2020/032391, dated Jul. 19, 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in application No. PCT/US2020/034969, dated Sep. 12, 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in application No. PCT/US2021/031801, mailed Aug. 17, 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report mailed Jul. 14, 2020, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2020/032391, filed May 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report mailed Sep. 8, 2020, issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2020/034969, filed May 28, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Khan et al., “Edge computing, A survey,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 97, pp. 219-235, Aug. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al. “A delay-robust random access preamble detection algorithm for LTE system,” Proc. RWS (2012) pp. 7578. [cited by applicant]
L. Zhao, L. Wang, G. Bi, L. Zhang, and H. Zhang, “Robust frequency-hopping spectrum estimation based on sparse bayesian method,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 781-793, Feb. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Liang et al. “The Research on Random Access Signal Detection Algorithm in LTE Systems,” 2013 5 [cited by applicant]
Lo, Brandon F., et al., “HopSAC: Frequency Hopping Parameter estimation Based on Random Sample Consensus for Counter-Unmanned Aircraft Systems”, MILCOM 2019—2019 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM), IEEE No… [cited by applicant]
M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles, “Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 381-395, Jun. 1981. [cited by applicant]
M. Satyanarayanan, “The emergence of edge computing,” Computer, vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 30-39, Jan. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Nelson et al. “The View From Above: A Survey of the Public's Perception of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Privacy,” J. of Urban Tech. (2019) vol. 26, issue 1, pp. 83-105. [cited by applicant]
Q. Xia et al. “A survey of federated learning for edge computing: research problems and solutions,” High-Confidence Computing, vol. 1, No. 1, Jun. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Simon et al., “On the Implementation and Performance of Single and Double Differential Detection Schemes”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ. USA, vol. 40, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1992 (Feb… [cited by applicant]
Tao et al. “Improved Zadoff-Chu Sequence Detection in the Presence of Unknown Multipath and Carrier Frequency Offset,” IEEE Comm. Letters (2019) vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 922-925. [cited by applicant]
X. Liu, N. D. Sidiropoulos, and A. Swami, “Joint hop timing and frequency estimation for collision resolution in FH networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 3063-3074, Nov. 2005. [cited by applicant]
Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and F. Jing, “Frequency-hopping signal parameters estimation based on orthogonal matching pursuit and sparse linear regression,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 54 310-54 319, Sep. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al. “Random access algorithm of LTE TDD system based on frequency domain detection,” Proc. Int. Conf. Semantics, Know1. Grid (2009) pp. 346350. [cited by applicant]