IP Library Granted Patent US 12,599,073
Granted Patent B2
US 12,599,073 · App. 18/426,902 · Granted Apr 14, 2026

Wheat CENH3 alleles

Inventors: Jian Lv (Beijing, CN); Kun Yu (Beijing, CN); Juan Wei (Beijing, CN); Chunxia Liu (Beijing, CN); Hongju Zhou (Beijing, CN); Timothy Kelliher (Research Triangle Park, NC)
Assignee: Syngenta Crop Protection AG
A01H6/4678
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,599,073
App. No.
18/426,902
Granted
Apr 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to wheat plants comprising a mutation causing an alteration of the amino acid sequence in centromere histone H3 (CENH3), which have the biological activity of a haploid inducer. Further, the present invention provides methods of generating the wheat plants of the present invention and haploid and doubled haploid wheat plants obtainable by crossing the wheat plants of the present invention with wildtype wheat plants.

Claims (3)

1 . A method of generating a haploid-inducing wheat plant, the method comprising: a. obtaining at least a wheat plant cell comprising an A genome, a B genome, and a D genome; b. mutating the B genome to obtain a homozygous knock-out mutation in a CENH3α gene; c. mutating the D genome to obtain a homozygous knock-out mutation in a CENH3α gene; d. mutating the A genome to obtain a knock-down mutation at a 5′ splice site of an intron in a CENH3α gene; and e. generating a wheat plant therefrom; whereby the wheat plant generated from step e. produces haploid progeny when crossed with a wildtype wheat plant.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the knock-down mutation in the CENH3α gene is a restored frame shift mutation.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the restored frame shift mutation is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 56, a nucleic acid sequence 98% identical to SEQ ID NO: 56, SEQ ID NO: 63, a nucleic acid sequence 98% identical to SEQ ID NO: 63, or a combination thereof.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2024
From: LV, JIAN; YU, KUN; WEI, JUAN; LIU, CHUNXIA; ZHOU, HONGJU; KELLIHER, TIMOTHY
To: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG
Reel/Frame 069336/0497 →
MERGER Recorded Jul 31, 2024
From: SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG
To: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG
Reel/Frame 068139/0538 →
Priority Claims (1)
CN 201980063899.2 · Oct 12, 2018 · national
Continuity (2)
Division 17286950
Related Publication 20240334892A1 · Oct 10, 2024
References Cited (24)
RU 2551781C2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009068313A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016138021A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO 2017058022A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Yuan, Jing, et al. “Characterization of two CENH 3 genes and their roles in wheat evolution.” New Phytologist 206.2 (2015): 839-851. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report dated Jan. 16, 2020, mailed in International Application No. PCT/CN2019/110404. [cited by applicant]
Duan Minxiao et al. Progress of CENHJ-mediated Haploid Induction Technology Molecular Plant Breeding 25, Aug. 2017(Aug. 25, 2017) No. 10 VaLIS ISSN: 1672-416X sec pp. 4127-4131. [cited by applicant]
Ravi, Met al. Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination Nature 25 Mar. 2010 (Mar. 25, 2010) No. 7288 vol. 464 ISSN:0028-0836 see pp. 615-618. [cited by applicant]
Ceccherini, Isabella, et al., Strategies for the Identification of Intron-Exon Boundaries and Point Mutations: The Example of the RET Proto-Oncogene, ETHODS: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 9, 98-105 (1996) Article… [cited by applicant]
Muiruri, Kariuki S., et al., “Expressed Centromere Specific Histone 3 (CENH3) Variants in Cultivated Triploid and Wild Diploid Bananas ( [cited by applicant]
Xue, Chenxiao, et al., Manipulating mRNA splicing by base editing in plants, Sci China Life Sci 61, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-018-9392-7, received Sep. 14, 2018; accepted Sep. 20, 2018; published online Sep. 27, 20… [cited by applicant]
Brown, John W.S., et al., “ [cited by applicant]
Oneil, J. Patrick, et al., “Mutations that alter RNA splicing of the human HPRT gene: & review of the spectrum” Mutation Research 411, 1998, pp. 179-214. [cited by applicant]
Li, Chaokun, et al. “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of GABRR2 gene in RGC-5 cells induces random exon deletion, exon splicing and new exon recruitment”, Biochemical Engineering Journal (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.be… [cited by applicant]
Mou, Haiwei, et al. “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing induces exon skipping by alternative splicing or exon deletion”, Mou et al. Genome Biology (2017) 18:108 DOI 10.1186/s13059-017-1237-8. [cited by applicant]
Sharpe, Joshua J., et al., “Unexpected consequences: exon skipping caused by CRISPR-generated mutations”, Sharpe and Cooper Genome Biology (2017) 18:109 DOI 10.1186/s13059-017-1240-0. [cited by applicant]
Gapinske, Michael, et al., “CRISPR-SKIP: programmable gene splicing with single base editors”, Genome Biology (2018) 19:107 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1482-5. [cited by applicant]
Eckardt, Nancy A., “The Plant Cell Reviews Alternative Splicing”, The Plant Cell, vol. 25: 3639, Oct. 2013, www.plantcell.org. [cited by applicant]
Staiger, Dorothee, et al., et al., “Alternative Splicing at the Intersection of Biological Timing, Development, and Stress Responses”, The Plant Cell, vol. 25: 3640-3656, Oct. 2013, www.plantcell.org. [cited by applicant]
Reddy, Anireddy S., et al., “Complexity of the Alternative Splicing Landscape in Plants”, The Plant Cell, vol. 25: 3657-3683, Oct. 2013, www.plantcell.org. [cited by applicant]
E.V. Evtushenko et al., “Conserved Molecular Structure of the Centromeric Histone CENH3 in Secale and its Phylogenetic Relationships”, www.nature.com/scientificreports, May 31, 2017, pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Pauwels, Laurens et al.: “A Dual sgRNA Approach for Functional Genomics in [cited by applicant]
Extended ESR for EP19870975.0, mailed on Jun. 2, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Tarantul V. Z. Tolkovyj biotehnologiceskij slovar' russko-anglijskij (Explanatory Russian-English Dictionary of Biotechnology). Languages of Slavic Cultures Publishing House, Moscow, 2009, pp. 583, 584. [cited by applicant]