IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,333,303
Granted Patent B2
US 12,333,303 · App. 18/427,591 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

System and method for sensory characterization

Inventors: Oliver Zahn (Berkeley, CA); Karthik Sekar (Berkeley, CA); Richard Gerkin (Berkeley, CA)
Assignee: Climax Foods Inc.
G06F9/06G01N33/0001G01N33/02G06N20/00G16C20/70
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,333,303
App. No.
18/427,591
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In variants, a method for sensory characterization can include: determining attributes for a sample, collecting sensory data for the sample, determining a sensory characterization model, training the sensory characterization model based on the attributes and the sensory data, determining attributes for a test sample, and predicting a sensory characterization for the test sample using the sensory characterization model.

Claims (22)

1. A method, comprising:

determining a composition for a sample;

determining a context for the sample, wherein the context comprises at least one of a sample phase or a sample substrate;

learning a flavor function using flavor training data collected from set of sensory panelists; and

determining a flavor characterization for the sample based on the flavor function, the context, and the composition.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising training a mixture model using the flavor training data, wherein the sample comprises a mixture of sample components, wherein learning the flavor function comprises learning a component flavor function for each sample component, and wherein determining the flavor characterization for the sample comprises:

determining a component flavor characterization for each sample component based on the component flavor function and the composition; and

using the mixture model, aggregating the component flavor characterizations based on the context to determine the flavor characterization for the sample.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the flavor training data comprises panelist flavor rankings for single-component samples and panelist flavor rankings for multi-component samples, wherein the component flavor function for each sample component is learned using the panelist flavor rankings for single-component samples, wherein the mixture model is trained using the panelist flavor rankings for multi-component samples.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a context for the sample; and

parameterizing the context, wherein learning the flavor function comprises training a flavor model to determine the flavor function based on the composition and the parameterized context.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the composition comprises predicting the composition using a trained composition model.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the composition comprises a gustation composition, wherein the gustation composition is predicted using the trained composition model based on at least one of: headspace composition, manufacturing process parameters, manufacturing ingredients, molecular structures of sample components, or sample matrix.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the composition comprises an olfactory receptor composition, wherein the olfactory receptor composition is predicted using the trained composition model based on at least one of: headspace composition, manufacturing process parameters, manufacturing ingredients, molecular structures of sample components, or sample matrix.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the flavor function comprises a sigmoid function relating composition to component flavor intensity.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein learning the flavor function comprises learning an offset, a slope, and a maximum value for the sigmoid function.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the flavor training data comprises panelist flavor rankings.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein learning the flavor function comprises training a flavor model to determine the flavor function based on the composition, wherein training the flavor model comprises:

predicting a flavor characterization for each of a set of training samples using the flavor model;

determining a predicted flavor ranking for the set of training samples based on the predicted flavor characterizations; and

training the flavor model based on a comparison between the predicted flavor ranking and the panelist flavor ranking.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 22, 2024
From: ZAHN, OLIVER; SEKAR, KARTHIK; GERKIN, RICHARD
To: CLIMAX FOODS INC.
Reel/Frame 066533/0052 →
Continuity (5)
Division 18107294 · Feb 8, 2023
Provisional Application 63320635 · Mar 16, 2022
Provisional Application 63311739 · Feb 18, 2022
Provisional Application 63308465 · Feb 9, 2022
Related Publication 20240220242A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (26)
US 9891201B2 · Hort et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10915818B1 · Patel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10957424B1 · Navon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10962473B1 · O'Hara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10970621B1 · Pichara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10993465B2 · Pichara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164069B1 · Korsunsky et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164478B2 · Pichara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11205101B1 · Kawas Garcia et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11348664B1 · Kaneko et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11373107B1 · Clavero et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11404144B1 · Kang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11439159B2 · Hume et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20120027897A1 · Innocenzi · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140038850A1 · Fasan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160165935A1 · Eddy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170330097A1 · Chae et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180279632A1 · Stryker et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190369073A1 · Gafsou · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210219583A1 · Pichara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021240474A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Day, Adrienne , “How one man's philosophy of data and food science could help save the planet”, Grist.org, Nov. 10, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ravia, Aharon , et al., “A measure of smell enables the creation of olfactory metamers”, Nature, published Nov. 11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2891-7. [cited by applicant]
Shiebar, Jonathan , “Founded by an Impossible Foods and Google data scientist, Climax Foods raises $7.5 million to tackle the cheesiest market”, Techcrunch, Sep. 1, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Snitz, Kobi , “Predicting Odor Perceptual Similarity from Odor Structure”, PLOS Computational Biology, Sep. 2013, vol. 9, Issue 9. [cited by applicant]
Watson, Elaine , “Climax Foods raises $7.5m: ‘We want to replace animals as inefficient factories for converting plants into meat and dairy’”, FoodNavigator-usa.com, Sep. 2, 2020. [cited by applicant]