IP Library Granted Patent US 12,293,338
Granted Patent B2
US 12,293,338 · App. 18/431,328 · Granted May 6, 2025

Vehicle telematics systems and methods

Inventors: Joseph Robert Brannan (Bloomington, IL); Ryan Michael Gross (Normal, IL); Matthew Eric Riley, Sr. (Heyworth, IL); Darwin Gene Beachy (Hopedale, IL); Michael Aaron Myers (Heyworth, IL); Brian N. Harvey (Bloomington, IL); Benjamin Joel Tucker (Bloomington, IL); Scott Thomas Christensen (Salem, OR)
Assignee: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
G06Q10/20G07C5/006
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,293,338
App. No.
18/431,328
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are methods and systems for generating and applying vehicle maintenance models to vehicle telematics data. A vehicle telematics analytics (VTA) computing device is configured to receive vehicle telematics data associated with operation of a subject vehicle, and apply the received vehicle telematics data to a vehicle maintenance model to determine whether the operation of the subject vehicle is better or worse than standard operation of like vehicles. The VTA computing device may adjust a maintenance cost and/or determine if a user of the vehicle is eligible for a reward based upon this determination. The VTA computing device is configured to transmit an itemized report to the user including the adjusted maintenance cost and/or the reward as well as one or more other vehicle costs.

Claims (50)

1. A vehicle telematics analytics (VTA) computing device comprising a memory and a processor in communication with the memory, the processor programmed to:

generate a vehicle maintenance and charging model, the vehicle maintenance and charging model defining (i) standard operation of a plurality of vehicles based upon reference telematics data captured from a plurality of reference vehicles, and (ii) standard charging characteristics of the plurality of vehicles based upon the reference telematics data;

receive, from a user computing device of a user associated with a subject vehicle, first vehicle telematics data associated with operation of the subject vehicle, the first vehicle telematics data captured over a period of time including sensor data from device sensors associated with the subject vehicle;

using the first vehicle telematics data as input, execute the vehicle maintenance and charging model;

receive, as output from the vehicle maintenance and charging model, one or more scores indicating the user's operation of the subject vehicle is better than standard operation of like vehicles; and

automatically adjust a periodic maintenance cost associated with the subject vehicle to have an adjusted value less than an initial value by an amount proportional to at least one of a reduced maintenance schedule and a reduced burden on charging infrastructure, based upon the one or more scores output from the vehicle maintenance and charging model.

2. The VTA computing device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to train the vehicle maintenance and charging model using the reference telematics data associated with the like vehicles as an initial training set.

3. The VTA computing device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to:

receive second vehicle telematics data captured over the period of time using at least one of: (i) vehicle sensors disposed on the subject vehicle, (ii) external sensors disposed in an external computing device coupled to the subject vehicle, and (iii) device sensors disposed in the user computing device; and re-execute the vehicle maintenance and charging model using the first and second vehicle telematics data as input to receive an updated output therefrom.

4. The VTA computing device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to transmit an itemized report to the user associated with the subject vehicle, the itemized report including a representation of whether operation of the subject vehicle is better or worse than standard operation of the like vehicles, an identification of the adjusted value of the periodic maintenance cost, and one or more other vehicle costs.

5. The VTA computing device of claim 4 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive, from the user computing device, a request for the itemized report; and

in response to receiving the request, execute retrieval of the first vehicle telematics data from at least one of the user computing device, the subject vehicle, or an external computing device coupled to the subject vehicle.

6. The VTA computing device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to receive, as output from the vehicle maintenance and charging model, the one or more scores, each of the one or more scores respectively associated with acceleration, braking, cornering, speed, mileage, and location of the subject vehicle over the period of time.

7. The VTA computing device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to:

query a geofencing database using the first vehicle telematics data to access off-road location data; and

determine an amount or percentage of time the subject vehicle was operated in an off-road location.

8. The VTA computing device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to:

receive second vehicle telematics data captured over the period of time using device sensors disposed in user computing devices of other users operating the subject vehicle; and re-execute the vehicle maintenance and charging model using the first and second vehicle telematics data as input to receive an updated output therefrom.

9. A computer-implemented method for using vehicle telematics data to evaluate operation of a subject vehicle, the method being implemented by one or more processors, the method comprising:

generating, by the one or more processors, a vehicle maintenance and charging model, the vehicle maintenance and charging model defining (i) standard operation of a plurality of vehicles based upon reference telematics data captured from a plurality of reference vehicles, and (ii) standard charging characteristics of the plurality of vehicles based upon the reference telematics data;

receiving, by the one or more processors from a user computing device of a user associated with the subject vehicle, first vehicle telematics data associated with operation of the subject vehicle, the first vehicle telematics data captured over a period of time including sensor data from device sensors associated with the subject vehicle;

using the first vehicle telematics data as input, executing, by the one or more processors, the vehicle maintenance and charging model;

receiving, by the one or more processors as output from the vehicle maintenance and charging model, one or more scores indicating the user's operation of the subject vehicle is better than standard operation of like vehicles; and

automatically adjusting, by the one or more processors, a periodic maintenance cost associated with the subject vehicle to have an adjusted value less than an initial value by an amount proportional to at least one of a reduced maintenance schedule and a reduced burden on charging infrastructure, based upon the one or more scores output from the vehicle maintenance and charging model.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising training, by the one or more processors, the vehicle maintenance and charging model using the reference telematics data associated with the like vehicles as an initial training set.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising:

receiving, by the one or more processors, second vehicle telematics data captured over the period of time using at least one of: (i) vehicle sensors disposed on the subject vehicle, (ii) external sensors disposed in an external computing device coupled to the subject vehicle, and (iii) device sensors disposed in the user computing device; and

re-executing, by the one or more processors, the vehicle maintenance and charging model using the first and second vehicle telematics data as input to receive an updated output therefrom.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising transmitting, by the one or more processors, an itemized report to the user associated with the subject vehicle, the itemized report including a representation of whether the operation of the subject vehicle is better or worse than standard operation of the like vehicles, an identification of the adjusted value of the periodic maintenance cost, and one or more other vehicle costs.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , further comprising:

receiving, by the one or more processors from the user computing device, a request for the itemized report; and

in response to receiving the request, executing, by the one or more processors, retrieval of the first vehicle telematics data from at least one of the user computing device, the subject vehicle, or an external computing device coupled to the subject vehicle.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein receiving the one or more scores comprises receiving each of the one or more scores respectively associated with acceleration, braking, cornering, speed, mileage, and location of the subject vehicle over the period of time.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising:

querying, by the one or more processors, a geofencing database using the first vehicle telematics data to access off-road location data; and

determining, by the one or more processors, an amount or percentage of time the subject vehicle was operated in an off-road location.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising:

receiving, by the one or more processors, second vehicle telematics data captured over the period of time using device sensors disposed in user computing devices of other users operating the subject vehicle; and re-executing, by the one or more processors, the vehicle maintenance and charging model using the first and second vehicle telematics data as input to receive an updated output therefrom.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage media having computer-executable instructions embodied thereon, wherein when executed by a vehicle telematics data (VTA) computing device having at least one processor in communication with at least one memory, the computer-executable instructions cause the at least one processor to:

generate a vehicle maintenance and charging model, the vehicle maintenance and charging model defining (i) standard operation of a plurality of vehicles based upon reference telematics data captured from a plurality of reference vehicles, and (ii) standard charging characteristics of the plurality of vehicles based upon the reference telematics data;

receive, from a user computing device of a user associated with a subject vehicle, first vehicle telematics data associated with operation of the subject vehicle, the first vehicle telematics data captured over a period of time including sensor data from device sensors associated with the subject vehicle;

using the first vehicle telematics data as input, execute the vehicle maintenance and charging model;

receive, as output from the vehicle maintenance and charging model, one or more scores indicating the user's operation of the subject vehicle is better than standard operation of like vehicles; and

automatically adjust a periodic maintenance cost associated with the subject vehicle to have an adjusted value less than an initial value by an amount proportional to at least one of a reduced maintenance schedule and a reduced burden on charging infrastructure, based upon the one or more scores output from the vehicle maintenance and charging model.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 17 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the at least one processor to train the vehicle maintenance and charging model using the reference telematics data associated with the like vehicles as an initial training set.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 17 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the at least one processor to transmit an itemized report to the user associated with the subject vehicle, the itemized report including a representation of whether operation of the subject vehicle is better or worse than standard operation of the like vehicles, an identification of the adjusted value of the periodic maintenance cost, and one or more other vehicle costs.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 19 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the at least one processor to:

receive, from the user computing device, a request for the itemized report; and

in response to receiving the request, execute retrieval of the first vehicle telematics data from at least one of the user computing device, the subject vehicle, or an external computing device coupled to the subject vehicle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 7, 2024
From: BRANNAN, JOSEPH ROBERT; GROSS, RYAN MICHAEL; RILEY, MATTHEW ERIC, SR.; BEACHY, DARWIN GENE; MYERS, MICHAEL AARON; HARVEY, BRIAN N.; TUCKER, BENJAMIN JOEL; CHRISTENSEN, SCOTT THOMAS
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066400/0788 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17071163 · Oct 15, 2020
Provisional Application 62938423 · Nov 21, 2019
Provisional Application 62925500 · Oct 24, 2019
Provisional Application 62923050 · Oct 18, 2019
Related Publication 20240177121A1 · May 30, 2024
References Cited (80)
US 6434512B1 · Discenzo · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7822675B1 · Kuno et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8073653B2 · Suzuki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 9522641B1 · Cermak et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9830748B2 · Rosenbaum · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9990782B2 · Rosenbaum · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10229461B2 · Akiva et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10269190B2 · Rosenbaum · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10332208B1 · Loo et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10366370B1 · Binion et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10467824B2 · Rosenbaum · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10668930B1 · Harvey et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10759442B2 · Stenneth et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10817891B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10832261B1 · Chan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11227452B2 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11407410B2 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11524707B2 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11594083B1 · Rosenbaum · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11625745B1 · Warden et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040243423A1 · Rix et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20080306799A1 · Sopko, III et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090037206A1 · Byrne et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100073158A1 · Uesaka et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100094482A1 · Schofield et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100094688A1 · Olsen, III et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100280734A1 · Brinton · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110270706A1 · Anspach et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130031029A1 · Davidson · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130244210A1 · Nath et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130311249A1 · Solomon et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140039990A1 · Georgi · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140074345A1 · Gabay et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140136309A1 · Goldman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140309849A1 · Ricci · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140350989A1 · Telatar et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150091507A1 · Hyde et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100505A1 · Binion et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150213420A1 · Krishnamurthy et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150246654A1 · Tadic et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150348058A1 · Liu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160035150A1 · Barfield, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160163130A1 · Zagajac et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170109712A1 · Bullock · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170140652A1 · Hodges et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180082342A1 · Cahan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180268621A1 · Oz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200005399A1 · Takamatsu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200074492A1 · Scholl et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200152067A1 · Salles et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210334865A1 · Irey · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220092893A1 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220340148A1 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230060300A1 · Rosenbaum · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 109993563A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 111260202A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3239686A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3578433B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3730375B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3960576A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 4190659A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 4190660A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018180643A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 20170116487A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2001067335A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008140381A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013141797A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015181583A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016126421A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017142536A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018077644A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019140018A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Peng Wu, Which battery-charging technology and insurance contract is preferred in the electric vehicle sharing business?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 124, 2019, pp. 537-548, ISSN 0965-8564,… [cited by examiner]
Ehsani M, Falahi M, Lotfifard S. Vehicle to Grid Services: Potential and Applications. Energies. 2012; 5(10):4076-4090. https:// doi.org/10.3390/en5104076 (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Peng Wu, Which battery-charging technology and insurance contract is preferred in the electric vehicle sharing business?, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 124, 2019, pp. 537-548, ISSN 0965-8564. [cited by applicant]
Bobby D. Gerardo, Jaewan Lee, “A framework for discovering relevant patterns using aggregation and intelligent data mining agents in telematics systems”, Telematics and Informatics, vol. 26, Issue 4, 2009, pp. 343-352, … [cited by applicant]
Gopalakrishna Palem, “Condition-based Maintenance using sensor arrays and telematics” International Journal of Mobile Network Communications & Telematics, vol. 3, No. 3, Jun. 2013. [cited by applicant]
Selcuk S. “Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends”. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2017;231(9): 1670-1679, doi: 10.1177/09544054… [cited by applicant]
Jean Pilon-Bignell, Angie Milne, “Geotab management by measurement Increasing Profitability with telematics”, Geotab Inc. https://www.connectedvehicles.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/increasing-profitability-whitepaper.… [cited by applicant]
Toledo et al., Can feedback from in-vehicle data recorders improve driver behavior and reduce fuel consumption?, Transportation Research Part A—Policy and Practice, vol. 94, 2016, pp. 194-204, ISN 0965-8564. [cited by applicant]