IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,321,172
Granted Patent B2
US 12,321,172 · App. 18/440,768 · Granted Jun 3, 2025

Driver re-engagement system

Inventors: Steve Roberson (Normal, IL); Brian Mark Fields (Phoenix, AZ)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G05D1/0061B60W50/0098B60W50/082B60W50/14G05D1/0077G05D1/81G05D1/87G08G1/162B60W2050/143B60W50/16B60W2420/40B60W2420/403B60W2420/408B60W2420/54B60W2510/0604B60W2510/18B60W2510/20B60W2554/00B60W2556/65
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,321,172
App. No.
18/440,768
Filed
Feb 13, 2024
Granted
Jun 3, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3662
USPC
701/23
Abstract

In a network of autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles, an alert may be triggered when one of the vehicles switches from autonomous to manual mode. The alert may be communicated to nearby autonomous vehicles so that drivers of those vehicles may become aware of a potentially unpredictable manual driver nearby. Drivers of autonomous vehicles who may have become disengaged (e.g., sleeping, reading, talking, etc.) during autonomous driving may become re-engaged upon noticing the alert. A re-engaged driver may choose to switch his/her own vehicle from autonomous to manual mode in order to appropriately react to an unpredictable nearby manual driver. In additional or alternative embodiments, the alert may be triggered or intensified when indications of impairment of a nearby driver or malfunction of a nearby vehicle are detected.

Claims (43)

1. A method, comprising:

triggering, by a processor, an alert to a user associated with a first vehicle operating in an autonomous mode, only when a second vehicle operating in a manual mode is near the first vehicle, the alert including a recommendation that the user select an option to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to a manual mode; and

ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to: (i) the first vehicle switching from autonomous mode to manual mode, or (ii) the second vehicle switching from manual mode to autonomous mode.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alert indicates that the second vehicle has switched operational modes from a prior autonomous or semi-autonomous mode to a current manual mode.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alert indicates that the second vehicle is driving erratically, and further comprising:

triggering, by the processor, an elevated alert to the user indicating that the second vehicle is driving erratically.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alert indicates that the second vehicle is malfunctioning, and further comprising:

triggering, by the processor, an elevated alert to the user indicating that the second vehicle is malfunctioning.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alert is configured to wake the user who is asleep.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to a dismissal of the alert by the user.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to a selection by the user to switch operational modes.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

switching, by the processor, the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode in response to a selection, by the user, of the option to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to the manual mode.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving, by the processor within the first vehicle, an indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby; and

ceasing, by the processor, the alert in response to the indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby.

10. An electronic device, comprising:

a non-transitory memory configured to store computer executable instructions; and

a processor configured to interface with the non-transitory memory, and configured to execute the computer executable instructions to cause the processor to:

trigger an alert to a user associated with a first vehicle operating in an autonomous mode, only when a second vehicle operating in a manual mode is near the first vehicle, the alert including a recommendation that the user select an option to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to a manual mode; and

cease the alert in response to: (i) the first vehicle switching from autonomous mode to manual mode, or (ii) the second vehicle switching from manual mode to autonomous mode.

11. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the alert indicates that the second vehicle has switched operational modes from a prior autonomous or semi-autonomous mode to a current manual mode.

12. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the alert indicates that the second vehicle is driving erratically, and wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to:

trigger an elevated alert to the user indicating that the second vehicle is driving erratically.

13. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the alert indicates that the second vehicle is malfunctioning, and wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to:

trigger an elevated alert to the user indicating that the second vehicle is malfunctioning.

14. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the alert is configured to wake the user who is asleep.

15. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to:

cease the alert in response to a dismissal of the alert by the user.

16. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to:

cease the alert in response to a selection by user to switch operational modes.

17. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to:

switch the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode in response to a selection, by the user, of the option to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to the manual mode.

18. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the computer executable instructions further cause the processor to:

receive, at the first vehicle, an indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby; and

cease the alert in response to the indication that the second vehicle is no longer nearby.

19. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions, executable by a processor, the instructions comprising:

triggering an alert to a user associated with a first vehicle operating in an autonomous mode, only when a second vehicle operating in a manual mode is near the first vehicle, the alert including a recommendation that the user select an option to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to a manual mode; and

ceasing the alert in response to: (i) the first vehicle switching from autonomous mode to manual mode, or (ii) the second vehicle switching from manual mode to autonomous mode.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 19 , the instructions further comprising:

switching the first vehicle from operating in the autonomous mode to operating in the manual mode in response to a selection, by the user, of the option to switch the first vehicle from the autonomous mode to the manual mode.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2024
From: ROBERSON, STEVE; FIELDS, BRIAN MARK
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 068631/0141 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17950716 · Sep 22, 2022
Continuation 16913980 · Jun 26, 2020
Continuation 15605554 · May 25, 2017
Related Publication 20240184287A1 · Jun 6, 2024
References Cited (58)
US 8509982B2 · Montemerlo · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8954217B1 · Montemerlo et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9147353B1 · Slusar · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9311271B2 · Wright · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9390451B1 · Slusar · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9513632B1 · Gordon · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9633487B2 · Wright · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9697733B1 · Penilla et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9809158B2 · Geller · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9830748B2 · Rosenbaum · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9990782B2 · Rosenbaum · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10192369B2 · Wright · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10198879B2 · Wright · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10259452B2 · Gordon · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10269190B2 · Rosenbaum · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10289113B2 · Perkins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10467824B2 · Rosenbaum · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10732627B1 · Roberson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10773643B1 · Patnaik · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11227452B2 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11318935B2 · Kindo · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11407410B2 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11487284B1 · Roberson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11524707B2 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11594083B1 · Rosenbaum · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11934189B2 · Roberson · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20140236414A1 · Droz · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140358353A1 · Ibanez-Guzman · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150134178A1 · Minoiu-Enache · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160167648A1 · James · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170192429A1 · Tseng · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170234689A1 · Gibson · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170329329A1 · Kamhi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180061242A1 · Bavar · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180222491A1 · Miyahara · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180229741A1 · Narita · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180292836A1 · Laur · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180329414A1 · Igarashi · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190072974A1 · Hwang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190265700A1 · Honda · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200114911A1 · Mitsuhashi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200341465A1 · Yun · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210331690A1 · Pierfelice · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220092893A1 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220340148A1 · Rosenbaum · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230060300A1 · Rosenbaum · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 3239686A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3578433B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3730375B1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3960576A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 4190659A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 4190660A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
KR 100789072B1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
KR 20200128474A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018116618A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022016457A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Time Magazine 2014 “Autos GM Cars to Use Motion Sensors to Track Distracted Drivers” Sep. 2, 2014 Retrieved from the internet at: URL:http://time.com/3256037/gm-sensors-distracted-driving/<https://protect-us.mimecast.co… [cited by applicant]
CNBC (2017) “Putting Cadillac's self-driving Super Cruise technology to the text” Published Jun. 28, 2017. Retrieved from the Internet at: URL:https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/28/putting-cadillacs-self-driving-super-cruise-… [cited by applicant]