IP Library Granted Patent US 12,255,587
Granted Patent B2
US 12,255,587 · App. 18/447,207 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Gate drivers for stacked transistor amplifiers

Inventors: Poojan Wagh (Sleepy Hollow, IL); Kashish Pal (Reading, GB); Robert Mark Englekirk (Littleton, CO); Tero Tapio Ranta (San Diego, CA); Keith Bargroff (San Diego, CA); Simon Edward Willard (Irvine, CA)
Assignee: PSEMI CORPORATION
H03F1/0211H03F1/0261H03F1/223H03F3/193H03F2200/18H03F2200/21H03F2200/451H03F2200/522
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,255,587
App. No.
18/447,207
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various methods and circuital arrangements for biasing one or more gates of stacked transistors of an amplifier are possible where the amplifier is configured to operate in at least an active mode and a standby mode. Circuital arrangements can reduce bias circuit and stacked transistors standby current during operation in the standby mode and to reduce impedance presented to the gates of the stacked transistors during operation in the active mode while maintaining voltage compliance of the stacked transistors during both modes of operation.

Claims (53)

1. A method for biasing a transistor stack for operation according to at least a first mode and a second mode, the method comprising:

during the first mode of operation, providing biasing voltages to gates of the transistors of the stack, except an input transistor, via high impedance nodes of a first resistive ladder network; and

during the second mode of operation, providing biasing voltages to said gates via low impedance nodes of a second resistive ladder network and wherein a current through the second resistive ladder network during the second mode of operation is substantially larger than a current through the first resistive ladder network during the first mode of operation.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

the first mode of operation is a standby mode for no amplification through the transistor stack, and

the second mode of operation is an active mode for amplification through the transistor stack.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

in the first mode of operation, a current conducted through the transistor stack is a leakage current; and

in the second mode of operation, a current conducted through the transistor stack provides an amplification of an RF signal input to the transistor stack.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

high resistance values of the first resistive ladder network provide the high impedance nodes, and

low resistance values of the second resistive ladder network provide the low impedance nodes, the low resistance values being substantially smaller than the high resistance values.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

the first mode of operation is a standby mode, and

the current through the first resistive ladder network during the first mode of operation is equal to, or less than, 3 μA.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

the second mode of operation is an active mode, and

the current through the second resistive ladder network during the second mode of operation is as large as 0.8 mA.

7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

based on the providing,

coupling during the first mode of operation a respective first biasing voltage to each of said gates; and

coupling during the second mode of operation a respective second biasing voltage to each of said gates that is substantially equal to the respective first biasing voltage.

8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

based on the providing,

coupling during the first mode of operation a respective first biasing voltage to each of said gates; and

coupling during the second mode of operation a respective second biasing voltage to each of said gates,

wherein for at least one gate of said gates, the respective first biasing voltage is different from the respective second biasing voltage.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

the transistor stack comprises one or more gate capacitors each connected between a gate of a transistor of the transistor stack, except an input transistor of the transistor stack, and a reference voltage.

10. A circuital arrangement comprising:

a transistor stack configured to operate as an amplifier, the transistor stack comprising an input transistor and one or more cascode transistors; and

a biasing circuit coupled to one or more gates of the one or more cascode transistors, the biasing circuit comprising:

a first resistive ladder network comprising one or more high impedance nodes; and

a second resistive ladder network comprising one or more low impedance nodes; wherein

during a first mode of operation of the circuital arrangement, the one or more high impedance nodes are coupled to the one or more gates to provide respective biasing voltages, and

during the second mode of operation, the one or more low impedance nodes are coupled to the one or more gates to provide respective biasing voltages and wherein a current through the second resistive ladder network during the second mode of operation is substantially larger than a current through the first resistive ladder network during the first mode of operation.

11. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein:

a ratio of a current through the second resistive ladder network during the second mode of operation to a current through the first resistive ladder network during the first mode of operation is equal to, or larger than, 100.

12. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein:

the first mode of operation is a standby mode for no amplification through the transistor stack, and

the second mode of operation is an active mode for amplification through the transistor stack.

13. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein:

a current conducted through the transistor stack during the first mode of operation is a leakage current; and

a current conducted through the transistor stack during the second mode of operation provides an amplification of an RF signal provided to the input transistor.

14. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein:

the first resistive ladder network comprises resistors with high resistance values that provide the high impedance nodes, and

the second resistive ladder network comprises resistors with low resistance values that provide the low impedance nodes, the low resistance values being substantially smaller than the high resistance values.

15. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein:

for each of the one or more gates, the respective biasing voltage provided during the first mode of operation is substantially equal to the respective biasing voltage provided during the second mode of operation.

16. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein:

for at least one of the one or more gates, the respective biasing voltage provided during the first mode of operation is different from the respective biasing voltage provided during the second mode of operation.

17. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein the one or more low impedance nodes are coupled to the one or more gates via respective one or more switches.

18. The circuital arrangement according to claim 10 , wherein the one or more high impedance nodes are coupled to the one or more gates via respective one or more switches.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2025
From: WAGH, POOJAN; PAL, KASHISH; ENGLEKIRK, ROBERT MARK; RANTA, TERO TAPIO; BARGROFF, KEITH; WILLARD, SIMON EDWARD
To: PEREGRINE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 070006/0535 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 25, 2025
From: PEREGRINE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
To: PSEMI CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 070008/0206 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17531510 · Nov 19, 2021
Continuation 16882061 · May 22, 2020
Continuation 16240601 · Jan 4, 2019
Continuation 15690115 · Aug 29, 2017
Division 15268275 · Sep 16, 2016
Related Publication 20240039479A1 · Feb 1, 2024
References Cited (128)
US 2994833A · Cerofolini · 1961 [cited by applicant]
US 6392490B1 · Gramegna et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6747514B1 · Aude · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6831504B1 · Holloway et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6870391B1 · Sharpe-Geisler · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7248120B2 · Burgener et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7276976B2 · Oh · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7649418B2 · Matsui · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7737790B1 · Chen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7751036B2 · Hamamatsu · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7786807B1 · Li · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7859243B2 · Lorenz · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8111104B2 · Ahadian et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8446173B1 · Faucher et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8487706B2 · Li et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8779859B2 · Su · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8779860B2 · Jeon · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8928415B2 · Cha · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9083287B2 · Papamichail · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9148088B1 · Ding · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9219445B2 · Nobbe et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9419560B2 · Korol · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9509263B2 · Lam · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9641141B1 · Zheng et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9843293B1 · Wagh et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9874893B2 · Ciubotaru · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9882531B1 · Willard et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10181819B2 · Wagh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10250199B2 · Klaren et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10389306B2 · Wagh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10700642B2 · Wagh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10784818B2 · Willard et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11190139B2 · Wagh et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11742802B2 · Wagh et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040135639A1 · Maneatis · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040245975A1 · Tran et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050206454A1 · Richard et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060226910A1 · Tanoi · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070075784A1 · Pettersson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100244964A1 · Deguchi et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100329013A1 · Shikata et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110025422A1 · Marra et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110043284A1 · Zhao et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110181364A1 · Ahadian et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110304393A1 · Luff · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120139643A1 · Scott et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120200338A1 · Olson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130082782A1 · Leuschner et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130187712A1 · Cabanillas et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130310114A1 · Zohny et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140171010A1 · Olson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140184335A1 · Nobbe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140184336A1 · Nobbe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140184337A1 · Nobbe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140266458A1 · Scott et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140266460A1 · Nobbe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150084695A1 · Onizuka · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150236650A1 · Deo · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150270806A1 · Wagh et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150280655A1 · Nobbe et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160126906A1 · Maxim et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160241235A1 · Hasegawa · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170133989A1 · Dykstra et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170146591A1 · Nobbe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170149437A1 · Luo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180083577A1 · Wagh et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180083578A1 · Klaren et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180131327A1 · Wagh · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180159475A1 · Willard · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180262164A1 · Ranta et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190158029A1 · Wagh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190158031A1 · Klaren et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190190459A1 · Wagh et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190379330A1 · Willard et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200358402A1 · Wagh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220158589A1 · Wagh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220368287A1 · Klaren et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018052460 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018052539 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018052817 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Apr. 12, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/690,115, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Dec. 18, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/690,115, 31 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PSemi Corporation, Response filed in the USPTO dated May 9, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/690,115, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wienema, David, International Preliminary Report on Patentability received from the EPO dated Jan. 4, 2019 for appln. No. PCT/US2016/057052, 39 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Pornpromlikit, et al., “A Watt-Level Stacked-FET Linear Power Amplifier in Silicon-on-Insulator CMOS”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniquea, IEEE Service Center, vol. 58, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2010, pp. 57-64. [cited by applicant]
Kurzbauer, Werner, International Preliminary Report on Patentability received from the EPO dated Jan. 3, 2019 for appln. No. PCT/US2017/050839, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mottola, Steven J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 13, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/839,648, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Sep. 20, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,601, 27 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Feb. 14, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,601, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 15, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/283,298, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mottola, Steven J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 5, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,287, 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mottola, Steven J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Mar. 19, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,287, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Apr. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/250,889, 47 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PSemi Corporation, Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 21, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/240,601, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jun. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,275, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,275, 25 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Oct. 24, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,275, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Duperron, Nathalie, International Search Report and Written Opinion received from the EPO dated Aug. 31, 2017 for appln. No. PCT/US2017/044015, 19 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Willard, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Sep. 20, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,257, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mottola, Steven J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 24, 2017 U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,257, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wagh, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jun. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,275, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kellner, Alexandra, International Search Report and Written Opinion received from the EPO dated Dec. 8, 2017 for appln. No. PCT/US207/050839, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 11, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,229, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Klaren, et al., Response filed in the USPTO dated Jan. 29, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,229, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 3, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,229, 34 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Office Action received from the USPTO dated May 18, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/785,096, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wienema, David, Written Opinion received from the EPO dated Aug. 6, 2018 for appln. No. PCT/US2017/044015, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wienema, David, Written Opinion received from the EPO dated Aug. 9, 2018 for appln. No. PCT/US2016/057052, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Pornpromlikit, et al., “A Watt-Level Stacked-FET Linear Power Amplifier in Silicon-on-Insulator CMOS”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Serive Center, Piscataway, NJ, US., vol. 58, No. 1, Jan. … [cited by applicant]
Kurzbauer, Werner, Written Opinion received from the EPO dated Aug. 15, 2018 for appln. No. PCT/US2017/050839, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Sep. 12, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/785,096, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Camps, Ester, Notification Concerning Informal Communications with the Applicant received from the EPO dated Nov. 14, 2018 for appln. No. PCT/US2017/050839, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wienema, David, Written Opinion received from the EPO dated Nov. 27, 2018 for appln. No. PCT/US2016/057052, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Nov. 30, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,229, 33 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mottola, Steven J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 3, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/839,648, 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wagh, et al., “Standby Voltage Condition for Fast RF Amplifier Bias Recovery”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,297, filed Sep. 16, 2016 in the USPTO, 53 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nobbe, Dan, “Cascode Amplifier Bias Circuits”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,229, filed Sep. 16, 2016 in the USPTO, 62 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Willard, et al., “Body Tie Optimization for Stacked Transistor Amplifier”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,257, filed Sep. 16, 2016 in the USPTO, 42 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Pornpromlikit, et al., “A 33-dBm 1.9-GHz Silicon-on-Insulator CMOS Stacked-FET Power Amplifier”, 2009 IEEE, pp. 533-536. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Sep. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,297, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mottola, Steven J., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Jul. 11, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,257, 22 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jun. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,297, 31 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Patricia T., Office Action received from the USPTO dated Mar. 9, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,297, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Wagh, et al., Response to Office Action filed in the USPTO dated Mar. 27, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,297, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Mottola, Steven J., Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated May 20, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/453,287, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Jul. 29, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/882,061, 26 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Office Action received from the USPTO dated Dec. 23, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/531,510, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Choe, Henry, Notice of Allowance received from the USPTO dated Apr. 4, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/531,510, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]