IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,432,073
Granted Patent B2
US 12,432,073 · App. 18/466,789 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Automatically validating of signatures for object detection

Inventor: Igal Raichelgauz (Tel Aviv, IL)
Assignee: AUTOBRAINS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
H04L9/3247
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,432,073
App. No.
18/466,789
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method that is automatically validating of signatures for object detection, the method includes automatically evaluating, by a controller, a signature being generated by an adaptable artificial intelligence (AI) system and stored in a memory, by determining whether the signature introduced an error in a previously accurate detection of an object; and triggering a response to address an outcome of the evaluating with respect to a problem found during the automatically evaluating.

Claims (30)

1. A method that is automatically validating of signatures for object detection, the method comprises:

automatically evaluating, by a controller, a signature being generated by an adaptable artificial intelligence (AI) system and stored in a memory, by determining whether the signature introduced an error in a previously accurate detection of an object; and

triggering a response to address an outcome of the evaluating with respect to a problem found during the automatically evaluating;

wherein the signature is a candidate signature that was generated, following a detection of an error associated with an erroneous signature, by an error resolving part of the adaptable AI system; and

wherein the response comprises not replacing the erroneous signature by the candidate signature when finding that the signature candidate did introduce the error in the previously accurate detection of the object.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the automatically evaluating comprises concurrently evaluating the signature and additional signatures being generated by the adaptable AI system.

3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the evaluation of the signature further comprising determining whether the signature accurately identifies objects that are similar to an object associated with the signature.

4. The method according to claim 1 wherein an automatically evaluating of the signature is triggered with a storing of the signature in the memory.

5. The method according to claim 1 wherein automatically evaluating is performed as part of a verification and validation process used in automotive testing.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the signatures are indicative of an environment of a vehicle.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the automatically evaluating is executed during a driving of the vehicle.

8. The method according to claim 1 wherein the response comprises not replacing the erroneous signature by the candidate signature when finding that the signature fails to accurately identify objects that are similar to an object associated with the signature.

9. A method that is automatically validating of signatures for object detection, the method comprises:

automatically evaluating, by a controller, a signature being generated by an adaptable artificial intelligence (AI) system and stored in a memory, by determining whether the signature introduced an error in a previously accurate detection of an object; and

triggering a response to address an outcome of the evaluating with respect to a problem found during the automatically evaluating;

wherein the signature is a candidate signature that was generated, following a detection of an error associated with an erroneous signature, by an error resolving part of the adaptable AI system; and

wherein the response comprises (a) replacing the erroneous signature by the candidate signature when finding that the signature candidate did not introduce the error in the previously accurate detection of the object, and (b) generating a routing rule for routing a sensed information unit (SIU) to the error resolving part of the adaptive AI system, when the other part of the adaptable AI system generates the erroneous signature following a reception of the SIU.

10. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to automatically validating of signatures for object detection, comprising:

automatically evaluating, by a controller, a signature being generated by an adaptable artificial intelligence (AI) system and stored in a memory, by determining whether the signature rendered another previously accurate signature in the memory to be erroneous for a detection of an object; and

triggering a response to address an outcome of the evaluating with respect to a problem found during the automatically evaluating;

wherein the signature is a candidate signature that was generated, following a detection of an error associated with an erroneous signature, by an error resolving part of the adaptable AI system; and

wherein the response comprises not replacing the erroneous signature by the candidate signature when finding that the signature candidate did introduce the error in the previously accurate detection of the object.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 10 , wherein an automatically evaluating of the signature is triggered with a storing of the signature in the memory.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 10 , wherein automatically evaluating is performed as part of a verification and validation process used in automotive testing.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 10 wherein the response comprises not replacing the erroneous signature by the candidate signature when finding that the signature fails to accurately identify objects that are similar to an object associated with the signature.

14. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to automatically validating of signatures for object detection, comprising:

automatically evaluating, by a controller, a signature being generated by an adaptable artificial intelligence (AI) system and stored in a memory, by determining whether the signature rendered another previously accurate signature in the memory to be erroneous for a detection of an object; and

triggering a response to address an outcome of the evaluating with respect to a problem found during the automatically evaluating;

wherein the signature is a candidate signature that was generated, following a detection of an error associated with an erroneous signature, by an error resolving part of the adaptable AI system;

wherein the response comprises (a) replacing the erroneous signature by the candidate signature when finding that the signature candidate did not introduce the error in the previously accurate detection of the object, and (b) generating a routing rule for routing a sensed information unit (SIU) to the error resolving part of the adaptive AI system, when the other part of the adaptable AI system generates the erroneous signature following a reception of the SIU.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2024
From: RAICHELGAUZ, IGAL
To: AUTOBRAINS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Reel/Frame 067531/0055 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250088366A1 · Mar 13, 2025
References Cited (12)
US 8504839B2 · Krig · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 11743286B2 · Du · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11829192B2 · Melnik · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12177181B2 · Chen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20190073151A1 · Marinescu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190375422A1 · Shtrom · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210366601A1 · Livoti · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220048076A1 · Trojosky · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230131682A1 · Singh · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230319092A1 · Zeng · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230385896A1 · Gonta · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240020032A1 · Poosapalli · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Cited By (2)
US 12,482,274 US 12,664,792