IP Library Granted Patent US 12,241,882
Granted Patent B2
US 12,241,882 · App. 18/487,018 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Soil health indicators using microbial composition

Inventors: Poornima Parameswaran (Orinda, CA); Di Wu (San Francisco, CA); Daniel S. Weaver (San Francisco, CA); Jenna Morgan Lang (Elk Grove, CA)
Assignee: TRACE GENOMICS, INC.
G01N33/24C12Q1/6888C12Q1/689C12Q1/6895G16B20/00G01N33/243G01N33/245G01S19/42G16B30/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,241,882
App. No.
18/487,018
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An analytics system uses soil health indicators to determine metrics for soil samples. In an embodiment, the analytics system receives metadata describing a soil sample, where the metadata indicates one or more types of crops grown in a geographical location having the soil sample. The analytics system determines nucleic acid sequence reads of the soil sample. The analytics system determines taxonomic information of the nucleic acid sequence reads. The analytics system determines microbial composition of the soil sample using the taxonomic information. The analytics system determines reference metrics of soil samples from geographical locations in which the one or more types of crop were grown. The analytics system determines a metric of the soil sample using the microbial composition and the reference metrics. The analytics system transmits the metric to a client device.

Claims (29)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining a soil sample from a geographical location having an attribute based on one or more applied products or been treated with an agricultural technique;

determining, by an analytics system including one or more processors and a memory, a plurality of organisms in the soil sample known to be associated with post-harvest disease pressure;

determining, by the analytics system, a microbial composition of the soil sample using a normalized count of each of the plurality of organisms;

determining, by the analytics system, that a plurality of soil samples from a plurality of geographical locations within a threshold distance of the geographical location have the attribute based on the one or more applied products or been treated with the agricultural technique;

determining, by the analytics system, reference metrics of the plurality of soil samples from the plurality of geographical locations within the threshold distance of the geographical location, wherein the plurality of soil samples from the plurality of geographical locations provide context to the microbial composition of the soil sample, and wherein the reference metrics include a distribution of values of soil health indicators;

determining, by the analytics system, a metric of the soil sample indicative of post-harvest disease pressure by comparing the microbial composition to the reference metrics of the plurality of soil samples from the plurality of geographical locations; and

transmitting, by the analytics system, the metric to a client device for display in context of the reference metrics on a user interface.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of organisms in the soil sample known to be associated with post-harvest disease pressure includes microbes having a genus of Botrytis, Botryotinia, Alternaria, Mucor, Rhizomucor , or Rhizopus.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more applied products includes a fumigant.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the agricultural technique is no-till farming, use of a cover crop, carbon farming, strip-till, or conservation agriculture.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the metric is displayed as a percentile value.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the soil health indicator indicates soil mineral or organic element availability, a plant growth promoting factor, an interaction with plant pathogens, or crop performance.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the metric, a prediction of a physical attributes of a plant grown in soil at the geographical location.

8. A system comprising one or more processors and a memory, the memory storing computer program instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to:

determine a plurality of organisms in a soil sample known to be associated with post-harvest disease pressure, wherein the soil sample is obtained from a geographical location having an attribute based on one or more applied products or been treated with an agricultural technique;

determine a microbial composition of the soil sample using a normalized count of each of the plurality of organisms;

determine that a plurality of soil samples from a plurality of geographical locations within a threshold distance of the geographical location have the attribute based on the one or more applied products or been treated with the agricultural technique;

determine reference metrics of the plurality of soil samples from the plurality of geographical locations within the threshold distance of the geographical location, wherein the plurality of soil samples from the plurality of geographical locations provide context to the microbial composition of the soil sample, and wherein the reference metrics include a distribution of values of soil health indicators;

determine a metric of the soil sample indicative of post-harvest disease pressure by comparing the microbial composition to the reference metrics of the plurality of soil samples from the plurality of geographical locations; and

transmit the metric to a client device for display in context of the reference metrics on a user interface.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of organisms in the soil sample known to be associated with post-harvest disease pressure includes microbes having a genus of Botrytis, Botryotinia, Alternaria, Mucor, Rhizomucor , or Rhizopus.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more applied products includes a fumigant.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the agricultural technique is no-till farming, use of a cover crop, carbon farming, strip-till, or conservation agriculture.

12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the metric is displayed as a percentile value.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the soil health indicator indicates soil mineral or organic element availability, a plant growth promoting factor, an interaction with plant pathogens, or crop performance.

14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the memory stores further computer program instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to:

determine, based on the metric, a prediction of a physical attributes of a plant grown in soil at the geographical location.

Assignments (5)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 18, 2025
From: TRACE GENOMICS, INC.
To: TRACE GENOMICS ABC
Reel/Frame 071453/0501 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2025
From: TRACE GENOMICS ABC
To: MIRATERRA INC.
Reel/Frame 071453/0532 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2023
From: PLACELLA, SARAH
To: TRACE GENOMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 065782/0208 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2023
From: PARAMESWARAN, POORNIMA; WU, DI; LANG, JENNA MORGAN
To: TRACE GENOMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 065782/0234 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2023
From: WEAVER, DANIEL S.
To: TRACE GENOMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 065782/0252 →
Continuity (12)
Continuation 16258415 · Jan 25, 2019
Provisional Application 62657590 · Apr 13, 2018
Provisional Application 62622067 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622071 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622063 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622061 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622062 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622064 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622070 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622060 · Jan 25, 2018
Provisional Application 62622059 · Jan 25, 2018
Related Publication 20240142431A1 · May 2, 2024
References Cited (33)
US 9315849B2 · Fitzpatrick · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10465232B1 · Wu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10762982B1 · Wu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11263707B2 · Perry · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11485999B2 · Wu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20150284810A1 · Knight et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160270289A1 · Schildroth · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160283651A1 · Knight et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190194742A1 · Wu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200257997A1 · Mewes et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200271636A1 · Hartman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200381081A1 · Zajdband et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210010993A1 · Shibata et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230266295A1 · Mooshammer · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2016025848A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017096385A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Aranda, S. et al., “Microbial Communities Associated with the Root System of Wild Olives ( [cited by applicant]
Calvo, J. et al., “Biological Control of Postharvest Spoilage Caused by Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinereal in Apple by Using the Bacterium Rahnella aquatilis,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, Feb. 15… [cited by applicant]
Duniere, L. et al., “Bacterial and Fungal Core Microbiomes Associated with Small Grain Silages During Ensiling and Aerobic Spoilage,” BMC Microbiology, Mar. 3, 2017, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 19743347.7, Oct. 12, 2021, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fierer, N. et al., “Toward an Ecological Classification of Soil Bacteria,” Ecology, 2007, vol. 88, No. 6, pp. 1354-1364. [cited by applicant]
MicroBiometer, “Welcome to the microBIOMETER,” 8 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Apr. 9, 2019], Retrieved from the internet <URL: microbiometer.com>. [cited by applicant]
Nelson, M.B. et al., “Global Biogeography of Microbial Nitrogen-Cycling Traits in Soil,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Jul. 19, 2016, vol. 113, No. 29, pp. 8033-8040. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/015264, Apr. 15, 2019, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Reddy, B.V.B. et al., “eSNaPD: A Versatile, Web-Based Bioinformatics Platform for Surveying and Mining Natural Product Biosynthetic Diversity from Metagenomes,” Chemistry & Biology, Aug. 14, 2014, vol. 21, pp. 1023-1033. [cited by applicant]
Solvita, “Solvita—providing indicators of soil biological processes,” 2 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Apr. 9, 2019], Retrieved from the internet <URL: solvita.com/soil/>. [cited by applicant]
Ward Laboratories, Inc., “Haney/Soil Health Test Information Rev. 1.0,” 4 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Apr. 9, 2019], Retrieved from the internet <URL: www.wardlab.com/haney-info.php>. [cited by applicant]
Ward Laboratories, Inc., “PLFA Information,” 3 pages, [Online] [Retrieved Apr. 9, 2019], Retrieved from the internet <URL: www.wardlab.com/bio-testing-info.php>. [cited by applicant]
Wolinska, A. et al. “Metagenomic Analysis of Some Potential Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in Arable Soils at Different Formation Processes.” Microbial Ecology, vol. 73, No. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 162-176. [cited by applicant]
Yuan, H. et al. “Abundance and Diversity of CO [cited by applicant]
Zhao, J. et al. “Analysis of Unculturable Bacterial Communities in Tea Orchard Soils Based on Nested PCR-DGGE.” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 28, Jan. 11, 2012, pp. 1967-1979. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,415, filed Aug. 23, 2022, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,415, filed Feb. 9, 2023, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]