IP Library Granted Patent US 12,312,632
Granted Patent B2
US 12,312,632 · App. 18/499,761 · Granted May 27, 2025

Systems and methods for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Inventors: Kelly Flentie (Charlestown, MA); Eric Stern (Charlestown, MA)
Assignee: SeLux Diagnostics, Inc.
C12Q1/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,312,632
App. No.
18/499,761
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), the gold-standard diagnostic that indicates whether an antimicrobial will be clinically effective, often suffer the slowest times-to-result for the most resistant pathogens. Here we introduce novel assays to be performed in parallel with standard AST assays that provide additional resistance information and enable rapid, same-shift reporting of AST results for a plurality of pathogens.

Claims (51)

1. A method for determining a qualitative susceptibility result of an antimicrobial for a microorganism-comprising sample, the method comprising:

inoculating a plurality of panels comprising a plurality of reservoirs comprising one or more dilution series reservoirs, one or more high microorganism load reservoirs (HMLRs), and one or more control reservoirs, wherein

a microorganism is present at a first concentration C m0 in the one or more dilution series reservoirs comprising an antimicrobial A that extends from a low concentration of antimicrobial (C AL ) that is at or below a susceptible breakpoint to a high concentration of antimicrobial (C AH ) that is at or above a resistant breakpoint;

the microorganism is present at a second concentration≥2×C m0 in the one or more HMLRs comprising the antimicrobial A at a third concentration≥C AL /4; and

the microorganism is not present in one or more control reservoirs comprising the antimicrobial A;

incubating the plurality of panels under conditions promoting microorganism growth;

measuring a relative growth in the one or more dilutions series reservoirs, the one or more HMLRs, and the one or more control reservoirs; and

determining a qualitative susceptibility interpretations from the relative growth measurements.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein growth in the reservoirs is determined following addition of a metabolic viability probe comprising resazurin and methylene blue, ferrous and ferric potassium salts, or 1-methoxy-5-methlyphenasinum methyl sulfate.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein growth in the reservoirs is determined by time-resolved fluorescence or time-gated luminescence.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein growth in the reservoirs is determined following the addition of a probe capable of binding microbial surfaces.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first concentration C m0 is between 1×10 5 and 5×10 6 CFU/mL.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining the qualitative susceptibility interpretations comprises a viability assay where a probe is added following a growth threshold being achieved and a surface area assay following the viability assay, wherein the surface area assay comprises:

incubating a liquid suspension of the microorganism in the presence of the antimicrobial A under conditions that promote growth of the microorganism;

adding a signaling agent configured to bind to a surface of the microorganism;

separating the microorganism bound by the signaling agent from unbound signaling agent; and

measuring one or more signal levels associated with the microorganism as compared to one or more controls, thereby measuring the antimicrobial susceptibility of the microorganism;

wherein the signaling agent comprises a linker group L, and an amplifier group comprising an Europium coordination complex; and wherein,

the linker group L forms a covalent bond to the amplifier group; or

the linker group L forms one or more non-covalent interactions with the amplifier group.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more HMLRs comprise the antimicrobial A at a fourth concentration≥C AL .

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more HMLRs comprise a fourth microorganism concentration≥3×C m0 , ≥4×C m0 , ≥5×C m0 , ≥6×C m0 , ≥7×C m0 , ≥8×C m0 , ≥9×C m0 , ≥10×C m0 , ≥11×C m0 , ≥12×C m0 , ≥13×C m0 , ≥14×C m0 , ≥15×C m0 , ≥16×C m0 , ≥17×C m0 , ≥18×C m0 , ≥19×C m0 , ≥20×C m0 .

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antimicrobial A is one or more of, but not limited to, the following: Amikacin, Amikacin-fosfomycin, Amoxicillin, Amoxicillin-clavulanate, Ampicillin, Ampicillin-sulbactam, Azithromycin, Azlocillin, Aztreonam, Aztreonam-avibactam, Besifloxacin, Biapenem, Cadazolid, Carbenicillin, Cefaclor, Cefamandole, Cefazolin, Cefdinir, Cefditoren, Cefepime, Cefepime-tazobactam, Cefetamet, Cefixime, Cefmetazole, Cefonicid, Cefoperazone, Cefotaxime, Cefotetan, Cefoxitin, Ceftolozane-tazobactam, Cefpodoxime, Cefprozil, Ceftaroline, Ceftaroline-avibactam, Ceftazidime, Ceftazidime-avibactam, Ceftazidime-avibactam, Ceftibuten, Ceftizoxime, Ceftobiprole, Ceftolozane-tazobactam, Ceftriaxone, Cefuroxime, Cephalothin, Chloramphenicol, Cinoxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Clarithromycin, Clinafloxacin, Clindamycin, Colistin, Dalbavancin, Daptomycin, Delafloxacin, Dirithromycin, Doripenem, Doxycycline, Enoxacin, Eravacycline, Ertapenem, Erythromycin, Faropenem, Fidaxomicin, Finafloxacin, Fleroxacin, Fosfomycin, Fusidic acid, Garenoxacin, Gatifloxacin, Gemifloxacin, Gentamicin, Gepotidacin, Grepafloxacin, Iclaprim, Imipenem, Imipenem-relebactam, Kanamycin, Lefamulin, Levofloxacin, Levonadifloxacin, Linezolid, Linopristin-flopristin, Lomefloxacin, Loracarbef, Mecillinam, Meropenem, Methicillin, Mezlocillin, Minocycline, Moxalactam, Moxifloxacin, Nafcillin, Nalidixic acid, Netilmicin, Nitrofurantoin, Norfloxacin, Ofloxacin, Omadacycline, Oritavancin, Oxacillin, Penicillin, Piperacillin, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Plazomicin, Polymyxin B, Quinupristin-dalfopristin, Razupenem, Rifampin, Solithromycin, Sparfloxacin, Sulfisoxazole, Sulopenem, Tedizolid, Teicoplanin, Televancin, Telithromycin, Tetracycline, Ticarcillin, Ticarcillin-clavulanate, Tigecycline, Tobramycin, Trimethoprim, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, Trospectomycin, Vancomycin, Aculeacin A, Amphotericin B, Caspofungin, Clotrimazole, Fluconazole, Flucytosine, 5-Fluorocytosine, Griseofulvin, Itraconazole, Ketoconazole, Nystatin, Sordarin, Terbinafine, Voriconazole and a salt or hydrate form thereof.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises performing one or more first checkpoint assays to determine if microorganism growth has achieved a threshold value; and

(a) if the threshold value is achieved, performing at least one secondary assay to measure a relative growth in the dilution series reservoirs and the one or more HMLRs, and based upon said measuring of the relative growth, determining the qualitative susceptibility result (QSR) and obtaining a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); or

(b) if the threshold value is not achieved, performing one or more additional incubation periods under conditions promoting microorganism growth until

(i) the threshold value is achieved, and thereafter performing step (a); or

(ii) a maximum of 18 hours has transpired without the threshold value being achieved and no further assays are performed.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the at least one of the one or more first checkpoint assays and the secondary assay is selected from the group consisting of: a metabolic probe assay, a surface-binding probe assay, a chemical probe assay, a biochemical probe assay, an enzymatic biochemical probe assay, an ATP assay, a nucleic acid probe assay, a double-stranded nucleic acid probe assay, an optical density assay, a visual assay, and a pH molecular probe assay, wherein the metabolic probe comprises 7-hydroxy-10-oxidophenoxazin-10-ium-3-one (resazurin).

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein at least one well of the plurality of panels is a second checkpoint assay well comprising a growth indicator during the initial incubation period or the additional incubation period, wherein the growth indicator comprises resazurin.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dilution series comprises at least three reservoirs comprising different antimicrobial concentrations.

14. A method for determining a qualitative susceptibility result of an antimicrobial for a microorganism-comprising sample, the method comprising:

inoculating a plurality of panels comprising a first plurality of reservoirs comprising one or more dilution series reservoirs, one or more high microorganism load reservoirs (HMLRs), and one or more control reservoirs, wherein

a microorganism is present at first concentration C m0 in the dilution series reservoirs of an antimicrobial A that extends from a low concentration of antimicrobial (C AL ) that is at or below a susceptible breakpoint to a high concentration of antimicrobial (C AH ) that is at or above a resistant breakpoint;

the microorganism is present at a second concentration≥2×C m0 in one or more HMLRs comprising antimicrobial A at a third concentration≥C AL /4; and

the microorganism is not present in the one or more control reservoirs comprising the antimicrobial A;

incubating the plurality of panels under conditions promoting microorganism growth;

measuring relative growth in the dilutions series reservoirs, the one or more HMLRs, and the one or more control reservoirs determined by time-resolved fluorescence or time-gated luminescence; and

determining the qualitative susceptibility interpretations from the relative growth measurements.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein growth in the reservoirs is determined following addition of a metabolic viability probe comprising resazurin and methylene blue, ferrous and ferric potassium salts, or 1-methoxy-5-methlyphenasinum methyl sulfate.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein growth in the reservoirs is determined following the addition of a probe capable of binding microbial surfaces.

17. The method of claim 14 , wherein the first concentration C m0 is between 1×10 5 and 5×10 6 CFU/mL.

18. The method of claim 14 , wherein the step of determining the qualitative susceptibility interpretations comprises a viability assay where a probe is added following a growth threshold being achieved and a surface area assay following the viability assay, wherein the surface area assay comprises:

incubating a liquid suspension of the microorganism in the presence of the antimicrobial A under conditions that promote growth of the microorganism;

adding a signaling agent that binds to a surface of the microorganism;

separating the microorganism bound by the signaling agent from unbound signaling agent; and

measuring signal levels associated with the microorganism as compared to one or more controls, thereby measuring the antimicrobial susceptibility of the microorganism;

wherein the signaling agent comprises a linker group L, and an amplifier group comprising an Europium coordination complex; and wherein,

the linker group L forms a covalent bond to the amplifier group; or

the linker group L forms one or more non-covalent interactions with the amplifier group.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more HMLRs comprises the antimicrobial A at a concentration≥C AL .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2025
From: FLENTIE, KELLY; STERN, ERIC
To: SELUX DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 070840/0741 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17004848 · Aug 27, 2020
Provisional Application 62892305 · Aug 27, 2019
Related Publication 20240102074A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (49)
US 3798320A · Cameron et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 4169096A · Kawaguchi et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4565790A · Hemmila et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4647536A · Mosbach et al. · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4808541A · Mikola et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4927923A · Mathis et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5457185A · Lehn et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5489401A · Freeman · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5512493A · Mathis et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5527684A · Mabile et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5627074A · Mathis et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5665554A · Reeve et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5695946A · Benjamin et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6284470B1 · Bitner et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6385272B1 · Takahashi · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6844028B2 · Mao et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7341841B2 · Metzger et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7629029B2 · Mao et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7868144B2 · Diller et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8178602B2 · Mao et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8895255B1 · Goldberg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9834808B2 · Stern et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 11845976B2 · Flentie · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20040029254A1 · Stamm et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20120149599A1 · Williams et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130217063A1 · Metzger et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278136A1 · Shamsheyeva et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140323340A1 · Goldberg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140363817A1 · Dukan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150064703A1 · Super et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150337351A1 · Metzger · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160010138A1 · Shamsheyeva et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170211121A1 · Stern et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180179572A1 · Stern et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180291419A1 · Richards et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200149086A1 · Stern et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 0064484A2 · 1982 [cited by applicant]
EP 0139675A1 · 1985 [cited by applicant]
EP 3202885A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 8403698A1 · 1984 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016015027A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017015145A2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017127684A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018119439A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2020/048242, mailed on Jan. 22, 2021, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for EP Patent Application No. 20856302.3, mailed Mar. 14, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Weibull, E., et al., “Bacterial Nanoscale Cultures for Phenotypic Multiplexed Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing”, Journal of clinical microbiology, 52(9):3310-3317, Jul. 2, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Dorey, L., et al., “Activity of florfenicol forActinobacillus pleuropneumoniaeandPasteurella multocidausing standardised versus non-standardised methodology”, Veterinary Journal, 218:65-70, 16 Nov. 16, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Bonnefoy, A., et al., “In vitro activity of AVE1330A, an innovative broad-spectrum non-.beta.-lactam .beta.-lactamase inhibitor”, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 54(2):410-417, Aug. 1, 2004. [cited by applicant]