IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,579,582
Granted Patent B2
US 12,579,582 · App. 18/505,704 · Granted Mar 17, 2026

System and method for processing document data

Inventors: Loren Naim Falandino (Superior Township, MI); Thomas Allen Seward (Ann Arbor, MI); Bradley Keith Goodyear (Superior Township, MI)
Assignee: Insurance Quantified, LLC
G06Q40/08G06Q10/06311
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,579,582
App. No.
18/505,704
Granted
Mar 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques including a system and method for processing insurance documents are provided. The techniques may involve the use of a system. The system may include a component configured to process a plurality of input document entities. The system may include a routing component configured to process the plurality of input document entities, wherein the routing component is configured to determine one or more workflows for processing at least one of the plurality of document entities. The system may include a workflow management component configured to process the at least one of the plurality of document entities.

Claims (30)

1 . A system comprising:

at least one computer hardware processor; and

at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium, storing processor-executable instructions, that, when executed by the at least computer hardware processor causes the at least one computer hardware processor to perform a method comprising:

obtaining a plurality of input digital document entities including insurance claims data related to a subject insurance claim;

analyzing the plurality of input digital document entities to determine one or more workflows for processing at least one of the plurality of document entities;

processing the at least one of the plurality of document entities according to the one or more workflows, the processing comprising:

analyzing the at least one of the plurality of digital document entities to determine whether one or more human-in-the-loop tasks are to be performed on at least a portion of the at least one of the plurality of document entities; and

when it is determined that one or more human-in-the-loop tasks are to be performed:

generating an interactive graphical user interface (GUI) including the one or more human-in-the-loop tasks to be performed for processing the portion of the at least one of the plurality of document entities;

displaying the interactive GUI;

obtaining, via the interactive GUI, digital document data corresponding to the portion of at least one of the plurality of document entities processed according to the one or more human-in-the-loop tasks; and

updating the digital document entities based on the digital document data corresponding to the portion of the at least one of the plurality of document entities;

extracting a plurality of insurance claims features from the updated digital document entities;

analyzing the insurance claims data and insurance claims features using at least one machine learning model trained on a plurality of insurance loss claim records to predict a loss for the subject insurance claim;

generating a deliverable data product using the predicted loss, insurance claims data, and/or extracted insurance claims features; and

providing the deliverable data product to one or more external systems.

2 . The system according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the one or more human-in-the-loop tasks includes a quality assurance annotation performed by at least one user.

3 . The system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores further instructions that cause the processer to perform, before the analyzing, routing input documents or portions of input documents to one or more workflows.

4 . The system according to claim 3 , wherein the routing is performed based on a classification of the input documents or portions of input documents.

5 . The system according to claim 3 , the routing comprises routing the input documents or portions of input documents to a specific user to perform a reviewing action.

6 . The system according to claim 3 , wherein the routing comprises generating one or more tasks for processing the digital input document entities or portions of input document entities.

7 . The system according to claim 6 , wherein the one or more tasks comprise a plurality of parallel tasks to support processing of a single document entity.

8 . The system according to claim 6 , wherein generating the tasks is performed based on at least one of: quality metrics, random sampling, logical data check, and other properties of a subject input document or portion of the subject input document.

9 . The system according to claim 1 , the one or more human-in-the-loop tasks comprise annotating data elements of the at least one of the plurality of document entities.

10 . The system according to claim 1 , wherein the deliverable data product further comprises one or more of:

a risk measure in relation to a claim; and

a scoring parameter in relation to the claim.

11 . The system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one machine learning model is configured to predict loss in relation to the subject insurance claim based on closed claims data.

12 . The system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one non-transitory computer readable storage medium stores further instructions that cause the processer to perform: analyzing the insurance claims data and insurance claims features using at least one machine learning model configured to predict loss in relation to the subject insurance claim based on open claims data.

13 . The system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one machine learning model configured to predict loss in relation to a subject insurance claim is configured to train on a training data set defined across insurance carriers in a commercial insurance industry.

Assignments (4)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 72458 FRAME 990. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER. Recorded Feb 13, 2026
From: TWO SIGMA INSURANCE QUANTIFIED, LP
To: INSURANCE QUANTIFIED, LLC
Reel/Frame 074852/0539 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 3, 2025
From: TWO SIGMA INSURANCE QUANTIFIED, LP
To: INSURANCE QUANTIFIED, LLC
Reel/Frame 072458/0990 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 18, 2024
From: GROUNDSPEED ANALYTICS, INC.
To: TWO SIGMA INSURANCE QUANTIFIED, LP
Reel/Frame 067757/0854 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2024
From: FALANDINO, LOREN NAIM; SEWARD, THOMAS ALLEN; GOODYEAR, BRADLEY KEITH
To: GROUNDSPEED ANALYTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 067108/0039 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63424454 · Nov 10, 2022
Related Publication 20240161203A1 · May 16, 2024
References Cited (30)
US 8175394B2 · Vincent · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 11210473B1 · Mariko et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11676204B1 · Fleming · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20020035488A1 · Aquila · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030036934A1 · Ouchi · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040128182A1 · Pepoon · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050149376A1 · Guyan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20090043615A1 · Belhe et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090187429A1 · Scalet et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20130039571A1 · Stein et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140324466A1 · Wertzberger · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012544A1 · Ramaswamy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160307200A1 · Adams · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160342852A1 · Blanchflower · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20210383067A1 · Reisswig · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220017032A1 · Qi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220214911A1 · Scarfutti · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220392047A1 · Wheaton et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240086734A1 · Singh et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240161204A1 · Bien · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240161530A1 · Falandino et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 106600423A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2005050545A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/505,729, filed Nov. 9, 2023, Falandino et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/505,759, filed Nov. 9, 2023, Falandino et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/479,635, filed Oct. 2, 2023, Shah et al. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., Machine Learning-Based Techniques for Digital Data Extraction from Documents with Complex Formats. U.S. Appl. No. 18/479,635, filed Oct. 2, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Carion et al., End-to-End object detection with transformers. European Conference on computer vision. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2020. 26 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., Layoutlmv2: Multi-modal pre-training for visually-rich document understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14740. 2022. 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lopresti et al., Using Consensus Sequence Voting to Correct OCR Errors. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. Jan. 3, 1996;67(1):39-47. [cited by applicant]