IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,331,125
Granted Patent B2
US 12,331,125 · App. 18/510,256 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Anti-cMet antibody-drug conjugates and uses thereof

Inventors: Brian P. Fiske (Waltham, MA); Nimish Gera (Waltham, MA); Alexander J. Nichols (Lincoln, MA)
Assignee: Mythic Therapeutics, Inc.
C07K16/2863A61K47/68031A61K47/68035A61K47/6849A61P35/00C07K16/32A61K38/00A61K2039/505C07K2317/52C07K2317/73C07K2317/77C07K2317/94
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,331,125
App. No.
18/510,256
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein are antibodies and uses of the same.

Claims (42)

1. An antibody-drug conjugate, wherein the antibody-drug conjugate comprises:

(a) a heavy chain variable domain and a light chain variable domain selected from the group of:

(i) SEQ ID NO: 5 and SEQ ID NO: 6, respectively;

(ii) SEQ ID NO: 11 and SEQ ID NO: 12, respectively;

(iii) SEQ ID NO: 13 and SEQ ID NO: 14, respectively;

(iv) SEQ ID NO: 15 and SEQ ID NO: 16, respectively;

(v) SEQ ID NO: 17 and SEQ ID NO: 18, respectively; and

(vi) SEQ ID NO: 21 and SEQ ID NO: 22, respectively;

(b) a light chain constant region sequence of SEQ ID NO: 157 comprising a valine to cysteine substitution at amino acid position 98, wherein the drug is monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and the MMAE is conjugated to the cysteine at amino acid position 98 via a valine-citrulline (vc) linker; and

(c) a heavy chain CH1-CH2-CH3 sequence of SEQ ID NO: 155 or SEQ ID NO: 189 optionally comprising one or more of (A) through (C):

(A) a lysine to cysteine substitution at amino acid position 105 and deletion of a threonine at amino acid positions 106 and 108;

(B) a methionine to tyrosine substitution at amino acid position 135, a serine to threonine substitution at amino acid position 137, and a threonine to glutamic acid substitution at amino acid position 139; and

(C) a methionine to leucine substitution at amino acid position 311 and an asparagine to serine substitution at amino acid position 317.

2. The antibody-drug conjugate of claim 1 , comprising a heavy chain CH1-CH2-CH3 sequence of SEQ ID NO: 155 or SEQ ID NO: 189 further comprising a lysine to cysteine substitution at amino acid position 105 and deletion of a threonine at amino acid positions 106 and 108.

3. The antibody-drug conjugate of claim 2 , comprising heavy chain and light chain sequences selected from the group of:

(i) SEQ ID NO: 35 and SEQ ID NO: 42, respectively;

(ii) SEQ ID NO: 59 and SEQ ID NO: 66, respectively;

(iii) SEQ ID NO: 67 and SEQ ID NO: 74, respectively;

(iv) SEQ ID NO: 75 and SEQ ID NO: 82, respectively;

(v) SEQ ID NO: 83 and SEQ ID NO: 90, respectively; and

(vi) SEQ ID NO: 99 and SEQ ID NO: 106, respectively.

4. The antibody-drug conjugate of claim 3 , wherein the heavy and light chain sequences comprise SEQ ID NO: 75 and SEQ ID NO: 82, respectively.

5. The antibody-drug conjugate of claim 1 , comprising a heavy chain CH1-CH2-CH3 sequence of SEQ ID NO: 155 or SEQ ID NO: 189 comprising a lysine to cysteine substitution at amino acid position 105 and deletion of a threonine at amino acid positions 106 and 108; and a methionine to leucine substitution at amino acid position 311 and an asparagine to serine substitution at amino acid position 317.

6. The antibody-drug conjugate of claim 5 , wherein the antibody comprises heavy chain and light chain sequences selected from the group of:

(i) SEQ ID NO: 36 and SEQ ID NO: 42, respectively;

(ii) SEQ ID NO: 60 and SEQ ID NO: 66, respectively;

(iii) SEQ ID NO: 68 and SEQ ID NO: 74, respectively;

(iv) SEQ ID NO: 76 and SEQ ID NO: 82, respectively;

(v) SEQ ID NO: 84 and SEQ ID NO: 90, respectively; and

(vi) SEQ ID NO: 100 and SEQ ID NO: 106, respectively.

7. The antibody-drug conjugate of claim 1 , wherein the heavy chain CH1-CH2-CH3 sequence of SEQ ID NO: 155 or SEQ ID NO: 189 comprises:

a lysine to cysteine substitution at amino acid position 105 and deletion of a threonine at amino acid positions 106 and 108; and

a methionine to tyrosine substitution at amino acid position 135, a serine to threonine substitution at amino acid position 137, and a threonine to glutamic acid substitution at amino acid position 139.

8. The antibody-drug conjugate of claim 7 , wherein the antibody comprises heavy chain and light chain sequences selected from the group of:

(i) SEQ ID NO: 37 and SEQ ID NO: 42, respectively;

(ii) SEQ ID NO: 61 and SEQ ID NO: 66, respectively;

(iii) SEQ ID NO: 69 and SEQ ID NO: 74, respectively;

(iv) SEQ ID NO: 77 and SEQ ID NO: 82, respectively;

(v) SEQ ID NO: 85 and SEQ ID NO: 90, respectively; and

(vi) SEQ ID NO: 101 and SEQ ID NO: 106, respectively.

9. A pharmaceutical composition comprising an effective amount of the antibody-drug conjugate of claim 1 .

10. A method of treating cancer, reducing the volume of a tumor, or inducing cell death in a cancer cell, wherein the cancer or tumor is characterized by having a population of cancer cells that have cMet presented on their surface, comprising administering an effective amount of the antibody-drug conjugate of claim 1 to the subject.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2026
From: MYTHIC THERAPEUTICS, INC.
To: MYTHIC ABC, LLC
Reel/Frame 075155/0119 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2026
From: MYTHIC ABC, LLC
To: GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Reel/Frame 075155/0157 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2024
From: FISKE, BRIAN P.; GERA, NIMISH; NICHOLS, ALEXANDER J.
To: MYTHIC THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 066069/0786 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 18273078
Provisional Application 63145348 · Feb 3, 2021
Related Publication 20240101688A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (162)
US 5652138A · Burton et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 7612181B2 · Wu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8088376B2 · Chamberlain et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8217148B2 · Davies · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8258268B2 · Wu et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8394925B2 · Chamberlain et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8586714B2 · Ghayur et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8716450B2 · Ghayur et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8722855B2 · Ghayur et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8735546B2 · Ghayur et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8822645B2 · Ghayur et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10336818B2 · Chamberlain et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10383948B2 · Allan · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10799597B2 · Goldenberg · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20110111406A1 · Igawa · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130243775A1 · Papadopoulos et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160161500A1 · Lee et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170007715A1 · Andreev et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170191055A1 · Short et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170348429A1 · Reilly et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180208658A1 · Liu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180230218A1 · Chittenden et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190024078A1 · Short et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200061204A1 · Feng et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220281984A1 · Nichols et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240197906A1 · Fiske et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 102174106 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102918057 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103002916 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
EP 2552955 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015502397A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 20180025865 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009125825 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011111007 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011122011 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011151412 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013093809A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013138400 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017134197 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017201204 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018044619 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018062402 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018093669 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018129029 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018136455 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019189453 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020014306 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020092385A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021022039 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022169975 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Zhou. Site-specific antibody conjugation for ADC and Beyond. Biomedicines 2017, 5, 64; doi:10.3390/biomedicines5040064 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Dimasi et al. Efficient preparation of site specifici antibody drug conjugates using cysteine insertion. Mol/ Pharmaceutics 2017, 14, 1501-1516; DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00995 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Li et al. 2019. Evaluation and use of an anti-cynomolgus monkey CD79b surrogate antibody-drug conjugate to enable clinical development of polatuzumab vedotin. Br J Pharmacol. 2019; 176: 3805-3818. https://doi.org/10.111… [cited by examiner]
Abdiche et al., “Exploring blocking assays using Octet, ProteOn, and Biacore biosensors”, Anal Biochem., Mar. 2009, 386(2):172-180. [cited by applicant]
Amini, “Hospital Adminstration Routine,” Sanqin Publishing House, 2013, pp. 397-398. [cited by applicant]
Bonvin et al., “De novo isolation of antibodies with pH-dependent binding properties,” MABS, Mar. 11, 2015, 7(2):294-302. [cited by applicant]
Borrok et al., “pH-dependent Binding Engineering Reveals an FcRn Affinity Threshold That Governs IgG Recycling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, Feb. 13, 2015, 290(7):4282-4290. [cited by applicant]
BroadInstitute.Org [online], “Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia”, available on or before Jul. 2016, retrieved on Mar. 29, 2022, retrieved from URL <https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle>, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Carter et al., “Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Cancer Therapy”, Cancer J., May 2008, 14(3):154-169. [cited by applicant]
Catcott et al., “Microscale screening of antibody libraries as maytansinoid antibody-drug conjugates”, mAbs, 2016 8(3):513-523. [cited by applicant]
Chandna, “Single-Cell Gel Electrophoresis Assay Monitors Precise Kinetics of DNA Fragmentation Induced During Programmed Cell Death”, Cytometry, 2004, 61A:127-133. [cited by applicant]
Chari, “Targeted Cancer Therapy: Conferring Specificity to Cytotoxic Drugs”, Acc. Chem. Res., Jan. 2008, 41(1):98-107. [cited by applicant]
Cromie et al., “Nanobodies and their use in GPCR drug discovery”, Curr. Top. Med. Chem., 2015, 15(24):2543-2557. [cited by applicant]
Dall et al., “Increasing the Affinity of a Human IgG1 for the Neonatal Fc Receptor: Biological Consequences”, J Immunol., 2002, 169:5171-5180. [cited by applicant]
De Genst et al., “Antibody repertoire development in camelids”, Dev. Comp.Immunol., 2006, 30(1-2):187-198. [cited by applicant]
De Meyer et al., “Nanobody-based products as research and diagnostic tools”, Trends Biotechnol., May 2014, 32(5):263-270. [cited by applicant]
DiGiammarino et al., “Design and generation of DVD-Ig™ molecules for dual-specific targeting”, Methods Mol. Biol., 2012, 899:145-156. [cited by applicant]
Fischer et al., “The assay design used for measurement of therapeutic antibody concentrations can affect pharmacokinetic parameters”, mAbs, 2012, 4(5):623-631. [cited by applicant]
Fujita et al., “A Novel Non-Agonist c-Met Antibody Drug Conjugate with Superior Potency Over a c-Met Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in c-Met Amplified and Non-Amplified Cancers”, Cancer Biol. Ther., 2002, 21(6):549-559. [cited by applicant]
Garber, “Bispecific antibodies rise again”, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., Nov. 2014, 13:799-801. [cited by applicant]
Gera et al., “Design of pH Sensitive Binding Proteins from the Hyperthermophilic Sso7d Scaffold”, PLoS One, Nov. 2012, 7(11):e48928. [cited by applicant]
Gupta et al., “Preclinical pharmacokinetics of MHAA4549A, a human monoclonal antibody to influenza A virus, and the prediction of its efficacious clinical dose for the treatment of patients hospitalized with influenza A… [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “Assessment of Histone H2AX Phosphorylation Induced by DNA Topoisomerase I and II Inhibitors Topotecan and Mitoxantrone and by the DNA Cross-Linking Agent Cisplatin”, Cytometry Part A., 2004, 58A:99-110. [cited by applicant]
Igawa et al., “pH-dependent antigen-binding antibodies as a novel therapeutic modality,” Proteomics, , 2014, 1844(11):1943-1950. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Appln. No. PCT/US2020/044263, dated Feb. 10, 2022, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2022/015116, dated Jun. 30, 2022, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2020/044263, dated Dec. 23, 2020, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in International Appln. No. PCT/US2020/044263, dated Oct. 30, 2020, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in International Appln. No. PCT/US2022/015116, May 9, 2022, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jakob et al., “Structure reveals function of the dual variable domain immunoglobulin (DVD-Ig™) molecule”, mAbs, 2013, 5(3):358-363. [cited by applicant]
Jamur et al., “Permeabilization of cell membranes”, Methods Mol Biol., 2010, 588:63-66. [cited by applicant]
Kijanka et al., “Nanobody-based cancer therapy of solid tumors”, Nanomedicine, 2015, 10:161-174. [cited by applicant]
Kovaleva et al., “Shark variable new antigen receptor biologics—a novel technology platform for therapeutic drug development”, Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther., 2014, 14(10):1527-1539. [cited by applicant]
Krah et al., “Single-domain antibodies for biomedical applications”, Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol., 2016, 38:21-28. [cited by applicant]
Labrijn et al., “Controlled Fab-arm exchange for the generation of stable bispecific IgG1”, Nature Protcols, 2014, 9(10):2450-2463. [cited by applicant]
Lefranc, “The IMGT unique numbering for Immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and Ig-like domains”, Immunologist, Jul. 1999, 7(4):132-136. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A Biparatopic HER2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Induces Tumor Regression in Primary Models Refractory to or Ineligible for HER2-Targeted Therapy”, Jan. 2016, Cancer Cell 29:117-29. [cited by applicant]
Lu et al., “Linkers Having a Crucial Role in Antibody-Drug Conjugates”, Int. J. Mol. Sci., Apr. 2016, 17(4):561, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mahmutefendic et al., “Segregation of open Major Histocompatibility Class I conformers at the plasma membrane and during endosomal trafficking reveals conformation-based sorting in the endosomal system”, Int. J. Biochem… [cited by applicant]
McCombs et al., “Antibody drug conjugates: design and selection of linker, payload and conjugation chemistry”, Aaps J., Mar. 2015, 17(2):339-351. [cited by applicant]
Mendoza et al., “Inhibition of Ligand-mediated HER2 Activation in Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer”, Cancer Res., Oct. 2002, 62:5485-5488. [cited by applicant]
Mujic-Delic et al., “GPCR-targeting nanobodies: attractive research tools, diagnostics, and therapeutics”, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., May 2014, 35(5):247-255. [cited by applicant]
Muyldermans et al., “Recognition of antigens by single-domain antibody fragments: the superfluous luxury of paired domains”, Trends Biochem. Sci., Apr. 2001, 26(4):230-235. [cited by applicant]
Muyldermans, “Nanobodies: Natural Single-Domain Antibodies”, Annu. Rev. Biochem., Jun. 2013, 82:775-797. [cited by applicant]
Muyldermans, “Single domain camel antibodies: current status”, Rev. Mol. Biotechnol., 2001, 74:277-302. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Chinese Appln. No. 114746123, mailed on Oct. 31, 2023, 85 pages (with Machine translation). [cited by applicant]
Oflazoglu et al., “Potent Anticarcinoma Activity of the Humanized Anti-CD70 Antibody h1F6 Conjugated to the Tubulin Inhibitor Auristatin via an Uncleavable Linker”, Clin. Cancer Res., 2008, 14(19): 6171-6180. [cited by applicant]
Promega Corporation, “CellTiter-Glo™ Luminescent Cell Viability Assay,” Technical Bulletin #TB288, revised Mar. 2015, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rahbarizadeh et al., “Nanobody; an Old Concept and New Vehicle for Immunotargeting”, Immunol. Invest., 2011, 40:299-338. [cited by applicant]
Sanderson et al., “In vivo Drug-Linker Stability of an Anti-CD30 Dipeptide-Linked Auristatin Immunoconjugate”, Clin. Cancer Res., Jan. 2005, 11(2 Pt1):843-852. [cited by applicant]
Schneider et al., “Quantification of human Alu sequences by real-time PCR—an improved method to measure therapeutic efficacy of anti-metastatic drugs in human xenotransplants”, Clin. Exp. Metas., 2002, 19:571-582. [cited by applicant]
Singh et al., “Measurement and Mathematical Characterization of Cell-Level Pharmacokinetics of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Case Study with Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE”, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, 2017, 45(11):1120-1132. [cited by applicant]
Sorkin et al., “Quantitative analysis of endocytosis and turnover of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and EGF receptor”, Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol., Mar. 2010, Chapter 15, Unit-15.14. [cited by applicant]
Spiess et al., “Alternative molecular formats and therapeutic applications of bispecific antibodies”, Mol. Immunol., 2015, 67(2 Pt A):95-106. [cited by applicant]
Tiberghien et al., “Design and Synthesis of Tesirine, a Clinical Antibody-Drug Conjugate Pyrrolobenzodiazepine Dimer Payload”, ACS Med Chem Lett, Nov. 2016, 7(11):983-987. [cited by applicant]
Tillotson et al., “Engineering an Anti-Transferrin Receptor ScFv for pH-Sensitive Binding Leads to Increased Intracellular Accumulation,” Plos One, Dec. 29, 2015, 10(12): e0145820. [cited by applicant]
Vainshtein et al., “Quantitative Measurement of the Target-Mediated Internalization Kinetics of Biopharmaceuticals”, Pharm Res., 2015, 32:286-299. [cited by applicant]
Van Audenhove et al., “Nanobodies as Versatile Tools to Understand, Diagnose, Visualize and Treat Cancer”, EBioMedicine, Jun. 2016, 8:40-48. [cited by applicant]
Van Bockstaele et al., “The development of nanobodies for therapeutic applications”, Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs, 2009, 10(11):1212-1224. [cited by applicant]
Vincke et al., “Introduction to heavy chain antibodies and derived Nanobodies”, Methods Mol. Biol., 2012, 911:15-26. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “ABBV-399, a c-Met Antibody—Drug Conjugate that Targets Both MET-Amplified and c-Met-Overexpressing Tumors, Irrespective of MET Pathway Dependence”, Clin Cancer Res, Feb. 2017, 23(4):992-1000. [cited by applicant]
Wesolowski et al., “Single domain antibodies: promising experimental and therapeutic tools in infection and immunity”, Med. Microbiol. Immunol., Aug. 2009, 198(3):157-174. [cited by applicant]
Wiley et al., “The Role of Tyrosine Kinase Activity in Endocytosis, Compartmentation, and Down-regulation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor”, J. Biol. Chem., 1991, 266(17):11083-11094. [cited by applicant]
Wustner, “Steady State Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Model for Hepatic High-Density Lipoprotein Transport”, Traffic, 2006, 7(6):699-715. [cited by applicant]
Awad, “Impaired c-Met Receptor Degradation Mediated by MET Exon 14 Mutations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, Mar. 10, 2016, 34(8):879-881. [cited by applicant]
Cappuzzo et al., “Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 4, 2005, 97(9):643-655. [cited by applicant]
Castañeda-González et al., “Multiple mutations in the EGFR gene in lung cancer: a systematic review,” Translational Lung Cancer Research, Oct. 2022, 11(10):2148-2163. [cited by applicant]
Chang et al., “Whole-Body Pharmacokinetics and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE),” Journal of Clinical Medicine, Mar. 23, 2021, 10(6):1332, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chon et al., “FDA Approval Summary: Amivantamab for the Treatment of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations, ” Clinical Cancer Research, Sep. 1, 2003, 29(17):3262-3266. [cited by applicant]
Coleman et al., “Antibody-drug conjugates in lung cancer: dawn of a new era?, ” NPJ Precision Oncology, Jan. 2023, 7(5):1-12. [cited by applicant]
De George et al., “Guidance for Industry: S9 Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer Pharmaceuticals,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Mar. 2010, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “MET-Targeted Therapies and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review,” Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, Mar. 10, 2022, 26(2):203-227. [cited by applicant]
Doronina et al., “Novel peptide linkers for highly potent antibody-auristatin conjugate,” Bioconjugate chemistry, Oct. 15, 2008, 19(10):1960-3. [cited by applicant]
Dubowchik et al., “Cathepsin B-sensitive dipeptide prodrugs. 1. A model study of structural requirements for efficient release of doxorubicin, ” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Dec. 1, 1998, 8(23):3341-3346. [cited by applicant]
Fernandes et al., “When the MET receptor kicks in to resist targeted therapies,” Oncogene, Jun. 2021, 40(24):4061-4078. [cited by applicant]
Fisher Jr., “Considerations for the Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Antibody-Drug Conjugates,” Antibodies, Apr. 19, 2021, 10(2):15. [cited by applicant]
Francisco et al., “cAC10-vcMMAE, an anti-CD30-monomethyl auristatin E conjugate with potent and selective antitumor activity,” Aug. 15, 2003, Blood, 102(4):1458-1465. [cited by applicant]
Fujino et al., “Lung Cancer with MET exon 14 Skipping Mutation: Genetic Feature, Current Treatments, and Future Challenges,” Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, May 20, 2021, 35-50. [cited by applicant]
Gera et al., “Abstract 5000: MYTX:011: A novel cMET_targeting antibody drug conjugate (ADC) engineered to increase on-target uptake in and efficacy against cMET expressing tumors,” Poster, Presented for the American Ass… [cited by applicant]
Gymnopoulos et al., “TR1801-ADC: a highly potent cMet antibody-drug conjugate with high activity in patient-derived xenograft models of solid tumors,” Molecular Oncology, Dec. 3, 2019, 14(1):54-68. [cited by applicant]
Han et al., “CYP3A-mediated drug-drug interaction potential and excretion of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with CD30-positive hematologic malignancies,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, A… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2023/083354, mailed on Mar. 20, 2024, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jackman et al., “Exon 19 Deletion Mutations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Are Associated with Prolonged Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Gefitinib or Erlotinib,” Clinical Cancer Researc… [cited by applicant]
Junutula et al., “Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index,” Nature biotechnology, Aug. 2008, 26(8):925-932. [cited by applicant]
Kinoshita et al., “Safety and pharmacokinetics of polatuzumab vedotin in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation study,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, J… [cited by applicant]
Koeppen et al., “Biomarker Analyses from a Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study Evaluating Erlotinib + Onartuzumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: MET Expression Levels Are Predictive of Patient Benefit,” Clinical … [cited by applicant]
Kontermann et al., “Bispecific antibodies,” Drug Discovery Today, Jul. 2015, 20(7):838-847. [cited by applicant]
Lai et al., “Preclinical Evaluation of a New, Non-Agonist ADC Targeting MET-Amplified Tumors with a Peptide-linked Maytansinoid,” Poster, AACR Annual Meeting, Mar. 29-Apr. 3, 2019, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein express and gene copy number and impact on outcome,” British Journal of Cancer, Jul. 2012, 107(2):325-333. [cited by applicant]
Lv et al., “Soluble c-Met is a Reliable and Sensitive Marker to Detect c-Met Expression Level in Lung Cancer,” BioMed Research International, Jan. 1, 2015, 2015(626578):1-9. [cited by applicant]
Okamoto et al., “Pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel anti-HER2 Adc, in HER2-positive tumor-bearing mice,” Xenobiotica, Oct. 2, 2020, 50(10):1242-1250. [cited by applicant]
Park et al., “MET amplification, protein expression, and mutations in pulmonary adenocarcinoma,” Lung Cancer, Dec. 2015, 90(3):381-387. [cited by applicant]
Pastuskovas et al., “Tissue distribution, metabolism, and excretion of the antibody-drug conjugate Herceptin-monomethyl auristatin E in rats,” Cancer Res, May 1, 2005, 65(9 Supplement):1195-6, 1 page (abstract only). [cited by applicant]
Resnick et al., “Epidermal growth factor receptor, cMET, B-catenin, and p53 expression as prognostic indicators in stage II colon cancer: a tissue microarray study,” Clinical Cancer Research, May 2004, 10(9):3069-3075. [cited by applicant]
Saber et al., “An FDA oncology analysis of antibody-drug conjugates,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Apr. 2015, 71(3):444-52. [cited by applicant]
Salgia, “MET in Lung Cancer: Biomarker Selection Based on Scientific Rationale,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Apr. 2017, 16(4):555-565. [cited by applicant]
Scagliotti et al., “A Randomized-Controlled Phase 2 Study of the MET Antibody Emibetuzumab in Combination with Erlotinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC Patients,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, … [cited by applicant]
Shen et al., “Conjugation site modulates the in vivo stability and therapeutic activity of antibody-drug conjugates,” Nature Biotechnology, Feb. 2012, 30(2):184-189. [cited by applicant]
Sierra Jr. et al., “c-MET as a potential therapeutic target and biomarker in cancer,” Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, Nov. 2011, 3(1 Suppl):S21-35. [cited by applicant]
Spigel et al., “Randomized Phase II trial of onartuzumab in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, Nov. 2013, 31(32):4105-4114. [cited by applicant]
Strickler et al., “Phase 1 dose-escalation and -expansion study of telisotuzumab (ABT-700), an Anti-c-met antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors,” Molecular cancer therapeutics, May 2020, 19(5):1210-1217. [cited by applicant]
Takahashi et al., “A phase I study of enfortumab vedotin in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma,” Investigational new drugs, Aug. 2020, 38:1056-1066. [cited by applicant]
Toki et al., “Protease-mediated fragmentation of p-amidobenzyl ethers: a new strategy for the activation of anticancer prodrugs,” The Journal of organic chemistry, Mar. 22, 2002, 67(6):1866-72. [cited by applicant]
Walker et al., “Monoclonal antibody mediated intracellular targeting of tallysomycin S10b,” Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug. 16, 2004, 14(16):4323-7. [cited by applicant]
Walker et al., “Synthesis of an immunoconjugate of camptothecin,” Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan. 2002, 12(2):217-219. [cited by applicant]
Wolf et al., “Capmatinib in MET Exon 14-Mutated or MET-Amplified Non-Small- Cell Lung Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, Sep. 2020, 383(10):944-957. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “SHR-A1403, a novel c-Met antibody-drug conjugate, exerts encouraging anti-tumor activity in c-Met-overexpressing models,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, Jan. 14, 2019, 40(7):971-979. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and concurrent exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutations: A case report and review of the literature,” Oncol Lett. May 201… [cited by applicant]
Yuan et al., “Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials,” Clinical Cancer Research, Jul. 2016, 22(17):4291-4301. [cited by applicant]
Zalevsky et al., “Enhanced antibody half-life improves in vivo activity,” Nature biotechnology, Feb. 2010, 28(2):157-9. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “An engineered human Fc domain that behaves like a pH-toggle switch for ultra-long circulation persistence,” Nature Communications, Nov. 6, 2019, 10(1):5031, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Majumdar et al., “Correlations between changes in conformational dynamics and physical stability in a mutant IgG1 mAb engineered for extended serum half-life,” Mabs, Jan. 2, 2015, 7(1);84-95, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]