IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,408,891
Granted Patent B2
US 12,408,891 · App. 18/516,835 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Systems and methods for interventional procedure planning

Inventors: Caitlin Q. Donhowe (Mountain View, CA); Prashant Chopra (Foster City, CA); Dorin Panescu (San Jose, CA); Carol Reiley (Mountain View, CA); Tao Zhao (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
A61B8/12A61B8/0841A61B8/085A61B8/4263A61B10/04A61B17/00234A61B34/10A61B5/0066A61B5/065A61B8/4245A61B2034/102A61B2034/107A61B2034/2051A61B2090/364
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,408,891
App. No.
18/516,835
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for performing an interventional procedure includes an interventional instrument and a control system. The control system includes a processor and a memory comprising machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the control system to: receive a model of an anatomic structure, the anatomic structure including a plurality of passageways; identify a target structure in the model; identify a planned deployment location for positioning a distal tip of the interventional instrument to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure; determine whether an angle of approach of the distal tip relative to a passageway wall of a passageway of the plurality of passageways at the planned deployment location is acceptable; and navigate the interventional instrument, via computer control or based on user input, to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure.

Claims (48)

1. A system for performing an interventional procedure, the system comprising:

an interventional instrument; and

a control system comprising one or more processors and memory comprising machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to:

receive a model of an anatomic structure, the anatomic structure including a plurality of passageways;

identify a target structure in the model;

identify a planned deployment location for positioning a distal tip of the interventional instrument to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure;

determine whether an angle of approach of the distal tip relative to a passageway wall of a passageway of the plurality of passageways at the planned deployment location is acceptable;

receive pose information for at least a distal portion of the interventional instrument from a sensor system, the pose information being in an interventional instrument reference frame;

register the interventional instrument reference frame to a model reference frame of the model;

register the interventional instrument reference frame to a patient reference frame of the anatomic structure;

navigate, via computer control or based on user input, the interventional instrument to the planned deployment location and the determined acceptable angle based on the pose information from the sensor system to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure; and

perform the interventional procedure on the target structure.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the angle of approach is acceptable comprises comparing the angle of approach to a minimum approach angle selected to prevent deflection of the interventional instrument by the passageway wall.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the control system to:

receive information about a bending capability of the interventional instrument; and

determine a maximum approach angle based at least in part on the bending capability of the interventional instrument.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the interventional instrument comprises a catheter and a needle.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the bending capability of the interventional instrument comprises a flexibility of at least a portion of the catheter.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the bending capability of the interventional instrument comprises a shape characteristic of the needle.

7. The system of claim 3 , wherein the machine-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to determine the maximum approach angle further based on anatomical information about the passageway.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the anatomical information about the passageway comprises a diameter of the passageway.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the anatomical information about the passageway comprises an elasticity of the passageway.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to identify the planned deployment location based on a user input and further cause the system to:

issue a feedback cue indicating the planned deployment location is objectionable.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the machine-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to determine the planned deployment location is objectionable based on a determination that the angle of approach exceeds a maximum approach angle.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to automatically identify the planned deployment location based at least in part on the angle of approach at the planned deployment location being acceptable.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the machine-readable instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the system to:

receive a user input indicating a user-selected deployment location; and

determine whether an angle of approach of the distal tip relative to the passageway wall of the passageway at the user-selected deployment location is acceptable.

14. A method of planning an interventional procedure, the method comprising:

receiving a model of an anatomic structure, the anatomic structure including a plurality of passageways;

identifying a target structure in the model;

identifying a planned deployment location for positioning a distal tip of an interventional instrument to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure;

determining whether an angle of approach of the distal tip relative to a passageway wall of a passageway of the plurality of passageways at the planned deployment location is acceptable;

receiving pose information for at least a distal portion of the interventional instrument from a sensor system, the pose information being in an interventional instrument reference frame;

registering the interventional instrument reference frame to a model reference frame of the model;

registering the interventional instrument reference frame to a patient reference frame of the anatomic structure;

navigating, via computer control or based on user input, the interventional instrument to the planned deployment location and the determined acceptable angle based on the pose information from the sensor system to perform the interventional procedure on the target structure; and

performing the interventional procedure on the target structure.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein determining whether the angle of approach is acceptable comprises comparing the angle of approach to a minimum approach angle selected to prevent deflection of the interventional instrument by the passageway wall.

16. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

receiving information about a bending capability of the interventional instrument; and

determining a maximum approach angle based at least in part on the bending capability of the interventional instrument.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the interventional instrument comprises a catheter and a needle.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the maximum approach angle is further based on anatomical information about the passageway.

19. The method of claim 14 , wherein identifying the planned deployment location comprises receiving a user input selecting the planned deployment location and wherein the method further comprises:

issuing a feedback cue indicating the planned deployment location is objectionable.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the planned deployment location is determined to be objectionable based on a determination that the angle of approach exceeds a maximum approach angle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2023
From: DONHOWE, CAITLIN Q.; CHOPRA, PRASHANT; REILEY, CAROL; ZHAO, TAO; PANESCU, DORIN
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 065891/0234 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17867212 · Jul 18, 2022
Continuation 16751797 · Jan 24, 2020
Continuation 16247057 · Jan 14, 2019
Continuation 14144232 · Dec 30, 2013
Provisional Application 61747920 · Dec 31, 2012
Related Publication 20240081775A1 · Mar 14, 2024
References Cited (129)
US 5740808A · Panescu et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5999837A · Messner et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6083170A · Ben-Haim · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6380732B1 · Gilboa · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6389187B1 · Greenaway et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6468265B1 · Evans et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7206462B1 · Betke et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7506650B2 · Lowe et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7725214B2 · Diolaiti · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7772541B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7781724B2 · Childers et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7930065B2 · Larkin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8062212B2 · Belson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8226546B2 · Belson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8248414B2 · Gattani et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8303505B2 · Webler et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8317746B2 · Sewell et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8361090B2 · Belson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8398541B2 · Dimaio et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8517923B2 · Belson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8611983B2 · Glossop et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9289268B2 · Ramraj et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10582909B2 · Donhowe et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10588597B2 · Zhao et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11426141B2 · Donhowe et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020077544A1 · Shahidi · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020115941A1 · Whayne et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020133057A1 · Kukuk · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030085890A1 · Baumberg et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030093067A1 · Panescu · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030163142A1 · Paltieli et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040068187A1 · Krause et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040254458A1 · Govari · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050020901A1 · Belson · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050182295A1 · Soper et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050182319A1 · Glossop · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060013523A1 · Childlers et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060025677A1 · Verard et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060239544A1 · Yankelevitz et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070237373A1 · Kiraly et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070249911A1 · Simon · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070293734A1 · Coste-Maniere · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080082109A1 · Moll et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080123922A1 · Gielen et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080255505A1 · Carlson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080287803A1 · Li et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080287805A1 · Li · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080294034A1 · Krueger et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090062813A1 · Prisco et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090088632A1 · Khamene et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090156895A1 · Higgins et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090163810A1 · Kanade et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090171184A1 · Jenkins et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090227861A1 · Ganatra et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090262980A1 · Markowitz et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090268010A1 · Zhao et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100249506A1 · Prisco · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110112569A1 · Friedman et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110207997A1 · Greenburg et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110282140A1 · Itkowitz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120004533A1 · Peng et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120035438A1 · Ferren et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120059378A1 · Farrell · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120065481A1 · Hunter et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120078080A1 · Foley et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120190981A1 · Harris et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120203067A1 · Higgins et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120289776A1 · Keast et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120289777A1 · Chopra et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120289843A1 · Chopra et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120296620A1 · Aulbach · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120327204A1 · Friedman et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120330622A1 · Butson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130030408A1 · Piferi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130085774A1 · Chen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130165915A1 · Thiel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130303876A1 · Gelfand et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140188440A1 · Donhowe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150094914A1 · Abreu · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150173619A1 · Zvuloni et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150221105A1 · Tripathi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150347682A1 · Chen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170132812A1 · Tripathi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200214664A1 · Zhao et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220346751A1 · Donhowe et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 1986015A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 101375805A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 101420898A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 100515332C · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 101862205A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 102186404A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 102406517A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102481115A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102740755A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102740791A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
DE 202005016721U1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
DE 102007009016A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 1481637A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
EP 1779802A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2238901A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
EP 2377457A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009542374A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010540021A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011525827A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012510332A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005072445A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005082246A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006124388A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009023801A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010049834A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010064154A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010078009A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011057157A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012158324A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014106253A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Hanna et al. Influence of the Optical Axis-To-Target View Angle on Endoscopic Task Performance University of Dundee Tayside DD1 9SY, Scholand, Jul. 1998 (Year: 1998). [cited by examiner]
Striegel et al. Determining Scope Position During Colonoscopy Without Use of Ionizing Radiation or Magnetic Imaging: the Enhance Mapping Ability of the NeoGuide Endoscopy System Surg Endose (2011) 25:636-640 (Year: 2010… [cited by examiner]
Dagon, B. et al., “Real-Time Update of 3D Deformable Models for Computer Aided Liver Surgery,” IEEE, 2008, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13867391.8, mailed on Jul. 22, 2016, 7 pages (ISRG05240/EP). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 13868283.6, mailed on Jul. 26, 2016, 7 pages (ISRG04870/EP). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 18188100.4, mailed on Nov. 13, 2018, 8 pages (ISRG04870D1/EP). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US13/78497, mailed on Apr. 28, 2014, 14 pages (ISRG05240/PCT). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US13/78508, mailed on Apr. 3, 2014, 15 pages (ISRG04870/PCT). [cited by applicant]
Linte, C.A. et al., “Evaluation of Model-Enhanced Ultrasound-Assisted Interventional Guidance in a Cardiac Phantom,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Sep. 2010, vol. 57 (9), pp. 2209-2218. [cited by applicant]
Office Action mailed Dec. 28, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201380068398.6 filed Dec. 31, 2013, 18 pages (IGRG04870/CN). [cited by applicant]
Tovar-Arriaga S., et al., “A Fully Sensorized Cooperative Robotic System for Surgical Interventions Sensors,” Sensors (Basel), Jul. 9, 2012, vol. 12 (7), pp. 9423-9447. [cited by applicant]
Vertut, J., and Coiffet, P., “Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development,” English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wen R., et al., “Robot-Assisted RF Ablation with Interactive Planning and Mixed Reality Guidance,” IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration, 2012, pp. 31-36. [cited by applicant]
Yaniv Z., et al., “Needle-Based Interventions With the Image-Guided Surgery Toolkit (IGSTK): From Phantoms to Clinical Trials,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2010, vol. 57 (4), pp. 922-933. [cited by applicant]