IP Library Granted Patent US 12,229,684
Granted Patent B2
US 12,229,684 · App. 18/534,481 · Granted Feb 18, 2025

Claim analysis with deep learning

Inventors: Byung-Hak Kim (San Jose, CA); Hariraam Varun Ganapathi (San Francisco, CA); Andrew Atwal (Foster City, CA)
Assignee: AKASA, Inc.
G06N3/084G06F17/18G06F18/24G06N3/08G06Q40/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,229,684
App. No.
18/534,481
Granted
Feb 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments relate to system for automatically predicting payer response to claims. In an embodiment, the system receives claim data associated with a claim. The system identifies a set of claim features of the claim data, and generates an input vector with at least a portion of the set of claim features. The system applies the input vector to a trained model. A first portion of the neural network is configured to generate an embedding representing the input vector with a lower dimensionality than the input vector. A second portion of the neural network is configured to generate a prediction of whether the claim will be denied based on the embedding. The system provides the prediction for display on a user interface of a user device. The prediction may further include denial reason codes and a response date estimation to indicate if, when, and why a claim will be denied.

Claims (17)

1. A method comprising: training a first portion of one or more neural networks implemented on computer, the first portion of the one or more neural networks to generate an embedding based on a first vector of claim features, the first vector comprising at least features of a claim, the embedding comprising a second vector having a lower dimensionality than the first vector, the second vector comprising at least a first sub-vector to express one or more diagnosis tokens and a second sub-vector to express one or more procedure tokens; and

training a second portion of one or more neural networks to generate a prediction of a payer's response to the claim based, at least in part, on the embedding, the prediction of the payer's response to the claim comprising at least a likelihood that the claim would be denied,

wherein training the first portion of the one or more neural networks and training the second portion of the one or more neural networks comprises determining weights for the first and second portions of the one or more neural networks based, at least in part, on a computed prediction of payer's response and a label representing a payer's response.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the prediction of the payer's response to the claim further comprises an indication of a response date estimate or a reason for denial, or a combination thereof.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first vector comprises an indication of one or more procedures performed and one or more diagnoses received.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the first vector further comprises an indication of patient gender, payer state, total charges, service date, payer identifier, individual relationship code or duration of service, or a combination thereof.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a length of the first sub-vector is based, at least in part, on a number of possible diagnoses and a length of the second sub-vector is based, at least in part, on a number of possible procedures.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second vector represents demographic information as binary values, and represents procedures and diagnoses as numeric values.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generated prediction of the payer's response further comprises one or more suspiciousness scores to express a contribution of one or more of the claim features on a denial prediction.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the one or more suspiciousness scores are computed based, at least in part, on magnitudes of gradients of prediction scores for values of the features of the claim.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein at least one of the one or more suspiciousness scores reflect an impact of individual features on a prediction of a claim denial.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein training the first portion of the one or more neural networks and training the second portion of the one or more neural networks further comprises training a machine-learning model according to a loss function, the loss function being based, at least in part, on a binary cross-entropy loss for a denial probability prediction, a categorical cross-entropy loss for a set of service-level denial reason code classifications or a categorical cross-entropy loss for a set of claim-level denial reason code classifications, or a combination thereof.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second portion of one or more neural networks to generate the prediction of a payer's response based, at least in part, on a first reason code sequence, a second reason code sequence and a response date estimation, wherein the first reason code sequence includes likelihood scores for claim-level reason codes in a set of claim-level reason codes, and wherein the second reason code sequence includes likelihood scores for service-level reason codes in a set of service-level reason codes.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more neural networks comprises:

a first set of task-specific output layers to generate the first reason code sequence,

a second set of task-specific output layers to generate the second reason code sequence, and

a third set of task-specific layers to generate the response date estimation.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 11, 2023
From: KIM, BYUNG-HAK; GANAPATHI, HARIRAM VARUN; ATWAL, ANDREW
To: ALPHA HEALTH, INC
Reel/Frame 065833/0548 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 11, 2023
From: ALPHA HEALTH, INC
To: AKASA, INC.
Reel/Frame 065865/0904 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17362820 · Jun 29, 2021
Continuation 16818899 · Mar 13, 2020
Provisional Application 62951934 · Dec 20, 2019
Related Publication 20240193425A1 · Jun 13, 2024
References Cited (54)
US 10268676B1 · Meisner · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11043293B1 · Salzbrenner · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20040162813A1 · Hollingsworth · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20160267396A1 · Gray et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323389A1 · Vavrasek · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190258640A1 · Clarkson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190392257A1 · Foley · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200175314A1 · Fang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210105619A1 · Kashani et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Abdullah, et al, “Comparative Study of Medical Claim Scrubber and a Rule Based System,” https://www.academia.edu/7557098/Comparative_Study_of_Medical_Claim_Scrubber_And_A_Rule_Based_System, Dec. 2009, 5 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Anand, et al, “A Data Mining Framework for Identifying Claim Overpayments for the Health Insurance Industry,” Proceedings of the 3rd Informs Workshop on Data Mining and Health Informatics (DM-HI 2008), Oct. 2008, 7 Page… [cited by applicant]
Bai, et al, “Medical Concept Representation Learning from Multi-source Data,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19), Jul. 2019, 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Barkholz, “Insurance claim denial cost hospitals $262 billion annually,” Modern Healthcare, Jun. 27, 2017, retrieved online on Jun. 26, 2020, https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20170627/NEWS/170629905/insurance-cl… [cited by applicant]
Bradley, et al, “turning hospital data into dollars,” Healthcare Financial Management, Feb. 2010, vol. 64, No. 2, 5 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Carroll, “More than a third of U.S. healthcare costs go to bureaucracy,” Reuters, Health News, Jan. 6, 2020, retrieved online Jun. 26, 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-costs-administration-idUSKBN1Z5261, … [cited by applicant]
Chimmad, et al, “Assessment of Healthcare Claims Rejection Risk Using Machine Learning,” IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Health Networking Applications and Services (Healthcom), Oct. 2017, 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Cho, et al, “Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation,” Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Oct. 25-29, 20… [cited by applicant]
Choi, et al, “MiME: Multilevel Medical Embedding of Electronic Health Records for Predictive Healthcare,” 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2018), Dec. 2018, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Choi, et al, “Learning Low-Dimensional Representations of Medical Concepts,” 2016 AMIA Joint Summits on Translation Science, Jul. 2016, San Francisco, CA, 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Ghani, et al, “Interactive Learning for Efficiently Detecting Errors in Insurance Claims,” KDD 'II, Aug. 21-24, 2011, ACM 978-1-4503-0813-7/11/08, 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
HCPRO, “Report: Front-end revenue cycle processes leading cause of denials,” Medicare Web, https://revenuecycleadvisor.com/news-analysis/report-front-end-revenue-cycle-processes-leading-cause-denials, Oct. 25, 2017, 2 P… [cited by applicant]
Ioffe, et al, “Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift,” In 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '15), Jul. 2015, Lille, France, 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Kim, et al, “Handmard Product for Low-Rank Bilinear Pooling,” In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2017), Apr. 2017, Toulon, France, 14 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Kingma, et al, “ADAM: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Adam%3A-A-Method-for-Stochastic-Optimization-Kingma-Ba/a6cb366736791bcccc5c8639de5a8f9636bf87e8, Published as a conferen… [cited by applicant]
Kumar, et al, “Data Mining to Predict and Prevent Errors in Health Insurance Claims Processing,” In 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2010), Jul. 2010, Washington DC, U… [cited by applicant]
Miotto, et al, “Deep Patient: An Unsupervised Representation to Predict the Future of Patients from the Electronic Health Records,” Scientific Reports, May 2016, 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Nair, et al, “Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines,” In 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML '10), Jun. 2010, Haifa, Israel, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Hochreiter, et al, “Long Short-Term Memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, No. 8, Nov. 15, 1997, 49 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Pecci, “A Nuts-And-Bolts Guide to AI,” HealthLeaders, Jan. 8, 2020, retrieved on Jul. 8, 2020, https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/finance/nuts-and-bolts-guide-ai, 5 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Pecci, “Not up on Robotic Process Automation for the Rev Cycle? Time to Pay Attention,” HealthLeaders, Sep. 25, 2019, retrieved on Jul. 8, 2020, https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/finance/not-robotic-process-automation-… [cited by applicant]
Rajkomar, et al, “Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records, ”Digital Medicine, vol. 1 No. 18, May 2018, 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Medicare Web, “Front-end revenue cycle processes leading cause of denials,” Oct. 25, 2017, retrieved Jul. 10, 2020, https://revenuecycleadvisor.com/news-analysis/report-front-end-revenue-cycle-processes-leading-cause-de… [cited by applicant]
Saito, et al, “The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets,” PLOSE ONE, DOI: 10.1371, journal.pone, 0118432, Mar. 4, 2015, 21 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Shrank, et al, “Waste in the US Health Care System Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings,” JAMA, Oct. 2019, vol. 322, No. 15, 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Simonyan, et al, Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps, arXiv: 1312.6034, Dec. 2018, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Tenenbaum, et al, “Separating Style and Content with Bilinear Models,” Neural Computation, Jun. 2000, vol. 12, 37 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Department of Health & Human Services, et al “Understanding the Remittance Advice: A Guide for Medicare Providers, Physicians, Suppliers, and Billers,” Mar. 2006, retrieved online Jul. 22, 2020, https://duckduckgo.com/?… [cited by applicant]
Wojtusiak, et al, “Rule-based Prediction of Medical Claims' Payments,” IEEE 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, Dec. 2011, 6 Pages. [cited by applicant]
X12, https://x12.org/codes/claim-adjustment-reason-codes, May 2019, 1 Page. [cited by applicant]
Zhong, et al, “Medical Concept Representation Learning from Claims Data and Application to Health Plan Payment Risk Adjustment,” arXiv preprint arXiv: 1907.06600, Jul. 2019, 4 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,899, Mailed Jun. 7, 2021, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,899, filed Jul. 29, 2021, 14 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,899, Mailed Jul. 19, 2021, 15 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, PCT/US2020/066254, Mailed May 17, 2021, 53 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hansen, et al, “Neural Check-Worthiness Ranking with Weak Supervision: Finding Sentences for Fact-Checking,” WWW'19 Companion, May 13-17, 2019, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hassan, et al, “ClaimBuster: the First-ever End-to-end Fact-checking System,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 10, No. 12, http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard, Aug. 1, 2017, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fursov, et al, “Sequence embeddings help to identify fraudulent cases in healthcare insurance,” Preprint submitted to Journal of Economics, https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03072, Oct. 9, 2019, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Charpter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty), PCT/US2020/066254, Mailed Jun. 30, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Issue Fee, U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,899, filed Oct. 7, 2021, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/362,820, Mailed Jan. 25, 2023, 32 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/362,820, filed Apr. 25, 2023, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/362,820, Mailed Jun. 1, 2023, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/362,820, Mailed Aug. 16, 20223, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Issue Fee, U.S. Appl. No. 17/362,820, filed Nov. 15, 2023, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]