IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,587,320
Granted Patent B2
US 12,587,320 · App. 18/561,237 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

Distance-based NACK procedures in a vehicular platoon

Inventors: Mohit Narula (San Diego, CA); Kapil Gulati (Belle Mead, NJ); Hui Guo (Beijing, CN)
Assignee: QUALCOMM Incorporated
H04L1/1854H04L1/1864H04L1/1896H04L5/0055
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,587,320
App. No.
18/561,237
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A user equipment (UE), such as a vehicle UE may receive an indication of a change in a formation of a vehicle grouping, such as a platoon, with which the UE is associated, the vehicle grouping including a plurality of vehicles moving as a group based on sidelink communications between members of the group. The UE may determine a distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE based on whether the UE is, as a result of the change in the formation, a primary vehicle in the vehicle grouping or a secondary vehicle that is responsive to one or more primary vehicles in the vehicle grouping, and may operate in accordance with the distance-based feedback procedure.

Claims (70)

1 . A method for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising:

receiving an indication of a change in a formation of a vehicle grouping with which the UE is associated, the vehicle grouping comprising a plurality of vehicles moving as a group based at least in part on sidelink communications between members of the group;

determining a distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE based at least in part on whether the UE is, as a result of the change in the formation, a primary vehicle in the vehicle grouping or a secondary vehicle that is responsive to one or more primary vehicles in the vehicle grouping; and

operating in accordance with the distance-based feedback procedure.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that, as the result of the change in the formation, the UE is the secondary vehicle in the formation.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE comprises:

determining, based at least in part on the UE being the secondary vehicle in the formation, that the distance-based feedback procedure to be used includes deactivation of distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback while the UE is the secondary vehicle.

4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

deactivating the distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback one or more duty cycles of the UE after the UE joins the vehicle grouping.

5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

reactivating the distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback upon determining that the UE is no longer the secondary vehicle in the formation.

6 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

reactivating the distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback one or more duty cycles of the UE before the UE leaves the vehicle grouping.

7 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE comprises:

receiving a second indication from the one or more primary vehicles in the vehicle grouping that the distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE includes deactivation of distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback while the UE is the secondary vehicle.

8 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

receiving a third indication from the one or more primary vehicles in the vehicle grouping that the UE is to reactivate the distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback in connection with the UE no longer being the secondary vehicle in the formation.

9 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE comprises:

determining, based at least in part on the UE being the secondary vehicle in the formation, that the distance-based feedback procedure to be used includes primary vehicle-supported distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback while the UE is the secondary vehicle.

10 . The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

receiving from the primary vehicle, as part of the distance-based feedback procedure, sidelink control information that includes at least one of a negative acknowledgment distance value, a geodesic zone identifier, or a global navigation satellite system coordinate; and

using the at least one of the negative acknowledgment distance value, the geodesic zone identifier, or the global navigation satellite system coordinate as a basis for distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback at the UE.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein using the at least one of the negative acknowledgment distance value, the geodesic zone identifier, or the global navigation satellite system coordinate comprises:

refraining from calculating any of the negative acknowledgment distance value, the geodesic zone identifier, or the global navigation satellite system coordinate while the UE is the secondary vehicle.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein each of the negative acknowledgment distance value, the geodesic zone identifier, or the global navigation satellite system coordinate received from the primary vehicle is representative of the vehicle grouping instead of an individual vehicle.

13 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

using, as the distance-based feedback procedure and based at least in part on the UE being the secondary vehicle in the formation, a primary vehicle-supported distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback while the UE is the secondary vehicle; and

transitioning from the primary vehicle-supported distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback to an updated distance-based feedback procedure to be used, wherein the updated distance-based feedback procedure includes deactivation of distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback while the UE is the secondary vehicle.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the transitioning is based at least in part on an autonomous decision by the UE.

15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the transitioning is based at least in part on an instruction received from the primary vehicle.

16 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that, as the result of the change in the formation, the UE is the primary vehicle in the formation.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE comprises:

determining, based at least in part on the UE being the primary vehicle in the formation, that the distance-based feedback procedure to be used includes activation of distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback for the vehicle grouping while the UE is the primary vehicle.

18 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

transmitting, to one or more secondary vehicles in the vehicle grouping, a second indication deactivating distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback at the one or more secondary vehicles after the one or more secondary vehicles have joined the vehicle grouping.

19 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

transmitting, to one or more secondary vehicles in the vehicle grouping, a second indication activating distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback at the one or more secondary vehicles before the one or more secondary vehicles leave the vehicle grouping.

20 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

transmitting, to a subset of all secondary vehicles in the vehicle grouping, a second indication deactivating distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback at the subset of all secondary vehicles.

21 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

transmitting, to one or more secondary vehicles in the vehicle grouping, a second indication via a sidelink message to deactivate or activate distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback.

22 . The method of claim 21 , wherein the second indication is included within sidelink control information of the sidelink message.

23 . The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE comprises:

determining, based at least in part on the UE being the primary vehicle in the formation, that the distance-based feedback procedure to be used includes assisting one or more secondary vehicles in the vehicle grouping via primary vehicle-supported distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback.

24 . The method of claim 23 , further comprising:

transmitting, to the one or more secondary vehicles, one or more sidelink control parameters for the vehicle grouping, the one or more sidelink control parameters including at least one of a negative acknowledgment distance value, a geodesic zone identifier, or a global navigation satellite system coordinate.

25 . The method of claim 24 , further comprising:

determining a length of the vehicle grouping; and

determining the one or more sidelink control parameters based at least in part on the length of the vehicle grouping.

26 . The method of claim 24 , wherein each of the negative acknowledgment distance value, the geodesic zone identifier, or the global navigation satellite system coordinate received from the primary vehicle is representative of the vehicle grouping instead of an individual vehicle.

27 . An apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising:

a processor;

memory coupled with the processor; and

instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to:

receive an indication of a change in a formation of a vehicle grouping with which the UE is associated, the vehicle grouping comprising a plurality of vehicles moving as a group based at least in part on sidelink communications between members of the group;

determine a distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE based at least in part on whether the UE is, as a result of the change in the formation, a primary vehicle in the vehicle grouping or a secondary vehicle that is responsive to one or more primary vehicles in the vehicle grouping; and

operate in accordance with the distance-based feedback procedure.

28 . The apparatus of claim 27 , wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to:

determine that, as the result of the change in the formation, the UE is the secondary vehicle in the formation; and

determine, based at least in part on the UE being the secondary vehicle in the formation, that the distance-based feedback procedure to be used includes deactivation of distance-based negative acknowledgment feedback while the UE is the secondary vehicle.

29 . An apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising:

means for receiving an indication of a change in a formation of a vehicle grouping with which the UE is associated, the vehicle grouping comprising a plurality of vehicles moving as a group based at least in part on sidelink communications between members of the group;

means for determining a distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE based at least in part on whether the UE is, as a result of the change in the formation, a primary vehicle in the vehicle grouping or a secondary vehicle that is responsive to one or more primary vehicles in the vehicle grouping; and

means for operating in accordance with the distance-based feedback procedure.

30 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing code for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), the code comprising instructions executable by a processor to:

receive an indication of a change in a formation of a vehicle grouping with which the UE is associated, the vehicle grouping comprising a plurality of vehicles moving as a group based at least in part on sidelink communications between members of the group;

determine a distance-based feedback procedure to be used by the UE based at least in part on whether the UE is, as a result of the change in the formation, a primary vehicle in the vehicle grouping or a secondary vehicle that is responsive to one or more primary vehicles in the vehicle grouping; and

operate in accordance with the distance-based feedback procedure.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: NARULA, MOHIT; GULATI, KAPIL; GUO, HUI
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 065617/0853 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240259142A1 · Aug 1, 2024
References Cited (10)
US 20180359072A1 · Tiirola · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200389257A1 · Kung · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210211238A1 · Kung · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 111226408 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2017016889 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020144943A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Interdigital Inc: On Physical Layer Procedures, 3GPP Draft, R1-1813227, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre, 650, Route Des, Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France, Nov. 16, 201… [cited by examiner]
Interdigital Inc: “On Physical Layer Procedures”, 3GPP Draft, R1-1813227, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre, 650, Route Des, Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France, Nov. 16, 2… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/CN2021/107518—ISA/EPO—Jan. 19, 2022. [cited by applicant]
OPPO: “Physical Layer Procedure for NR-V2X,” 3GPP Draft, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #95, R1-1812811, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre, 650, Route Des Lucioles, F-06921, Sophia-Antipolis … [cited by applicant]