IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,676,214
Granted Patent B2
US 12,676,214 · App. 18/585,569 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

Managing patients of knee surgeries

Inventors: Emily Bogue (New South Wales, AU); Joshua Twiggs (New South Wales, AU); Willy Theodore (New South Wales, AU); Brad Miles (New South Wales, AU); Bede O'Connor (New South Wales, AU)
Assignee: Kico Knee Innovation Company Pty. Ltd.
G16H10/20A61B17/92A61F2/3868A61F2/4684G06N3/02G06N3/042G06N7/00G16H15/00G16H40/63G16H50/20A61F2002/3895A61F2002/4687
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,676,214
App. No.
18/585,569
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3683
USPC
705/2
Abstract

This disclosure relates to systems and methods for managing patients of knee surgeries. A pre-operative patient questionnaire user interface is associated with a future knee operation of the patient. Patient input data is indicative of answers of a patient in relation to the pre-operative patient questionnaire. A processor of a computer system evaluates a statistical model to determine a predicted satisfaction value indicative of satisfaction of the patient with the future knee operation. The statistical model comprises nodes stored on data memory representing the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value, and edges stored on data memory between the nodes representing conditional dependencies between the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value. The processor then generates an electronic document comprising a surgeon report associated with the future knee operation to indicate to the surgeon the predicted satisfaction value.

Claims (50)

1 . A method for managing patients of knee surgeries, the method comprising:

receiving patient input data indicative of activity desires or patient behaviour;

performing a kinematic simulation by a simulator that simulates a result of a future knee operation of a patient to determine kinematic simulation data;

evaluating by a processor of a computer system a statistical model to determine a predicted satisfaction value indicative of satisfaction of the patient with the future knee operation, the statistical model comprising:

nodes stored on data memory representing the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value and representing the kinematic simulation data and the patient input data indicative of activity desires or patient behaviour, and

edges stored on data memory between the nodes representing conditional dependencies between the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value,

wherein each stored node is associated with a probability function that is configured to receive as an input of values for parent variables as defined by the stored edges, and is further configured to produce as an output a probability of a variable represented by that stored node; and

generating an indication of the predicted satisfaction value.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating an indication of activity level for the patient.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the patient input data, quantitative indications of influencing factors.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the influencing factors include one or more factors from a Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating an electronic document comprising a surgeon report associated with the future knee operation to indicate the predicted satisfaction value.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the statistical model is a Bayesian Network.

7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the generating the surgeon report comprises determining a statistical transformation of the predicted satisfaction value.

8 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

automatically determining an intervention procedure based on the predicting satisfaction value, wherein generating the surgeon report comprises generating an indication of the intervention procedure.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating, after a knee operation, a post-operative patient questionnaire user interface associated with the knee operation;

receiving post-operative patient input data indicative of answers of the patient in relation to the post-operative patient questionnaire; and

determining updated conditional dependencies between the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value based on the post-operative patient input data.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving intra-operative data and post-operative data; and

determining, after a knee operation, a revised predicted satisfaction value based on the intra-operative data and the post-operative data.

11 . A non-transitory computer readable medium with program code stored thereon that, when installed on a computer, causes the computer to perform the steps of:

receiving patient input data indicative of activity desires or patient behaviour;

performing a kinematic simulation by a simulator that simulates a result of a future knee operation of a patient to determine kinematic simulation data;

evaluating by a processor of a computer system a statistical model to determine a predicted satisfaction value indicative of satisfaction of the patient with the future knee operation, the statistical model comprising:

nodes stored on data memory representing the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value and representing the kinematic simulation data and the patient input data indicative of activity desires or patient behaviour, and

edges stored on data memory between the nodes representing conditional dependencies between the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value,

wherein each stored node is associated with a probability function that is configured to receive as an input of values for parent variables as defined by the stored edges, and is further configured to produce as an output a probability of a variable represented by that stored node; and

generating an indication of the predicted satisfaction value.

12 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , the steps further comprising generating an indication of activity level for the patient.

13 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , the steps further comprising:

determining, based on the patient input data, quantitative indications of influencing factors.

14 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the influencing factors include one or more factors from a Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

15 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , the steps further comprising:

generating an electronic document comprising a surgeon report associated with the future knee operation to indicate the predicted satisfaction value.

16 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the statistical model is a Bayesian Network.

17 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the generating the surgeon report comprises determining a statistical transformation of the predicted satisfaction value.

18 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , the steps further comprising:

automatically determining an intervention procedure based on the predicted satisfaction value, wherein generating the surgeon report comprises generating an indication of the intervention procedure.

19 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , the steps further comprising:

generating, after a knee operation, a post-operative patient questionnaire user interface associated with the knee operation;

receiving post-operative patient input data indicative of answers of the patient in relation to the post-operative patient questionnaire; and

determining updated conditional dependencies between the patient input data and the predicted satisfaction value based on the post-operative patient input data.

20 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , the steps further comprising:

receiving intra-operative data and post-operative data; and

determining, after a knee operation, a revised predicted satisfaction value based on the intra-operative data and the post-operative data.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2025
From: 360 KNEE SYSTEMS PTY. LTD.
To: KICO KNEE INNOVATION COMPANY PTY. LTD.
Reel/Frame 071268/0368 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2024
From: BOGUE, EMILY; TWIGGS, JOSHUA; THEODORE, WILLY; MILES, BRAD; O'CONNOR, BEDE
To: 360 KNEE SYSTEMS PTY LTD.
Reel/Frame 066547/0763 →
Priority Claims (1)
AU 2015904543 · Nov 5, 2015 · national
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17171197 · Feb 9, 2021
Continuation 15772872 · Nov 3, 2016
Related Publication 20240225848A1 · Jul 11, 2024
References Cited (38)
US 7769763B1 · Bem · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 10102926B1 · Leonardi · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10984893B2 · Bogue · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20040133463A1 · Benderev · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20080172214A1 · Col · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100332194A1 · McGuan · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130035951A1 · Frey · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130185310A1 · De Guise · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130332128A1 · Miles · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140013565A1 · MacDonald · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140046682A1 · Soto · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140052465A1 · Madan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140108322A1 · Buchanan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140244220A1 · McKinnon · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244292A1 · Rosenberg · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150072327A1 · Beaulieu · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150088541A1 · Yao · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150286784A1 · Hagigi · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150324530A1 · Heywood · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160283676A1 · Lyon · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180330800A1 · Bogue · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015529359 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013106918 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015054290A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
Mannion et al., The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty, Sep. 12, 2009, Arthritis Research & Therapy, pp. 1-13. (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Eskinazi et al., An Open-Source Toolbox for Surrogate Modeling of Joint Contact Mechanics, Feb. 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 269-277. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Huang et al., Kinematics and Mechanical Properties of Knees following Patellar Replacing and Patellar Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty, Nov. 10, 2015, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, vo… [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/AU2016/051043, Jan. 10, 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jahandar, “Concurrent Simulation of a Subject Specific Musculoskeletal Model with Anatomical Knee,” Pro Quest, No. 10178614, Jul. 2015, pp. 1-105. [cited by applicant]
Mannion et al. “The Role of Patient Expectations in Predicting Outcome After Total Kenee Arthroplasty,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, Sep. 21, 2009, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Miller et al. “total Knee Arthroplasty Component Templating,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 1707-1709, 2012. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/772,872, Final Office Action, Mailed Nov. 2, 2020, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/772,872, Non-Final Office Action, Mailed Mar. 30, 2020, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/772,872, Notice of Allowance, Mailed Feb. 11, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Application No. JP 2018-543410, Office Action, Mailed Apr. 17, 2020, 19 pages with translation. [cited by applicant]
“Business Intelligence”, Ma Gang, pp. 293-304, Dongbei University of Finance & Economics Press, Jul. 2010. [cited by applicant]
“Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Hip and Knee Reconstruction”, Robert L et al., pp. 13-24, People's Military Medical Press, Sep. 2009. [cited by applicant]
“Patient's preoperative expectation and surgeon's satisfaction versus Patient's postoperative satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty”, Yu Benfeng, Chinese Master's Theses Full-text Database—Series of Medical and Hea… [cited by applicant]