IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,458,274
Granted Patent B2
US 12,458,274 · App. 18/587,636 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Classification of epileptic and non-epileptic phenotypes from EEG recordings and related closed-loop applications

Inventors: Daniel Korenblum (San Francisco, CA); Thadd C. Reeder (Medford, OR)
Assignee: Encephalogix, Inc.
A61B5/372A61B5/4094A61B5/4836A61B5/7267A61B5/165A61B5/291A61B5/31A61B5/369A61B5/374A61B5/72A61B5/7235A61B5/7264A61B5/7275A61N1/36064G06F3/015G06N3/02G06N20/00G06N20/10G06N20/20G06N99/00H04L41/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,458,274
App. No.
18/587,636
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A detection function is used to detect an event in an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal in order to generate a plurality of detected events. For each detected event in the plurality of detected events, a plurality of features from the EEG signal is measured in order to obtain a measured feature vector, where the plurality of features is defined by a feature space corresponding to the event and a measured feature space includes a plurality of measured feature vectors corresponding to a plurality of labeled points having locations. The EEG signal is classified based at least in part on the locations of the plurality of labeled points in the measured feature space.

Claims (71)

1 . A closed-loop feedback system, comprising:

a brainstate estimator that generates a brainstate estimate of a subject's brain, including by:

detecting a peak shape in an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal in order to generate a plurality of detected peaks in the EEG signal;

obtaining a plurality of to-be-measured features that correspond to the peak shape, wherein the plurality of to-be-measured features includes an amplitude feature, a prominence feature, and a duration feature;

measuring the plurality of to-be-measured features from the plurality of detected peaks in the EEG signal in order to obtain a plurality of measured feature vectors, including by:

for a given detected peak in the plurality of detected peaks, analyzing a portion of the EEG signal that includes said given detected peak and excluding a rest of the EEG signal outside of said portion of the EEG signal; and

adding, to the plurality of measured feature vectors, a measured amplitude for said given detected peak, a measured prominence for said given detected peak, and a measured duration for said given detected peak, wherein a multidimensional space includes the plurality of measured feature vectors as a plurality of labeled points having locations within the multidimensional space;

classifying the EEG signal based at least in part on the locations of the plurality of labeled points in the multidimensional space, including by:

obtaining, for the multidimensional space, a plurality of totally disjoint regions that the multidimensional space is divided up into and a plurality of probabilities associated with the plurality of totally disjoint regions, wherein the multidimensional space includes a first axis that corresponds to the amplitude feature, a second axis that corresponds to the prominence feature, and a third axis that corresponds to the duration feature;

determining a combined value based at least in part on the locations of the plurality of labeled points within the multidimensional space, the plurality of totally disjoint regions, and the plurality of probabilities; and

classifying the EEG signal based at least in part on the combined value; and

generating, based at least in part on the classification of the EEG signal, the brainstate estimate;

outputting the brainstate estimate of the subject's brain;

a controller that generates a control signal based at least in part on the brainstate estimate of the subject's brain; and

a stimulus generator that generates a stimulus for the subject's brain based at least in part on the control signal.

2 . The system recited in claim 1 , wherein

the brainstate estimate includes a vector of state probabilities.

3 . The system recited in claim 2 , further including instructions for selecting a second EEG signal to supplement the EEG signal.

4 . The system recited in claim 2 , further including instructions for selecting a second EEG signal to supplement the EEG signal, including by using metadata with timing information, wherein the metadata includes one or more of the following: information associated with a treatment aftereffect or information associated with the subject moving.

5 . The system recited in claim 1 , wherein classifying the EEG signal includes classifying the EEG signal as epileptic or not epileptic.

6 . The system recited in claim 1 , wherein:

those regions in the plurality of totally disjoint regions that have an associated probability define an acceptance region;

those regions in the plurality of totally disjoint regions that do not have an associated probability are outside of the acceptance region; and

determining the combined value includes ignoring those labeled points in the plurality of labeled points with locations that fall outside of the acceptance region.

7 . The system recited in claim 1 , wherein:

the EEG signal is associated with measuring a response of a treatment to the subject of the closed-loop treatment system;

the brainstate estimator further selects a supplemental EEG signal in an event the EEG signal is too short;

the supplemental EEG signal is selected from one or more potential recordings associated with the subject and any potential recording that is associated with a subject other than the subject is ineligible to be the supplemental EEG signal; and

selecting the supplemental EEG signal is based at least in part on a comparison of an aftereffect duration, during which treatment by the closed-loop treatment system lingers in the subject, and time information associated with the one or more potential recordings associated with the subject.

8 . The system recited in claim 1 , wherein:

the EEG signal is associated with measuring a response of a treatment to the subject of the closed-loop treatment system;

the brainstate estimator further selects a supplemental EEG signal in an event the EEG signal is too short;

the supplemental EEG signal is selected from one or more potential recordings associated with the subject and any potential recording that is associated with a subject other than the subject is ineligible to be the supplemental EEG signal; and

selecting the supplemental EEG signal is based at least in part on a comparison of a period of movement, during which the subject was moving, and time information associated with the one or more potential recordings associated with the subject.

9 . A method for operating a closed-loop feedback system, comprising:

generating a brainstate estimate of a subject's brain using a brainstate estimator in the closed-loop feedback system, including by:

detecting a peak shape in an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal in order to generate a plurality of detected peaks in the EEG signal;

obtaining a plurality of to-be-measured features that correspond to the peak shape, wherein the plurality of to-be-measured features includes an amplitude feature, a prominence feature, and a duration feature;

measuring the plurality of to-be-measured features from the plurality of detected peaks in the EEG signal in order to obtain a plurality of measured feature vectors, including by:

for a given detected peak in the plurality of detected peaks, analyzing a portion of the EEG signal that includes said given detected peak and excluding a rest of the EEG signal outside of said portion of the EEG signal; and

adding, to the plurality of measured feature vectors, a measured amplitude for said given detected peak, a measured prominence for said given detected peak, and a measured duration for said given detected peak, wherein a multidimensional space includes the plurality of measured feature vectors as a plurality of labeled points having locations within the multidimensional space;

classifying the EEG signal based at least in part on the locations of the plurality of labeled points in the multidimensional space, including by:

obtaining, for the multidimensional space, a plurality of totally disjoint regions that the multidimensional space is divided up into and a plurality of probabilities associated with the plurality of totally disjoint regions, wherein the multidimensional space includes a first axis that corresponds to the amplitude feature, a second axis that corresponds to the prominence feature, and a third axis that corresponds to the duration feature;

determining a combined value based at least in part on the locations of the plurality of labeled points within the multidimensional space, the plurality of totally disjoint regions, and the plurality of probabilities; and

classifying the EEG signal based at least in part on the combined value;

generating, based at least in part on the classification of the EEG signal, the brainstate estimate;

outputting the brainstate estimate of the subject's brain;

generating a control signal, using a controller in the closed-loop feedback system, based at least in part on the brainstate estimate of the subject's brain; and

generating a stimulus for the subject's brain, using a stimulus generator in the closed-loop feedback system, based at least in part on the control signal.

10 . The method recited in claim 9 , wherein

the brainstate estimate includes a vector of state probabilities; and

the method is performed by a device associated with the closed-loop treatment system.

11 . The method recited in claim 10 , wherein the device and the controller are included in a same edge device.

12 . The method recited in claim 10 , wherein the controller is included in an edge device and the device is included in a different device.

13 . The method recited in claim 10 , further including selecting a second EEG signal to supplement the EEG signal.

14 . The method recited in claim 10 , further including selecting a second EEG signal to supplement the EEG signal, including by using metadata with timing information, wherein the metadata includes one or more of the following: information associated with a treatment aftereffect or information associated with the subject moving.

15 . The method recited in claim 9 , wherein classifying the EEG signal includes classifying the EEG signal as epileptic or not epileptic.

16 . The method recited in claim 9 , wherein:

those regions in the plurality of totally disjoint regions that have an associated probability define an acceptance region;

those regions in the plurality of totally disjoint regions that do not have an associated probability are outside of the acceptance region; and

determining the combined value includes ignoring those labeled points in the plurality of labeled points with locations that fall outside of the acceptance region.

17 . The method recited in claim 9 , wherein:

the EEG signal is associated with measuring a response of a treatment to the subject off the closed-loop treatment system;

the method further includes selecting a supplemental EEG signal in an event the EEG signal is too short;

the supplemental EEG signal is selected from one or more potential recordings associated with the subject and any potential recording that is associated with a subject other than the subject is ineligible to be the supplemental EEG signal; and

selecting the supplemental EEG signal is based at least in part on a comparison of an aftereffect duration, during which treatment by the closed-loop treatment system lingers in the subject, and time information associated with the one or more potential recordings associated with the subject.

18 . The method recited in claim 9 , wherein:

the EEG signal is associated with measuring a response of a treatment to the subject of the closed-loop treatment system;

the method further includes selecting a supplemental EEG signal in an event the EEG signal is too short;

the supplemental EEG signal is selected from one or more potential recordings associated with the subject and any potential recording that is associated with a subject other than the subject is ineligible to be the supplemental EEG signal; and

selecting the supplemental EEG signal is based at least in part on a comparison of a period of movement, during which the subject was moving, and time information associated with the one or more potential recordings associated with the subject.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2024
From: KORENBLUM, DANIEL; REEDER, THADD C.
To: ENCEPHALOGIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 068026/0066 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63448795 · Feb 28, 2023
Related Publication 20240285221A1 · Aug 29, 2024
References Cited (37)
US 7299088B1 · Thakor · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 11742076B2 · Banerjee · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030052775A1 · Shambroom · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040133120A1 · Frei · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20110257517A1 · Guttag · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20160029946A1 · Simon · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160045128A1 · Sitt · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190224481A1 · Wingeier · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210267551A1 · Zhu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230200741A1 · Olivatto Fioravanti · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230389856A1 · Heasman · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 107479685A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Lin, Chinese Patent Document CN 107479685 A—translation provided by Clarivate Analytics (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Dimitrov et al., “Sleep spindles comprise a subset of a broader class of electroencephalogram events”, SLEEPJ, vol. 44, No. 9, 1-15, published Apr. 15, 2021 (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Altinay et al., A Comprehensive Review of the Use of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Treatment of Psychiatric and Headache Disorders, Headache, 2015, pp. 345-350. [cited by applicant]
Author Unknown, Bayes Classifier, Wikipedia, Jun. 23, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Baldin et al., Yield of Epileptiform Electroencephalogram Abnormalities in Incident Unprovoked Seizures: a Population-Based Study, Epilepsia, 2014, pp. 1389-1398, vol. 55, No. 9. [cited by applicant]
C.E. Shannon, a Mathematical Theory of Communication, Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 1948, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 3-55. [cited by applicant]
Cascino et al., Epilepsy, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Christopher M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Conrad et al., Spatial Distribution of Interictal Spikes Fluctuates Over Time and Localizes Seizure Onset, Brain 2020, 2020, pp. 554-569. [cited by applicant]
Durbin et al., Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, 1998. [cited by applicant]
Edwards et al., Neurostimulation Devices for the Treatment of Neurologic Disorders, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Sep. 2017, pp. 1427-1444, vol. 92, No. 9. [cited by applicant]
Galhardoni et al., Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Pain: a Review of the Literature, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2015, pp. S156-S172. [cited by applicant]
Karoly et al., Cycles in Epilepsy, Nature Reviews Neurology, May 2021, pp. 267-284, vol. 17. [cited by applicant]
Karoly et al., Interictal Spikes and Epileptic Seizures: Their Relationship and Underlying Rhythmicity, Brain 2016, 2016, pp. 1066-1078. [cited by applicant]
Lehn et al., Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures Treated as Epileptic Seizures in the Emergency Department, Epilepsia, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Ma et al., Responsive Neurostimulation: Candidates and Considerations, Epilepsy & Behavior 88, 2018, pp. 388-395. [cited by applicant]
Obeid et al., The Temple University Hospital EEG Data Corpus, Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2016, vol. 10, Article 196. [cited by applicant]
Paul Van Der Laken, ROC, AUC, Precision, and Recall Visually Explained, paulvanderlaken.com, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Sanei et al., EEG Signal Processing, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Stanslaski et al., Design and Validation of a Fully Implantable, Chronic, Closed-Loop Neuromodulation Device With Concurrent Sensing and Stimulation, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, J… [cited by applicant]
Thangavel et al., Improving Automated Diagnosis of Epilepsy from EEGs Beyond IEDs, Journal of Neural Engineering, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Tom Fawcett, An Introduction to ROC Analysis, Pattern Recognition Letters 27, 2006, pp. 861-874. [cited by applicant]
Urbach et al., “Within a Minute” Detection of Focal Cortical Dysplasia, Neuroradiology, 2022, pp. 715-726. [cited by applicant]
Violante et al., Non-Invasive Temporal Interference Electrical Stimulation of the Human Hippocampus, Nature Neuroscience, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Agrawal et al., Yield of Monitoring in an Adult Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (P2.097), Neurology, Apr. 2015. [cited by applicant]