IP Library Granted Patent US 12,555,135
Granted Patent B2
US 12,555,135 · App. 18/588,772 · Granted Feb 17, 2026

Automated campaign configuration switching framework

Inventors: Nathan R. Janos (Santa Monica, CA); Sanjeev M. Rao (Manhattan Beach, CA); John W. Meacham, III (Santa Monica, CA); Gyu-Ho Lee (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: SYSTEM1, LLC
G06Q30/0243G06Q30/0246
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,555,135
App. No.
18/588,772
Granted
Feb 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Dynamic campaign optimization systems and methods may be used to continuously test many alternative campaign configurations while allowing all configurations, including configurations formerly identified as successful and unsuccessful, to be re-tested in order to identify successful configurations that may previously have been identified as unsuccessful.

Claims (56)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving, over a network connection and at a computing device, user requests originating from respective client devices, for a content element;

identifying, by the computing device, configuration alternatives for the content element;

in response to each of the user requests:

selecting one of the configuration alternatives based on initial weights of the configuration alternatives;

configuring, by the computing device, an alternative-configured impression of the requested content element according to the selecting; and

presenting the alternative-configured impression to the respective user request, wherein presenting includes transmitting the alternative-configured impression of the content element to a respective originating client device;

updating, by the computing device, each respective initial weight of the configuration alternatives to a respective second weight based on subsequent requests for the content element corresponding to the presented alternative-configured impression;

automatically selecting, by the computing device and after the updating, a configuration alternative, the configuration alternative having a second weight that is below a threshold; and

based on the automatically selecting, increasing, by the computing device the second weight of the selected configuration alternative to a third weight by adding a random amount to the second weight.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating a success metric value for each configuration alternative based on the subsequent requests from users to whom each corresponding alternative-configured impression is presented; and

wherein the updating is in proportion to the success metric each configuration alternative.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the updating is further based on a member of the group comprising: statistical significance intervals of the success metric, a number of trials in which each configuration alternative has been tested, a total number of trials in which all configuration alternatives in a campaign have been tested, a frequency of configuration alternative testing trials, timing history of configuration alternative testing trials, dates configuration alternative test impressions, and a geographical location of users viewing a tested configuration alternative.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the automatic selecting comprises selecting a configuration alternative with a statistical confidence interval wider than a threshold confidence interval.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the automatic selecting comprises selecting a configuration alternative with a number of impressions during a past period of time below a threshold number of impressions.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the configuration alternatives comprises identifying information describing a user and selecting a plurality of configuration alternatives based on the information describing the user.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein identifying information describing the user comprises identifying a user cohort of which the user is a member.

8 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions, which when executed by at least one processor, configure the processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, over a network connection and at a computing device, user requests originating from respective client devices, for a content element;

identifying, by the computing device, configuration alternatives for the content element;

in response to each of the user requests:

selecting one of the configuration alternatives based on initial weights of the configuration alternatives;

configuring, by the computing device, an alternative-configured impression of the requested content element according to the selecting; and

presenting the alternative-configured impression to the respective user request, wherein presenting includes transmitting the alternative-configured impression of the content element to a respective originating client device;

updating, by the computing device, each respective initial weight of the configuration alternatives to a respective second weight based on subsequent requests for the content element corresponding to the presented alternative-configured impression;

automatically selecting, by the computing device and after the updating, a configuration alternative, the configuration alternative having a second weight that is below a threshold; and

based on the automatically selecting, increasing, by the computing device the second weight of the selected configuration alternative to a third weight by adding a random amount to the second weight.

9 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:

calculating a success metric value for each configuration alternative based on the subsequent requests from users to whom each corresponding alternative-configured impression is presented; and

wherein the updating is in proportion to the success metric each configuration alternative.

10 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the updating is further based on a member of the group comprising: statistical significance intervals of the success metric, a number of trials in which each configuration alternative has been tested, a total number of trials in which all configuration alternatives in a campaign have been tested, a frequency of configuration alternative testing trials, timing history of configuration alternative testing trials, dates configuration alternative test impressions, and a geographical location of users viewing a tested configuration alternative.

11 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the automatic selecting comprises selecting a configuration alternative with a statistical confidence interval wider than a threshold confidence interval.

12 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the automatic selecting comprises selecting a configuration alternative with a number of impressions during a past period of time below a threshold number of impressions.

13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein identifying the configuration alternatives comprises identifying information describing a user and selecting a plurality of configuration alternatives based on the information describing the user.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein identifying information describing the user comprises identifying a user cohort of which the user is a member.

15 . A system comprising:

at least one processor;

at least one storage device comprising instructions, which when executed by the at least one processor, configure the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, over a network connection, user requests originating from respective client devices, for a content element;

identifying configuration alternatives for the content element;

in response to each of the user requests:

selecting one of the configuration alternatives based on initial weights of the configuration alternatives;

configuring an alternative-configured impression of the requested content element according to the selecting; and

presenting the alternative-configured impression to the respective user request, wherein presenting includes transmitting the alternative-configured impression of the content element to a respective originating client device;

updating each respective initial weight of the configuration alternatives to a respective second weight based on subsequent requests for the content element corresponding to the presented alternative-configured impression;

automatically selecting, after the updating, a configuration alternative, the configuration alternative having a second weight that is below a threshold; and

based on the automatically selecting, increasing, the second weight of the selected configuration alternative to a third weight by adding a random amount to the second weight.

16 . The system of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

calculating a success metric value for each configuration alternative based on the subsequent requests from users to whom each corresponding alternative-configured impression is presented; and

wherein the updating is in proportion to the success metric each configuration alternative.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the updating is further based on a member of the group comprising: statistical significance intervals of the success metric, a number of trials in which each configuration alternative has been tested, a total number of trials in which all configuration alternatives in a campaign have been tested, a frequency of configuration alternative testing trials, timing history of configuration alternative testing trials, dates configuration alternative test impressions, and a geographical location of users viewing a tested configuration alternative.

18 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the automatic selecting comprises selecting a configuration alternative with a statistical confidence interval wider than a threshold confidence interval.

19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the automatic selecting comprises selecting a configuration alternative with a number of impressions during a past period of time below a threshold number of impressions.

20 . The system of claim 15 , wherein identifying the configuration alternatives comprises identifying information describing a user and selecting a plurality of configuration alternatives based on the information describing the user.

21 . The system of claim 20 , wherein identifying information describing the user comprises identifying a user cohort of which the user is a member.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTERESTS IN IP COLLATERAL Recorded Oct 27, 2024
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., RESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: ANKURA TRUST COMPANY, LLC, SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 069267/0389 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 22, 2024
From: SYSTEM1 OPCO, LLC; NEXTGEN SHOPPING, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 069216/0246 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15465183 · Mar 21, 2017
Continuation 14880028 · Oct 9, 2015
Related Publication 20250022007A1 · Jan 16, 2025
References Cited (22)
US 7814038B1 · Repici · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 9038043B1 · Fleetwood · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20050234698A1 · Pinto · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070027771A1 · Collins · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090150215A1 · Kalb · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20140019228A1 · Aggarwal · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140324599A1 · Munoz Torres · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160175719A1 · Reillo · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160292722A1 · Myers · 2016 [cited by examiner]
Ghose; Modeling and analysis of air campaign resource allocation; IEEE; pp. 403-418; 2002. [cited by examiner]
Schirmeir; An Open and Versatile Fault-Injection Framework; IEEE, pp. 245-255; 2015. [cited by examiner]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Appeal Brief filed Apr. 20, 2022”, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Appeal Decision mailed Nov. 2, 2023”, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed May 3, 2022”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 20, 2019”, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2021”, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2019”, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 8, 2023”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 29, 2017”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Reply Brief filed Jul. 5, 2022”, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Response Filed Jan. 22, 2021 to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 20, 2019”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/465,183, Response Filed Dec. 4, 2019 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2019”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]