IP Library Granted Patent US 12,246,355
Granted Patent B2
US 12,246,355 · App. 18/590,827 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Sorting of Zorba

Inventors: Nalin Kumar (Fort Wayne, IN); Manuel Gerardo Garcia, Jr. (Austin, TX)
Assignee: SORTERA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
B07C5/3422B07C5/34B07C5/342B07C5/04B07C2501/0054
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,246,355
App. No.
18/590,827
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A material handling system sorts mixed materials utilizing a combination of x-ray fluorescence and/or a vision system that implements an artificial intelligence system in order to identify or classify each of the materials, which are then sorted into separate groups based on such an identification or classification. The system is capable of sorting between materials typically found within Zorba, Zebra, and Twitch.

Claims (53)

1. A method for sorting of scrap pieces from a conveyed stream of Zorba materials, comprising:

performing one or more vision checks on each scrap piece within the conveyed stream of Zorba materials, wherein each of the one or more vision checks comprises classifying each scrap piece as a function of processing visual images captured from each scrap piece through an artificial intelligence (“AI”) system;

performing one or more sensor system classifications on each scrap piece within the conveyed stream of Zorba materials; and

sorting scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials into one or more classification groups as a function of a combination of the one or more vision checks and the one or more sensor system classifications.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the conveyed stream of Zorba materials comprises one or more wrought aluminum alloys and one or more cast aluminum alloys, wherein the sorting further comprises:

sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials one or more of the cast aluminum alloys into one or more first classification groups based on a first combination of the one or more vision checks and the one or more sensor system classifications; and

sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials one or more of the wrought aluminum alloys into one or more second classification groups based on a second combination of the one or more vision checks and the one or more sensor system classifications,

wherein the sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials of the one or more cast aluminum alloys is performed before the sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials of the one or more wrought aluminum alloys.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the sorting further comprises sorting copper scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials based on a combination of the one or more vision checks and the one or more sensor system classifications, wherein the combination comprises a first vision check to determine whether a scrap piece is composed of copper and a first one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether a ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than a first predetermined value, wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a copper scrap piece when the first vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of copper and the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value.

4. The method as recited in claim 3 , further comprising sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials printed circuit board scrap pieces based on a second vision check, wherein the sorting of the printed circuit board scrap pieces is performed before the sorting of the copper scrap pieces.

5. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the sorting further comprises sorting copper and brass scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials based on a combination of the one or more vision checks and the one or more sensor system classifications, wherein the combination comprises a vision check to determine whether a scrap piece is composed of copper or brass, a first one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether a ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than a first predetermined value, and a second one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than a second predetermined value,

wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a copper scrap piece when the vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of copper and the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value,

wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a red brass scrap piece when the vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of brass, the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is less than the first predetermined value, and the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the second predetermined value,

wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a yellow brass scrap piece when the vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of brass, the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is less than the first predetermined value, and the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is less than the second predetermined value.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the sorting further comprises sorting Ni-plated and stainless-steel scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials based on a combination of sensor system classifications, wherein the combination comprises (1) a first one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether a measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is greater than a first predetermined value and (2) a second one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether a ratio of a measured amount of nickel to a measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is greater than a second predetermined value,

wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a Ni-plated scrap piece when the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value and the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of nickel to a measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is greater than the second predetermined value, and

wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a stainless-steel scrap piece when the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value and the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of nickel to a measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is less than the second predetermined value.

7. The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the combination further comprises a third one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether a measured amount of manganese in the scrap piece is greater than a third predetermined value,

wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 201 and/or 202 stainless-steel scrap piece when the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value, the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of nickel to a measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is less than the second predetermined value, and the third one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the measured amount of manganese in the scrap piece is greater than the third predetermined value, and

wherein a scrap piece is sorted out of the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 301, 302, 304, and/or 316 stainless-steel scrap piece when the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value, the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of nickel to a measured amount of chromium in the scrap piece is less than the second predetermined value, and the third one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the measured amount of manganese in the scrap piece is less than the third predetermined value.

8. The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the sorting of Ni-plated and stainless-steel scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials based on the combination of sensor system classifications is performed before sorting of wrought or cast aluminum scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials.

9. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the conveyed stream of Zorba materials comprises one or more wrought aluminum alloys and one or more cast aluminum alloys, wherein the sorting further comprises sorting 356 and/or 360 cast aluminum alloy scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials based on a combination of a sensor system classification to determine whether measured amounts of copper and zinc in a scrap piece is greater than a predetermined value and a vision check to determine whether the scrap piece is a cast aluminum alloy, wherein the sorting further comprises sorting the scrap piece from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 356 or 360 cast aluminum alloy when the sensor system classification determines that measured amounts of copper and zinc in a scrap piece are less than the predetermined value and the vision check determines that the scrap piece is a cast aluminum alloy.

10. The method as recited in claim 9 , wherein the sorting of 356 and/or 360 cast aluminum alloy scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials is performed before sorting of wrought aluminum alloy scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials.

11. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the conveyed stream of Zorba materials comprises one or more wrought aluminum alloys and one or more cast aluminum alloys, wherein the sorting further comprises sorting die cast zinc scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials based on a combination of a first one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether measured amounts of copper and zinc in a scrap piece are greater than a first predetermined value, a vision check to determine whether the scrap piece is a cast aluminum alloy, and a second one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether a ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than a second predetermined value, wherein the sorting further comprises sorting the scrap piece from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a die cast zinc scrap piece when:

(1) the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the total measured amount of copper and zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value, and

(2) the first vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of a cast aluminum alloy, and

(3) the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is less than the second predetermined value.

12. The method as recited in claim 11 , wherein the sorting further comprises sorting the scrap piece from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 38x or 319 cast aluminum alloy scrap piece when:

(1) the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the total measured amount of copper and zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value, and

(2) the first vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of a cast aluminum alloy, and

(3) the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the second predetermined value.

13. The method as recited in claim 11 , wherein the sorting of die cast zinc scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials is performed before sorting of wrought aluminum alloy scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials.

14. The method as recited in claim 11 , wherein the sorting of die cast zinc scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials is performed before sorting of 7xxx series aluminum alloy scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials.

15. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the conveyed stream of Zorba materials comprises one or more wrought aluminum alloys and one or more cast aluminum alloys, wherein the sorting further comprises sorting 38x or 319 cast aluminum alloy scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials based on a combination of a first one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether measured amounts of copper and zinc in a scrap piece are greater than a first predetermined value, a vision check to determine whether the scrap piece is a cast aluminum alloy, and a second one of the one or more sensor system classifications to determine whether a ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than a second predetermined value, wherein the sorting further comprises sorting the scrap piece from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 38x or 319 cast aluminum alloy scrap piece when:

(1) the first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the total measured amount of copper and zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the first predetermined value, and

(2) the first vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of a cast aluminum alloy, and

(3) the second one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that the ratio of a measured amount of copper to a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than the second predetermined value.

16. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials one or more of the wrought aluminum alloys into one or more first classification groups further comprises sorting a scrap piece from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 2xxx series wrought aluminum alloy when a vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of a wrought aluminum alloy and a sensor system classification determines that a measured amount of copper in the scrap piece is greater than a predetermined value.

17. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials one or more of the wrought aluminum alloys into one or more first classification groups further comprises sorting a scrap piece from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 7xxx series wrought aluminum alloy when a vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of a wrought aluminum alloy and a sensor system classification determines that a measured amount of zinc in the scrap piece is greater than a predetermined value.

18. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the sorting from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials one or more of the wrought aluminum alloys into one or more first classification groups further comprises sorting a scrap piece from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials as classified as a 3xxx series wrought aluminum alloy when:

(1) a vision check determines that the scrap piece is composed of a wrought aluminum alloy, and

(2) a first one of the one or more sensor system classifications determines that:

(i) a measured amount of manganese in the scrap piece is less than a first predetermined value, and

(ii) a measured amount of iron in the scrap piece is less than a second predetermined value.

19. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein each of the one or more vision checks is performed by a single vision system implementing one or more AI models within the AI system, and wherein each of the one or more sensor system classifications is performed by a single x-ray fluorescence (“XRF”) system implementing one or more algorithms for analyzing XRF spectral data collected from the scrap pieces.

20. A method for sorting of scrap pieces from a conveyed stream of Zorba materials, comprising:

performing vision checks on each scrap piece within the conveyed stream of Zorba materials, wherein each of the vision checks comprises classifying each scrap piece as a function of processing visual images captured from each scrap piece through an artificial intelligence (“AI”) system, wherein the vision checks are performed by a single vision system implementing a different AI model within the AI system for each of the vision checks;

performing x-ray fluorescence (“XRF”) sensor system classifications on each scrap piece within the conveyed stream of Zorba materials, wherein each of the XRF sensor system classifications is performed by a different algorithm analyzing XRF spectral data collected from each scrap piece by a single XRF system; and

sorting scrap pieces from the conveyed stream of Zorba materials in a following order:

a) a plurality of different non-ferrous metal scrap pieces into separately sorted classification groups based on a first combination of one or more vision checks and one or more sensor system classifications;

b) a plurality of different cast aluminum alloy scrap pieces into separately sorted classification groups based on a second combination of one or more vision checks and one or more sensor system classifications; and

c) a plurality of different wrought aluminum alloys scrap pieces into separately sorted classification groups based on a third combination of one or more vision checks and one or more sensor system classifications.

21. The method as recited in claim 20 , wherein the plurality of different non-ferrous metal scrap pieces is selected from a group consisting of copper, red brass, yellow brass, Ni-plating, stainless-steel, die cast zinc, and lead, wherein the plurality of different non-ferrous metal scrap pieces is selected from a group consisting of 356, 360, 319, and 38x cast aluminum alloys, and wherein the plurality of different wrought aluminum alloys scrap pieces is selected from a group consisting of 2xxx, 3xxx, 5xxx, 6xxx, and 7xxx series wrought aluminum alloys.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2025
From: GARCIA, MANUEL GERARDO, JR.; KUMAR, NALIN
To: SORTERA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 070049/0886 →
Continuity (15)
Continuation In Part 17495291 · Oct 6, 2021
Continuation In Part 17491415 · Sep 30, 2021
Continuation In Part 17380928 · Jul 20, 2021
Continuation In Part 17227245 · Apr 9, 2021
Continuation In Part 16939011 · Jul 26, 2020
Continuation In Part 16852514 · Apr 19, 2020
Continuation 16375675 · Apr 4, 2019
Division 16358374 · Mar 19, 2019
Continuation In Part 15963755 · Apr 26, 2018
Continuation In Part 15963755 · Apr 26, 2018
Continuation In Part 15213129 · Jul 18, 2016
Provisional Application 63487583 · Feb 28, 2023
Provisional Application 62490219 · Apr 26, 2017
Provisional Application 62193332 · Jul 16, 2015
Related Publication 20240246116A1 · Jul 25, 2024
References Cited (185)
US 4317521A · Clark · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4572735A · Poetzschke · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4586613A · Horii · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4834870A · Osterberg · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4848590A · Kelly · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5016039A · Sosa · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5042947A · Potzschke · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5114230A · Pryor · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5236092A · Krotkov · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5260576A · Sommer, Jr. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5663997A · Willis · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5676256A · Kumar · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5733592A · Wettstein · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5738224A · Sommer, Jr. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5911327A · Tanaka · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6064476A · Goltsos · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6100487A · Schultz · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6124560A · Roos · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6266390B1 · Sommer, Jr. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6313422B1 · Anibas · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6313423B1 · Sommer · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6412642B2 · Charles · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6421042B1 · Omura · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6519315B2 · Sommer, Jr. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6545240B2 · Kumar · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6795179B2 · Kumar · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7099433B2 · Sommer · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7200200B2 · Laurila · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7564943B2 · Sommer, Jr. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7616733B2 · Sommer · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7674994B1 · Valerio · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7763820B1 · Sommer, Jr. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7802685B2 · Allen · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7848484B2 · Sommer, Jr. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7886915B2 · Shulman · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7978814B2 · Sommer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8144831B2 · Sommer, Jr. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8553838B2 · Sommer · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8600545B2 · Earlam · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8615123B2 · Dabic · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9156162B2 · Suzuki · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9316596B2 · Levesque · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9514590B2 · Lindbichler · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9785851B1 · Torek · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9927354B1 · Starr · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9956609B1 · De Saro · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10005107B2 · Ogusu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10036142B2 · Bamber · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10207296B2 · Garcia · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10295451B2 · Schneider · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10467477B2 · Gershtein · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10478861B2 · Comtois · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10710119B2 · Kumar · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10722922B2 · Kumar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10799915B2 · Horowitz · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10824936B2 · Wu · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10967404B2 · Grof · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11278937B2 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020186882A1 · Cotman · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030147494A1 · Sommer, Jr. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040151364A1 · Kenneway · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040235970A1 · Smith · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060239401A1 · Sommer, Jr. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070029232A1 · Cowling · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070262000A1 · Valerio · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080029445A1 · Russcher · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080257795A1 · Shuttleworth · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080302707A1 · Bourely · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090292422A1 · Eiswerth · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100017020A1 · Hubbard-Nelson · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100264070A1 · Sommer, Jr. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110017644A1 · Valerio · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110247730A1 · Yanar · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120148018A1 · Sommer, Jr. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130028487A1 · Stager · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130079918A1 · Spencer · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130126399A1 · Wolff · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130184853A1 · Roos · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130264249A1 · Sommer, Jr. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130304254A1 · Torek · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150012226A1 · Skaff · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150336135A1 · Corak · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160016201A1 · Schons · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160059450A1 · Meredith · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160136694A1 · Janda · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160250665A1 · Lampe · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160346811A1 · Iino · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170014868A1 · Garcia, Jr. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170232479A1 · Pietzka · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170261437A1 · Buchter · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180065155A1 · Ripley · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180243800A1 · Kumar · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190130560A1 · Horowitz · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190210067A1 · Kumar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190247891A1 · Kumar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190299255A1 · Chaganti · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200050922A1 · Wu · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200290088A1 · Kumar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200368786A1 · Kumar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210001377A1 · Sutton · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210046509A1 · Andersen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210094075A1 · Horowitz et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210217156A1 · Zabble · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210229133A1 · Kumar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210346916A1 · Kumar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220016675A1 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220023918A1 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220161298A1 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220168781A1 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220203407A1 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220245402A1 · Tae · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220355342A1 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220371057A1 · Kumar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230011383A1 · Balthasar · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230044783A1 · Garcia, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230053268A1 · Garcia, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230169751A1 · Geurts · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230173543A1 · Kumar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230176028A1 · Kumar et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240109103A1 · Kumar et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240149304A1 · Kumar et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
BR PI02107945B1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
CA 3065962A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 102861722 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 106000904 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 107552412A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 111659635 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 211888005U · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 202009006383 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 0074447 · 1987 [cited by applicant]
JP H07275802 · 1995 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010172799 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 5969685 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017109197 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021163078 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
TW I707812 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011159269 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016199074 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017011835A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2019241114A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2021126876A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2023137423 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report for application EP19792330.3; Apr. 30, 2021; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
India Patent Office; Office Action issued for India Application Serial No. 201937044046; Jun. 4, 2020; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/042850; Sep. 28, 2016; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
A. Lee, “Comparing Deep Neural Networks and Traditional Vision Algorithms in Mobile Robotics,” Swarthmore College, 9 pages, downloaded from Internet on May 1, 2018. [cited by applicant]
K. Tarbell et al., “Applying Machine Learning to the Sorting of Recyclable Containers,” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 7 pages, downloaded from Internet on May 1, 2018. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/213,129, filed Oct. 6, 2017. [cited by applicant]
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and the Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2018/029640, Jul. 23, 2018; 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office; Extended Search Report for application 16825313.6; Jan. 28, 2019; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
India Patent Office; Office Action issued for India Application Serial No. 201817002365; Mar. 12, 2020; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and the Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2019/022995, Jun. 5, 2019; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/375,675, filed Jun. 28, 2019. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/375,675, filed Jan. 17, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Patent Office; Office Action issued for Chinese Application No. 201980043725.X on Apr. 28, 2022; 21 pages; Beijing, CN. [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., “SSA-CNN: Semantic Self-Attention CNN for Pedestrian Detection,” ArXiv: 1902.09080v3, Jun. 6, 2019, pp. 4321-4330. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Designing and verifying a disassembly line approach to cope with the upsurge of end-of-life vehicles in China,” Elsevier, Waste Management (2018), vol. 76, Jun. 2018, pp. 697-707. Retrieved on Jul. 10, 20… [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office; Office Action issued Jan. 10, 2023 for Serial No. 2021-509947; 9 pages (with translation). [cited by applicant]
International Searching Authority, International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2022/035011, Oct. 27, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Rozenstein, O. et al., “Development of a new approach based on midwave infrared spectroscopy for post-consumer black plastic waste sorting in the recycling industry,” Waste Management 68 (2017); pp. 38-44, Jul. 2017. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/020657; Jun. 16, 2022; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/016869; Jun. 29, 2022; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/060626; May 2, 2023; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/051681; Mar. 20, 2023; 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/039622; Oct. 28, 2022; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/035013; Sep. 23, 2022; 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mach Vision New High Technology Equipment—Machinex, Jun. 8, 2021, downloaded from https://www.machinexrecycling.com/news/mach-vision-new-high-technology-equipment/, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
BHS and NRT Introduce Max-AI™; Bulk Handling Systems (BHS); Apr. 18, 2017; downloaded from https://max-ai.com/autonomous-qc/ on Apr. 18, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Gao et al., “Applying Improved Optical Recognition with Machine Learning on Sorting Cu Impurities in Steel Scrap,” Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, vol. 6, pp. 785-795, Dec. 7, 2020. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/030943; Sep. 28, 2022; 10 pages; Alexandria, VA. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/358,374, filed Jun. 28, 2019. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/358,374, filed Dec. 12, 2019. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/963,755, filed Apr. 5, 2019. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/963,755, filed Sep. 13, 2019. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/963,755, filed May 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/491,415, filed Nov. 15, 2021. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/673,694, filed Jan. 25, 2024. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/696,831, filed Mar. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/495,291, filed Oct. 27, 2023. [cited by applicant]
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/972,507, filed Jun. 20, 2024. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2024/017756; Jun. 17, 2024; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States International Searching Authority; International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT/US2024/017762; Jun. 17, 2024; 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Elmahi, E.M., “Studies of Some Alloys Using X-Ray Fluorescence,” Thesis; University of Khartoum, Jan. 1997, 58 pages. [cited by applicant]
Data Sheet for Aluminum 319.0-F, Sand Cast; available from MatWeb, www.matweb.com; downloaded from internet on Sep. 29, 2022; 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Data Sheet for Aluminum 356.0-F, Sand Cast; available from MatWeb, www.matweb.com; downloaded from internet on Sep. 29, 2022; 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (2)
US 12,403,505 US 12,599,934